Jump to content

User talk:Jamesontai/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jameson L. Tai (talk) - ARCHIVE 4


Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6→Archive 9

WikiProject Universities Newsletter: Issue VI (February 2008)

The February 2008 issue of the WikiProject Universities newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you for your continued support of WikiProject Universities! —Delivered on 19:11, 5 March 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

RE: Ads

Thanks for the compliment! I've been meaning to get around to put in the images but I just got home from school, and now must go eat. I'll do it in a bit. Anyway, the AIM guy is licensed LGPL, so it's ok to use him. Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 23:34, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Wow, good to know! Thanks for the clarification! :-) - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 06:50, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the pointer!!!!! :)

Hello! Thank you so much for pointing out my multiple tilde problem! [1] It was very nice of you!!!!!!! You are a class act, through and through!!! ;P

Re: User:Sudoguy

The user has to be online at the time and engaging in vandalism for me to report him. Next time you see someone engaging in vandalism and they have received their last warning, you should report them to WP:AIAV immediately. Cheers! Redfarmer (talk) 09:36, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

No problem. I'll keep that in mind, thanks for the heads up! - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 12:11, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Round 7 of WP:UNI/COTF is finally here!

Hope everyone got a good two week rest in observance of Spring Break. Here are the new articles for the next fourteen days until 27 Mar 2008.

The current University Collaborations of the Fortnight are:
Editor Nominated Topic King's College London
B-Class Improvement Drive Clemson University
Start/Stub Improvement Drive University of Hong Kong

Every fortnight three higher education-related topics, stubs, or red linked articles are chosen for you to improve. Be bold!
This COTF is organized by Wikipedia:WikiProject Universities. (Nominate future collaborations or see past collaborations.)
This WP:UNI/COTF is effective: Mar 14 2008 ~ Mar 27 2008.

I've taken advice to purposefully scramble the articles so they must be multi-nation (so we don't get complaints that it's too US-centric). This time we've got an article in UK, one in US, and one in HKG. Hope this will suffice. As always, please let me know if there are any questions. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 23:03, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Your revert

Rollback is generally only for vandalism. Using it for good-faith edits isn't really within the boudaries of policy. I'm not criticizing you, just informing you that you should usually use the [Twinkle (AGF] button in the future. Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 21:31, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

I considered it as vandalism since those links were to unknown airlines, like poodleair (returned no google results: here). I believed that these were false airlines, google search did not return a result, and there is no article named Poodleair. Therefore I considered it vandalism. Thanks for keeping users in check and notifying me of these edits. Please let me know if you have any further questions regarding that particular edit.  :-) Have a great day! - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 01:05, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Okay, I understand. Thanks, Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 01:11, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Why?

Why are you being so difficult? It seems like you're out to get me. You can reply on my talk page. GreenJoe 03:39, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

No, I'll reply here. I'm not out to get you - only respond to your comments. Using a Wikipedia essay as an excuse over the numerous guidelines and policies on Wikipedia does not justify anything. All I've done was copy and paste the top box of the essay you've been citing so much. You need mount yourself a more compelling argument towards your cause - not bicker with other editors who respond to your comments with accusations of stalking and not assuming good faith. It is a mistake on your part and you should not be directing that frustration on me. All I've done was point out the obvious. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 05:00, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Deadline used to be part of WP:NOT. I'm not sure why it was removed. GreenJoe 18:09, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
I have not examined WP:NOT's edit history in detail yet, but having the deadline portion "used to be" there really does not change anything. The fact is, your citation off of a Wikipedia essay is not a valid explanation nor is it a policy to keep. And since this AfD revolves a time period after the deadline portion moved to an essay and not a guideline, it has no basis for a keep vote. I'm not interested in why the essay was moved to its current location, but I am wondering if you're actually going to make a compelling argument on why each of SUs on AfD are notable. Just focus on that and stop making accusations on people stalking you and not assuming good faith. It makes you sound unfriendly and hard to work with. It also doesn't change people's delete votes. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 18:31, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Note This edit of Wikipedia:There is no deadline was from August 23, 2006. Which means it has been an essay since then. And it looks like your first edit on this account was on 12:40, 3 September 2006. So unless you were editing under a different account before that, this has been an essay since you first started using Wikipedia. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 18:36, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Like many people here I used to edit anonymously before I created an account. I do see your point though. I'll look for more relevant policies. GreenJoe 18:42, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Re Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Stefano Carlson

Pages such as this do not need to be sent to MfD. They can be speedy deleted under G8. Just so you know =] seresin | wasn't he just...? 20:29, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

List of Fraternities and Sororities at George Mason University -- afd

I closed as no consensus, but acknowledged that there is consensus to retain the information, either at an expanded article or merge back to the main. I'd suggest raising a discussion on the article talk page about the way forward rather than another AfD. Gnangarra 08:15, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

University of Florida Division of Continuing Education

  • I disagree with your opinion that this article has notability issues. This is just like any other College or School that has been created for the University of Florida. The only difference is that it's offered in a non-traditional format, and some of the degree programs are being facilitated via distance learning. This is a legitiate division that receives funding from the Legislature just like any other school, in addition it has it's very own Dean to carry out the day to day operations. To be honest, some of the degree programs being facilitated in this Division are the only one of it's kind being offered by the university, and therefore is extremely notable so that prospective students might be able to learn about these unique opportunities.
  • Lastly, I believe that non-traditional programs get a bad rap because they are new, and that they do not fall under the cookie cutter version of what a tradition academic program should encompass. This is simply an old paradigm that will take time to dissipate, and I firmly believe that Wikipedia can help to shed some light on this new method of instruction. Jccort (talk) 20:57, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
  • As I said before, your best option is to establishing notability via in-line citations from reliable third-party sources. I understand your viewpoint as well as your reasons to have an article in this division. However, you must also note colleges ("faculties" in UK) and other academic programs that had articles on Wikipedia that were AfDed. I'm not trying to nominate the article for deletion here, but it won't stop others from doing so. And to prove to you just what I'm talking about, please read what happened to the article I tried to create myself last year Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florida Institute of Technology/College of Engineering. I would suggest you do something similar to what I did (group all of the otherwise non-notable colleges together and internally link the notable ones). Please let me know if you have any further questions. Let me make this clear, I'm not out to get you or to derail your WikiProject, just letting you know something's getting slightly "gray". I wasn't trying to single out the continuing education division either, it just caught my eye when I was looking at WP:NPP. I've been reviewing some of the other college articles you've created, and I'm afraid some of them have similar notability issues. Please see if you can establish notability of them too. I'd hate to see your hard work go to waste. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 23:30, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Happy Easter

