User talk:JN Dela Cruz

References

Hi Ice bear johny, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! DMacks (talk) 16:23, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit to the Wiswesser rule article, you said you were having trouble adding references. The Wikipedia features related to referencing can definitely be confusing. What is the ref you are trying to add? DMacks (talk) 16:24, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello po :>

Hello po kuya :>! I'm sorry if I may respond eccentrically, because i don't know the tags in wikipedia, and I am just an apprentice. Btw po i edited the table according to the formula in Wiswesser's rule, but I can't seem to add a reference . (I just want to ameliorate the page, and learn to add references, for future usage lang po.). Thank you po for acquainting me to rudiments of Wikipedia! Ice bear johny (talk) 02:05, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help:Referencing for beginners. DMacks (talk) 03:27, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Albert L. Allred moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Albert L. Allred, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 23:25, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

mmm i am still a dabbler when it comes to Wikipedia; I will try to add a source next time. Thanks for informing me :>! Ice bear johny (talk) 06:56, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have submitted the page already, hope you like it :>>> Ice bear johny (talk) 07:36, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

M

Your submission at Articles for creation: Albert L. Allred has been accepted

Albert L. Allred, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 10:32, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

YAY hehehe thanks for replying and accepting it :> Ice bear johny (talk) 11:26, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Few advice on Ionization energy edits

Hi @Ice bear johny: thanks again for your edits. Allow me to give you a few advice: when citing a reference that's already been cited, please re-use that reference (Cite button>Re-use). Also, when your reference is a link to a web page, you need to add more information than just the link. Wikipedia can sometimes help you with this (Cite button>Automatic>Generate), but sometimes you need to provide page title, author, date when you accessed the page etc. Articles here are not meant to be your original research (as in: this atom has higher ionization energy than that atom because (I think) the orbital is smaller and there may be relativistic effects). The statement needs to be written as such in your sources. Your sources should be books and review articles, sometimes regular scientific articles, in rare cases online courses (make sure they have citations), but definitely not web forums (totally unreliable and will most likely be removed). Finally, avoid using "we", per MOS:WE. Thanks, Ponor (talk) 14:45, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean po by original research? I'll study the {{citation}}: Empty citation (help) template soon, but as of now I'm currently preoccupied with some things i need to take care of. Nonetheless, Imma try to improve my future edits. Oh and why I've been so slow in adding more references is because i was not able to find sufficient ones, like for lead and zirconium.

If you know why their IE is aberrant, feel free to edit my mere inferences. Really tho, I only use sites such as blogspots for ideas/corroborating sources. When I serendipitously find a much nicer source, expect me to replace it. Ice bear johny (talk) 14:59, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wait you say something about "cute reuse". How can i do that? I'm just a junior (like really really junior editor) so i dunno much about such things. Anyways thanks for your feedback! Ice bear johny (talk) 15:01, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Original research means your edits should not be your own conclusions on the subject (some are OK, if they're simple and reasonable and not mere guessing). I'm only saying all this because I don't want your work to be edited out of the article. I'll try to find some good sources myself; probably some chemistry books. I don't know how you're editing the articles, but in your Preferences you can choose Editing>Editing mode>Visual editor, then turn on some Gadgets for citations, as well as some cool Beta features. The Cite button is on top of the editor (for me), next to Paragraph drop down menu, underlined A, and Link. You can get it with Ctrl+Shift+K. When a little window pops up, you'll have three options to add a citation: Automatic, Manual, Re-use. Best wishes, Ponor (talk) 15:21, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WAIT WHAT MY EDIT CAN BE REMOVED?! BRUH-. Oh and I'm using phone, and a real bummer at that :(. Anyways, I hope imma finish writing all those edits in my notebook before they get removed. Goodnight ponor (it's nighttime here and my parents' are forcing me to sleep once again).Ice bear johny (talk) 16:10, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If edits reversed...

...all is not lost. The View history at top menu goes to chronological list of edits. For each, clicking on prev (left) show the edit. Content can be copied into your own sandbox to be saved. I have no familiarity with the topic, but it appears your tone is not encyclopedic, you are adding original research, and you are adding content with references that are not considered reliable sources. Wikipedia is reference as you write, not write first, reference later. David notMD (talk) 02:10, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Btw how can i access the sandbox? I'm using phone so no shortcuts :(. Anyways thanks! Ice bear johny (talk) 02:15, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok i fixed some of my grammar and pronouns. Some of my references are only put because no other references are there. Hmmm although i think my context of reference is wrong (it should be further reading), there are really no other refs. Ice bear johny (talk) 04:33, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ask at Teahouse how to create your Sandbox using a phone. Also, at Talk pages, add one more : at the beginning of your comment than was used for the previous comment - this indents. David notMD (talk) 11:30, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A suggestion - reach out to editors who have contributed content (not just general editing stuff) to this article in the recent past, to ask them to review and improve, especially better referencing. Ponor appears to be one such editor. David notMD (talk) 11:38, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ah yes we're kinda collaborating on that article :))). Anyways thanks for your advice! Have a nice day! Ice bear johny (talk) 11:57, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ionization energy: Diagram of Ac and Ra

