User talk:Jamiep1234

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jamiep1234/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:11, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Jamiep1234! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 15:11, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jamiep1234/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Paid editing

Hello Jamiep1234. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jamiep1234. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jamiep1234|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 19:00, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi i can confirm i am not benefiting from this subject i am just a recovered drug addict myself and wanted the DAA fellowship to exist on wikipedia Jamiep1234 (talk) 19:05, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

i can disclose i am not being paid at all to write this content or benefit in any way Jamiep1234 (talk) 19:08, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi i have submited another review. Would you be ble to edit it if its not acceptable or is that something you wont be able to help with. Would appreciate any help. Thanks in advance Jamiep1234 (talk) 19:42, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jamiep1234/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:12, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jamiep1234/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:48, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Drug Addicts Anonymous (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Drug Addicts Anonymous may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:13, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Drug Addicts Anonymous (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Drug Addicts Anonymous and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:25, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Drug Addicts Anonymous has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Drug Addicts Anonymous. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 20:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi im sorry its not my intention to waste any time. Its the first time i have done something like this Jamiep1234 (talk) 20:54, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Drug Addicts Anonymous has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Drug Addicts Anonymous. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 20:36, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Sorry im just strugling as im very new could you have another look see if its ok to go now. Jamiep1234 (talk) 20:51, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Sources need to be independent Wikipedia has no interest in what their own website says. Theroadislong (talk) 20:55, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Im going to have to leave it there im not sure how to proceed with this. I dont know how wikipedia expect normal people to get articles on here. Jamiep1234 (talk) 21:00, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

See your first article, creating an article from scratch is the most difficult task on Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 21:06, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Drug Addicts Anonymous (March 5)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by TipsyElephant were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: I'm rejecting this draft because I agree with Theroadislong. Submitting any draft seven times in one day is clearly disruptive, especially given that the editor has not fixed simple problems pointed out by the reviewers. For instance, it was pointed out in the second reviewer comment that "we" and "our" should be removed and yet there is still a heading containing these words. None of the sources demonstrate notability and the article is simply advertising. Given that the primary contributor is a WP:SPA and is using these pronouns also suggests the editor has a personal connection to the subject and should WP:DISCLOSE whether they have a WP:COI. If any conflicts of interest are disclosed and the draft is dramatically improved then perhaps this can be appealed. For now I would recommend that the primary contributor to this draft consider contributing to Wikipedia in other ways to familiarize themselves with Wikipedia guidelines and policies. For example, exploring the Wikipedia:Community portal, doing some copyediting on a topic you are interested in, or reading up on core policies such as WP:N, WP:V, and WP:OR. TipsyElephant (talk) 21:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

TipsyElephant (talk) 21:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Drug Addicts Anonymous

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Drug Addicts Anonymous, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 07:13, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Druggi per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Druggi. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 18:00, 7 March 2023 (UTC)