Sorry for the late delivery, but

Thanks

Thanks for the barnstar, I appreciate it. It's my first! Anyway, I hope we can finally be done with developing consensus on the article guidelines. Once it's archived at the village pump I will change the template atop the page to an official guideline. Hopefully it won't be a problem. Awesome.—Noetic Sage 19:18, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello

Thank you for so quickly commenting on my page. I realize that wikipedia is a completely open editing website. The little disclaimer at the top is merely to allow my project team to get all of our efforts on the page before it is edited by the rest of the community (even though I realize that there is no stopping them). I am trying to actually get everything up tonight, so I may be revising that statement in the very near future. And yes, I immediately realized my error in referencing, and i fixed it. Thank you very much for your guidance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Soggypenny (talk • contribs) 05:23, 24 March 2008 (UTC)


Good point

Yes, I have just realized the impossibility of my request. A suggestion has just been put up to bring what what I have so far into a userspace. How exactly do I do that? Once again, thank you for all of your help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Soggypenny (talk • contribs) 05:47, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you so much. I guess it's safe to assume, since this is the sandbox, that I will be able to edit this to my heart's content and make it into a legitimate encyclopedia article before bringing it out into the rough seas of wikipedia. Once again, thank you for being my life preserver here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Soggypenny (talk • contribs) 05:55, 24 March 2008 (UTC)


Got it

Yes, yes. I have learned so much in such a short amount of time. The post-move edit was a delay in my reading your message telling me of your benevolent actions. I will no longer edit in the article marked for deletion, but will use my userspace instead. A million thank yous. (and now for the tildas). Soggypenny (talk) 06:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

YAY! There's a signature! :D - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 06:08, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Council roll call

Hi there. You are receiveing this message because your name appears on the WikiProject Council participants list. The WikiProject Council is currently having a roll-call; if you are still interested in participating in the inter-project discussion forum that WT:COUNCIL has become, or you are interested in continuing to develop and maintain the WikiProject Guide or Directory, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Participants and remove the asterisk (*) from your name on the list of participants. If you are no longer interested in the Council, you need take no action: your name will be removed from the participants list on April 30 2008.

Melon‑Bot (STOP!) 22:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

COTF

Just poking you to select the next round of COTF so I can send out the newsletter. :) —Noetic Sage 03:18, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

ROUND 8 WP:UNI/COTF

The current University Collaborations of the Fortnight are:
Editor Nominated Topic Kennesaw State University
B-Class Improvement Drive Columbia University
Start/Stub Improvement Drive Chulalongkorn University

Every fortnight three higher education-related topics, stubs, or red linked articles are chosen for you to improve. Be bold!
This COTF is organized by Wikipedia:WikiProject Universities. (Nominate future collaborations or see past collaborations.)
This WP:UNI/COTF is effective: Mar 28 2008 ~ Apr 10 2008.

OK... so Columbia's a B-class article looking at FA nomination. Let's see if we can push it through FAN! (And good luck to anyone who speaks Thai and can translate the Thai version of Chulalongkorn University article into English) See you all 5 days before tax day (for those of us who are US taxpayers)! - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 03:44, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Some admin coaching!

I bet you thought I'd forgotten about you but really I've been bogged down with uni-work. You said earlier that you were interested in AfDs so how about some practice closes? Try closing these (templates and all) and I'll provide commentary. I chose more difficult ones because the clear cut results don't require practice. Note that when closing you must remove the line that says: {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|X}} but in these cases I have already removed them to prevent my subpages appearing in the AfD log. That's the bit I forget most often. The 3rd is becoming increasingly common; people with notability for one event. I'm not going to say wrong or right, just say what I would have done as all of these are open to interpretation. I've only copied accross 3 so far so take a crack! User:James086/AFD1, User:James086/AFD2 and User:James086/AFD3. James086Talk | Email 14:02, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Goblin chronicles - I agree with your no consensus close on this one. The references added aren't very good but if they exist there might be more.
  • Lisa jennings - I disagree here; I would have deleted. What you said in your closing summary is correct but I don't think there would be much left after the un-reference-able original research was removed. That's not to say you're wrong, I might be more deletionist than you and there are definitely loads of people who would have closed the same way. It will be interesting to see how someone else closes it.
  • Kristin Davis (prostitute) - Definitely agree, I doubt we'll ever hear of her again. James086Talk | Email 09:39, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Also I just read over your recent 500 contribs and the following speedies were turned down:

  • Ronny van Dyke - Close, there is a weak assertion of notability and I may or may not have deleted.
  • Kimo nz - I can't see an assertion so I'll ask the admin who declined.
  • Tora (alice nine) - I would have nom'd for AfD because it is a notable person (being a member of the band) but there wasn't any worthwhile content.
  • Psychostats - Software isn't eligible for speedy deletion under A7 (unfortunately) so it should have been PROD or AfD.

