User talk:Indianwebmasters07

Welcome!

Hello, Indianwebmasters07, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Brianhe (talk) 21:31, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Rahul Sethi with Deepesh Rahi Fatehabad, Haryana.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Rahul Sethi with Deepesh Rahi Fatehabad, Haryana.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Social media links on your userpage

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guideline. If you believe that your user page does not violate our guideline, please leave a note on this page. Alternatively you may add {{Db-userreq}} to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it, or you can simply edit the page so that it meets Wikipedia's user page guideline. Thank you. Suggest you remove the social media links to comply wih WP:ELNO. — Brianhe (talk) 19:08, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are still actively editing, so I will reiterate that the social media links (twitter, etc.) on your userpage are considered inappropriate and should be removed. — Brianhe (talk) 23:11, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest guideline

Hello, Iamrahulsethi. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Radha Soami Satsang Beas, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

This note added because you have self-identified as connected with educationbhaskar.com, the link you added to Radha Soami Satsang Beas. — Brianhe (talk) 23:20, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of external links (linkspam)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Repeated addition of links to your site, educationbhaskar.com. — Brianhe (talk) 23:35, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Teacher Eligibility Test. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 05:34, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh, you may be blocked from editing. Grayfell (talk) 09:41, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

iamrahulsethi (talk) 08:09, 19 February 2019 (UTC)== Help me! ==[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me regarding page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suresh_Bhatt. It is still not indexed in Google Search. Can you please elaborate the exact issue so that I can fix it.

Rahul Sethi

Helped. Namaste Rahul. There is nothing you can do in this situation. The article is in queue for New Page Review, and a reviewer will look at it sooner or later. You may want to add further secondary sources to the article in the mean time. Why the urgency? If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page, although you are guaranteed quicker feedback at the Wikipedia:Teahouse. Happy editing, Sam Sailor 20:13, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wish

Hello. Help improve for article Maureen Wroblewitz. Thanks you. Arina56 (talk) 12:44, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Bharat Bhushan Midha.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bharat Bhushan Midha.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:04, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Bharat Bhushan Midha new.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Bharat Bhushan Midha new.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 02:51, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Image File: Bharat Bhushan Midha new.jpg and File: Bharat Bhushan Midha.jpg

I have the right to use this image as this image (File: Bharat Bhushan Midha new.jpg and File: Bharat Bhushan Midha.jpg) is taken by me from the person "Bharat Bhushan Midha". Can you please guide me how to use and which category suit it?

File:Bharat Bhushan Midha n.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bharat Bhushan Midha n.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:17, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Bharat Bhushan Midha) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Bharat Bhushan Midha.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your new article on Bharat Bhushan Midha.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:41, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of GD Vashist

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on GD Vashist, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ∯WBG^converse 18:24, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Iamrahulsethi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 04:38, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Iamrahulsethi, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Iamrahulsethi|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. GSS (talk|c|em) 06:19, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Iamrahulsethi

A tag has been placed on User:Iamrahulsethi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GSS (talk|c|em) 06:20, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Suresh Danoda

The article Suresh Danoda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Politician who has not been elected and does not hold any constitutional office. The subject fails WP:NPOL , WP:GNG and being a general secretary, Scheduled Caste (Anusuchit Jati) Morcha of the Bharatiya Janata Party does not qualify him to have a stand alone article on Wikipedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FitIndia ^Talk 09:00, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Suresh Danoda for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Suresh Danoda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suresh Danoda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FitIndia ^Talk 11:04, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Suresh Danoda

Hi, could you please disclose if you have any relationship with Suresh Danoda ? Thank you. FitIndia ^Talk 11:18, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am a party worker at BJP IT Cell and serving them without any cost. I am part of a team where we are updating data online for Government/ Party/Organizational persons which are at high positions. I personally meet them, ask them information and then update the information at wikipedia. likewise, I met with Mr. Danoda who is member at a working body of Governement of Haryana. I can provide you ID proof of Mr. Suresh (Member at Governement of Haryana) if needed. I already mentioned the required citations (www.prharyana.gov.in.) from government site which is clearly mentioning his role in Governement.

