User talk:Jamalie7

Welcome!

Hi Jamalie7! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 22:53, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@I dream of horses uh am I in trouble ? Jamalie7 (talk) 22:58, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@I dream of horses oi am I in trouble !!!!!?? Jamalie7 (talk) 23:18, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Karamanli dynasty, you may be blocked from editing. You've been warned multiple times about this editing behaviour. R Prazeres (talk) 22:00, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@R Prazeres sorry for tha hassle of asking but may I ask are you blind ? Jamalie7 (talk) 22:02, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Check your tone, per WP:CIVIL. I've looked at the sources myself (for which you provided no details). If I'm wrong, you are free to quote the exact passages in those sources, including the page numbers, that support your claim, at the article's talk page. I'm also not blind to the fact that you repeated the exact claim that Las Davas previously attempted to push into the article without evidence. R Prazeres (talk) 22:10, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@R Prazeres i quoted them when I reverted like come on one of my source specifically said they raided kanem established rule over aouzou and tebisti toubou the other call on them establishing several tribal policies and yes I can list those tribes they are all Libyan I'm Libya I know those tribes and the other source mention them attacking kanem Jamalie7 (talk) 22:15, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@R Prazeres okay that sounded offensive a little i apologies Jamalie7 (talk) 22:20, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See my response at Talk:Karamanli dynasty. R Prazeres (talk) 22:26, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kingdom of sabha moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kingdom of sabha, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 09:14, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@HitroMilanese sorry Jamalie7 (talk) 09:21, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@HitroMilanese i may say. that those are source i list it Jamalie7 (talk) 09:39, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Samira819 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Samira819. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 21:10, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dreamy Jazz what ? could you simplify. Jamalie7 (talk) 11:29, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence shows that you and the account Samira819 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) are the same person or have coordinated together. Therefore, you were evading a block and using multiple accounts in a disruptive way which is against policy. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 12:07, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dreamy Jazz who is that? Jamalie7 (talk) 11:29, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dreamy Jazz and also:

I respect Wikipedia's policies, but I disagree with the assumption that I am the same person as that other editor. I would like to express my frustration with the deletion of my edits, which were based on reliable sources from academic websites and books. I spent a lot of time reading these books, such as the one by Mukaram Hhana from the University of Pennsylvania: Commandeering Empires: Egypt, Tripoli, and Tunis in the Age of Revolution, 1774-1835. I used these sources to improve the articles on the French campaign in Egypt and Syria and the First Italo-Senussi War. I feel that the current versions of these articles are biased towards a certain narrative of history that does not reflect the complexity and diversity of perspectives on these topics. I hope you can reconsider your decision and restore my edits, or at least explain to me why they were removed. Thank you for your attention and understanding. Jamalie7 (talk) 11:56, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dreamy Jazz

I also want to express my dissatisfaction with some editors who do not accept Arabic books or websites as reliable sources, even though they are and they offer a valuable insight into North African and Arabic history. I think these sources should be respected and considered, not reverted without explanation. Jamalie7 (talk) 12:02, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to appeal your block, you should do so as specified in the notice above.

I cannot detail the specific evidence to protect your privacy. The evidence is from the CheckUser tool. If you truly do not know about this other account, you should explain what would cause your account and Samira819 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) to use the same device to make similar edits. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 13:38, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

D okay after checking true i made close edits but with different sources and i Didn't edit exact same stuff i edited different stuff. I never seen that account before Jamalie7 (talk) 14:34, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is that good evidence? Jamalie7 (talk) 15:26, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oi ? Jamalie7 (talk) 13:35, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]