I think you're tagging quite well with a high rate of success (is that the right word?). Anyway, I think the only thing preventing a successful RfA now is time. Early May (3 months since your first) seems to be the time people think is acceptable and I definitely think you'll pass then. James086Talk | Email 09:39, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Woohoo! :D To tell you the truth I was in a really good mood while doing the Lisa Jennings article. I agree that most likely I would have deleted it. The main reason I didn't want to delete it was because I did find a lot on "Ito En" in the Japanese Google Search. However, my rusty Japanese skills couldn't sift through it well enough to make sure they were talking about the tea and not the girl... Since I did see a blog which I could decipher out that there was a reference on the girl, I actually gave the article the benefit of the doubt. I'm not sure if I was supposed to do that. I agree with the CSDs you've referenced. The problem with these CSDs is that I tag them when they first click on Submit. Many times the articles I tag are just incomplete and I don't see their finish product. Most of the time I do go back to my watchlist and make sure the articles are CSDed or else I'd reevaluate and AfD them. (I do the same with prods). Anyways... thanks for evaluating my AfDs and my last 500 edits - that must have took a lot of time! Thank you! - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 16:56, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

BYU flagship

Hello, apparently Wrad contacted you about my edits. Wrad objected to me calling BYU the "flagship" of the Mormon church. He wanted official sources for this appellation. He rejected my unofficial sources. But now I have found some sources that are pretty official; they are quotes from some Mormon leaders. I will discuss it on the BYU page.JackWilliams (talk) 22:18, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Wrad contacted WikiProject Universities to request non-biased option in hopes to find a impartial consensus. It is not canvassing. And you still have not read my statement about quoting people saying something incorrectly does not make it encyclopedic. Please actually read my comments before responding. Thank you. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 22:23, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
The term "flagship" does not only apply to public universities. The website dictionary.reference.com has the following for definition #4 for "flagship": "4. the best or most important one of a group or system: This store is the flagship of our retail chain." Also, I found quotes from some high-level Mormon leader referring to the idea of BYU being the flagship of the Mormon church.JackWilliams (talk) 22:31, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm not going to attempt to tell you this again about quoting random people. I am not going to argue with dictionary.com. However, I will use the definition of flagship university for my argument. Unless you can reach consensus (not by just editing that article to fit your personal needs) with the editors on that article, usage of the term flagship on a parallel interface that states that a flagship university is a public university will be considered incorrect. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 22:34, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Universities Newsletter: Issue VII (March 2008)

The March 2008 issue of the WikiProject Universities newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you for your continued support of WikiProject Universities! —Delivered on 18:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Read - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 05:41, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: Robotics category

I actually don't know how to do that, unfortunately. I tried putting the category in the talk template, but it didn't work, only the template showed up in the category. :( Midorihana~いいですね? はい! 05:36, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 05:40, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Melbourne International Airport

It has to do with the px error that was prevalent several days ago. All that is required is to remove the px. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 02:40, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

hm... interesting... - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 03:48, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: Invite WP:ROBO

Recently you invited me to join WP:ROBO. I very much appreciate the invite, but I'm busy enough with userscripts and all kinds of edits regarding spaceflight. I really don't have the time to be any sort of useful member of other WikiProjects atm. Happy editing though ! --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 15:19, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Afds and vandalism

I don't know if there is a script that does it; if so then I've been doing it old school. The template used is {{Relist}} and then they copy the name of the afd (i.e. copy {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/foo}}) to today's log. I only tend to use that template when there are only 1 or 2 comments although admittedly I haven't closed an AfD in ages! Oh and with regard to vandalism, I just let it stay; I would prefer they vandalise my userspace to the mainspace and usually once they start on my userpages they keep going until they get blocked. Besides it gets archived by Miszabot pretty fast. James086Talk | Email 08:08, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Lee MinJin

Women's world Go champion not important enough? There doesn't seem to be a speedy delete tag and I have put the {hangon} in the wrong place it seems. Please don't delete without discussion. SmokeyTheCat  •TALK• 10:50, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Babycakes Clothing

I've heard of this guy and his clothing line; the Telegraph article suggests a tinge of notability. If this article doesn't survive now, it'll be back soon. ;-) - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 13:32, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I did a google search on it again by changing a couple of parameters and found something slightly more reliable than a myspace page to back the article up, but still the notability on it was marginal during the time when I nominated it. I hope the guy realizes our notability policies and produces a better cited article next time. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 20:15, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Mike burgener‎

I could use some help.

How can I change the title of my article? I want to put a capital B for Burgener.

What is wrong with the lead section?

Thanks

Babycmon (talk) 04:53, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied to user talk page. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 22:51, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Der Letzte Tag

Dude, you gotta prod these. They are not eligible for speedy deletion. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 14:16, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

As real as your life

how did you find my page? and why are you so vigilant in the murdering of pre-mature articles? just out of curiosity . Akiman89 (talk) 23:29, 20 April 2008 (UTC)


All new pages show up on a main Wikipedia thread. I do apologize if you're mistaken, but I'm not in the assassination business. However, I do what I can to prevent articles that do not satisfy the policies and guidelines of Wikipedia from staying on their servers. Have a good day. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 23:31, 20 April 2008 (UTC)


Thank you for you politeness and honesty, this isn't the first time i've had a failed attampt at a article but i'll keep tryinAkiman89 (talk) 23:38, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

If you are trying to start an article, I suggest you understand why we delete your articles to start with. Reading and understanding Wikipedia policies and guidelines will help you fix the problems before we see them. If you need to work on an article and it's not done yet, WP:SANDBOX and spots in your userspace serve great places for you to experiment with Wiki code and work on articles without the peer review. Of course they wouldn't exist in the main article webspace, but you should be able to work on them enough until you are ready to deploy it as a full-fledged article. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 23:47, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Get a grip on your trigger happy CSD finger, please

You put a completely unwarrented CSD notice on Visual Researchers' Society of Canada. Might I suggest instead of spending your time writing off the work of others, you contribute something useful yourself. Note: do not reply quoting "Wikipedia policies" or anything similar because I will simply label you a pathetic bureaucrat and question the point of your life if you do so. --Flukes1 (talk) 00:55, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

I won't reply quoting Wikipedia policies, just that you didn't read the notice above. (I had hoped that the big red stop sign would catch the attention of our ADHD users.) Don't whine to me about why your article got deleted. I only nominated your article for deletion, I didn't actually delete it. An admin siding with my decision seconded my POV in deleting your article. And I do contribute to Wikipedia. My 7000+ edits I've made should be a clear indication. Perhaps you should consider the fact that the world does not revolve around you, and your illiteracy is actually catching up to you. Have a great day. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 05:43, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

