User talk:Iqbal Ghori (P)

Welcome!

Hello, Iqbal Ghori (P), and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Iqbal Ghori (P)/Professional Career, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Sunmist3 (talk) 05:31, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Iqbal Ghori (P)/Professional Career

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Iqbal Ghori (P)/Professional Career requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.icmap.com.pk/president.aspx. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sunmist3 (talk) 05:31, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mohammad Iqbal Ghori (President ICMAP), where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Gestrid (talk) 07:22, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Mohammad Iqbal Ghori (President ICMAP) (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NeilN ^{talk to me} 08:17, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iqbal Ghori (P) (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i want to unblock my this account because now i know how to create an article on Wikipedia Iqbal Ghori (P) (talk) 10:54 am, Today (UTC+2)

Decline reason:

You are blocked for WP:SOCKPUPPETRY, but you do not even mention that in this request. You have to show me that you understand the reason for block, which you did not even try. And, we don't unblock sockpuppets. Log in to your main account (User:Mohammad Iqbal Ghori (President ICMAP)) to request unblock. Vanjagenije (talk) 16:08, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS Account Request

I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool. Iqbal Ghori (P) (talk)

Only vetted people get access to UTRS. There is a way for blocked users with their talk page access turned off to send a request to UTRS to unblock their account, which someone with vetted access would review. They would then decide whether or not to unblock the account. However, since you can still edit your own talk page, the best way to request an unblock would be to use the {{unblock}} template. Unfortunately, you appear to be a sockpuppet of another account and won't be unblocked here. You must request an unblock at your main account. You should also know that you can request an unblock as many times as needed, provided no one turns off your talk page access (at which point you would then use UTRS). -- Gestrid (talk) 16:19, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

is my problem is solved? now am i able to edit in my Wikipedia account? Iqbal Ghori (P) (talk) 04:33, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No. Look directly above this post. The reason your account is still block is listed there in the large tan box. -- Gestrid (talk) 04:36, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

i want to unblock my this account what can i do now?? can u please guide me?

Iqbal Ghori (P) (talk) 04:43, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, just follow the instructions given in the above box. Login to your other account on Wikipedia (the one you named "Mohammad Iqbal Ghori (President ICMAP)") and ask them to unblock you there. Be sure to give them a good reason to unblock them. An example of a bad reason is "Please unblock me so I can edit Wikipedia." To request an unblock, copy and paste {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} and replace "Your reason here" with the reason you believe you should be unblocked.

Your other account was blocked for violating our copyright policy, so you would have to convince the administrator that reviews your unblock request that you now understand why you were blocked. Before you ask me to unblock you, don't. I'm not an administrator, so I can't unblock you. -- Gestrid (talk) 04:56, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

my this account is blocked only for the reason of having same IP address on Mohammad Iqbal Ghori (president) and this account? that's why it is necessary to unblock Mohammad Iqbal Ghori (President)?

Iqbal Ghori (P) (talk) 05:04, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, the reason is because this account seems to be run by the exact same person. -- Gestrid (talk) 05:18, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iqbal Ghori (P) (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please unblock me so that it is edit on Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iqbal Ghori (P) (talk • contribs) 05:15, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This sock account is not getting unblocked, and there is no need for you to be able to edit this page any longer, so I have revoked that ability. Stick to your original account only. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:08, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ok ok i can add a unblock request on my both account's talk page. is it enough for requesting to unblock me? does an administrator consider it?

Iqbal Ghori (P) (talk) 05:25, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

They'll consider the one on your original account as long as you convince them that you realize why you were blocked in the first place. The reason, according to the administrator who blocked you, is because you violated our copyright policy. Details on violating that policy can be found here. -- Gestrid (talk) 05:31, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

now i know that in Wikipedia copyright is not allowed irrespective if it is our own work or not . now how i can convince the administrator to unblock my this account? i already edit an unblock request. is there any other procedure to do a request for unblocking??

Iqbal Ghori (P) (talk) 05:46, 29 July 2016 (UTC) I'll ask the reviewing administrator to look at this page, where you have said that you now understand. -- Gestrid (talk) 05:52, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]