User talk:Iconovate

Welcome!

Hi, Iconovate. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 10:43, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to Gratton appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article to establish notability. If you wish to create such an article, please confirm that your subject is notable according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 10:43, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dean Anthony Gratton.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! LukeSurl^{t c} 09:46, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Iconovate. You have new messages at LukeSurl's talk page.
Message added 10:21, 19 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

LukeSurl^{t c} 10:21, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah-Jayne Gratton

Hi. Since this article was the same as the one deleted in a previous deletion discussion (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah-Jayne Gratton), it has been deleted per our policy. If you wish to re-create the article, please see the instructions on how to appeal the deletion decision here. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 10:31, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Dean Anthony Gratton (August 9)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dean Anthony Gratton.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Black Kite (talk) 10:36, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. This one's pretty much exactly the same as the one that was deleted as well. Black Kite (talk) 10:42, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sarah-Jayne Gratton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sarah-Jayne Gratton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah-Jayne Gratton (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 10:31, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sarah-Jayne Gratton

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sarah-Jayne Gratton, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Fiddle Faddle 10:33, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dean Anthony Gratton

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dean Anthony Gratton, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Fiddle Faddle 10:46, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I was coming here to post a message warning you that continuing to re-create pages deleted as a result of consensus at deletion discussions would be likely to lead to a block. Before writing the message, however, I thought it best to check your editing history to decide whether you had enough experience to know that full well already or not, so as to decide whether the warning should be a final one or not. And, guess what I found in the course of looking through all the relevant history? I found that you are evading blocks on at least two earlier accounts, and perhaps more. Naturally, this account is now blocked too. Perhaps this time you will get the message: Wikipedia is not the place to promote yourself and your wife, or yourself and your husband, or your two friends, or the two people who pay you to try to create spam articles about them, or whatever: in short, Wikipedia is not the place to promote anyone or anything. You really would be better off spending your time trying to promote them somewhere else, where you might not find that your work keeps getting deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:37, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]