University AFDs

Hello. It seems some of the university-related AFD are having trouble gaining enough discussion to form a consensus. I thought you might want to voice your opinion on this AFD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Student Action--SevernSevern (talk) 17:09, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

RE:Userpage

Thanks for that note. What colors would you suggest I use on my userpage? What colors would go well together and look good? Thanks.  Marlith (Talk)  18:58, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the Invitaton

Thanks for the invitation. Is there a ubx for the project. If there isn't I could make it.    Juthani1    19:53, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Check out the Userbox WT:ROBO/Userbox. I also added it to the Project Page.    Juthani1    20:45, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Not Sure if you can do that. If you know how to go ahead and do it. People will probable add their name on the page anyway. We could make a category for paticipants. That may work, but again I'm not sure.    Juthani1    21:37, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Waityou didn't tell me you guys were all ready working on it! I feel bad that I used mine when you guys made your own. If you want to the project can have more than one userbox.    Juthani1    22:07, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Student Government AFDs

Hello. I have proposed a change to the student government/student union section under Common Deletion Outcomes, and I would like your input. Thanks! User:SevernSevern aka Flunkerton (talk) 17:49, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

WP:OUTCOMES

What about this language for the common deletion outcomes?

Proposed Language: "UK and Canadian University or college student unions tend to survive AfD, but American student governments tend not to survive AFD without significant secondary coverage."

As always, I'm open to suggestions.User:SevernSevern aka Flunkerton (talk) 16:48, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Personally I don't like generalizations like that. It gives people like GreenJoe (not a personal attack here) an excuse to keep a UK/Canadian Student Union, saying it should follow suit of the other many UK and Canadian SUs.
How about "UK and Canadian Student Unions have been quite successful in demonstrating notability than many American Student Unions/Student Governments. However, individual case-by-case demonstration of notability should be the prime determining factor and this common outcome should not be used as "precedence" for future AfDs."
Does this sound OK? - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 17:39, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, that is better. How about this:
"The notability of student unions may vary between different counties and different universities. A case-by-case demonstration of notability for each student union should be the prime determining factor in each AFD"
Thoughts?--Flunkerton (talk) 18:35, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Score. That sounds even better. I'd support you on that. Forward this wording to User:Noeticsage for comment too. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 19:01, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Ok, I notified NoeticSage and put you down as a "Support" on the talkpage. (I hope that doesn't violate etiquette.) --Flunkerton (talk) 19:31, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Ok, I changed the language at WP:OUTCOMES. It looked like consensus to me. Thanks for the help.--Flunkerton (talk) 22:06, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
No problem, just note that I replied on your user talk page instead due to a couple additional notes. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 22:11, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Well, it seemed like the the proposed language was not very controversial, so I figured "What the Hell." But I guess someone could have a legitimate beef with it. I'll take out the closed discussion templates in case there are any other comments people have. The link to the guide works well.--Flunkerton (talk) 22:14, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. I hope the link would be helpful. It's a good guide to those who are wondering what to vote for in AfDs. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 22:18, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Re:Apparently, someone does not like you...

Thanks for the heads up. I like to collect the really good insults I get. Unfortunely what was on that page was really run of the mill. Looks like they took a swipe at you too. And they think we don't have lives! Mallanox 21:00, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Zakladnica rastlinskega sveta

Hi, you tagged that article for A2. Could you point to the Wikipedia article where it does exist? Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:01, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, actually I was aiming for blatant copyright infringement, as much of the article is a direct copy from [2]. (See google search.) - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 21:04, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Ah, I see. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:06, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Fractal time

Both "Underconstruction" and "inuse" tags are not needed at the same time. Only one need to be used. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 21:08, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Pushing on a string

I invite you to remove the "notability|neologisms" tag for Pushing on a string. The phrase is no neologism, having first appeared in 1935, and I think I've adequately established its significance with references. Dpbsmith (talk) 21:16, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Yup. I've removed it. The article did not sufficiently expand on its notability, hence my notability concerning as such. Thanks for letting me know instead of removing the tag yourself. Have a great day! :D - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 21:18, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. I shouldn't have posted it before it was in a more complete state.Dpbsmith (talk) 21:21, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Backlog at Category:Wikipedians seeking to be adopted in Adopt-a-user

WikiProject Universities Newsletter: Issue VIII (April 2008)

The April 2008 issue of the WikiProject Universities newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you for your continued support of WikiProject Universities! —Delivered on 21:31, 2 May 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

List of Florida birds

Hi. Thanks for your typo-fixing efforts. However, for future reference, please note that when words like "carolina" and "dominica" and "florida" and "montana" occur as species names in binomial scientific names (such as Dendroica dominica and Cornus florida), they are supposed to start with a lower-case letter. --Orlady (talk) 23:33, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Oh my, utter failure... :( - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 03:23, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Not utter failure. Some of your edits on that page were exactly on the mark. --Orlady (talk) 03:48, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Remove bot

A request has been made to remove the bot installed on the talk page of Brigham Young University. You're attention would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! --Eustress (talk) 00:23, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I didn't see a thread on the bot of T:BYU, so I'll just reply here. I'm wondering what reasons you have for removing the bot at the moment. The reason why I installed it in the first place was to sort out old conversations less than I think it was 7 days to minimize scrolling (old edit wars were bundled with side conversations that were affecting general productivity). It was later on changed by another editor to change the counter to 105 days. Personally, having an automatic archiving bot should not hinder normal talk page operations and I have not heard any complaints regarding the usage of the bot apart from its initial archive during an edit war, something that was fixed weeks ago. Please let me know on your thoughts.  :-) - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 03:30, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your reply. I think 105 days is way too long for an article of this magnitude—moreover, any archival period would be difficult with such an article, as I think the editors involved in talk can best determine when text can be archived. I guess I'm just saying that the automation is nice on some articles but not as helpful on this one. I would just like it removed so we can archive the old-fashioned way :) Thanks for your consideration. --Eustress (talk) 03:57, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Question

