User talk:Ihaveahax/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Ihaveahax. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
Re: A barnstar for you!
Thank you for the barnstar! Getting rid of spam has become a recent focus of mine. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:20, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Your signature
Hello Ihaveamac, I noticed the page you have with your signature. I just wanted to remind you (in case you didn't know) that you can add a custom signature in your preferences so you can sign with four tildes as you normally would. If you intend to use User:Ihaveamac/sig as a template, let me know and I'll make some changes so it will display properly. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:47, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Blanking warning messages from talk pages
Hi.I saw your edit query when restoring blanked messages on an IP page. The general answer is that editors may blank their own talk pages but it is less clear for anonymous IP editors. I have often restored comments just as you did, but if it just a single message I guess it is probably prudent to be accommodating! Regards Velella Velella Talk 23:11, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
- So, it's good when they remove warnings from their talk pages? Well, he did it again with the summary "SUCH SAD PEOPLE. YOU REALLY HAVNT GOT ANYTHING BETTER TO DO ..LOL". ~ihaveamac [talk|contribs] 23:20, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
- No, not good, but usually not worth worrying about. The Bots can usually keep count even if comments are removed. With editors like the IP you have been dealing with, I find it is usually better just to walk away until something more serious happens. I think that he/she only made one vandal edit and all the rest has been repercussions. It is often best just to cut a little slack until it gets serious . Velella Velella Talk 23:31, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
- That makes sense now. ~ihaveamac [talk|contribs] 23:33, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
- No, not good, but usually not worth worrying about. The Bots can usually keep count even if comments are removed. With editors like the IP you have been dealing with, I find it is usually better just to walk away until something more serious happens. I think that he/she only made one vandal edit and all the rest has been repercussions. It is often best just to cut a little slack until it gets serious . Velella Velella Talk 23:31, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Re: Dutta Vs Dutta poster
No, there is any other version without watermark (in all version they have added some watermarks). I could try deleting the watermark using photoshop brush, but that generally spoils some part of an image's look (i.e. you copy some portion of the surrounding and try to hide the watermark with it). So, I thought to wait till 23 November (film's release date), hopefully we'll get 1 clean image then. Thanks for your suggestion and kindness! --Tito Dutta (talk) 07:04, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Gustavo Romero
The talk page just repeated the article page, the content of both was Gustavo Romero (born 1985), Colombian photographer, videographer, and designer plus a weblink Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:06, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Protection question
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
If a page in my userspace is fully protected so only administrators can edit it, will I still be able to edit it since it's in my userspace? ~ihaveamac [talk|contribs] 07:59, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
- No. JohnCD (talk) 08:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
- ok, thanks. I thought I saw something like that on a page, but I wasn't sure. ~ihaveamac [talk|contribs] 08:54, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
- Having confidently given that answer, I had doubts, but I have confirmed it by experiment. I have an alternate account for use where it might not be secure to use an admin account, so I logged in to that and set up a subpage, came back to my main account and protected it, went back to the alt account and no, I couldn't edit it. JohnCD (talk) 09:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
- ok, thanks. I thought I saw something like that on a page, but I wasn't sure. ~ihaveamac [talk|contribs] 08:54, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Your iChatGui
Hey, I have a question. I'm using your iChatGui and I was wondering if it was possible to make it not show a message that starts with any of my personal admin commands that I made myself.
~ PlusJon on ROBLOX (@PlusJon) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.107.183.65 (talk) 18:51, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
- I've replied to you on Roblox. ~ihaveamac [talk|contribs] 18:55, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
SineBot
Thanks for the information, I had done that only a few minutes before your message. I don't use my alt account much, I set it up for the purpose of using it on extra devices (tablets work computer, etc) so I never noticed there was an issue. :) -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 16:42, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
concerning your nomination to delete my page, "Mr Ideran"
Hello, this is wolfie the oe wolf and i am here to ask you to lift the speedy deletion of my page Mr ideran. I have worked tiredlessly on this for over a week, being new to Wikipedia, and i wanted to write a page on a mentor, a father figue if you will, and pay my respects. This is not just some botched information I scrambled together, this is actual information i gathered from students and teachers. The entire of high school of Oswego East would be just let down if this page was removed. And i promise you, there will be no lewd comments put on this page, only the factual information, from an honest student. Even though some of the information is sometimes hard to believe, you must take my word that it comes either directly from lessons or conversations with Steve. If this article is not deleted then it will only grow and prosper for its time on Wikipedia. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolfie the oe wolf (talk • contribs) 04:59, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
once again, concerning
Im sorry but i dont follow, im new so walk me through here man. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolfie the oe wolf (talk • contribs) 05:11, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
?
so long as students are able to search the name mr ideran, easily, and the page stays for no matter what edits are on there, note they will be legitimate. Wolfie Wolfstein (talk) 05:19, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
thanks...but.
thanks, i know sandlot is for practicing and it wont appear if you search as just a person wanting to read it. What can i do to fix the existing page, put it back up, and allow the page to actually stay without so many flags and 10 yard penalties?? Wolfie Wolfstein (talk) 05:26, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
cool
thanks man, i believe five sources from legitimate sites will work?
