User talk:Italiano111

Test

Italiano111 (talk) 09:20, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Same interest ?

Are you also interested in European Union matters ? Seniorfox (talk) 15:30, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgaria article

The version you posted appears with image interference from different-sized screens to me - both from IE and Google Chrome. The fortress image in the History section creates a huge text gap. The image layout is a recommendation, not a strict standard to be kept, and the current one puts more strain on one side of the page. And one more thing - European Union maps, flags and the like are totally uninformative as images. The photos that were picked up before your edits were each responding to a specific subsection. Given these circumstances, I will revert the edits you made once more, as the current arrangement of images renders the structure of the page more chaotic. - ☣Tourbillon ^A ? 08:24, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you posting here ? I made a note at the talk page. Italiano111 (talk) 23:08, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File talk:Rometreaty.jpg#License

I've replied there... J Milburn (talk) 22:52, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If we can get some confirmation that this is free, that's great, but until then it can only be used in compliance with the NFCC. If you are convinced that it is free, could you please update the image page? By this, I do not mean just adding a PD tag, I mean replacing the non-free tag with a PD tag, and replacing the rationale with Template:Information, being sure to include a careful explanation of, and evidence for, the PD status of the image. J Milburn (talk) 23:04, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I´m not the one responsible for the Italy license tag ! It has not been added by me. Italiano111 (talk) 19:01, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

United Kingdom

Can you explain what you mean please at United Kingdom in your edit comment "As per Wikipedia:WikiProject Countries and as per Main article "Politics of the United Kingdom" when you keep shortening the section title "Government and Politics" to "Politics" - this doesn't seem to mean anything. Thanks. Jamesinderbyshire (talk) 12:06, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stop editing without explanations as you just did at United Kingdom. You need to go to the talk page and discuss. Jamesinderbyshire (talk) 19:18, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What do mean ? Every edit has its rationale and is well explained. It is rather obvious that the edits are following just MOS recommendations. What is your problem ? Italiano111 (talk) 19:46, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ciao

next time you will be refered.Grazie. Greco22 (talk) 14:48, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ciao why do you delete the gallery section? you dont like it? Greco22 (talk) 16:35, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article is long enough and already presents sufficient photomaterial. BTW, the pics are due to the gallery format very small. Most of the pics have similar quality than others which are already in place in the sections. As far I can see, no other country articles of higher quality has a gallery. So in order to elevate the quality it is better to have the gallery removed. Hope you understand. Italiano111 (talk) 16:47, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I dont agree with you. In the gallery are represented places and sites of Greece which are not represented in the main section

It was not me who created the gallery section (but its a common practice in many articles as you can see), but I decorated it and it is not kind to remove it cause simply you dont agree with it

So i think it would be better to leave editors from Greece, who know better than you the "Greek" subjects, to edit the article. Or you can try to improve the article if you think so, but with not removing anything that you dont like

Greco22 (talk) 16:58, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Recommend that both of you relax and forget about this article before somebody comes along and blocks both of you. Think of all the useful edits you could be making instead. Trouble is that if either of you is blocked it is automatic that both of you will. Read Wikipedia:MASTADONS. When you can't agree with anybody discuss any issues that you have on the talk page of the article and let others take the decision on the article. Nipsonanomhmata (talk) 17:10, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nipsonanomhmata, as far I see it the case is clear. There is a proposal for change on the talk page concerning the gallery issue. It has been repeated without an answer, so there is "officially" consensus. Every edits which are intended to reinstall the gallery can (don´t take this as a direct offense) be regarded as positive vandalism. In the future, if there are serious arguments for the gallery, please add comments on the Greece talk page. ´Italiano111 (talk) 17:22, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My personal opinion is this. Although galleries are beautiful. They are heavy in kbytes. The images can be deployed across relevant articles i.e. it isn't necessary to have galleries on articles on wikipedia.org (although that might be different on wikimedia.org). I note that Greco22 is media oriented and probably has done some work on the images. Give him more time to respond with arguments on the article's talkpage. No offense taken. Am just trying to help you both avoid being blocked. Nipsonanomhmata (talk) 17:33, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Country articles

While I share your desire to standardise country articles into a basic format, changing the guideline and then going around changing country articles per your change to the guideline (including Featured articles) is not the way to go about it. I've opened an RfC on the subject at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countries/Templates, please post your opinion! If this garners a solution, hopefully we'll be able to get a basic format based on current countries that made it to FA! Chipmunkdavis (talk) 12:04, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will respond on the WikiProject page. Italiano111 (talk) 19:01, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion would be appreciated

