User talk:Janto - Wikipedia

Spammer alert

Hi, Janto. I removed your alert about 205.204.242.21: this IP had already been given a one-month block today, and there's no sign of the block being evaded. I hope it hasn't spoilt your day. --Gareth Hughes 21:23, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It was my first request for a ban. It was fun :-) --Janto 21:40, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Stellenbosch External Link

[edit]

Hi Janto,

As per [1], Wikipedia is not just a mere collection of external links ... that specific link does not add any value or serve to illustrate any issue mentioned in the article and IMHO could even be considered spam. I have thus deleted it, as a previous editor also seems to have done. Kind Regards, Elf-friend 07:45, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Also see [2], I cannot see that that link falls under any of the categories that are OK to add. Regards, Elf-friend 08:17, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm mostly convinced. --Janto 13:31, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki for Engineering

[edit]

Engineering Wiki is a wiki entirely dedicated to collecting information about Engineering. The Engineering Wiki is in early development stages at the moment. We invite you to help devlope this wiki.

Thanks!

[edit]

I had to do some research on the shooto/shootfighting/shootwrestling. Most sources tended to mix them up, and some even gave inaccurate information. By checking a multitude of sites I was however able to separate the concepts (I think)! =] ---Marcus- 23:34, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think about this

[edit]

I noticed that the article about the boston crab used this image: Image. It is used purely under "fair use" apparently... so i started wondering if that same argument can be used for pictured depicting techniques related to fighting. Any ideas? ---Marcus- 17:09, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea. If the images on Professional wrestling holds and related articles are fair use, then I see no reason why we can't do the same with real (hehehe) fighting techniques. Where can one ask? --Janto 18:35, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Origin of name Stellenbosch

[edit]

Hi Janto, Thank you for your feedback on the issue. I went and dug deeper and found that Simon van der Stel's wife was not a Bosch but Johanna Jacoba Six. I went to school at Paul Roos Gymnasium and I can remember being told the Bosch version of the story.. Sounds like Adam and Eve now. Regards Gregorydavid 08:30, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Erwin Ballarta

[edit]

I'm looking for people who might be interested in helping to improve the Erwin Ballarta article. I see that you mention MMA on your user page and made some recent improvements to Pekiti Tirsia Kali, so maybe you'd be interested. Even if you don't want to pitch in, you may find the article interesting to read. — ApolloCreed ^{(comment) (talk)} 03:10, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why so few Wikipedians are engineers?

[edit]

I am trying to understand why there are so few Wikipedians who are graduate engineers. Once I get a grasp on that, perhaps I may be able to formulate some ideas on how to attract more experienced engineers to become Wikipedians. It would be very helpful if you would respond to these a few questions:

Are you a university graduate engineer?
Please indicate in which of these engineering disciplines you obtained your degree:
1. Aeronautical or aerospace engineering
2. Bioengineer or biological engineering
3. Chemical engineering
4. Civil engineering
5. Electrical engineering
6. Environmental engineering
7. Mechanical engineering
8. Petroleum engineering
9. Other
In what year did you obtain your degree?
What attracted you to participate in Wikipedia?

If you would rather not answer these questions on your Talk page, then you may respond on my User talk:mbeychok page. Or you may respond to me via Wikipedia's email which I have enabled on my User:mbeychok page.

If you would rather not respond at all, that's fine also. Regards, - mbeychok 04:28, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the support on Stellenbosch University. By the way, I did Civil (March 1979) there..

I can answer the questions above later.. PS Wiki is the best colaborative mechanism I have ever come across.. Cheers Gregorydavid 11:21, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Untagged image

[edit]

An image you uploaded, Image:StellenboschUniversityCrest.jpg, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 14:45, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

MA Userbox

[edit]

Today, there was a merger of Category:Martial Artist Wikipedians into Category:Wikipedian martial artists. This resulted in a userbox {{User:TonyTheTiger/Userboxes/Martialartist}} being added to the category. This userbox is available to you. TonyTheTiger 20:39, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MA Userbox

[edit]

Maties Userbox

[edit]

Ek dink jy sal hiervan hou: Template:User_Matie .

FMalan 09:18, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania 2007

[edit]

Hi Janto

Wikimania 2007, which is being held in Taipei, Taiwan on August 3-5, is offering opportunities for travel scholarships to Wikimania for active users of Wikimedia projects from the continent of Africa. Although the original scholarship deadline has passed, please, if you are interested, you may still apply at http://wm07schols.wikimedia.org/apply.php. Sincerely yours, Cary Bass 20:59, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikimania 2008 in Cape Town

[edit]

Hi. Would you be interested in helping to ensure Wikimania 2008 is held in Cape Town? If so, please go to the Cape Town bid page, and sign up on the discussion page. Feel free to dive right in with adding suggestions, or fleshing out the bid! I'd greatly appreciate any help, no matter how small. Greenman 00:09, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

South African Wikimedia Chapter

[edit]

