User talk:Ivebeenhacked/Archive 2024

This is Ivebeenhacked's talk page of 2024

Edits shouldn't be made on this page. Thanks!

■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■

AfC notification: Draft:Air India Flight 829 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Air India Flight 829. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:53, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Air India Flight 829 (April 7)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Sohom Datta was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia is not news. A aviation incident that was forgotten relatively quickly does not meet the barrier for being included in the encyclopedia.

Sohom (talk) 21:06, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sohom (talk) 21:06, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An Invite to join Aviation WikiProject

Hi, you are cordially invited to join the Aviation WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to aviation. This includes aircraft, airports, airlines and other topics.

We look forward to welcoming you to the project!

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 13:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Added name! CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine (talk) 18:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Happy editing! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 00:08, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello, I'm User:Skip6546. An edit you recently made to East Coast Jets Flight 81 seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. User:Skip6546 (talk) 12:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wait... why does "your talk page" link to this page? '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 05:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

but why no Censored messages? Skip6546 (talk) 05:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTCENSORED. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 05:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

but why not do you without censored? Skip6546 (talk) 05:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you clarify what you're trying to say? '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 06:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You see, in this Wikipedia page, WP:NOTCENSORED, the name and the article clarify that usually articles shouldn't be censored. I've even asked people on the Wikipedia:Teahouse and all of them said the same thing. CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine (talk) 16:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no I'm going to report called disruptive editing Skip6546 (talk) 23:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're gonna report me for doing something correctly? CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine (talk) 20:12, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i said everyone I can stupid user I'm going to report! Skip6546 (talk) 02:26, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You do you. CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine (talk) 13:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit on Airbus A330

Hello there, I saw your message on my talk page. The edit you reverted was not a test, it was a correction based on the final report on the accident (check page 2, or 7 in the pdf), which only says there were 6 causalities on the ground. I applied this correction to as many other articles as I could find as well. ThatFlyingSquid (talk) 16:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that revert. I was looking at the wrong sources. CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine (talk) 17:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why'd you remove the (initially X) notations from Air Florida flight 90's infobox?

My understanding is that it is common practice across multiple plane crash-related articles to use such notations where the mortality and injury counts change after the crash. Removing them could be disruptive editing. Ellenor2000 (talk) 20:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How quickly people die doesn't change the ultimate number of people dying. It doesn't change history does it? Therefore, its redundant stating the "initially X" notations. It says all of this in here, "to summarize" info. CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine (talk) 13:08, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Nairobi Mid-Air Collision

Hey, just wanted to say that because I now know that I (you too), are in violation of WP:RR3, I will not be reverting until tomorrow. Fadedreality556 (talk) 15:27, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dude I literally have more evidence than you and I proved it. You have an unreliable preliminary report site. Just stop your edits dude. CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine (talk) 15:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Correction, aircraft info on a preliminary report isn't unreliable. Also no. Fadedreality556 (talk) 14:20, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. v/r - Seawolf35 ^T--C 15:42, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User talk:76.171.193.254 has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. GSK (talk • edits) 06:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'll do better! CreatorMH (talk) 06:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:CreatorOfMinecraftHerobrine reported by User:Seawolf35 (Result: ). Thank you. v/r - Seawolf35 ^T--C 15:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 18:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Singapore flight

The accident was due to turbulences but the 6000 ft loss happened 15 minutes later and was a normal descent Df (talk) 02:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:N767BA has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:N767BA. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:11, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: N767BA has been accepted

N767BA, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:11, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, sir! CreatorMH (talk) 16:05, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox policing

You might want to create your own sandbox in your own userspace so you can avoid edit summaries like these [1] [2]. Just a thought. GSK (talk • edits) 06:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! I'm a slow learner. CreatorMH (talk) 06:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited American Airlines Flight 331, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingston. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

EasyJet

added a link pointing to Hijacked

Pan Am Flight 799

added a link pointing to Khánh Hòa

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:09, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1987 Egyptair Airbus A300 crash (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Article is only cited to databases. Please add some secondary sources that go into detail and resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1987 Egyptair Airbus A300 crash and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 23:26, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of EasyJet Flight 6074 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EasyJet Flight 6074, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EasyJet Flight 6074 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Use infobox plane1