User:Chzz is telling me that he can't get to the "edit" button on your talk page. This user is using the modern screen and can't see the "edit" tab on your talk page; see here. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 01:05, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Furhter info: It works on 'monobook' but not on other skins; I think it's due to the {| style="position:absolute; top:0; part - perhaps you could consider changing it? Makes it a bit tricky to write to you! --  Chzz  ►  01:08, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Wow, that's the first time anyone has approached me about this. Since I am using modified code from other users, I'll keep my current code and will wait until there is a feasible workaround on this issue on the other Wiki skins. Also, since I will be unable to respond to standard talk page messaging, I did indicate on my user page to email me instead, but I guess I should repost that on my talk page right? :D Have a great day. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 05:24, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy tagging

When you speedy tag an article, could you please also flag it as 'patrolled' to save a duplication of effort? Thanks.  Chzz  ►  01:08, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

I was under the impression that once the article is CSD-tagged that the article is automatically assumed to be patrolled. Is there a way to modify the CSD scripting so it would do that automatically? - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 05:25, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Adoption

Are you still looking to adopt people? Chexmix53 (talk) 18:31, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Yup, if you're looking for help, please ask away! :D - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 02:44, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Rankings in lead

There is a debate at WT:UNI#Rankings in lead about the consensus for including or excluding rankings from the lead of university articles. Your input would be appreciated. Madcoverboy (talk) 18:20, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll look into it. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 19:16, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Ramani Ayer

Hi, I noticed you left a {{copyedit}} tag on Ramani Ayer that I just created. Just a note; with just a tag and without any specific comments in either the edit summary of the talk page there's no real way I know what you've identified as needing work. Any kind of commentary on the talk page would be appreciated. Thanks, --ImmortalGoddezz (t/c) 17:49, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

The reason why I did not leave a note on the talk page is because I believe the entire article needs to be reworded/copyedited. I'll try to identify the problems with the article more specifically later on, but I think the tag will serve its purpose as another editor will eventually come along and help copyedit it. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 17:52, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

New categories for WikiProject Robotics

Hi Jamesontai - thanks for your recent comment in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Robotics. If you have no objections, I'd like to start adding these three categories to our WikiProject in the next few days. --Jiuguang Wang (talk) 16:31, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

No objections, go right ahead! :D - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 05:16, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Da Vinci Surgical System

One more thing - one of the articles within WP:WikiProject Robotics, the Da Vinci Surgical System, have recently been deleted - I'm trying to get it restored (see the deletion review), and would appreciate your input. Thanks!--Jiuguang Wang (talk) 16:40, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Yeah the article was fine until it was spammed. Commented. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 05:16, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Mechanical engineering

Jameson, I see you're on wikibreak until July 3, but I just wanted to pass this along, in case you want to help or you know someone who might help. I finished reviewing mechanical engineering for GA a couple of days ago, it's "on hold" for a week, and so far, not a lot is happening...I know that's your field. - Dan Dank55 (talk)(mistakes) 13:07, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm in the middle of a bunch of exams and such this week. I'll try to take a look at it, but may not get to edit a lot until this weekend. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 15:30, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Take your time. Although the "on hold" is supposed to last for just a week, Wikipedia isn't going to be helped by failing it before the content experts have a chance to look at it. - Dan Dank55 (talk)(mistakes) 15:36, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Well, we'll see what needs to be worked on. I've read through it once already and it reads pretty smooth at the moment, but there are awkward sections that I might work on later on this week. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 20:09, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Notepad

Every night, someone thinks about you before they go to sleep. At least fifteen people in this world love you. The only reason someone would ever hate you is because they want to be just like you. There are at least two people in this world that would die for you. You mean the world to someone. Someone that you don't even know exists loves you. When you make the biggest mistake ever, something good comes from it. When you think the world has turned its back on you, take a look, it never will. Always remember the compliments you've received. Forget the rude remarks. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 13:10, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Thank you from Horologium

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which passed unanimously with the support of 100 editors. Your kindness is very much appreciated. I look forward to using the tools you have granted me to aid the project. I would like to give special thanks to Wizardman, Black Falcon and jc37 for nominating me. — Horologium
) - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 14:25, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

A discussion

A discussion on Should WikiProjects get prior approval of other WikiProjects (Descendant or Related or any ) to tag articles that overlaps their scope ? is open here . We welcome you to participate and give your valuable opinions. You are receiving this note as you are a member of WikiProject Council -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 12:34, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Responded. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 05:53, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

"Dole Nutrition Institute" and tagging mainstream news

Jamesontai, I would like to take care of your claims regarding the article "Dole Nutrition Institute", but as the article already takes information only from respected “published, third-party sources about the subject”, I am unclear what possible edit could be made to satisfy your intentions.

1) You claim the article needs additional references. The article sites:

- internationally respected news organization: Reuters,

- business publications: BNET Business Network, San Fernando Valley Business Journal,and The Corporate Social Responsibility Newswire

- food and nutrition information sources: Your Health Connection, Food and Drink Quarterly, and Southern Living magazine,

- and professional educators’ website: Education World.

If eight referenced, published, third-party sources are not enough for a one-page article, would you please suggest how many would be? Would fifteen? Thirty?

2) You claim the presence of weasel words but you fail to actually point out any. Any alleged “weasel words” are taken from, as Wikipedia requires, “published, third-party sources about the subject”. Which words do you feel are “weasel” and since they are from mainstream media - short of a tirade against news sources - what addition do you think would balance the words?

3) You complain about the “sound” of the article. If you don’t like the way it reads, again, all information is from published legitimate sources. Perhaps you should take that complaint up with the mainstream media sources themselves, or use the “talk” feature to list specifically what is insidious about Reuters and Southern Living Magazine. My difficulty is that it appears your problem with the chapter is actually a distrust of the newspapers and journals. When even Reuters is not legitimate enough, who is?