Hi Janto. The idea of setting up a local Wikimedia chapter has been discussed by South African Wikipedians (and those associated with other Wikimedia projects) for some time now, and we want to help turn this dream into a reality. There are currently over 25 chapters established around the world, and several more planned and being discussed, but so far, none in Africa. A South African chapter, should it become a reality, would be a continental first. If you're interested in being involved in the creation of a South African Wikimedia Chapter, could you please email me directly at wikipedia@africancommons.org. Kaydee 68 13.30, 08 June 2010 (UTC)

South African Wikimedia Chapter update and mailing list

[edit]

Hi there. Local Wikipedians have set up a mailing list where we will be discussing the formation of a local Wikimedia Chapter in South Africa. Please join the mailing list at this url https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaza. There is also a page set up on Meta where you can add your name if you're interested to take this idea forward. Check out http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_South_Africa. Thanks Kaydee 68 (talk) 09:02, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nontheism

[edit]

See: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nontheism.

Greetings, I see that you have chosen to conspicuously identify as a "Nontheistic Wikipedian" Me too! Currently there is a proposal to delete the article Nontheism or merge and redirect it to Atheism. Greg Bard (talk) 22:27, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rescue

[edit]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armageddon theology WritersCramp (talk) 13:18, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

[edit]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:13, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tai's Method

[edit]

Hi, I just saw your new article, Tai's Method — not bad! Couple things though: the use of "pointed out" isn't really in keeping with a neutral tone, (see WP:SAY) and the cited source was a blog, and hence unreliable. It's easy enough to check the citations in a database (now up to 140), so I left in the claim. The blog could be made into an external link instead. Other than these details, a great start to an article! Feezo (Talk) 13:11, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I wasn't trying to use the blog link to make a claim that there are more than 75 citations. What I'm trying to say is there are blogs criticizing those 75+ authors. One of the critics is the one I linked. A quick google shows many other blogs, but the one I linked seemed to be the earliest. janto (talk) 13:19, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's a model stub now. :) The current use of "pointed out" is also a clear exception to Wikipedia:Manual of Style (words to watch). Feezo (Talk) 13:43, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I changed it to "It has been asserted that". Thanks for the input! janto (talk) 13:19, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I meant that the "pointed out" phrasing could be appropriate in this case! On second thought, "asserted" actually is better, so the current version is fine. :) Feezo (Talk) 19:45, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Allan Gray (company)

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Allan Gray (company) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. SummerPhD (talk) 00:26, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Inviting you to WikiAfrica Incubator!

[edit]

Hey Janto,

WikiAfrica invites you to support the Africa Incubator

WikiAfrica is pleased to invite you as a self-declared African Wikipedian to evaluate the Africa Incubator. WikiAfrica has created the Africa Incubator to support and assist new authors, as they create their first articles and learn the ins and outs of contributing to Wikipedia.

The Africa Incubator is a ‘soft landing’ for new authors to develop articles that relate to Africa. It assists them in becoming compliant and knowledgeable of Wikipedia principles and rules. Based within the Wikipedia framework, the Africa Incubator is fully interactive and enables feedback, assistance and forums.

This is where we need your help! For the Africa Incubator to be successful, it needs the intervention, interaction and experience of Incubator Mentors. We are looking for a pool of active experienced Wikipedians to consistently participate in ’owning’ the Africa Incubator. Incubator Mentors will assist new comers through the editing process. They will also help test and expand the Africa Incubator, and will play a vital role in encouraging newcomers to be Wikipedians for life

Please visit WikiAfrica Incubator to give us your honest feedback and evaluation. WikiAfrica is a ground-breaking project that is designed to Africanise Wikipedia by generating and expanding 30,000 articles over two years. Find out more about this project here WikiAfrica. To get involved, contact Francis [wikipedian@wikiafrica.net] Twitter: twitter.com/#!/wikiafrica Facebook: www.facebook.com/WikiAfrica --Awinda 12:57, 6 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Awinda (talk • contribs)

Call for Wikipedians in Residence in Africa

[edit]

Hello,

I hope you are well and thriving!! WikiAfrica has just put out a call for two Wikipedians in Residence. One in Cape Town at WikiAfrica, at the Africa Centre; and the other for WikiAfrica Cameroon in Douala, at doual’art. If you are interested, please contact either Marilyn [marilyn.doualabelldoualart.org] for the WikiAfrica Cameroon call or Isla [islahfafricacentre.net] for the WikiAfrica position in Cape Town.

If you are not interested in applying, I would be very grateful if you could spread this call far and wide among your networks to ensure that both projects get excellent candidates. Here is the link for the information page: http://www.wikiafrica.net/two-wikipedians-in-residence-for-africa/

Best regards, Islahaddow

(This message was sent using Lucia Bot at 22:23, 16 November 2012 (UTC))[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Janto. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Janto. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tonfa in popular culture for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tonfa in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tonfa in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rorshacma (talk) 18:08, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]