Jump to content

User talk:InverseHypercube/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4

Please filI out our brief Teahouse survey

Teahouse logo
Teahouse logo

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback!

We have created a brief survey intended to help us understand the experiences and impressions of veteran editors who have participated on the Teahouse. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages some time during the last few months.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 15 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host

This message was sent via Global message delivery on 01:13, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Minor barnstar
For making Crime In South Africa less emotional. Nic Roets (talk) 08:33, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Thank you! Much appreciated. InverseHypercube (talk) 08:40, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
  • I noted that you removed a notability tag from this article, but the same editor who templated it then nominated the article for deletion, apparently with no notice to you. Cheers.--Milowenthasspoken 16:35, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Wanna organize your user page?

Wanna organize your user page? I can show you how. Tonymax469 (talk) 03:58, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the offer, but I like it as it is. InverseHypercube (talk) 04:02, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Abdelaziz Thâalbi

Yngvadottir (talk) 00:03, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

The article Genome diversity and karyotype evolution of mammals has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Although I started this article, I now wonder whether it's in scope. It is copied from an open access journal, but I fear it may be too specialized and current to be in an encyclopedia. I worry that its technicality will not allow it to be updated, and that it will quickly become outdated as new research emerges.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. InverseHypercube (talk) 20:42, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Genome diversity and karyotype evolution of mammals is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genome diversity and karyotype evolution of mammals until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. InverseHypercube (talk) 20:44, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Copyeditor's Barnstar
Nice edits! Editor2020 (talk) 03:34, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Thank you, much appreciated! InverseHypercube (talk) 03:36, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Conservative Judaism

I suspect you were previously unaware, but 'Conservative Judaism' is the full title of an entity and should be capitalised. It is not immediately obvious when it looks like a simple adjective/noun combination. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 17:57, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Ah, yes. Thanks for the heads up. InverseHypercube (talk) 03:05, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Ambassador census

Hey IH, can you add yourself and your preferences here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Academical Village/Online Ambassador Census if you are planning on working with classes next term? This helps match up OAs with classes of their interest. Hope you are well, The Interior (Talk) 19:50, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! I didn't know where I had to sign up. InverseHypercube (talk) 20:40, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Markus? Is that you? This is a LittleFish AKA mangoonis : Mate1, Online Ambassador Observer via Adrian Morrison/POF/SocialCommissions/Match? Can you mentor me?

<ref>http://forums.plentyoffish.com/datingPosts210802.aspx</ref> — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.121.136.249 (talk) 01:59, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I have no idea who you are or what you're talking about. InverseHypercube (talk) 02:03, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

I reverted your addition of a quote to the Benedict Groeschel page due to the fact that the quote you supplied isn't actually a quote he said, but a paraphrasing from one of the news articles. The way was listed, implies that he actually said it that exact way, when in fact he didn't. BLP policies mean we must tread lightly and precisely when dealing with topics like this. Please see the talk page for more info and discussion about this topic. Marauder40 (talk) 20:57, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

I thought it was obvious that it wasn't a direct quote, but point taken. InverseHypercube (talk) 21:00, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

If you read my edit summary, you'll see that the nominal size indeed isn't the issue. The issue is that you can display a 2000x1528 pixel version without rendering errors. This essentially means that Wikipedia hosts a 2000x1528 pixel version of a non-free file (and maybe you can even get bigger copies without rendering errors), which is way too big. See Category:Fair use images that should be in SVG format: "Fair-use SVGs shouldn't include more detail than is necessary to display them accurately at their current resolution." This one appears to include more detail than necessary. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:02, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Justice as Fairness, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Equality (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:28, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Cite video: medium

The standard for medium or type across the Citation Style 1 series is to use sentence case. Please discuss if you feel this should be changed. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 21:31, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Social entrepreneurship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cobra (programming language) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Lambda expression
Ian Affleck (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to National Research Council

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassadors update

Hi! You're getting this message because you are or have been a Wikipedia Ambassador. A new term is beginning for the United States and Canada Education Programs, and I wanted to give you an update on some important new information if you're interested in continuing your work this term as a Wikipedia Ambassador.

You may have heard a reference to a transition the education program is going through. This is the last term that the Wikimedia Foundation will directly run the U.S. and Canada programs; beginning in June, a proposed thematic organization is likely to take over organizing the program. You can read more about the proposal here.

Another major change in the program will take effect immediately. Beginning this term, a new MediaWiki education extension will replace all course pages and Ambassador lists. (See Wikipedia:Course pages and Help:Education Program extension for more details.) Included in the extension are online volunteer and campus volunteer user rights, which let you create and edit course pages and sign up as an ambassador for a particular course.

If you would like to continue serving as a Wikipedia Ambassador — even if you do not support a class this term — you must create an ambassador profile. If you're no longer interested in being a Wikipedia Ambassador, you don't need to do anything.