I am assuming you act with the noble intention of improving wikipedia, as do I, and I look forward to your response. Thank you, Tropical08 Tropical08 (talk) 23:46, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Please note that article tags may be made from any editor on Wikipedia. And tagging an article on Wikipedia means an editor has questions about the reference itself. Please don't tell me to "take it up with mainstream media." Remarks such as these leads me to believe that you are not assuming good faith. When requesting another editor's point of view or comment, it's best to leave your own sarcastic comments aside for your personal editing or your blog. Thank you and have a good day. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 04:33, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
I have examined your so-called references and have made the necessary remarks on the article's talk page. Regurgitating press releases from Dole through reputable outlets like Reuters does not make the reference any more "third-party", especially when the page itself states that it's a corporate news-wire. Trying to blab on about how I am ignoring these sources on my talk page is despicable. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 00:48, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD Discussion

As original creator of the RobotShop article, the time you took to review, research and comment on the article in a professional, unbiased manner is appreciated. Although you eventually changed your vote, you did it by weighing the facts as opposed to making a snap decision.--Cbenson1 (talk) 19:32, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for realizing that. Hopefully you can make other contributions to Wikipedia in the future. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 23:29, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

editing other editor's comments

I suggest you don't spellcheck Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Requests for Coaching like you did here. You are editing other editor's comments. Even though the page is not a talk page, I think some items from here may apply.--Rockfang (talk) 03:02, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Wow... n00b mistake there. Sorry I guess I got carried away at the end of the list on AWB. Edit has been reverted. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 03:17, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Rescue barnstar

The Article Rescue Barnstar
Jamesontai, for your excellent and patient work on cleaning up and improving the Robotshop article so that others could see the merits of inclusion I hereby award you this shiny and somewhat cool barnstar. Please bask on its loveliness often and keep it nearby so you can dust it off for inspiration! Banjeboi 02:58, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
I love it. Thanks a bunch! :D - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 03:18, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 14 and 21, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 29 14 July 2008 About the Signpost
From the editor: Transparency 
WikiWorld: "Goregrind" Dispatches: Interview with botmaster Rick Block 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Volume 4, Issue 30 21 July 2008 About the Signpost
WikiWorld: "Cartoon physics" News and notes: New Board Chair, compromised accounts 
Dispatches: History of the featured article process Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:35, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

List of Brigham Young University alumni FLC

Hello. I noticed at WP Universities that you said you could probably take a look at this FLC. The FLC is still open, so please take a look when you get a chance. Thanks! --Eustress (talk) 14:33, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh my, there goes my memory again... lol Thanks for remind me. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 20:09, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
lol...thanks for your participation! --Eustress (talk) 21:59, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

arctic -> Arctic

I don't think the change you made here is necessary. It wasn't talking about the Arctic as a "place". It was just implying the coldness of his breath.--Rockfang (talk) 01:37, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Noted. You might want to let the guys at AWB know that they may need to after the code for "arctic". - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 01:40, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Whether or not a capitalisation change should be made depends on how the word is used. I don't think AWB can do that.--Rockfang (talk) 02:02, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Actually, it can. It can differentiate via word usage. I've seen it automatically correct incorrect usage of its and it's. However, the use of capitalization will be slightly more difficult. I'll see about an inquiry. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 02:42, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Mediterranean basin

Please type Macedonia in the search area. You will find that it takes you to a disambiquation page. It does not take you to FYROM. Please don't support propaganda through this article. Read here so that you know what the fuss is about (and don't just revert without having knowledge on the matter). And yes I am Greek and the subject is extremely sensitive. 79.103.165.7 (talk) 09:07, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

My edit was legit. Be it as it may that you may or may not be "extremely sensitive" to the subject, if you are introducing new information, cite it with your edit. And if I'm not mistaken, my edit was to take it off of FYROM, so I'm not sure what you're fussing about. I've heard of the naming disputes, please do not start a side edit war until that naming dispute is settled. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 09:11, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Help

Hi Jameson - I need your help. Please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Julie Dancer, repeated personal attack and harrassment. I have to go offline for a few hours, and I would appreciate it if you can keep an eye out for me. Thanks! --Jiuguang (talk) 14:58, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

OK, never mind - it seems that it was taken care of rather quickly. Thanks! --Jiuguang (talk) 16:48, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Hm... it seems like he/she's finally blocked (one week though), and I'm glad someone got to it. I'm just glad I didn't get those emails. Did you see the "after thoughts" on her user talk page? It looked very, very sad. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 19:39, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Yes, it was very sad. Even worse is that he/she emailed Henrik I. Christensen, a professor at my school whom I've never met, about this, and Henrik forwarded the email to my advisor (?!). In the email was full of interesting comments like using Karnaugh map to prove the existence of god, etc...we all had a good laugh about it. --Jiuguang (talk) 20:37, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
And yet, this is still not over - the article is now at wikibooks:Optimal Classification, and the corresponding link has been added to several articles (which most have been reverted by other editors). The one left standing is on attribute-value system, which I'm reverting now. I'm sure I'll get another hate-mail soon. --Jiuguang (talk) 20:37, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
I think our effort at WikiBooks will not lead to anywhere - I left a message on wikibooks:User talk:Whiteknight#Optimal_Classification, and I hope he, as a respected member of the community, can recognize and rectify the situation in time. It's very disappointing. --Jiuguang (talk) 00:59, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
It's ok. I'm not too worried. As a primarily en-wiki editor, I really don't think it'll affect me too much. However, since I've noticed it, I've done my part in creating a Wikibooks account, activated it, and nominating the Wikibook article for deletion. It's up to the process now, let it take its due course and whatever comes of it I'll pretty much accept since I'm really an outsider at Wikibook standards. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 02:48, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Project Runway (season 5)

Thanks for your input on it. I posted a link to my userspace with 3 choices we have, to show what each looks (or would look) like. Seeing all 3, if you would like to respond with your opinion again. :D <3 Tinkleheimer TALK!! 23:59, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