@Aviationwikiflight@Midori No Sora@Ivebeenhacked@Maungapohatu Should we use infobox plane1 on articles with one aircraft as US Airways Flight 1549 or American Airlines Flight 77 ? I think use plane1 then the image will be in a more visible position. Tô Ngọc Khang (talk) 14:41, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I agree with this. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 16:05, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought, Template:Infobox aircraft occurrence is against this. We could only use plane1 if more than one aircraft is involved. Let's see what others say. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 16:08, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:List of accidents and incidents involving the Boeing 777 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:List of accidents and incidents involving the Boeing 777. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:42, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of accidents and incidents involving the Boeing 777 (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CSMention269 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

asn.flightsafety.org has been used multiple times as only source for each case. Kindly get reliable sources with in-depth coverage for each case. Regarding on the topic issue, it needs to be discussed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of accidents and incidents involving the Boeing 777 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 11:02, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just Asking(Don't Mind)

Can you please name your favourite(fav) aircraft and fav airline? BuddyHeigh (talk) 14:42, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Favorite aircraft is the Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner and favorite airline is Qatar Airways. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 14:46, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You must have seen all-time fav aircraft being the Boeing 747. Since I was a child, I had fascination in the aircraft. I first flew in it with Air India in 1986. After that, I flew in it at least 5-6 times. And the most recent one was in 2022, when I rode with Lufthansa, and their blend of classic seating and modernized seating made it my fav airline. BuddyHeigh (talk) 18:39, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the Boeing 747 (Boeing 747-800 specifically) is my Top Five favorite aircraft. The 747 really is incredible. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 18:46, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I remember the Maharaja grand interiors inside the jumbo. Additionally, I got a spot for t-tails like the Boeing 717 and McDonnell Douglas MD-80 Series. For regional flyers, I'll go for the Cessna 208B Caravan. From good ol' Boeing, I have the spot for the 747, 767 and 777. Fokkers like Friend and Fellowship also hold a place. From Airbus, the A300, 320-200s,330neo and the 380 are my favourites.The British Concorde is unforgettable. Lockheeds like L-1011 TriStars and L-188 Electras are in my list. I also like McDonnell Douglas' DC-9, DC-10-30, MD-11, MD-80 Series and MD-90 Series. I also have a like for Russo-Soviet aircraft like Ilyushin Il-62 and Il-96, Tupelov Tu-134, Tu-154, Tu-204 and Tu-214 and Yakovlev Yak-42, Yak-82 and MC-21. BuddyHeigh (talk) 14:11, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Those are all amazing and unforgettable aircraft you've named there. Basically named Aviation History since the 70s and I like it. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 14:20, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to 1966 Palomares B-52 crash, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 23:16, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2024 Kamchatka Mil Mi-8 crash

On 6 September 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 Kamchatka Mil Mi-8 crash, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 01:53, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. This means a lot to me. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 02:48, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2000 Tehran ruway disaster

Hi @Ivebeenhacked. Thank you for created useful articles. And if possible, can you create "2000 Tehran ruway disaster" ( A collision between Iran Air Force C-130 and Iran Air A300, all 8 people on C-130 died ). Tô Ngọc Khang (talk) 08:37, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tô Ngọc Khang. I was thinking of that disaster but there is a serious lack of citations. I might consider creating it but I need time thinking about it. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 08:48, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tô Ngọc Khang. If you want, you should create a draft about it called the "2000 Tehran airport disaster" since the collision didn't take place on the runway and I might help you. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 08:49, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tô Ngọc Khang. 2000 Tehran airport disaster. You should've created a draft by using WP:Article Wizard. It would've been much simpler to edit and submit the page to the live feed. You already put the page on live. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 09:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:2000_Tehran_airport_disaster

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:USAir_Flight_499 Tô Ngọc Khang (talk) 09:50, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Air India Flight 127

There is a source that the plane had been owned by Korean Air and was leased to Air India. I am adding the link for your reference as this can be used as a citation.^[1]. Refer this one as well - https://www.airhistory.net/photo/410130/VT-EVJ. Nuts5070 (talk) 18:53, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't use airfleets.net. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 19:37, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "Boeing 747 MSN 24199".

Aircraft involved in the accident when still in service with previous operator

Hi @Ivebeenhacked. I think we should use accident aircraft photo in service with previous operator (if we don't have photo of aircraft with current operator) on infobox and put similar aircraft photo is below. In my opinion, anyway photo of accident aircraft is still better. Tô Ngọc Khang (talk) 14:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tô Ngọc Khang. It really makes no difference. Also, remove that watermark from the image of the accident aircraft. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 14:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aircraft involved in the accident with a previous livery

Hi @Ivebeenhacked. Should we use the photo of accident aircraft with previous livery (if we don't have photo with current livery) on infobox ? Tô Ngọc Khang (talk) 06:25, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tô Ngọc Khang. If we don't have a photo of the accident aircraft with the current livery, it is better to display and aircraft similar looking to the one involved with the same livery (imo). We could place the aircraft's previous lives photo at the bottom of the infobox. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 19:10, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For me, I will do the opposite. Anyway photo of the accident aircraft should be given more priority or no need to add. This is similar to aircraft involved in the accident while serving other airlines. I think we should hear opinition from others people.

