User talk:JGBlue1509

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Jg abagat abc123, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Sreeram Dilak

09:28, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II was changed by Jg abagat abc123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.859026 on 2021-09-06T09:43:36+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:43, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Northrop Grumman E-2 Hawkeye, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 08:40, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mount Negron

The article Mount Negron has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Haven't included sufficient information and references

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Superatp 05:48, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Uncited changes

Will you please stop making uncited changes without any explanation like you did on Martin B-26 Marauder here.Nigel Ish (talk) 15:21, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Limay moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mount Limay, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 23:46, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at North American P-51 Mustang, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 06:21, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent contributions. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft of your article in draftspace or in your userspace first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. Htanaungg (talk) 09:55, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Agamomata moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mount Agamomata, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Htanaungg (talk) 09:56, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at North American FJ-2/-3 Fury, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop changing the title. on specs from one variant to another. You are obviously not reading the articles or sources, as the FJ-3 was not powered by the GE J47, but the Wright J65. Your actions are disruptive, and if you do this again, you will be reported to ANI, and probably blocked. BilCat (talk) 04:30, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

Hi Jg abagat abc123, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages! ~ GB fan 11:02, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mount Limay

Hello, Jg abagat abc123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mount Limay, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mount Agamomata

Hello, Jg abagat abc123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mount Agamomata, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mount Limay

Hello, Jg abagat abc123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mount Limay".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:46, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, I'm Blaze Wolf. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dodge Challenger, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 12:55, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Danziger Kantapfel moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Danziger Kantapfel. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:58, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Edelborsdorfer

Hello, Jg abagat abc123

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MatthewVanitas, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Edelborsdorfer, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MatthewVanitas}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

MatthewVanitas (talk) 07:05, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Danziger Kantapfel

Hello, Jg abagat abc123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Danziger Kantapfel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Danziger Kantapfel

Hello, Jg abagat abc123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Danziger Kantapfel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:21, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MyPhone myA1 Plus

Hi, your article MyPhone myA1 Plus is still promotional, even after removing the price tag. Phrases such as aimed at providing essential features at affordable prices, aimed at budget-conscious consumers who need reliable devices for everyday use and makes it a popular choice for those looking for cost-effective smartphones are all stuff that you would find in advertisements rather than neutral articles, and same for qualitative judgements like practical features, decent performance, and affordability. In this case, the solution is not to just change individual words – the whole prose should be rewritten from what independent secondary sources say about the phone. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 14:58, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll note that adding back the price is very much not an improvement. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 17:16, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]