User talk:Januszjan88

Old Believers Church in Foļvarka moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Old Believers Church in Foļvarka, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Old Believer churches in Latvia

A tag has been placed on Category:Old Believer churches in Latvia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:42, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Categorisation

Please stop creating categories as blank pages, they are not simple metatags but part of a hierarchy. As such they should always be created with links to parent categories, at the moment you are responsible for a majority of uncategorised categories on the whole of en Wikipedia. Also if you look at the hierarchy to see what's already there, you will see that eg Category:Abandoned villages in Latvia would have been better named Category:Former villages in Latvia, as there's already various Category:Former villages by country categories. Just generally, avoid WP:OVERCATEGORISATION and categories with only 1 or 2 articles, it's better to put articles in 2 more general categories than 1 more specialist category. Good categories have 30+ articles, not one or two. Le Deluge (talk) 13:44, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Old Believers Church in Foļvarka has been accepted

Old Believers Church in Foļvarka, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 18:25, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:20th-century Latgalian painters has been nominated for renaming

Category:20th-century Latgalian painters has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 09:45, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:20th-century Latgalian artists

A tag has been placed on Category:20th-century Latgalian artists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:03, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Latgalian art historians has been nominated for merging

Category:Latgalian art historians has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:24, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Latgalian writers has been nominated for merging

Category:Latgalian writers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:33, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:20th-century Latgalian ceramists has been nominated for splitting

Category:20th-century Latgalian ceramists has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 15:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]