@Aviationwikiflight@Dual Freq@Maungapohatu What do you think ? Tô Ngọc Khang (talk) 22:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:N954VJ McDonnell Douglas DC-9-32, New York La Guardia.jpg

Hi @Ivebeenhacked. Can you help me to correct information from DC-9-32 to DC-9-31 ? I made a mistake while uploading photos to Commons. Tô Ngọc Khang (talk) 10:27, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really know how Commons works and I'm pretty sure I need 500+ edits to be able to move pages in Commons, similar to English Wikipedia. I might be wrong about that or I just don't know how to move pages/photos in Commons. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 13:28, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay ! Thank you ! Tô Ngọc Khang (talk) 14:17, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Leave me alone JKSX (talk) 17:33, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are disrupting Wikipedia. Please stop. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 17:39, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not. JKSX (talk) 17:53, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There was absolutely no need to change the word "accident" to "crash". Both occurrences were accidents. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 17:54, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You've already been explained twice by me and you kept reverting the edit. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 17:54, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But leave me alone and stop reverting my edits JKSX (talk) 18:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, there was absolutely no need to change the word "accident" without good reasoning. That's called disruptive editing. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 18:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, that's not. JKSX (talk) 18:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How is it not? Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 18:08, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because JKSX (talk) 18:17, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Look, the only thing I gotta say is that you are disrupting Wikipedia. Please stop Edit warring. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 18:40, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not. JKSX (talk) 19:41, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you. fanfanboy (block) 19:52, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note that I've blocked both JMSNXYZ and JKSX as Confirmed socks.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:45, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not even surprised. It was so obvious they were socks. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 19:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

N708PA

Hi @Ivebeenhacked. I know you created some articles of prototpye aircraft, as B-HNL, N767BA... If so, can you create N708PA article (the prototype of Boeing 707) ? Thank you ! Tô Ngọc Khang (talk) 06:40, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tô Ngọc Khang. I'll see if I get the time. I'll first have to look for the sources. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 13:24, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tô Ngọc Khang. Hello there. I don't think I'm gonna make an article for N708PA. I can't really find reliable sources. I could make an article for N757A, the first Boeing 757 produced. If you can find reliable sources for N708PA and share them with me, then I might do it. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 17:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JMSNXYZ (talk) 16:29, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JMSNXYZ. Hello there. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 17:17, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nigeria Airways Flight 825

Hi @Ivebeenhacked. I think we should use the BOAC photo on infobox and remove the photo of similar aircraft. I found a photo of 5N-ABD on internet and it has a different livery. See https://www.vc10.net/Airframes/Images/5N-ABD_LHR_outsideTBA.jpg. I also don't found any photo of VC10 with same livery on Commons. So current photo on infobox also don't show that the aircraft look like when it was crashed. Tô Ngọc Khang (talk) 05:24, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay do it. Remove that Nigeria Airways photo and explain your claim. If someone reverts your edit and then instead of reverting back, go to the talk page and explain your claim and evidence. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 02:45, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ilyushin Il-76

Previous to your addition, I added the shoot-down of the Ilyushin Il-76 to the Ilyushin Il-76#Operational history section here. I didn't read the whole page and missed the Ilyushin Il-76#2020s section. There are two sections with mentions of accidents. Should there be two sections mentioning identical incidents? Cheers Adakiko (talk) 18:53, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Adakiko. It looks like the two sections mention the same accidents in the exact order. However, accident/incident events should be mentioned in the #Accidents and incidents section, not in the #Operational History section. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 19:47, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge between List of Air India Express destinations and Air India Express

I have proposed a merge for the article List of Air India Express destinations to be merged into the article Air India Express, you may feel free to join the discussion at either Talk:List of Air India Express destinations#Merge proposal into Air India Express or Talk:Air India Express#Merge proposal with List of Air India Express destinations Metrosfan (talk) 13:11, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of accidents and incidents involving the Boeing 777 (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TarnishedPath was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Given that this is a list it must meet WP:NLIST. That is the article needs multiple reliable sources which discuss 'accidents and incidents involving the Boeing 777' as a class.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of accidents and incidents involving the Boeing 777 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TarnishedPath^talk 15:47, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "Boeing 747 MSN 24199".

[1]