:@

Hey! let me continue fixing the article, the section "2002–2003: Ahli Arab, Ana Eih, scandal and move to Rotana Records" doesn't match with the written words. I want to write this: "In 2002, before coming to fame again and releasing a new album, a fake scandal of Nelly Makdessy was published as a message Yahoo! Group and then to other websites including music forums. The message said that Makdessy was a porn star in the U.S. and it shows fake photos of her having sex. Since then, Makdessy's popularity became less. She signd with new label called Rotana Records and released a second album, Ahli Arab." but you don't let me do it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Diasporas (talk • contribs) 10:13, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

  • I've tried to explain to him on his talk page about it. and refuses to listen. There is a level 4 warnig on his page. It may be good faith. But I think he is playing dumb ChiragPatnaik (talk) 10:37, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Michael Naumann

I might understand undue weight as a reason as he might not be too interesting a figurehead for international readers, but not "inappropriate". I went through great lengths to write in a neutral tone, neither glorifying nor unfairly attacking him. No need to point towards the sandbox, I've been a registered user of both the German and the English Wikipedia for years, only this year over different topics I was indefinitely blocked from the English version within 48 hours of my very first block which was extended into indefinite before I was even unblocked. --87.154.27.41 (talk) 10:24, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

You shouldn't be circumventing your block anyways. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 10:26, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Also, I immediately undid it within seconds. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 10:28, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
I'm definitely staying away from the topic I've been banned about, as not even 32 experienced editors and admins on my side could help me get unblocked when they were confronted with a plethora of novel faces that had never been seen before or after, especially not where I'd got banned about, yet who were amazingly well-informed of months of exchanges of myself and others. BTW, your Click here to quickly leave a new message. link above is broken, it still points towards NASCAR Fan24's talkpage. --87.154.27.41 (talk) 10:35, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for you openness. --87.154.27.41 (talk) 10:36, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing out the broken link. It's what I get for direct copy/paste of code. Not sure how you got blocked since I really don't know who you are or what en-wiki account you got blocked from, but even with the best of intentions, I don't think editing through an anonymous IP will change much after they find out. I hope you are able to somehow reason with the blocking admin or consult with others, however, from the looks of what you just said, you not only got blocked, but banned? Then I think to prevent sticky situations, I think it'd be best to focus your efforts to improve these articles to other editors. Not trying to cast you off or anything, I've never interacted with a banned user on an anonymous IP who I did two simul. HG edits on...lol - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 10:41, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Meetup

Wikipedia:Meetup/Gainesville, Florida - in the planning stages, if you're interested. :) --Ebyabe (talk) 16:58, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

oOo... never been there before... it's worth the drive. :D - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 17:19, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

IRC

Yes, I do. I'm often on the admin channel, however. Is there a particular channel that you guys go to? —Kurykh 00:28, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

  1. wikipedia-en - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 00:32, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Nick: Kurykh. —Kurykh 00:37, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
lolz ok - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 00:38, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

SFO

Wikipedia:Be Bold. I got it to GA status two years ago this week, and sort of left it to its own devices. People add some stuff here and there, and some crap accumulated in the process, and now I'm cleaning it out again, and getting it ready for another peer review. —Kurykh 04:42, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I'll take a look at it again some time tonight. I wanted to let you know because I didn't want to have your work crapped up into an edit conflict...:D - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 23:05, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Many thanks!

Thank you...

...for participating in my RfA, which closed with 119 in support, 4 neutral and 5 opposes. I'm honestly overwhelmed at the level of support that I've received from the community, and will do my best to maintain the trust placed in me. I 'm also thankful to those who opposed or expressed a neutral position, for providing clear rationales and superb feedback for me to build on. I've set up a space for you to provide any further feedback or thoughts, should you feel inclined to. However you voted, thanks for taking the time out to contribute to the process, it's much appreciated. Kind regards, Gazimoff 22:51, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Robotics July Newsletter


The WikiProject Robotics Newsletter
Issue I (July 2008)


Project news
  • Project now covers 1000 articles on Wikipedia and is continuously growing in coverage and in members
  • New article assessment drive! Please help by assessing articles with no class assessment or importance rating!
  • New {{Robotics Barnstar}}! Give it to someone who has improved significant portions of robotics articles or WikiProject Robotics!
  • Four new DYKs were featured this month.
Articles of note

New Featured articles:

New Good articles:

Current proposals and discussions
  • Discussion on whether to add subcategories into this WikiProject and whether to create separate task forces per subcategory.
Awards and honors
  • User:Jiuguang Wang was recently awarded the Wikipedia Barnstar for his continued efforts in the article assessment drive.
The current Robotics Collaborations of the Fortnight are:
Editor Nominated Topic Robotics
B-Class Improvement Drive FIRST Robotics
Start/Stub Improvement Drive Home automation

Every fortnight three robotics-related topics, stubs, or red linked articles are chosen for you to improve. Be bold!
This COTF is organized by WikiProject Robotics. (Nominate future collaborations or see past collaborations.)
This WP:ROBO/COTF is effective: February 29, 2008—March 13, 2008.


Things to do
  1. Continue upkeep of Robotics Portal
  2. Assign a class and importance level to unassessed articles
  3. Place {{WikiProject Robotics}} on every related talk page.

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

Holly Hills

Please compare the text you restored here with the text of this website beginning just to the right of the picture. The material on this webpage is marked at being copyright at the bottom of the page. Note also that my edit is clearly identified as the removal of a copyright violation, which it certainly is. 24.36.74.15 (talk) 05:56, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

I reverted it because your edit was also removing other information and reference section. I've removed those three paragraphs you've mentioned and added a {{unreferenced}} tag. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 09:45, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

No problem!

I don't doubt you'd have done the same for me. - Vianello (talk) 00:32, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Yup! :D - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 00:34, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Need help understanding, Jamesontai!

I've updated my company website per instructions from our legal department. In doing so, I've received the following messages from you:

The information that you are deeming to be true and accurate is NOT. Please allow me to remove information that is not true!! I'm happy to refer you to our legal department for verification!