Thanks
Once again thanks, by the way.. i am doing this not only for the kids in my school so that can sort of create a cult around him, cuz he doesnt get any recognition, but also i am using this to sharpen my comedic writing skills, cuz im taking second city classes, so this helps immensely, thanks for taking the time to help a dumb ass like me!Wolfie Wolfstein (talk) 05:45, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks (2)
Thanks for the revert on my talk page. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:31, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
- You're welcome. I was constantly refreshing recent changes, and found your page (on my watch list) blanked. iXavier [talk|contribs] 05:35, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
- Re your message: The WHOIS records and comments by the first IP show that they are proxy servers for the Opera Turbo service. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:46, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
- Re your message: The proxies should probably be blocked as you said since they are a form of open proxies, but a larger discussion should probably be held since it would be blocking a service of a particular web browser. I don't usually deal with proxies, so you might want to bring it up at Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies/Requests. As for your testing, my guess is that it might be that IPv4 users are going through one set of IPs while IPv6 users are going through another. I don't know how the Opera Turbo service works, but from the description, it seems that it only kicks in under certain circumstances. Obviously, I don't use Opera. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:02, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
- Re your message: Interesting, though it doesn't surprise me. Everything is configurable nowadays. On a side note, you're right, I was giving that vandal a little too much slack, but I took care of that. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:32, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
- Re your message: Yeah, I know. I've been watching. It's pretty funny. Another admin will come along and put a stop to that. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:00, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
- Re your message: Sorry about the delay getting back to you. You're right that I can't handle their unblock requests since I was the admin who blocked them. Sometimes if the unblock requests are particularly abusive then the blocking admin can act, but under normal circumstances, the blocking admin should leave them for others to deal with. I see that Kinu and Jpgordan took care of it and revoked their talk page access. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:04, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
- Re your message: Yeah, I know. I've been watching. It's pretty funny. Another admin will come along and put a stop to that. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:00, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
- Re your message: Interesting, though it doesn't surprise me. Everything is configurable nowadays. On a side note, you're right, I was giving that vandal a little too much slack, but I took care of that. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:32, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
- Re your message: The proxies should probably be blocked as you said since they are a form of open proxies, but a larger discussion should probably be held since it would be blocking a service of a particular web browser. I don't usually deal with proxies, so you might want to bring it up at Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies/Requests. As for your testing, my guess is that it might be that IPv4 users are going through one set of IPs while IPv6 users are going through another. I don't know how the Opera Turbo service works, but from the description, it seems that it only kicks in under certain circumstances. Obviously, I don't use Opera. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:02, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
- Re your message: The WHOIS records and comments by the first IP show that they are proxy servers for the Opera Turbo service. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:46, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
what's going on?
Why aren't you on the wiki anymore? ~Curiouscrab
- I never intended to stay indefinitely really, and there's other reasons that I've gone inactive on the Scratch Wiki. I'll be here, make an account if you like (if you haven't yet). iXavier [talk|contribs] 02:44, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Hey, I took down the speedy tag you put on Norman B. Hansen because I couldn't figure out how it was a broken redirect or anything. Looks like it works fine and goes to Norman Hansen to me. Was I missing something? Apologies if I did, I'm rusty from not having edited in a long time. Did you want to do a page move? Peace, delldot ∇. 03:18, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
- When I added the tag, it appeared to be a broken redirect, even when refreshing. I guess I needed to purge, but that it was I saw. iXavier [talk|edits|logs] 03:21, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
- Huh, weird, well thanks for explaining! delldot ∇. 03:40, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Now that I'm not on an iPad, I can easily type this: The redirect was made at 19:36, and I tagged it at 19:55 as a broken redirect. The page it redirected to was created at 19:58, so it was a broken redirect when I tagged it, but the page was created 3 minutes later. iXavier [talk|edits|logs] 03:42, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
- Huh, weird, well thanks for explaining! delldot ∇. 03:40, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 December 2012
- WikiProject report: A Song of Ice and Fire
- Featured content: Battlecruiser operational
- Technology report: Efforts to "normalise" Toolserver relations stepped up
cat=no on Scratch Wiki templates
Somebody trolled the templates and removed the cat=no, but there is no history of it. Can you add them back? The template In Progress needs it. ~Curiouscrab
- Every edit is saved in the history, you can look at the diffs to find out who removed it. Can you name a specific template that it was removed from? iXavier [talk|edits|logs] 02:48, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
- In Progress ~Curiouscrab — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.188.59.201 (talk) 21:26, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
- Checking diffs... iXavier [talk|edits|logs] 22:44, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
- The template never had the "cat=no" parser function in it. You need to add this to it:
{{#ifeq: {{{cat}}} | no | | [[Category:CATEGORY NAME|{{PAGENAME}}]]}}
- iXavier [talk|edits|logs] 23:16, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 December 2012
- From the editor: Wikipedia, our Colosseum
- In the media: Is the Wikimedia movement too 'cash rich'?
