User talk:Imbluey2

Speedy deletion nomination of Roxy Cinema

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Roxy Cinema requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roxy Cinema. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:34, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Significa liberdade:

I have contested against your speedy deletion nomination on Roxy Cinema's talk page. It was contested as the article in question pertains to a movie theatre named Roxy Cinema in Singapore, not the Roxy Cinema in Vermont as shown in your 'Article for deletion' link. Additionally, sources do exist for this Roxy Cinema, which are provided in my contestation against your request. I would appreciate it if the speedily delete template was removed from the article, thank you. Please '@' my username so that I get notified of your response (talk) 05:18, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SMRT Comic Connect

Hey there. I might be off Wikipedia for a few days, but if you can, on my behalf, help update some of the station articles to include entries of SMRT Comic Connect? Except for Changi Airport; the pdf link hasn't been updated.--ZKang123 (talk)

Hi, I can do that, no problem at all. Imbluey2. Please ping me so that I get notified of your response 07:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Faber House explosions moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Faber House explosions. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 12:59, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Miminity I understand. I received a message a couple of days that the article may not meet WP:EVENT since there was not much of a lasting impact. I did forgot to mention that it was one of Singapore's first experiences with terrorism. Other than that, I'm thinking about merging it into an article on Faber House and mention the explosions as one of its points... Imbluey2. Please ping me so that I get notified of your response 13:48, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chinese Garden MRT station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CNA.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited September 2024 East–West MRT line disruption, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page East-West Line.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Chinese Garden MRT station

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chinese Garden MRT station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Brachy0008 -- Brachy0008 (talk) 03:04, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Chinese Garden MRT station

The article Chinese Garden MRT station you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Chinese Garden MRT station for comments about the article, and Talk:Chinese Garden MRT station/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Brachy0008 -- Brachy0008 (talk) 09:41, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raffles' Bust has been accepted

Raffles' Bust, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S5A-0043^Talk 12:27, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Details Cannot Body Wants has been accepted

Details Cannot Body Wants, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tavantius (talk) 14:02, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Imbluey2. Thank you for your work on Details Cannot Body Wants. Another editor, Tavantius, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for making an article on Wikipedia. Have you considered nominating it for Wikipedia's Do You Know Otherwise, have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Tavantius}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Tavantius (talk) 14:39, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tavantius: I am actually considered nominating it for DYK but I can't really think of any facts that would get people to click on the article. Maybe "did you know... that Singapore's 'first R-rated play' was technically two plays?" Imbluey2. Please ping me so that I get notified of your response 14:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, the part where the Public Entertainment Licensing Unit rated it R, making it Singapore's first film with that rating, could be the subject of the DYK. Tavantius (talk) 14:55, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, that works. Imbluey2. Please ping me so that I get notified of your response 14:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]