User talk:Jacob A. Henderson

April 2015

Hello, I'm Ebyabe. An edit that you recently made to Kent Hovind seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Repel All Boarders ‖ 02:51, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss any changes you wish made to the Kent Hovind article on the article's talk page. Since I think the reversion of your edit was correct according to Wikipedia policies, I will not revert it. Good luck. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Repel All Boarders ‖ 15:31, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Jacob A. Henderson (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BenLinus1214 was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jacob A. Henderson/sandbox/User:Jacob A. Henderson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BenLinus 1214^talk 16:16, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Portrait of Kent Hovind.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Portrait of Kent Hovind.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

The permission given is incompatible with a CC BY-SA 3.0 license

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:01, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Your recent editing history at Kent Hovind shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dbrodbeck (talk) 16:16, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You realize that Hovind saying he uses scientific evidence is useless as a source, right? We need actual mainstream scientists saying that. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:25, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Jacob A. Henderson/sandbox/User:Jacob A. Henderson

A tag has been placed on User:Jacob A. Henderson/sandbox/User:Jacob A. Henderson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 16:31, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kent Hovind

The lead is a summary of the article. So long as the sources are in the main body of the article, they don't need to be repeated in the summary. Dougweller (talk) 16:37, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Your recent editing history at Kent Hovind shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:33, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:TE and WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT. If you can't tell what science is or is not, you should not be touching the article. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:37, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Jacob A. Henderson! Thank you for your contributions. I am Liz and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:45, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:57, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

You are engaged in advocacy of a fringe point of view at Kent Hovind. This is out of line with our policies. Several people have pointed out to you that Wikipedia is a reality-based project and does not reflect minority religious dogmas as fact. If you continue as you are, then you will be blocked from editing. Guy (Help!) 08:37, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob, I am also one of the people removing your links to the Kent Hovind page. Kent Hovind has never provided scientific evidence for his claims. The only evidence he has ever produced is biblical references and pseudoscience nonsense. Please consult WP:RS for what is and what is not a reliable source. PS: Youtube is not a reliable source. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 15:32, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kent Hovind. That was not merely 'fixing grammar' You are editing against consensus, STOP IT NOW. Dbrodbeck (talk) 12:25, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob to address you question, in the Ken Hovind article itself, here:Kent_Hovind#Criticism_from_creationists and here:Kent_Hovind#Criticism_from_creationists are all the claims with citations and reliable sources and there is no scientific evidence to any of his claims. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 13:49, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob, have you read ANY of the other warnings on your talk page? You are engaging in an edit war. You have been warned MULTIPLE times. If you wish to make an edit on Kent Hovind's page, you MUST discuss it on Kent Hovind's talk page BEFORE. End of story. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 13:49, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacob A. Henderson (May 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jacob A. Henderson/sandbox/Jacob A. Henderson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wia /talk 03:47, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Jacob A. Henderson, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! /wia /talk 03:47, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Portrait of Kent Hovind.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Portrait of Kent Hovind.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:10, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Portrait of Kent Hovind.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Portrait of Kent Hovind.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:21, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Jacob A. Henderson/sandbox/Jacob A. Henderson

Hello, Jacob A. Henderson. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox/Jacob A. Henderson".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:09, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kent Hovind snaphot.png

A tag has been placed on File:Kent Hovind snaphot.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 23:59, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]