Jump to content

User talk:Jakec/Archive 22

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 15←Archive 20Archive 21Archive 22Archive 23

DYK for White Deer Creek

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:01, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Buck Run (Little Muncy Creek), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pipeline. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nescopeck Mountain

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nescopeck Mountain you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 17:41, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Wales/Awaken the Dragon

Hi, can I interest you and page stalkers in participating in April? Up to £200 in Amazon vouchers and books up for grabs.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:03, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nescopeck Mountain

The article Nescopeck Mountain you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Nescopeck Mountain for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 21:21, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Shickshinny Creek

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Shickshinny Creek you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 21:01, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

FLC review request

I'll try to find some time to review the list, but unfortunately I can't make any promises. This is my busy season in real life, and I have a couple other outstanding reviews that I have to return to soon. It may be a little while before I can get to your list. Giants2008 (Talk) 02:08, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

That's fine. Thanks for considering it anyway. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 10:05, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Mohanlal filmography

Hai, I have put this for FLC. Can you spare some time to take a look at it.--Inside the Valley (talk) 12:37, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

@Inside the Valley: I'll review it if you can take time to review Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/List_of_tributaries_of_Mahanoy_Creek/archive1, which has been in the queue for over two months and hasn't yet gotten quite enough feedback. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 13:46, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
I'm really sorry. I am not qualified for that. Best wishes for your FLC. --Inside the Valley (talk) 14:06, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Shickshinny Creek

The article Shickshinny Creek you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Shickshinny Creek for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 02:21, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Little Wapwallopen Creek

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Little Wapwallopen Creek you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 03:01, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Toby Creek

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Toby Creek you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 11:01, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Abrahams Creek

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Abrahams Creek you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 11:01, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Briottie

Hi. I don't agree with you about this one. The guidelines say that "usernames are acceptable if they contain a company or group name but are clearly intended to denote an individual person, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA"". This does not fall into that category as it is not "clearly intended" to denote an individual. Deb (talk) 18:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Also, having looked at your message on the user's talk page, I see that you told her to "try to make sure to use a very neutral and factual tone, as if you were simply a third-party person trying to inform people about this company". In my opinion, you should have been telling her not to edit the article instead of encouraging her to try to deceive readers into thinking she does not have a conflict of interest. Deb (talk) 18:54, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi, sorry I forgot to respond for so long. I do still maintain that the block was stale, and that even if it hadn't been, it was something of an edge case. In such cases, I believe blocks should only be used if discussion fails, and no attempt was made at discussion here. Beyond that, it's entirely possible for COI editors to create acceptable articles, and if the topic is notable, then this will improve Wikipedia, thus I think it should be encouraged. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 19:35, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Class A Wild Trout Waters

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Class A Wild Trout Waters you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 05:01, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Class A Wild Trout Waters

The article Class A Wild Trout Waters you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Class A Wild Trout Waters for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 05:21, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Class A Wild Trout Waters

The article Class A Wild Trout Waters you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Class A Wild Trout Waters for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 02:21, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Little Fishing Creek

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Little Fishing Creek you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 17:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Little Fishing Creek

The article Little Fishing Creek you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Little Fishing Creek for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 01:00, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Abrahams Creek

The article Abrahams Creek you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Abrahams Creek for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 07:41, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Little Fishing Creek

The article Little Fishing Creek you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Little Fishing Creek for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 22:01, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Toby Creek

The article Toby Creek you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Toby Creek for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 13:21, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Mahanoy Creek

Hi Jakec, There have been a few comments at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of tributaries of Mahanoy Creek/archive1 which need dealing with if we are to promote the nom. It's been open three months and we normally close at two, so there is some pressure to get the final points sorted. Thanks. - SchroCat (talk) 07:28, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

No Commons Requested

Thanks, [[1]] is an example of the extended usage I had in mind when I added the other parameters. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:59, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Well thanks, but I didn't write this article, and only nominated on behalf of an IP. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 01:15, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Chip Fairway

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:53, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Herrold Run, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Daily Item. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Silver Creek (Susquehanna River)

On 30 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Silver Creek (Susquehanna River), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Silver Creek was referred to by two different names on the same USGS map—and the locals had never heard of either name? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Silver Creek (Susquehanna River). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Silver Creek (Susquehanna River)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Big Wapwallopen Creek

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Big Wapwallopen Creek you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 12:40, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 2 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Fidlers Run

On 5 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fidlers Run, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in the late 1960s, a civil engineer found himself unable to uncover any written information on the spelling of Fidlers Run? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fidlers Run. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Fidlers Run), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Keyser Creek

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Keyser Creek you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Music1201 -- Music1201 (talk) 00:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Keyser Creek

The article Keyser Creek you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Keyser Creek for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Music1201 -- Music1201 (talk) 01:21, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Big Wapwallopen Creek

The article Big Wapwallopen Creek you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Big Wapwallopen Creek for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 22:01, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

