User talk:Imhussainkhan

This is Imhussainkhan's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Muhammad Ali Swati has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Muhammad Ali Swati. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 08:51, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muhammad Ali Swati (October 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by User4edits was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muhammad Ali Swati and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 09:14, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Imhussainkhan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 09:14, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muhammad Ali Swati (October 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It is pointless and disruptive to re-submit with zero improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muhammad Ali Swati and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:53, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Muhammad Ali Swati has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Muhammad Ali Swati. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:56, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Muhammad Ali Swati has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Muhammad Ali Swati. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:14, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have made the changes. Please check now, and I’ve submitted the draft. Imhussainkhan (talk) 12:25, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muhammad Ali Swati (October 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sir MemeGod was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see our guidelines for people known for only one thing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muhammad Ali Swati and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sir MemeGod  12:40, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

this source clearly mentioned he has recued more than 600 https://www.app.com.pk/national/muhammad-ali-swati-a-legacy-of-heroism-and-service/ the source is from Pakistan Most prestigious press. and from other here are other its means there are two events he also have 3 awards two from Prime Minister and one from KP Government. https://metrix.pk/muhammad-ali-swati-honoured-by-the-prime-minister-for-his-heroic-feats/ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2504638/rescue-hero-advocates-for-voluntary-service Imhussainkhan (talk) 12:46, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muhammad Ali Swati (October 23)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Saqib was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: I'm declining it for two reasons: first, it was recently deleted via AFD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Ali Swati, and second, this is a WP:BE Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thekhyberboypk

— Saqib (talk I contribs) 18:55, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Thekhyberboypk per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thekhyberboypk. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 21:00, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Imhussainkhan! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Request for Review: Wikipedia Draft of Muhammad Ali Swati, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:40, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]