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation fundraiser a success; Czech parliament releases photographs to chapter
- Technology report: Looking back on a year of incremental changes
- Discussion report: Image policy and guidelines; resysopping policy
- Featured content: Whoa Nelly! Featured content in review
- WikiProject report: New Year, New York
- Recent research: Wikipedia and Sandy Hook; SOPA blackout reexamined
Csd Templates/Yamart
The person is promoting their website and writing autobiography articles. A csd tag is appropriate for these situations. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 04:45, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
about Barbecue page
Hello, When I saw that section(Korea), I felt it was wrong because "Genghis Khan Teppanyaki" is not Korean one. It is derived from Korean Barbecue, but some Japanese guys named that for branding. Instead of it, there are so many names that represents Korean style barbecues. So, I just want to delete wrong information. I think that was written from Chinese guy who doesn't know Korea well. Is this enough? Then I am gonna delete that shit again.
- It's what you replaced the content with that made me revert. iXavier [talk|edits|logs] 05:37, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 07 January 2013
- WikiProject report: Where Are They Now? Episode IV: A New Year
- News and notes: 2012—the big year
- Featured content: Featured content in review
- Technology report: Looking ahead to 2013
The Signpost: 14 January 2013
- Investigative report: Ship ahoy! New travel site finally afloat
- News and notes: Launch of annual picture competition, new grant scheme
- WikiProject report: Reach for the Stars: WikiProject Astronomy
- Discussion report: Flag Manual of Style; accessibility and equality
- Special report: Loss of an Internet genius
- Featured content: Featured articles: Quality of reviews, quality of writing in 2012
- Arbitration report: First arbitration case in almost six months
- Technology report: Intermittent outages planned, first Wikidata client deployment
image deletion
if u r an admin, pls delete this image File:Alibabavum 40 Thirudargalum Audio.jpg. i only uploaded it, but now find it somwehat dissatisfying. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:10, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, not an admin. You might be able to tag it with G7 ({{db-g7}}) or something, but I can't delete it because I'm not an admin. :( iXavier [talk|edits|logs] 05:15, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- If you want, you can remove it from the article it's on, or replace it with a new image you want to upload. After the current image File:Alibabavum 40 Thirudargalum Audio.jpg is not used for 7 days, it will be deleted. iXavier [talk|edits|logs] 05:17, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 January 2013
- News and notes: Requests for adminship reform moves forward
- WikiProject report: Say What? — WikiProject Linguistics
- Featured content: Wazzup, G? Delegates and featured topics in review
- Arbitration report: Doncram case continues
- Technology report: Data centre switchover a tentative success
How do you make it so when I click on Unread it changes to Read? If you don't know, that's ok. ~Curiouscrab
- That may be impossible, but I don't know... iXavier [talk|edits|logs] 02:06, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
- Too bad. I created an Email system and it's pretty cool. ~Curiouscrab
Ihy34
I just reported them for vandalism. Was witting up and AN/I but this is ridiculous. Ridernyc (talk) 00:57, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- It also looks like the report on you was declined. iXavier [talk|edits|logs] 00:58, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- Of course it was, trying to build consensus and stop edit wars is not against any rules and is certainly not vandalism. Thanks for the backup. Ridernyc (talk) 01:00, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 January 2013
- In the media: Hoaxes draw media attention
- Recent research: Lessons from the research literature on open collaboration; clicks on featured articles; credibility heuristics
- WikiProject report: Checkmate! — WikiProject Chess
- Discussion report: Administrator conduct and requests
