User talk:Ihsnavihs

National varieties of English

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Narcissism, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 11:12, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Professional Security Association (IPSA) (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Slywriter were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:International Professional Security Association (IPSA) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:International Professional Security Association (IPSA), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 04:02, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ihsnavihs! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Slywriter (talk) 04:02, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Slywriter, @Teahouse!

Thank you for your message and feedback on the rejection of my submitted article. I am reworking it and would love to have any further tips and guidance you could offer. Further, if possible, It would be great to have you review it before I submit it again.

Awaiting your response.

Thanks,

Ihsnavihs Ihsnavihs (talk) 11:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ihsnavihs, you need to find significantly better sources. Currently, none of your sources establish notability as they are all press releases or profiles submitted by the company. Wikipedia cares very little what the subject has to say about itself. What's needed is independent reliable sources discussing the subject. If those do not exist, then its likely the subject does not meet WP:NORG and is not ready for a Wikipedia article. Also, if you are connected to the association, please review WP:COI.Slywriter (talk) 11:28, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, @Slywriter, for sharing your thoughts.

Following your feedback and recommendations, I have worked towards making the necessary changes to the initial article.

Would it be possible for you to review it for me before I can submit the changes?

If yes, please advice on how we can do this. Ihsnavihs (talk) 14:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:International Professional Security Association (IPSA) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:International Professional Security Association (IPSA). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:00, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for replying @Theroadislong.

I haven't actually uploaded the final changes on the wikipedia draft yet. Have been working offline on my computer. I shall be making the changes on wikipedia by the end of this week.

Would it be possible for you to review it for me and share your thoughts then?

Thanks. Ihsnavihs (talk) 14:04, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You simply need to click "resubmit" there is no pre-preview option? Theroadislong (talk) 14:52, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Ihsnavihs! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Can someone to help review changes I am making to an article of mine that was rejected?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:International Professional Security Association (IPSA) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:International Professional Security Association (IPSA). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:21, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have just completed. Can you please review and share your thoughts with me? Also, if you still find it problematic, could you please indicate the sections and portions of the article that I need to work on to make it better? Ihsnavihs (talk) 06:28, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So you removed the COI notice. Do you no longer have a COI, or are you preparing to add a paid editing disclosure? 331dot (talk) 10:16, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Asking for extra reviews

Ihsnavihs, you have posted requests for extra reviews of your draft, to the Teahouse, the Articles for Creation helpdesk, and the user talk pages of a couple of other editors. Please don't do that – if you have specific questions like "is this source OK?" you are welcome to ask it (but not in multiple places, please!), but what you are doing is asking for a review of your draft as a whole. You request a review of your draft by clicking the blue "Resubmit" button. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 11:35, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Ihsnavihs! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Reworked a declined article for Draft:International Professional Security Association (IPSA), has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Ihsnavihs, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ihsnavihs|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 16:35, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:International Professional Security Association

Hello, Ihsnavihs. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "International Professional Security Association".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 21:25, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]