Hello. In the Ionization energy article for the diagram of Ac and Ra, I think it would be more normal to place Ac to the right of Ra as in the periodic table which readers are used to seeing. However I cannot change the diagram myself as it requires software for drawing which I do not own. So may I suggest that you redraw this diagram with Ra on the left and Ac on the right? Dirac66 (talk) 19:26, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hmmm i only used inCollage, but ok imma fix it. Furthermore I wasn't able to edit much in Ionization energies because classes are now starting in the Philippines, but the main reason is i don't know the <math> symbols for the computation part; i.e even though I know the computation-s, I still cannot input them. Anyways have a good day! Ice bear johny (talk) 02:41, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it already :))) Ice bear johny (talk) 03:23, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Um, in the article I still see a figure with Ac to the left of Ra. And as for the <math> symbols, what I usually do is to find another article with a formula that has the symbols I want to insert, and then look at the source code for that other article to find a model to adapt to the article I am editing. Dirac66 (talk) 15:41, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No wait maybe it's lagging on mine or yours. Maybe wait it out, because on mine it's already a new version. Ice bear johny (talk) 16:09, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, problem fixed. It seems the Wikipedia article had the correct picture after you changed it, but my computer had kept the old version in its cache!?? So I cleared the cache with Ctrl-F5 and it is ok now. Thanks for changing the picture. Dirac66 (talk) 01:55, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jean Nicolas Jadot de Ville-Issey moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jean Nicolas Jadot de Ville-Issey, has no sources and citations and cannot therefore, as written, remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:29, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah oof alright thanks for reminding me Ice bear johny meowy123 13:52, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Ice bear johny! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Where can I ask questions for biology forum?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Apolinario Mabini

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Apolinario Mabini you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 22:40, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah thank you po hehehehehe Ice bear johny meowy123 23:02, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Apolinario Mabini

The article Apolinario Mabini you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Apolinario Mabini for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 02:21, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 9GAG

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 9GAG you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 18:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 9GAG

The article 9GAG you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:9GAG for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 06:21, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

National varieties of English

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Greta Thunberg, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 23:10, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Noted and thanks Ice bear johny meowy123 04:02, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArcticHell's userpage

Hello Ice bear johny. I was going through the work you had done on 9GAG as you had nominated it for GA review — I reviewed the nomination a few days ago — and I came across your edit on ArcticHell's userpage. Since editors should not substantially edit userpages of other editors per this, your changes may come off as vandalism and I would suggest that you undo them. I am not sure if ArcticHell and you are friends in real life (from your message on their talk page); but even if you both were, it would be inappropriate to replace someone's entire userpage content with something that very much looks like vandalism. I felt that I should discuss this with you first instead of reverting the edits myself, because you have been doing good work on Wikipedia and I believe your intent must not have been to vandalize someone's userpage. Best. — The Most Comfortable Chair 11:16, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ohhh ok ok thanks. We we're friends irl, and he doesn't like collaborating with me :'(. Anyways imma remove it. Thanks for noting me :))) Ice bear johny meowy123 11:54, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GMO

Thanks for your copy edits to Genetically modified organism. --David Tornheim (talk) 07:05, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

no problem :))) Ice bear johny (talk) 07:17, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Oxidation state

Hi Ice bear johny! I was recently looking at the list of articles for GA review for "Biology and medicine" WP:GAN#MED. I would recommend that you move the nomination to the "Chemistry and materials science" section WP:GAN#CHEM. Good luck with the review! Bibeyjj (talk) 21:47, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok thanks Ice bear johny (talk) 22:05, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Frederick George Dixon moved to draftspace

The article currently does not demonstrate how the subject meets our applicable notability guidelines. For academics, the thresholds to meet before we can have a separate article are those laid out at WP:NPROF. Please read those over and see whether you can be sure that Dixon meets one of these criteria, then integrate that material into the article and cite the sources that show this. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:25, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Empire AS ^Talk! — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2020 and tomorrow will be 2025. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2025. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Empire AS ^Talk! 19:06, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AWWWW THANK UUUUU UWUWUWUWU JN Dela Cruz (talk) 13:02, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) 😉 Empire AS ^Talk! 13:48, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Isko Moreno

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Isko Moreno you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Larry Hockett -- Larry Hockett (talk) 23:40, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Isko Moreno

The article Isko Moreno you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Isko Moreno for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Larry Hockett -- Larry Hockett (talk) 00:21, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hemiptera, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taxonomy. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Oxidation state

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Oxidation state you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Keresluna -- Keresluna (talk) 19:20, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JN Dela Cruz: Hi there, I have put the article oxidation state on hold for the GA nomination. I will wait one week for the article to be improved, if not I will decide that it is a fail. Thank you. Keresluna (talk) 23:16, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jean Nicolas Jadot de Ville-Issey

Hello, JN Dela Cruz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jean Nicolas Jadot de Ville-Issey, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Oxidation state

The article Oxidation state you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Oxidation state for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Keresluna -- Keresluna (talk) 15:21, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Anthony Frederick George Dixon

Hello, JN Dela Cruz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anthony Frederick George Dixon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:Ice bear johny/sandbox 4

The page User:Ice bear johny/sandbox 4 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Primefac (talk) 00:30, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok but pls dont delete 1 and 2 they still have content for wiki that I havent started on (classes) and notes for Geometry. Thanks 12:00, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Ok but pls dont delete 1 and 2 they still have content for wiki that I havent started on (classes) and notes for Geometry. Thanks 12:18, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User:JN Dela Cruz/sandbox 2

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page User:JN Dela Cruz/sandbox 2 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from http://kokie123.blogspot.com/2014/07/mga-sinaunang-kabihasnan.html, https://pdfcoffee.com/download/kabihasnang-indus-pdf-free.html, and https://www.slideshare.net/KenStudious/grade-7-ebolusyong-kultrural-sa-asya-metal-age. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review Primefac (talk) 15:16, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jean Nicolas Jadot de Ville-Issey

Hello, JN Dela Cruz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jean Nicolas Jadot de Ville-Issey".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:43, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]