User talk:Biomedicinal

Welcome!

Hello, Biomedicinal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Tag2556 (talk) 13:57, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Sign up for the WikiCup 2014 (sign up here, it will be fun. We can help each other. And would you like to review the Many-banded krait article, which I nominated for GA status. It is nowhere near GA status, but when I'm done with it, it'll be a much expanded article. By the way, Black mamba has become a GA article. I plan going for FA when I have more time. --DendroNaja (talk) 00:56, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and congratulation! Your contribution is recognized! Biomedicinal

Thanks! If you want to review my nomination for GA status of the many-banded krait, just go [here. I think I saw it listed at #13. Click review this article. --DendroNaja (talk) 03:22, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	Thanks for your great work on university articles. -down load 05:17, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Signatures

Please sign your Talk page contributions and include (a) date and time and (b) a link to your User page. This can provide some help if you've modified your signature and need to edit it further to comply with our guidelines about signatures. ElKevbo (talk) 14:51, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia and Wikiproject Medicine

Hello, Biomedicinal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Quick introduction to Wikipedia
How to write a great article
Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia, an essay from PLOS Computational Biology
Identifying reliable sources for medicine-related articles (general advice)
Wikipedia's Manual of Style for medicine-related articles (general style guide)
A few tricks to help you format references are at WP:MEDHOW

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, try Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then type {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page.

If you are interested in medicine-related themes, you may want to visit the Medicine Portal.
If you are interested in improving medicine-related articles, you may want to join WikiProject Medicine (sign up here or say hello here).

Again, welcome! Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 16:32, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia medical articles have a specific style as discussed at WP:MEDMOS Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 16:32, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We also tend to present the lead in the same order as the body of the text. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 17:16, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania

Hey there, I saw that you edited Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania and had removed "the" from the name. However, it's not just part of the name to be grammatically correct but also part of the official name. The official names are:

Raymond and Ruth Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
Perelman School of Medicine

DMacks has since fixed the name for you. Thank you, $The Haz talk$ 02:44, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Engineering. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 17:10, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

McGill University Page

Hey! I've noticed you've been quite active on the McGill page. In particular you've been editing two things in the introduction of the article:

1. The per student endowment of McGill university. I find this to be an unnecessary and overly specific piece of detail to put in the introduction. Not to mention the statement is in fact present in two different parts of the article (it's also mentioned in the Finances sub-section). Also, the statement is actually a grammatical oddity as there is a general rule in English grammar that you always follow a comma with the subject being talked about. For instance "Strong and brave, everyone liked Michael" is a wrong construction because the subject of the sentence (Michael) does not follow the comma. Similarly in the sentence "Valued at $36,711 per student, the University maintains one of the largest endowments among Canadian universities on a per-student basis", the subject of the sentence (the university's endowment) does not follow the comma, hence is a grammatical mistake. I think this statement needs to be immediately removed from the introduction.

2. I've noticed you undid my addition of rankings and a note of McGill's reputation from the lead citing a lack of citations and verifiability. McGill has been ranked number 1 in Canada for the last 10 years by MacLean's rankings. It's also maintained a Top 25 and Top 40 position in QS and Times WU Rankings. It has also received high employer reputation and technology ratings from The Globe and Mail and it's business school has been ranked 11th among non-US B-schools. All these have been backed up by relevant citations in the Rankings and Reputations sub section of the article. I believe all this qualifies McGill as a fairly prestigious university both in Canada and the world and deserving at least a one-line mention in the intro. This one-line mention about McGill's reputation could be backed by one or two citations (preferably QS and MacLean's rankings). Anyone wishing to look into greater detail about McGill's reputation and the validity of the claim can always look through the rankings and reputation sub-section and its abundance of references and links

Regards

Upapilot (talk)

Hmm.. I agree with your point that "prestigious" and "reputable" are rather vague terms. Alternatively, how about including a line stating that McGill has been consistently ranked among the best univs in Canada (rank 1 to 3) and one of the top 70 colleges in the world by different ranking agencies. This gives a rough outline about McGill's position in the domestic and global stage without being overly-biased towards one particular rank or making grandiose claims. -^{In dialogue with} Upapilot 09:04, 26 May 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Biomedicinal. You have new messages at Urbanoc's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Urbanoc (talk) 20:50, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

please help translate this message into the local language

The Cure Award

In 2015 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs, and we would love to collaborate further.

Thanks again :) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 03:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:32, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Biomedicinal. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Biomedicinal. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sulfuric acid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burns (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

West Africa Ebola virus epidemic

Hi this is to inform you that West African Ebola virus epidemic which you edited will be submitted for WikiJournal of Medicine...The objective of this message is to invite the contributors to collaboratively submit the article for review through Wiki.J.Med, and if possible, to help in further betterment of the article in accordance to the suggestions of the reviewers. Wikipedia articles are collaboratively authored. So, it is very important to make the authors aware of such a process that the article is currently undergoing[1] thanks--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:22, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Biomedicinal. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CUHK Medical Faculty Emblem.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CUHK Medical Faculty Emblem.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]