As a member of WikiProject Countries, I'm seeking your opinion on a possible issue identified at List of sovereign states. If you have some spare moments, please contribute a comment at the Discussion of criteria. Best regards, Nightw 05:05, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Belgium

Dear Italiano, could you please comment at the Belgium FAR (WP:Featured article review/Belgium/archive3) the new sections I have added to Belgium : Transport (a paragraph within Economy), Health and Military. Thanks. Vb 89.0.172.249 (talk) 19:18, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

India FAR

Hi there, The history section expansion of India in response to FAR comments is now complete. All remaining issues have been addressed. Please weigh in at FARC. Regards, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 20:29, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 26 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Germany page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:38, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Germany

would you please stop auntieruth (talk) 17:50, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Germany (2)

Hello Italiano111, please go ahead editing - I'll do the ref cleanup another time ;). You just have to fix the overwritten number of missions and cite for it. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 14:36, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done it. Italiano111 (talk) 14:36, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Germany (3)

Hello, I can see that you have a tendency to make a large number of edits on the Germany page and then simply leave the comment "trim." That is not sufficient when you make the number of changes that you do. Please try to make small changes to the page and save each of your edits as most other editors do. Just to mention one example: you removed a chart of ages for German citizens and put a picture of the German woman volleyball team under the demographics section. When you make a change like that after someone else has provided a logical rationale for incorporating the chart you need to explain why you feel it is better to have a picture which does not reflect the text on the page in that place. Please try to be constructive and cooperative.Monopoly31121993 (talk) 21:49, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, I see that you are still deleting thousands of characters without any explanation of what you are doing. That's not helpful for improving the quality of the page. One strategy that will help other editors understand what you are doing is to take things one edit at a time and explain your edits as you move along. Please let me know if you would like some help or advice.Monopoly31121993 (talk) 16:27, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well this is the third time I'm asking you on your talk page to not simply write "trim" and then make a whole variety of edits to the Germany page. I've also asked you to do this on the page's comments section so please change your editing behavior so we can improve the page.Monopoly31121993 (talk) 18:12, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you ? According to your edit history you have hardly any expertise in the Germany/country matter. You are not in the position to ask for anything. I did most of the rationale in the Germany Talk page in advance. Unlike you. Italiano111 (talk) 19:33, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, I've asked you very politely now multiple times to edit in a way that allows other users to understand what you are doing and why. If you don't want to explain your edits and conduct editing in a way that other editors can understand then it will be difficult for you to help contribute to editing the Germany page or anything else on Wikipedia. Wikipedia editing requires communication and simply changing large parts of the page and leaving the explaination "trim" is not helpful to other editors and doesn't help us improve these pages. Over the past 11 days I have offered to help you and asked you to change your editing to constructive style again and again. I'm not sure what else I can offer to help you.Monopoly31121993 (talk) 20:59, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have put most of the rationale to the discussion page although I´m not the one who typically obliged to. You never showed up there. Please stop pretending to help. Italiano111 (talk) 16:54, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Economy of Spain may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:15, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automotive images in the Economy section of Germany

Sorry but the inventiveness of German automobiles isn't necessarily related to its performance of exportation. Besides, it's unfair to, in your term, "advertise" Audi alone there. It's a fact that all the four manufacturers are among the best-selling and most recognized automotive brands as supported by the reference. ^{In dialogue with} Biomedicinal 17:00, 13 August 2015‎

I completely removed that image for the reason of "advertisement" and the irrelevance between exportation and innovation. I read your previous edit summary of changing to "a more representative economy image" but I personally don't think there's a "more representative image"; instead, people can keep changing it to their favorite models. So, it'll be better to remove it. ^{In dialogue with} Biomedicinal 17:26, 13 August 2015‎

You removed a significant longstanding image from the Economy part. This image of an automobile (or variations of it) represents the export and machinery tradition of the country. According to the edit history this image has not been questioned for years. The repeated removal of vital content in an FA rated article can be considered vandalism. If anything, you have to make your case at the discussion page first. This has not happened either. Italiano111 (talk) 15:18, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

However, this image had not been the one you changed to since at least August 2014. I changed it back for further discussion. Moreover, someone removed two images of German police cars without discussion before and I can't think of a good reason why he/she could do so. ^{In dialogue with} Biomedicinal 07:07, 15 August 2015

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Germany, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lion Man. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Serneholt

If you want to, please help by improving this weeks TAFI article Marie Serneholt. Any help is appreciated.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:38, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Italiano111. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Italiano111. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]