User talk:Jakob9999

Welcome!

Hello, Jakob9999, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Bop rock, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Gyrofrog (talk) 19:56, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bop rock

The article Bop rock has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be a neologism. No sources, and nothing that isn't already covered in Jazz fusion (or the Jazz-rock section therein). This could be turned into a redirect to that article, except that the term isn't really used in any notable context.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gyrofrog (talk) 19:56, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bop metal

The article Bop metal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be a neologism. No sources, and nothing that isn't already covered in Jazz fusion (or the Jazz-rock section therein). This could be turned into a redirect to that article, except that the term isn't really used in any notable context.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gyrofrog (talk) 19:59, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hello, I'm ChamithN. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Michael Jackson, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ChamithN (talk) 02:40, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Alternative metal, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 03:11, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Heavy metal music, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 04:46, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Synthmetal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Synthmetal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Synthmetal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Binksternet (talk) 04:50, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:File-New Text Document.png

Thanks for uploading File:File-New Text Document.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:File-New Text Document.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:File-New Text Document.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Synthpop reival for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Synthpop reival is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Synthpop reival until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Carbrera (talk) 19:02, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Synthpop reival, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Industrial and Capital Cities. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Smooth Criminal. Rob van vee 05:51, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Madness (band). Mlpearc (open channel) 20:03, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Door to Door (album). SummerPhD^v2.0 03:35, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 70's revival

Hi, I'm Mduvekot. Jakob9999, thanks for creating 70's revival!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article needs references to independent, reliable sources. Also, it should be renamed to 70s revival per MOS:DECADE

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mduvekot (talk) 02:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 70s revival for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 70s revival is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/70s revival until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 23:45, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eleven Fifty Two

The article Eleven Fifty Two has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG: BEFORE did not produce significant coverage in demonstrably independent and reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —swpb^T 19:41, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 18:48, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Genre changes

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Rush (band), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. - Mlpearc (open channel) 17:53, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Circuit City, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Sources are especially critical for "In popular culture"-type information in terms of establishing significance, as discussed at WP:IPCV. DonIago (talk) 13:10, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rockabilly Genre on Dio page

You raised a question about the sourcing for Dio's involvement in the Rockabilly genre, to which I responded. I'd appreciate it if you would state on the Dio Talk Page whether your concern is addressed or not. Holzman-Tweed (talk) 20:19, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Synth-funk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Single. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, WXLP, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:30, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vince Gill

How can they be associated if the event has not happened yet ? - Mlpearc (open channel) 15:36, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Checking further, according to Template:Infobox_musical_artist#associated_acts even when it does happen, they're still not associated. I'm going to revert your edit on that basis, of course your free to seek other consensus on the talk page. cheers, - Mlpearc (open channel) 15:46, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Football music

The article Football music has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Essay or something made up by the article creator. I couldn't find any reliable sources for the concept as described here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 14:45, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zoo music

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Zoo music, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 03:50, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia. Hoaxes are eligible for speedy deletion under criterion G3. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia — and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 03:50, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Soul metal

Hello, Jakob9999. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Soul metal, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

TimothyJosephWood 18:03, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And adding it to the soul music article isn't particularly helpful as it still doesn't contain a single reference. There is enough there for a stand-alone article, but only if you can find sources for the content. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:18, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Soul metal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Soul metal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soul metal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 19:41, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Final Warning

Looking through your talk page, (and block log), it looks like you've got a long history with creating unsourced articles, and making unsourced additions to pre-existing articles. You've had far too many chances at this point - this needs to stop now. If there's any more instances of this, your account will receive a lengthy block. If you have questions, let me know. But proceeding as you have been, is not acceptable. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 20:08, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You ignored my warning, didn't ask any questions, and instead proceeded to add unsourced content to an article. As such, you are blocked for 2 weeks. Sergecross73 msg me 23:52, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know about changing genre's

Thank you for discussing genres first as you did at Joe Walsh. Changing genre's without providing a source or establishing a consensus, or to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:57, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bedroom music

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bedroom music requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cabayi (talk) 14:41, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Bedroom music, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Cabayi (talk) 14:45, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for creating nonsense pages.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:07, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]