User talk:Jaknumberjar

April 2020

Are you also editing as Potassium69 (talk · contribs), Tkakk (talk · contribs) and several IPs? All have been vandalizing Bass guitar by adding similar nonsense. —Ojorojo (talk) 17:26, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

how do i publish my draft: [[1]]

Jaknumberjar (talk) 19:00, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I added a template to the top of Draft:Replayed_co with suggestions for your draft. When you're ready to submit it for review, press the [Submit your draft for review!] button. I believe that you have more work to do before submitting it. Please read Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) to determine if this company meets Wikipedia's requirements for inclusion, called "notability". If so, please add references that demonstrate "multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject". Happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 19:23, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Replayed co

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Replayed co, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Spencer^T•C 00:49, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Jaknumberjar/sandbox

A tag has been placed on User:Jaknumberjar/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spencer^T•C 00:49, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As GoingBatty mentioned above, please review Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies), specifically Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)#Primary_criteria. Per Wikipedia's guidelines about promotion, these notability criteria define what is needed in an article. UK government links are not secondary sources, nor does that indicate "significant coverage". Web archive links to the previous website for the company is not independent. If you can provide some sources to the listed criteria in the link above (specifically here), that will build the case that the article is not promotional. Best, Spencer^T•C 14:51, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As for advertising, the article made claims like "on a mission to empower digital new media content creators, through sustainable video post production", referred to "notable mentions"/"features", and had general promotional content about Khorsan. What is your connection with Mr. Khorsan? You seem to know a lot about him. Spencer^T•C 14:57, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Im an independent researcher and have email korsan directly, other than asking him a few questions regarding his business (that i have fact checked them to make sure that the information i was given was correct), i have no personal connection with him. further more, when i talk about mr korsan, i have wrote purely using sources like linkdln and IMdb. I am more than happy to change the wordings and some of the sources to make it more suitable for encyclopedia, as my intentions but rather contribute as a first time article as an independent contributer. Other sources could be derived from direct contact with Korsan. thank you for taking your time to verify - Jaknumberjar

Please review Wikipedia's policy on Original Research. Again, sources like LinkedIn and IMDB are typically not reliable to meet Wikipedia's standards, and please see the above for examples on the types of sources that would be needed. Lastly, it seems quite dubious how an independent researcher would have such an interest in a minor company and subject without having some kind of relationship between them (e.g. you have the subject's direct email address), and your contributions have centered only around this. Based on all of the information available to consider, an alternative outlet outside Wikipedia seems like it would be the ideal place for your independent research. Best, Spencer^T•C 17:02, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]