User talk:JanitorPH

February 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Manny Pacquiao have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Manny Pacquiao was changed by JanitorPH (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.882956 on 2021-02-14T19:26:20+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:26, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Oh, that's OK. No worries.😊 JanitorPH (talk) 19:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EditorManagerPH. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 20:41, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Francis Baraan

I moved the talk page you created so it stays with the draft, you can find it now at Draft talk:Francis Baraan. I'm also going to remove most of what you did there, since some of the templates you used are used appropriately. You may not use {{help}} templates in an attempt to expedite a review of your draft. It is submitted for review and I'm afraid you'll just have to be patient. Drafts are reviewed in no particular order. Taking a quick look at your draft, I suggest you work on improving the references and making sure that every statement has an inline citation. Lack of inline citations is one reason most reviewers will decline a draft. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:13, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thanks for the feedback! Exactly what do you mean by improving references? Should I add the author, date retrieved for the references? ThanksA JanitorPH (talk) 20:21, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Improving references is a catchall, since there can almost always be improvements. But just to pick a few: refs 10 and 11 appear to be "identification" references, and the URL does not work at placeandsee.com. This sort of identification is normally done through wiki-links. Since the references do not actually substantiate Baraaan's attendance, they are not useful at all for this section. If you want to say he attended such-and-such a school, you need a published (and, ideally, independent) source that backs this statement up.

And every place where you have a statement in the body of the article (after the lead paragraph, which is supposed to be a summary of the body and does not itself require references), you need a reference. These inline citations are required for this sort of article. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:17, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Francis Baraan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Francis Baraan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Baraan IV. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MrOllie (talk) 20:44, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Contesting deletion nomination.

Hello, Ollie. My edits and contributions are usually Filipino activists and celebs. I even started drafting an article for Draft:Margo Katharine Midwinter. I am not aware of the deleted article on Francis Baraan. But I checked it out after you mentioned it. The article was nominated for many issues, especially notability. But the subject meets WP:PUBLICFIGURE now. According to WP:ANYBIO, a biography of a living person has to have been nominated and honored with a major national award, plus other criteria. Others can edit my article, but I am sure nobody would question notability and references are all good.

And no, I am not a sockpuppet. Haha. JanitorPH (talk) 21:05, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of EditorManagerPH (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:21, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]