- News and notes: Khan Academy's Smarthistory and Wikipedia collaborate
- Featured content: Listing off progress from 2012
- Arbitration report: Doncram continues
- Technology report: Developers get ready for FOSDEM amid caching problems
The Signpost: 04 February 2013
- Special report: Examining the popularity of Wikipedia articles
- News and notes: Article Feedback Tool faces community resistance
- WikiProject report: Land of the Midnight Sun
- Featured content: Portal people on potent potables and portable potholes
- In the media: Star Trek Into Pedantry
- Technology report: Wikidata team targets English Wikipedia deployment
The Signpost: 11 February 2013
- Featured content: A lousy week
- WikiProject report: Just the Facts
- In the media: Wikipedia mirroring life in island ownership dispute
- Discussion report: WebCite proposal
- Technology report: Wikidata client rollout stutters
The Signpost: 18 February 2013
- WikiProject report: Thank you for flying WikiProject Airlines
- Technology report: Better templates and 3D buildings
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation declares 'victory' in Wikivoyage lawsuit
- In the media: Sue Gardner interviewed by the Australian press
- Featured content: Featured content gets schooled
The Signpost: 25 February 2013
- Recent research: Wikipedia not so novel after all, except to UK university lecturers
- News and notes: "Very lucky" Picture of the Year
- Discussion report: Wikivoyage links; overcategorization
- Featured content: Blue birds be bouncin'
- WikiProject report: How to measure a WikiProject's workload
- Technology report: Wikidata development to be continued indefinitely
The Signpost: 04 March 2013
- News and notes: Outing of editor causes firestorm
- Featured content: Slow week for featured content
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Television Stations
Wiktionary Block
Sorry about that! It was an error based on the spam you marked for deletion. I try to respond to spam as quickly as possible, and in this case clicked on the wrong line in the page history in my haste. You did nothing wrong, and everything right, and I wasn't paying attention. I've unblocked you, and blocked the IP that was the real culprit. I'll be more careful in such cases from now on. Chuck Entz (talk) 13:01, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- thank you, I figured it was a mistake since I only placed the delete template. ;)
//iXavier <talk/edits/logs>
13:54, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 March 2013
- From the editor: Signpost–Wikizine merger
- News and notes: Finance committee updates
- Featured content: Batman, three birds and a Mercedes
- Arbitration report: Doncram case closes; arbitrator resigns
- WikiProject report: Setting a precedent
- Technology report: Article Feedback reversal
The Signpost: 18 March 2013
- News and notes: Resigning arbitrator slams Committee
- WikiProject report: Making music
- Featured content: Wikipedia stays warm
- Arbitration report: Richard case closes
- Technology report: Visual Editor "on schedule"
Help
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Do books like Book:Microsoft Windows allow cover images with trademarks? //iXavier <talk/edits/logs>
06:16, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
- See WP:Logos for using non-free images of logos - does that help? JohnCD (talk) 09:39, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
- Well, it's a public domain logo with a trademark on it. That's what I'm wondering about.
//iXavier <talk/edits/logs>
16:29, 24 March 2013 (UTC) - I think they do, because Book:Wikipedia uses the Wikipedia logo as its cover image, which is apparently subject to a registered trademark. smtchahal 12:33, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
- Well, it's a public domain logo with a trademark on it. That's what I'm wondering about.
The Signpost: 25 March 2013
- WikiProject report: The 'Burgh: WikiProject Pittsburgh
- Featured content: One and a half soursops
- Arbitration report: Two open cases
- News and notes: Sue Gardner to leave WMF; German Wikipedians spearhead another effort to close Wikinews
- Technology report: The Visual Editor: Where are we now, and where are we headed?
The Signpost: 01 April 2013
- Special report: Who reads which Wikipedia?
- WikiProject report: Special: FAQs
- Featured content: What the ?
