User talk:Izudrunkizuhadenough

Welcome!

Hello, Izudrunkizuhadenough, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Gamergate controversy Wikipedia article controversy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Meters (talk) 03:15, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Gamergate controversy Wikipedia article controversy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Gamergate controversy Wikipedia article controversy. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Gamergate controversy. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Gamergate controversy – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Meters (talk) 03:15, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article I created covers part of the topic that is in it's own right very notable.--Izudrunkizuhadenough (talk) 03:18, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also the artcle you mentioned did not cover that sub-topic as much as was warranted.--Izudrunkizuhadenough (talk) 03:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you have something useful to add to the topic then add it to the existing article. Don't fork a new article. Meters (talk) 03:22, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 17 September 2016 United States attacks

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as 17 September 2016 United States attacks, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 23:35, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It appears others did not think it should be speedily deleted either given the switch to regular deletion.--Izudrunkizuhadenough (talk) 23:51, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 17 September 2016 United States attacks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 17 September 2016 United States attacks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/17 September 2016 United States attacks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. epicgenius (talk) 23:41, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Seeker Daily YouTube comments

Hello Izudrunkizuhadenough,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Seeker Daily YouTube comments for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 23:56, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, I'm Parsley Man. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 15 October 2011 global protests have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Parsley Man (talk) 03:26, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

VEGETTA777

It's not a Wikipedia page. Please write one or the text will be deleted.Xx236 (talk) 06:35, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of VEGETTA777

Hello Izudrunkizuhadenough,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged VEGETTA777 for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Cotton2 (talk) 06:40, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Delete this article

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello. A tag has been placed on Delete this article requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 07:28, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are you testing this Wikipedia?

Have you done one constructive edit? Xx236 (talk) 08:40, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Most of my edits. Schoolchildren will learn valuable things from my input someday.--Izudrunkizuhadenough (talk) 08:44, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

They will learn how to not edit?Xx236 (talk) 08:48, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's not funny. I edit well. I mean they will learn information from my edits. --Izudrunkizuhadenough (talk) 09:36, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bevilacqua family

A tag has been placed on Bevilacqua family requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Catholic Cardinals are unmarried by definition. A family of is patent nonsense

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kleuske (talk) 10:37, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Simple rules

We start a page, we write, we finish writing.

You create subsubstubs contaning one phrase, unsourced.

We are here to create pages or to make existing pages better. You have created one page 2016 East Carolina Pirates women's soccer team with This article or section is in the process of an expansion or major restructuring. Now you don't extend it but create Café Spice Namasté or Bevilacqua family, a typical East Carolina subjects.Xx236 (talk) 10:56, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Megan Conte lacks basic biographical data. Please start from the beginning. Xx236 (talk) 10:59, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean start from the beginning?--Izudrunkizuhadenough (talk) 11:10, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Beginning of a human being is in my opinion a date and place of birth. You don't quote her nationality.

If you write biographies, please read Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography.Xx236 (talk) 05:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jayda Hylton-Pelaia

Hello Izudrunkizuhadenough,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jayda Hylton-Pelaia for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 12:54, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did with this edit to Jayda Hylton-Pelaia. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 13:07, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jayda Hylton-Pelaia, you may be blocked from editing. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 13:07, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you wrote it was distruptive. --Izudrunkizuhadenough (talk) 13:10, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jayda Hylton-Pelaia. Stop wasting our time. Don't create any more junk articles, and don't think that logging out to remove a speedy is going to work. Meters (talk) 17:08, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If they are high quality how could they be junk? That makes no sense. Also, what makes you think I was the one who removed the speedy deletion tag? Don't even go there. Your arrogance is rude. --Izudrunkizuhadenough (talk) 17:45, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think the IP is you because an IP that has never before made a single edit to Wikipedia showed up and incorrectly removed the speedy nomination from one of your articles shortly after you were reverted and warned for edits to it. If you like we can take this to WP:SPI and let an admin decide. As for why I called your articles junk, well, perhaps you should ask the many editors who have nominated your various articles for speedy deletion (or for deletion of the only one to reach AFD). Or you could ask user:Xx236 , the other editor who has commented on this page about the lack of content in many of your articles. Meters (talk) 18:27, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Megan Conte

The article Megan Conte has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable. Playing on a university team is not notable, being the first non-American to score for a particular college team is not notable (and the cited source does not support this), having played one international senior and one international junior game is not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Meters (talk) 18:36, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Megan Conte for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Megan Conte is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megan Conte until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Meters (talk) 01:34, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of C'mon Bill, let's go!

The article C'mon Bill, let's go! has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEWS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GAB^gab 02:57, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Luke Barth

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Daniel Luke Barth, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GAB^gab 02:57, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Luke Barth

Hello Izudrunkizuhadenough,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Daniel Luke Barth for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 02:57, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I do not plan on recreating it, but if you looked into the history, you will see it was not a hoax. It really did receive about 1.4 million views in a single day. See http://stats.grok.se/en/201304/Daniel%20Luke%20Barth --Izudrunkizuhadenough (talk) 03:08, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2016 East Carolina Pirates women's soccer team

The article 2016 East Carolina Pirates women's soccer team has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Currently completely uncited BLP problem, but even if cited, unencyclopediac single-season college sports-team roster.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DMacks (talk) 03:08, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are articles about the current seasons of the same school's football and basketball teams.--Izudrunkizuhadenough (talk) 03:12, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Café Spice Namasté

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Café Spice Namasté requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DMacks (talk) 03:09, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Black Lives Matter protests at colleges and universities

The article Black Lives Matter protests at colleges and universities has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uncited and non-notable collection or subcollection.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DMacks (talk) 21:35, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Black Lives Matter protests at colleges and universities for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Black Lives Matter protests at colleges and universities is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Lives Matter protests at colleges and universities until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WWGB (talk) 04:44, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2016 East Carolina University protests

The article 2016 East Carolina University protests has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEWS. Few-day-old event or two does not make a unified topic as a whole even if any of the events were notable, and making only the local news within a day or two doesn't seem strong enough even for that.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DMacks (talk) 05:00, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2016 East Carolina University protests

The article 2016 East Carolina University protests has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No notability established

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:58, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2016 East Carolina University protests for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2016 East Carolina University protests is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 East Carolina University protests until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DMacks (talk) 06:20, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]