As per WP:COI you should not be creating or editing articles about members of the BJP as you are a part of their IT cell as you mentioned above. FitIndia ^Talk 12:20, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't create or edit article who is familer with me. The members of BJP are not familier with me. I must know about him by contacting them to give accurate and correct detail to wikipedia about them. Although, I am not suppose to give wrong and incomplete detail which can misguide valuable wikipedia users. I do create the basic page and wikipedia is open for all where any other user can make it more informative by adding more information.

As you say above that you are not familiar with them how do you have access to their Govt ID card ? FitIndia ^Talk 14:01, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, I say that I can arrange ID card from concern person if you need citation for his position by contacting him via mean of party. Sir, I already said that I am not familier with the concerned person. I collected the information from various resources.

Proposed deletion of Bharat Bhushan Midha

The article Bharat Bhushan Midha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage in reliable sources and no evidence of satisfying WP:NPOL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:48, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bharat Bhushan Midha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bharat Bhushan Midha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bharat Bhushan Midha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GPL93 (talk) 20:50, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iamrahulsethi. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 23:43, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Indianwebmasters07 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I object this block as I was working in an office. There were other IT members too who were editing the Wikipedia pages. As tool mentioned that the same IPs but a different UA. I am contributing since 2011, not regularly but casually. I assure you that I will take care of it from now. Please unblock so that I can contribute more on Wikipedia iamrahulsethi 07:10, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your claim about the findings is inaccurate. The UA was confirmed as identical between this account and two others. Even if your claim was accurate, you'd still have been violating WP:MEAT. Yamla (talk) 11:41, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock discussion

you said, "There were other IT members too who were editing the Wikipedia pages." Why? Is it your/their job? Dlohcierekim (talk) 09:35, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please read and heed WP:COI and WP:PAID. Dlohcierekim (talk) 09:36, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please forgive my lack of WP:AGF, but this, "they suggested me to do some changes from my account", sounds like WP:Meatpuppetry. I.E. recruiting people off wiki to carry out edits on behalf of another. Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:20, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Indianwebmasters07 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not paid worker. I was in their office from 2 days for other IT work and they suggested me to do some changes from my account, You can check my IP is different from them all other days. I assure you, it will never happen again.

Decline reason:

Someone else on the same IP address as you just happened to edit the same article as you, removed the COI tag, and remove the AfD banner? I doubt it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:21, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Indianwebmasters07 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The edit was on same IP but different systems. I already said that I was in office and we were at same ISP. My system was there in office. I know it was my mistake and I apologise for it and request you for unblock. I am learner and learnt a lession today. I have read all the policies and assure you that it will never happen again.iamrahulsethi 20:09, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Putting aside your denial of sock/meatpuppetry, which is not credible, you have not bothered to address your promotional edits. I am withdrawing your ability to make further appeals. MER-C 09:46, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sunita Duggal Image.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Sunita Duggal Image.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NitinMlk (talk) 19:43, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Suresh Bhatt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Suresh Bhatt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suresh Bhatt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ミラ P 22:51, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Rahul Sethi at OHM Cine Garden, sirsa, fatehabad.jpg

The file File:Rahul Sethi at OHM Cine Garden, sirsa, fatehabad.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal image of promotional sockmaster.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:54, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Rahul sethi, Fatehabad, Haryana.jpg

The file File:Rahul sethi, Fatehabad, Haryana.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo of non-notable person.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 12:35, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Rahul Sethi fatehabad.jpg

The file File:Rahul Sethi fatehabad.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo of non-notable person.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 12:36, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:GD Vashist Image.jpg

The file File:GD Vashist Image.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for GD Vashist. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:39, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Suresh Danoda Image.jpg

The file File:Suresh Danoda Image.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for Suresh Danoda. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:16, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]