- Arbitration report: Three open cases
- Technology report: Wikidata phase 2 deployment timetable in doubt
The Signpost: 08 April 2013
- Wikizine: WMF scales back feature after outcry
- WikiProject report: Earthshattering WikiProject Earthquakes
- News and notes: French intelligence agents threaten Wikimedia volunteer
- Arbitration report: Subject experts needed for Argentine History
- Featured content: Wikipedia loves poetry
- Technology report: Testing week
The Signpost: 15 April 2013
- WikiProject report: Unity in Diversity: South Africa
- News and notes: Another admin reform attempt flops
- Featured content: The featured process swings into high gear
The Signpost: 22 April 2013
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Editor Retention
- News and notes: Milan conference a mixed bag
- Featured content: Batfish in the Red Sea
- Arbitration report: Sexology case nears closure after stalling over topic ban
- Technology report: A flurry of deployments
The Signpost: 29 April 2013
- News and notes: Chapter furore over FDC knockbacks; First DC GLAM boot-camp
- In the media: Wikipedia's sexism; Yuri Gadyukin hoax
- Featured content: Wiki loves video games
- WikiProject report: Japanese WikiProject Baseball
- Traffic report: Most popular Wikipedia articles
- Arbitration report: Sexology closed; two open cases
- Recent research: Sentiment monitoring; UNESCO and systemic bias; and more
- Technology report: New notifications system deployed across Wikipedia
The Signpost: 06 May 2013
- Technology report: Foundation successful in bid for larger Google subsidy
- Featured content: WikiCup update: full speed ahead!
- WikiProject report: Earn $100 in cash... and a button!
The Signpost: 13 May 2013
- News and notes: WMF–community ruckus on Wikimedia mailing list
- WikiProject report: Knock Out: WikiProject Mixed Martial Arts
- Featured content: A mushroom, a motorway, a Munich gallery, and a map
- In the media: PR firm accused of editing Wikipedia for government clients; can Wikipedia predict the stock market?
- Arbitration report: Race and politics opened; three open cases
The Signpost: 20 May 2013
- Foundation elections: Trustee candidates speak about Board structure, China, gender, global south, endowment
- WikiProject report: Classical Greece and Rome
- News and notes: Spanish Wikipedia leaps past one million articles
- In the media: Qworty incident continues
- Featured content: Up in the air
The Signpost: 27 May 2013
- News and notes: First-ever community election for FDC positions
- In the media: Pagans complain about Qworty's anti-Pagan editing
- Foundation elections: Candidates talk about the Meta problem, the nation-based chapter model, world languages, and value for money
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Geographical Coordinates
- Featured content: Life of 2π
- Recent research: Motivations on the Persian Wikipedia; is science eight times more popular on the Spanish Wikipedia than the English Wikipedia?
- Technology report: Amsterdam hackathon: continuity, change, and stroopwafels
The Signpost: 05 June 2013
- From the editor: Signpost developments
- Featured content: A week of portraits
- Discussion report: Return of the Discussion report
- News and notes: "Cease and desist", World Trade Organization says to Wikivoyage; Could WikiLang be the next WMF project?
- In the media: China blocks secure version of Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: Operation Normandy
- Technology report: Developers accused of making Toolserver fight 'pointless'
The Signpost: 12 June 2013
- Featured content: Mixing Bowl Interchange
- In the media: VisualEditor will "change world history"
- Discussion report: VisualEditor, elections, bots, and more
- Traffic report: Who holds the throne?
- Arbitration report: Two cases suspended; proposed decision posted in Argentine History
- WikiProject report: Processing WikiProject Computing
The Signpost: 19 June 2013
- Traffic report: Most popular Wikipedia articles of the last week
- WikiProject report: The Volunteer State: WikiProject Tennessee
- News and notes: Swedish Wikipedia's millionth article leads to protests; WMF elections—where are all the voters?
- Featured content: Cheaper by the dozen
- Discussion report: Citations, non-free content, and a MediaWiki meeting
- Technology report: May engineering report published
- Arbitration report: The Farmbrough amendment request—automation and arbitration enforcement
The Signpost: 26 June 2013
- Traffic report: Most-viewed articles of the week
- In the media: Daily Dot on Commons and porn; Jimmy Wales accused of breaking Wikipedia rules in hunt for Snowden
- News and notes: Election results released
- Featured content: Wikipedia in black + Adam Cuerden
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Fashion
- Arbitration report: Argentine History closed; two cases remain suspended
The Signpost: 03 July 2013
- In the media: Jimmy Wales is not an Internet billionaire; a mass shooter's alleged Wikipedia editing
- Featured content: Queen of France
- WikiProject report: Puppies!
- News and notes: Wikipedia's medical collaborations gathering pace
- Discussion report: Snuggle, mainpage link to Wikinews, 3RR, and more
- Technology report: VisualEditor in midst of game-changing deployment series
- Traffic report: Yahoo! crushes the competition ... in Wikipedia views
- Arbitration report: Tea Party movement reopened, new AUSC appointments
The Signpost: 10 July 2013
- WikiProject report: Not Jimbo: WikiProject Wales
- Traffic report: Inflated view counts here, there, and everywhere
- Dispatches: Infoboxes: time for a fresh look?