Please do these steps as soon as possible

First, you need the relevant user rights for Online and/or Campus Ambassadors. (If you are an admin, you can grant the rights yourself, for you as well as other ambassadors.) Just post your rights request here, and we'll get you set up as quickly as possible.

Once you've got the ambassador rights, please set up at a Campus and/or Online Ambassador profile. You can do so at:

Going forward, the lists of Ambassadors at Special:CampusAmbassadors and Special:OnlineAmbassadors will be the official roster of who is an active Ambassador. If you would like to be an Ambassador but not ready to serve this term, you can un-check the option in your profile to publicly list it (which will remove your profile from the list).

After that, you can sign on to support courses. The list of courses will be at Special:Courses. (By default, this lists "Current" courses, but you can change the Status filter to "Planned" to see courses for this term that haven't reached their listed start date yet.)

As this is the first term we have used the extension, we know there will be some bugs, and we know the feature set is not as rich as it could be. (A big wave of improvements is already in the pipeline. And if you know MediaWiki and could help with code review, we'd love to have your help!) Please reach out to me (Sage Ross) with any complaints, bug reports, and feature suggestions. The basic features of the extension are documented at Wikipedia:Course pages, and you can see a tutorial for setting up and using them here.

Communication and keeping up to date

In the past, the Education Program has had a pretty fragmented set of communication channels. We're trying to fix that. These are the recommended places to discuss and stay up-to-date on the education program:

  1. The education noticeboard has become the main on-wiki location for discussion of the Education Program. You can post there about broad education program issues as well as issues with individual courses.
  2. The Ambassadors Announce email list is a very low-traffic announcements list of important information all Ambassadors need to be aware of. We encourage all Ambassadors (and other interested Wikipedians) to subscribe to the list; follow the instructions on the link to add your email address.
  3. If you use IRC regularly, or need to try to reach someone immediately, the #wikipedia-en-ambassadors connect IRC channel is the place to find me and fellow Ambassadors.
Ambassador training and resources

We now have an online training for Ambassadors, which is intended to be both an orientation about the Wikipedia Ambassador role for newcomers and the manual for how to do the role. (There are parallel trainings for students and for educators as well.)

Please go through the training if you feel like you need a refresher on how a typical class is supposed to go and where the Ambassadors fit in, or if you want to review and help improve it. If there's something you'd like to see added, or other suggestions you have for it, feel free to edit the training and/or leave feedback. A primer on setting up and using course pages is included in the educators' training.

The Resources page of the training is the main place for Ambassador-related resources. If there's something you think is important as a resource that's not on there, please add it.

Finally, whether or not you work with any classes this term, I encourage you to post entries to the Trophy Case whenever you see excellent work from students or if you have great examples from past semesters. And, as always, let students (and other editors!) know when they do things well; a little WikiLove goes a long way!

--Sage Ross (WMF) (talk) 20:50, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

April - National Contribution Month

Amqui (talk) 02:26, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback deployment

Hey InverseHypercube; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:35, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

A favor -Environmental law articles ready for preliminary review

Hi InverseHypercube. I see that you're an online ambassador. I'm the Professor for Aaron Frank's environmental law class, and while you're not signed up for my course, I was wondering if you'd be willing to take a look at any or all of the articles my students are working on. One of the aspects of this sort of course is that students understand that they are putting their work out before the wikipedia community for review. In the past, there hasn't been that much activity on their pages as they were working on them. I was hoping that if you get a chance you can take a look.

The students now have draft articles in mainspace and are starting to review each other's articles, and they could also use a preliminary review by an experienced Wikipedian in this area. If you get a chance, ideally sometime before Thursday or so, please take a look at the following list of articles and leave feedback on the talk page:

Thank you! Aarf613 (talk) 05:35, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Sierrtag180x36.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Sierrtag180x36.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

The article Pavol Demeš has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No real claim to notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sven Manguard Wha? 19:02, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Your opinion is needed in this discussion on Talk:Zeitgeist: The Movie

Hi. Two editors are advocating for the exclusion of any mention in the Zeitgeist: The Movie article that Peter Joseph, the creator of that film has stated publicly that words attributed to him in a story cited as a source in the article misquoted him, and that he has not distanced himself from the ideas expressed in that film, as that cited source indicates. I have responded to their arguments, but neither of them has responded directly to my counterarguments, but simply repeat the same statements of theirs over and over. Myself and one other editor disagree with them, so two editors are for the material's inclusion, and two are for its exclusion, with no sign of consensus in sight. Can you please offer your viewpoint in the discussion so that we can achieve consensus? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 01:12, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter


Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:24, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 15:37, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Hey!

