User talk:JanaFerrume

February 2023

Hello, I'm RPI2026F1. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Midjourney because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. RPI2026F1 (talk) 02:10, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hi thank you JanaFerrume (talk) 05:41, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cynthia Pinot (February 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Netherzone was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cynthia Pinot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Netherzone (talk) 03:57, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you :) i will work on trying to write more neutral, once you said that i reread it, it made sense. danka JanaFerrume (talk) 23:25, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JanaFerrume! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Netherzone (talk) 03:57, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you so much for this. I will! I do have questions, so I will go to the Teahouse this week ! JanaFerrume (talk) 17:43, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Belliveau moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Richard Belliveau, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 01:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hi i ment to save to draft not publish/ JanaFerrume (talk) 01:40, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you so much. hes an inventor with over 100 patents, and i got lost in the matrix thank you thank you! JanaFerrume (talk) 01:41, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Cynthia Pinot has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cynthia Pinot. Thanks! Netherzone (talk) 18:48, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Richard Belliveau has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Richard Belliveau. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 23:28, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@hoary, thank you! JanaFerrume (talk) 00:08, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cynthia Pinot (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Previously declined as promotional; still promotional. A sample: Icon jewel's clients include the Hollywood Elite. Icon Jewels has provided jewelry for premieres, award shows, including mega athletes [...]. Additionally: (1) Don't call her "Cynthia"; call her "Pinot". (2) Only cite reliable sources. (3) Read, digest, and act on the content of the page WP:Bare URLs.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cynthia Pinot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 23:39, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you, this helps greatly, and yes, referring to person by first name, I totally get it. Thank you for the redirect. :) JanaFerrume (talk) 00:10, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Richard Belliveau has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Richard Belliveau. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 05:24, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Cynthia Pinot has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cynthia Pinot. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 05:27, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Cynthia Pinot has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cynthia Pinot. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 05:30, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Belliveau (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Richard Belliveau and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:05, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Richard Belliveau has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Richard Belliveau. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:06, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removing my comment from AfC review

Hello, I just noticed that you removed my comment from Draft:Cynthia Pinot. Please do not do that again. It has been restored. Comments are helpful for other reviewers, editors as well as the article creator to see all comments during the Articles for Creation process. Thank you. Netherzone (talk) 04:32, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Richard Belliveau

Hello, JanaFerrume. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Richard Belliveau, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:10, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cynthia Pinot

Hello, JanaFerrume. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cynthia Pinot, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:04, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Richard Belliveau

Hello, JanaFerrume. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Richard Belliveau".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:25, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cynthia Pinot

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cynthia Pinot, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:35, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, I contested the delete, I think i took proper steps. I had two writer look at article, I ask that I have an opportunity to correct issues. thank you Janna Fant :) JanaFerrume (talk) 02:08, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cynthia Pinot (September 5)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: An article about her has been twice, once via this AfD and most recently for violating WP:PROMO. Nothing suggests she can meet the notability guidelines and once again, this is promotional.

S0091 (talk) 18:16, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I appreciate the input.

question: the intent is not to be promotion. This person has had great traction in the artworld in a short amount of time, I believe that in itself is very noteworthy. There are people that have done less, and have pages, And I ask, with all due respect to all that reviewed article. Should I rewrite and submit a fresh article if this person has more accomplishments. I am stimulated by both the art field, all thing native american, and technology. There are so many new fresh stories, people, and events that I believe should be noted, Please advise. JanaFerrume (talk) 21:58, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jana, can you please read through WP:PAID and WP:COI and confirm that you do not have any form of COI here? There seems to be a very active PR person churning out press releases for this subject, which is going to make it difficult to actually establish notability. It's more of a problem when you use PR terms like "starring" for roles that very clearly were not major in any way - uncredited at that. Much of the language in the art sections also appears to be slightly re-worded PR. Sam Kuru (talk) 22:53, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi thank you for all the notes. No COI here other than, I found subject interesting, and wanted to better an abandoned article. I agree with you, once you pointed out, the "sensationalism" in wording does sound pr-ish. I am trying to navigate between what is a good source, and a source that states, an award, show, credit ect.

I need to remove some of these references then.

Thank you for taking the time and giving me great notes, they are greatly appreciated.

I will redirect- JanaFerrume (talk) 03:23, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kuru, hi, I deleted a few notes on article on subject. While I wanted to keep a section for "acting", I found that it was a small note in subjects career, but not really worthy of a dedicated section for "acting." If you are able, to kindly review, and advise, if I'm headed In the right direction. Question, I did find a few images of subjects art that might be noteworthy, and was not sure if I should try to add to article at this stage. Is it better to wait until the article is better presented. Thank you again for all your help. :) JanaFerrume (talk) 18:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eugene Brave Rock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Metis. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message.