- Featured content: The week of the birds
- Discussion report: Featured article process governance, signature templates, and more
The Signpost: 17 July 2013
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Square Enix
- Traffic report: Most-viewed articles of the week
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation's new plans announced
- Featured content: Documents and sports
The Signpost: 24 July 2013
- In the media: Wikipedia flamewars
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Religion
- Discussion report: Partially disambiguated page names, page protection policy, and more
- Traffic report: Gleeless
- Featured content: Engineering and the arts
- Arbitration report: Infoboxes case opens
The Signpost: 31 July 2013
- Recent research: Napoleon, Michael Jackson and Srebrenica across cultures, 90% of Wikipedia better than Britannica, WikiSym preview
- Traffic report: Bouncing Baby Brouhaha
- WikiProject report: Babel Series: Politics on the Turkish Wikipedia
- News and notes: Gearing up for Wikimania 2013
- Arbitration report: Race and politics case closes
- Featured content: Caterpillars, warblers, and frogs—oh my!
The Signpost: 07 August 2013
- Arbitration report: Fourteen editors proposed for ban in Tea Party movement case
- Traffic report: Greetings from the graveyard
- News and notes: Chapters Association self-destructs
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Freedom of Speech
- Featured content: Mysterious case of the grand duchess
- Discussion report: CheckUser and Oversighter candidates, and more
The Signpost: 14 August 2013
- News and notes: "Beautifully smooth" Wikimania with few hitches
- In the media: Chinese censorship
- Featured content: Wikipedia takes the cities
- Discussion report: Wikivoyage, reliable sources, music bands, account creators, and OTRS
- WikiProject report: For the love of stamps
- Arbitration report: Kiefer.Wolfowitz and Ironholds case closes
The Signpost: 21 August 2013
- Recent research: WikiSym 2013 retrospective
- WikiProject report: Loop-the-loop: Amusement Parks
- Traffic report: Reddit creep
- Featured content: WikiCup update, and the gardens of Finland
- News and notes: Looking ahead to Wiki Loves Monuments
- Technology report: Gallery improvements launch on Wikipedia
The Signpost: 28 August 2013
- Recent research: WikiSym 2013 retrospective
- WikiProject report: Loop-the-loop: Amusement Parks
- Traffic report: Reddit creep
- Featured content: WikiCup update, and the gardens of Finland
- News and notes: Looking ahead to Wiki Loves Monuments
- Technology report: Gallery improvements launch on Wikipedia
The Signpost: 04 September 2013
- News and notes: Privacy policy debate gears up
- Traffic report: No accounting for the wisdom of crowds
- Featured content: Bridging the way to a Peasants' Revolt
- WikiProject report: Writing on the frontier: Psychology on Wikipedia
- Arbitration report: Manning naming dispute case opens; Tea Party case closes ; Infoboxes nears completion
- Technology report: Making Wikipedia more accessible
The Signpost: 11 September 2013
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Indonesia
- Featured content: Tintin goes featured
- Traffic report: Syria, celebrities, and association football: oh my!
- Arbitration report: Workshop phase opens in Manning naming dispute ; Infoboxes case closes
The Signpost: 18 September 2013
- WikiProject report: 18,464 Good Articles on the wall
- Featured content: Hurricane Diane and Van Gogh
- Technology report: What can Wikidata do for Wikipedia?
- Traffic report: Twerking, tragedy and TV
The Signpost: 25 September 2013
- Traffic report: Look on Walter's works
- WikiProject report: Babel Series: GOOOOOOAAAAAAALLLLLLL!!!!!
- Featured content: Wikipedia takes the stage
The Signpost: 02 October 2013
- Discussion report: References to individuals and groups, merging wikiprojects, portals on the Main page, and more
- News and notes: WMF signals new grantmaking priorities
- Featured content: Bobby, Ben, Roger and a fantasia
- Arbitration report: Infoboxes: After the war
- WikiProject report: U2 Too
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, IXavier. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
editToken
Hello IXavier,
Your script User:IXavier/twinklemod.js is no longer functional because it attempts to get an editToken
from mw.user.tokens
. The script should instead get a csrfToken
. editToken
s were removed from mw.user.tokens
on October 3, 2019 at Phabricator during this edit as they were redundant to csrfToken
s.– BrandonXLF (talk) 00:06, 25 November 2019 (UTC)