Thanks for noticing my editing! :) CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 12:27, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

No problem, thanks for improving that article! It was quite terrible before your edits. InverseHypercube (talk) 21:45, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Alain Deneault

Hello! Your submission of Alain Deneault at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —Bagumba (talk) 06:22, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Alain Deneault

The DYK project (nominate) 16:01, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tarzan Action Game.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tarzan Action Game.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:39, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Survey for editors who mentor newcomer

Dear Wikipedia Ambassador,

I am seeking input on your experience as a mentor to new Wikipedians. This survey is designed to provide insight for the development of a new mentorship support tool on Wikipedia. If you have a moment, please take this survey, it should not take more than 10 minutes of your time to complete.

https://syracuseuniversity.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_4V2SSrhU2NFOVAV

Also, if you are able to, I would greatly appreciate it if you would send the following survey to the mentee you worked with:

https://syracuseuniversity.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_4V1quUdMZ1By3Ah

Thank you in advance for your participation, Gabriel Mugar 13:33, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

I noticed that you created the above-mentioned article in 2010. It still doesn't have any credible sources. In fact, off the everything.com link ( http://everything2.com/title/College+Course+Numbers ), it specifically mentions the MIT numbering system, which is completely different, and, in fact, different in different "Courses" (what would be called "departments" in most universities). If I don't hear from you in the next week or so, I'm going to propose deletion.

Circumstantial evidence from the MIT web site suggests lexicographical ordering rather than numerical (plus alphabetic suffix); in other words there may be courses 2.04 and 2.042.

I'm also familiar with the CalTech system (at least in 1972-78), which was generally:

    • 1-99 undergraduate courses ("1" is usually the "101" of the "standard" system)
    • 100-199 beginning graduate courses
    • 200-299 advanced graduate courses
    • 300-399 seminars
    • (perhaps higher numbers might be used for independent study classes, but I think some of those were also in the 300s)
  • and a suffix, "a", "b", or "c" indicates the quarter the course segment is usually taught, although I recall one course I took where 5a was winter quarter and 5b was spring quarter.

Arthur Rubin (talk) 02:47, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello,
I forgot about this article, and honestly I don't care much what happens to it. But just because the sources are poor (they are) doesn't mean that it's not notable. InverseHypercube (talk) 02:57, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
It might be notable, but for an article, there would have to be something well-sourced we can say about it. I don't think there is.... — Arthur Rubin (talk) 15:25, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Bud Osborn

Hello! Your submission of Bud Osborn at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! 97198 (talk) 10:09, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Bud Osborn

Hello! Your submission of Bud Osborn at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 17:01, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Bud Osborn

Gatoclass (talk) 14:07, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Project tags

Hey, just wanted to comment about removing your tagging of the soring and Horse Protection Act articles as part of WP Animal rights. While I don't know if there is a blanket project guideline to tag every article dealing with animal abuse for the AR project, if it isn't a blanket policy, I'd prefer we did not tag these two for AR, and the reason is because the people I can only describe as the "soring denialists" use the AR movement as a boogeyman to drum up support for their positions against federal legislation, federal inspection and criminal penalties for violators. Almost 100% of the vandalism that isn't just the drive-by kiddie stuff is from IPs who are trying to whitewash the articles or remove references to how prevalent and harmful the practice is. I'd prefer not to draw their attention further and risk a POV tagging battle next. Hope that clarifies what my reasoning is here. Montanabw(talk) 01:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for the message. It's really unfortunate that there are people doing this (wouldn't be surprised if some of those IPs are from industry), and I'm not sure giving in to them is the right thing to do. But since it's a relatively minor thing I guess it's fine. InverseHypercube (talk) 01:36, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Oh, I'm sure of it. But I want to focus my attention on keeping the article content itself from being whitewashed. Keeping credibility and NPOV is sometimes an issue if the talk page turns into a dramafest... I appreciate your good will! Montanabw(talk) 19:53, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Invitation

A gummi bear holding a sign that says "Thank you"
Thank you for using VisualEditor and sharing your ideas with the developers.

Hello, InverseHypercube,

The Editing team is asking for your help with VisualEditor. I am contacting you because you were one of the very first testers of VisualEditor, back in 2012 or early 2013. Please tell them what they need to change to make VisualEditor work better for you. The team has a list of top-priority problems, but they also want to hear about small problems. These problems may make editing less fun, take too much of your time, or be as annoying as a paper cut. The Editing team wants to hear about and try to fix these small things, too. 

You can share your thoughts by clicking this link. You may respond to this quick, simple, anonymous survey in your own language. If you take the survey, then you agree your responses may be used in accordance with these terms. This survey is powered by Qualtrics and their use of your information is governed by their privacy policy.

More information (including a translateable list of the questions) is posted on wiki at mw:VisualEditor/Survey 2015. If you have questions, or prefer to respond on-wiki, then please leave a message on the survey's talk page.

Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:13, 23 March 2015 (UTC)