User talk:JPRMFIRM

July 2024

Hello, I'm AntiDionysius. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Terri J. Vaughn have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 22:03, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I simply added that she has a business partner and I linked the website to their production company. Can you explain how it is inappropriate? JPRMFIRM (talk) 22:07, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We don't, as a rule, include direct external links in the body of Wikipedia articles. If you click on the linking guidelines above you can learn more about link policy. AntiDionysius (talk) 22:10, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am new so is there any guidance that you can offer? The way it reads, my link should be fine. JPRMFIRM (talk) 22:22, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What was your intention behind adding the link? That'll help me give you the best guidance. AntiDionysius (talk) 22:24, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To confirm that she does have a business partner and to allow readers further look into the company. JPRMFIRM (talk) 22:37, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On the former reason you're looking for a citation: a little footnote that explains where a given piece of information comes from, and which looks much nicer than a link sitting in the text. There's a guide to formatting citations on Wikipedia here.

The latter reason is probably not enough to warrant the addition of the link. As the external link guideline says:

2. With rare exceptions, external links should not be used in the body of an article. Instead, include appropriate external links in an "External links" section at the end of the article, and in the appropriate location within an infobox, if applicable.

3. Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum.

Basically, someone's side business isn't really vital enough to warrant an external link on Wikipedia. If people want to know about it, they can google it. AntiDionysius (talk) 22:42, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay so why the mention of her business partner taken out? JPRMFIRM (talk) 22:43, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay so why was the mention of her business partner taken out? JPRMFIRM (talk) 22:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because the edit was reverted, and both changes occurred in the same edit. There is a loose policy too of not including the names of non-notable (i.e. those who don't have a Wikipedia page of their own) friends, family and associates of famous people in their Wikipedia pages, but that is a flexible and context-dependent thing. AntiDionysius (talk) 22:48, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. @AntiDionysius what excatly does this mean?

No stashed content found for 1233937526/8ee62317-4a8f-11ef-977c-9b2a210f6602 JPRMFIRM (talk) 05:47, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you encounter this? AntiDionysius (talk) 12:49, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When I tried to save but I don't see it anymore. However I need help adding the references to the page. Could you help me with that? JPRMFIRM (talk) 15:48, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @AntiDionysius. I need help with my last failed attempt for the wiki page I submitted. Is it possible to hop on a call? JPRMFIRM (talk) 15:46, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi JPRMFIRM! I noticed your contributions to Terri J. Vaughn and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! AntiDionysius (talk) 22:04, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unreferenced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:JPRMFIRM/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:24, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JPRMFIRM! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:24, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]