Blessings, Dunbarland (talk) 15:35, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

While editing articles belonging to your company is allowed, please refer to WP:COI and WP:NEUTRAL for more information. Referring to your legal department, whoever it is, will not prevent an editor on Wikipedia. Please refer to WP:LEGAL. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 15:53, 5 August 2008 (UTC)


Thanks. Where are the citations for the information that others have placed on the wiki page for my organization? Dunbarland (talk) 18:30, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

If it is not on the article, then it is unreferenced, as I have tagged it. (AKA, there are no proper citations whatsoever.) When citing on Wikipedia articles, be sure to include third-party, neutral, and reliable sources (not just corporate newsletters, primary sources, and news-wires from Reuters). See WP:RS, WP:N, WP:V and WP:CITE for more information. Hope this helps. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 20:43, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, Jamesontai...There are many, many statements in this article that are wildly incorrect! They are uncited, but seem to be getting a pass by Wiki editors... I'll keep looking for ways to correct the information within Wiki's parameters! Blessings, Dunbarland (talk) 11:58, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Sure, no problem. You may click here to view my main user page. The right column has a list of key Wikipedia policies and guidelines which I hope you find useful if you need additional reference. Feel free to come back here if you need more help that's already specified in those links. Have a great day! - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 21:14, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Request to delete page

Jameson, Can you please delete the article "Issels Treatment"? The company would rather not be in Wikipedia for reasons of vandalism by various people who have no understanding of the treatment and its concepts. Thank you. Truist (talk) 00:58, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

You may blank the page. If the original contributor of the article (you) blank the page, it is an indication that the author wants the page to be speedy-deleted. See WP:CSD#G7. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 04:03, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Jameson! The company changed their mind. They were afraid of people just vandalizing the page, but would like to keep the page for now. Thank you so much for your help. Much appreciated. Truist (talk) 21:57, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

No Problem. For your reference, please see my main user page so you may the collection of the Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Also, please keep in mind that if you are representing your company to place the article on Wikipedia, please keep in mind WP:COI, WP:NEUTRAL, WP:RS, WP:V, and other relevant useful pieces of information. This should prevent your material from getting reverted. Also, if you are working on a section and want to finish it later, may I suggest working on it as per WP:SANDBOX. When you're done working on it, come back and paste the code into the article. It makes a clearer reviewing experience for our peer editors. Thanks. Send me a message if you need more help. Have a great day. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 22:18, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Article: Pawn Tactics

I'm having a bit of a problem with your automated bot in that article. It appears to be recognizing some of my legitimate edits as "Vandalism" (probably because I forgot to check the 'Minor Edit' box on an edit). VSkyzv (talk) 05:15, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

It is not a bot. Please do not add pawnstudios.com on articles, especially as comments. It is considered as ways to circumvent spam filters from bots and other peer reviewers editing and reviewing all recent edits on Wikipedia. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 05:27, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Sorry I didn't know that it could interfere with bots but I'm happy to learn that. I don't really see the need to revert the entire edit and tag it as vandalism. The original wording could have just been changed, but I'm willing to work out a solution.VSkyzv (talk) 06:01, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
In normal situations, I agree, reverting your particular edit was best because the original wording prior was already detailed enough. It doesn't need to be spelled out the way you wrote it. Also, it was a bit pointy. Sometimes it's best to just leave certain things be. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 06:29, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

WP SFBA page redesign

Hi, I'm not sure if you noticed but I've sandboxed my redesign of the WP SFBA page and responded to you at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject San Francisco Bay Area#Project page redesign can you take a look and leave a comment whether you love it, hate it, don't care, etc. Thanks in advance. -Optigan13 (talk) 04:18, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

I'm currently in the middle of a CfD, but I'll get to it when I'm done. Thanks for notifying me. My watchlist is once again in need of a good cleaning/massive deletion. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 04:20, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Your Creeper (comics) undo

I just found your revert of five successive edits by IP 76.252.192.111 to the article Creeper (comics). Having closely examined the "diff" page, I feel that most of it should have been left in place. Of his/her work that you reverted, all that I disagree with is the rendering of the possessive of "Yatz" as "Yatz' " (twice) and the botched Wikilink for Commander Steel. Considering that it is quite possible you have reasons for your en masse revert that I am unaware of, I have as yet done nothing, and await your response to this. I have placed your talk page on my watchlist, and will undo that once this discussion has been resolved, so you can reply right here. --Ted Watson (talk) 20:49, 12 August 2008 (UTC) P.S. Thanks for pointing out the button that makes signing these so much easier!

Hi, I'm not sure why WP:HG reverted that one either. This might have been one of my edits I tried to ignore, and then HG crashed. I have restored the earlier version, so my edit's been undone. I'm still wondering exactly happened, but I'm going to see if HG logged anything I can review and possibly submit a bug ticket on Wikipedia freenode IRC channel. Thanks for point out that error. Have a great day. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 21:49, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

MIT

Given the quality of your contributions to a wide variety of university-related articles, I would like to solicit your feedback on MIT's current article at the peer review for whatever changes you feel would be necessary to secure your support at a future WP:FAC. Madcoverboy (talk) 16:46, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

I was just popping in to check my email. I'm flying back to Florida from California tonight, so I won't be able to sit down and do an article review for a few days, perhaps the weekend if that's ok with you? Thanks! - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 19:24, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
I was never close with Noetic so I don't have a sense for where he is or what happened if he's no longer active. Madcoverboy (talk) 20:26, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject San Francisco Bay Area roll call

Hello from WikiProject San Francisco Bay Area!

As part of a recent update to our project main page we are conducting a roll call to check which members are still active and interested in working on bay area related content. If you are still interested in participating, simply move your username from the inactive section of the participant list to the active section. I hope you will find the redesigned project pages helpful, and I wanted to welcome you back to the project. If you want you can take a look at the newly redesigned:

As well as the existing pages:

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page, and add it to your watchlist, if it isn't already.

Again, hi!  Although with you and Blow of Light I've already moved you into the active list, just didn't want you to feel left out. So take a look at the new project page. -Optigan13 (talk) 07:56, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! lulz @ me not reading the entire message. I clicked on the participants list and I was like... wth? I'm already active... hahahahah - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 09:04, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jamesontai/Archive_4&oldid=1090525056"