DYK Boyers Run

DYK nomination of Boyers Run

Hello! Your submission of Boyers Run at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Amgisseman(BYU) (talk) 22:03, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Keyser Creek

The article Keyser Creek you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Keyser Creek for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Music1201 -- Music1201 (talk) 01:41, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Big Wapwallopen Creek

The article Big Wapwallopen Creek you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Big Wapwallopen Creek for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 01:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Boyers Run

On 21 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Boyers Run, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Boyers Run starts in Pennsylvania and ends up near Liverpool? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Boyers Run. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Boyers Run), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Little Wapwallopen Creek

The article Little Wapwallopen Creek you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Little Wapwallopen Creek for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 21:40, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

TFL notification

Hi, Jakec. I'm just posting to let you know that List of tributaries of Bowman Creek – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for July 25. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 20:13, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Angelina & Neches River Authority, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Preston Smith and State constitution. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Little Wapwallopen Creek

The article Little Wapwallopen Creek you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Little Wapwallopen Creek for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 12:21, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Spring Brook (Lackawanna River)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Spring Brook (Lackawanna River) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Maile66 -- Maile66 (talk) 18:40, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

There are two dead links to be taken care of. Everything else looks fine. — Maile (talk) 21:12, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Spring Brook (Lackawanna River)

The article Spring Brook (Lackawanna River) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Spring Brook (Lackawanna River) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Maile66 -- Maile66 (talk) 23:41, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Little Mahantango Creek

On 8 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Little Mahantango Creek, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a man received a warranty guaranteeing him Beauty on Little Mahantango Creek in 1793? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Little Mahantango Creek. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Little Mahantango Creek), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:05, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

River categories

I'm startubg a new discussion at WP:CFD about the naming of river categories. Since you have participated in t least one of the recent discussions in the matterm you nay want to express your opinion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 July 11#Rivers. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 02:40, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tower Branch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Species of Special Concern. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Tower Branch

On 25 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tower Branch, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Tower Branch runs near a tract of land home to nine Species of Special Concern in Pennsylvania? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tower Branch. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Tower Branch), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:46, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Picture at Martins Creek (Tunkhannock Creek)

Is it looking up or downstream? The article photo caption says the former, but the photo description says the latter. Thanks Gjs238 (talk) 11:44, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Oh, the description was wrong. Thanks for letting me know. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 11:47, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stafford Meadow Brook

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stafford Meadow Brook you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Alexislynn(BYU) -- Alexislynn(BYU) (talk) 18:01, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

DYK Emily Blackman

I see you are presumed a helpful person because you are an administrator. I also see that you have DYK'ed Emily. Under your DYK is one that I submitted. Would you kindly help me make it look better. My formatting is not the same as yours. It lacks bold and other stuff. If you do so, that would be worthy of a barnstar. Thank you. Usernamen1 (talk) 20:19, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

I was about to do it, but it seems that BlueMoonset beat me to it. Regards, --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 13:00, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Roaring Creek (Pennsylvania)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Roaring Creek (Pennsylvania) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 11:01, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stafford Meadow Brook

The article Stafford Meadow Brook you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Stafford Meadow Brook for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Alexislynn(BYU) -- Alexislynn(BYU) (talk) 16:41, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stafford Meadow Brook

The article Stafford Meadow Brook you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stafford Meadow Brook for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Alexislynn(BYU) -- Alexislynn(BYU) (talk) 20:01, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Roaring Creek (Pennsylvania)

The article Roaring Creek (Pennsylvania) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Roaring Creek (Pennsylvania) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 21:40, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Emily C. Blackman

On 18 August 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Emily C. Blackman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Emily Clarissa Blackman became an assistant teacher at age 15, published a book of Susquehanna County history in 1873, and could allegedly read the Bible in ten languages? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Emily C. Blackman. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Emily C. Blackman), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:13, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Roaring Creek (Pennsylvania)

The article Roaring Creek (Pennsylvania) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Roaring Creek (Pennsylvania) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 19:21, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Nine Partners Creek

On 22 August 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nine Partners Creek, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Nine Partners Creek has a tributary named Leslie Creek, is also known as "Leslie Creek", and has been called a tributary of Leslie Creek? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Nine Partners Creek), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Leslie Creek (Nine Partners Creek)

On 22 August 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Leslie Creek (Nine Partners Creek), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Nine Partners Creek has a tributary named Leslie Creek, is also known as "Leslie Creek", and has been called a tributary of Leslie Creek? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Leslie Creek (Nine Partners Creek)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Just an FYI

Browsing the web, stumbled on an image of yours adorning a British Government webpage, see here. I was also pleased to see a reasonable attribution there too! The Rambling Man (talk) 10:56, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! I've seen my pictures on a few sites across the internet before; every few months I look to see if there are any new ones. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 02:10, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Roaring Brook (Lackawanna River)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Roaring Brook (Lackawanna River) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 10:01, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jakec/Archive_22&oldid=1078484187"