User talk:IndianEditor

IndianEditor, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi IndianEditor! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:02, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

India, a Featured Article

Please be aware that in a Featured Article such as India you should discuss a significant edit, especially one that has been challenged, on the talk page first, per WP:OWN#Featured_articles. The ASI web site is not a reliable source. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 11:18, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fowler&fowler Are you kidding me

ASI is (Archaeology Survey of India) and what can be bigger source than ASI itself. I am adding it back please don't do edit war. -IndianEditor (talk) 11:38, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Varna (Hinduism), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 08:34, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit:

Vedic Verses doesn't implies Varna being fixed. Varna can be changed anytime. For instance rishi Vishvamitra and Gautam Buddha where both were born in a Kshatriya family but both choose to become to Brahmin.^[1]^[2]

References

^ Constance Jones, James D. Ryan (2006). Encyclopedia of Hinduism. Infobase Publishing. p. 479.
^ Jacob N. Kinnard (2010). The Emergence of Buddhism: Classical Traditions in Contemporary Perspective. Fortress Press. p. 16.

Bullshit at first look; not what Kinnard says; not what Buddhism says. Plain bullshit. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 08:37, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Recently, you removed properly sourced criticism here of a person and a project you have an interest in (you created the article Rally for Rivers), and gave a very poor reason in the edit summary. That's tendentious editing. As for telling editors to create a new page for what car Sadhguru used, I can only say, you don't seem to understand how Wikipedia works. And this, a change you have made repeatedly, suggests you think the information in Wikipedia articles is bound by what the Indian government has declared. I'm sorry, I think you mean well, but you're creating a lot of trouble for other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 14:04, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: those are just two examples, see also Joshua Jonathan's warning above,[1] and all the other warnings in the history of this page. Bishonen | talk 14:33, 16 September 2017 (UTC).[reply]

??? What is this ?????

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IndianEditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know why Bishonen Blocked me. He didn't see the revision History of Zakir Rashid Bhat. I was told to add source for my edit and I provided "Top ten Wanted Terrorist in India" and after that no one said anything and after some time an anonymous account changed it. But at that time I was blocked so I couldn't change it and when I was Unblocked I changed it as per sources. Still Source says (Top Wanted Terrorist of India (not militant)) Now as far as Sadhguru is concerned. Rally for Rivers is small section and someone Added Car details. I mean what has rally for Rivers do with Cars. As I wrote during change One can create page if one has to add every minor detail about rally for Rivers. And as far as Varna edit is concerned when Joshua Jonathan deleted my edit I immediately shifted to talk page and still no one replied me on talk Page. If I am blocked because of the Crime I never did Then its a Shame for Wikipedia community

Decline reason:

I can't make sense of what you've written above which makes me think that the WP:CIR block is justified. regentspark (comment) 21:44, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Me

@Bishonen: Please read my Unblock Request. You without any reason blocked me. IndianEditor (talk) 19:06, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IndianEditor, I tried to explain the problems as clearly as I could in the block notice. I'm sorry, but I don't know what else to say. Now that you have posted a request for review of the block, an admin who hasn't had anything to do with you before — not me, and not SpacemanSpiff, but somebody new — will come and review the block. I hope it won't take long. Bishonen | talk 20:28, 18 September 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Unblock Me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IndianEditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Let me explain in detail why I am innocent. The reason I removed this here edit was because the source [1] says Zakir Musa is a Terrorist (not militant). And an anonymous account changed it to militant here So, I had to change it according to Source. And as far as this this edit change is concerned.Joshua Jonathan removed it and without wasting time I shifted to Talk Page and because I was blocked at that time I couldn't reply and my sources are totally perfect So in this matter, I didn't break any rule. And as this edit is concerned I recently came to know about Neutrality.So I apologize for this edit. Please unblock me.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks and no admin has decided to weigh in. You are welcome to request another unblock, but if you do so, please rewrite your request. Yamla (talk) 15:21, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

IndianEditor (talk) 11:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

IndianEditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19279 was submitted on Sep 20, 2017 13:56:24. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 13:56, 20 September 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

IndianEditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19363 was submitted on Sep 28, 2017 12:00:37. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 12:00, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of IndianEditor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. GAB^gab 19:39, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Constance Jones, James D. Ryan (2006). Encyclopedia of Hinduism. Infobase Publishing. p. 479.

[2] Jacob N. Kinnard (2010). The Emergence of Buddhism: Classical Traditions in Contemporary Perspective. Fortress Press. p. 16.

[1]

[2]