User talk:INeverCry/Archive 4

Admin conflict

I had added context to The Members of Akatsuki, disqualifying it for WP:CSD#A1 when you deleted it. I restored it, although I think this article might be best merged into the parent article with the fancruft removed. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:05, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

The link you added is a redirect to List of Naruto characters#Akatsuki. I don't see how a long list like this could be merged into what's only a small section of a larger article? INeverCry 21:16, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

It isn't a long list. It's a list with only 11 items, and it won't grow because the series is over. Each item includes what appears to be unnecessary detail. It could be merged if heavily trimmed, with 11 one-line bullet points listing the characters and their principal features. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:01, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Social protest novel deletion of Talk page

Hi, You commented on the deletion of the Talk page for the Social protest novel. I transferred this page (in an edited version) to the Social novel Talk page. I believe that I should not have deleted the page -- my fingers moved too quickly! I will restore this, if you can confirm that this is the correct way to handle my error. Thanks.Rwood128 (talk) 12:09, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

It's now a redirect. INeverCry 18:03, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of Westward Leaning

I am writing to you in regards to the page "Westward Leaning" that I created. I am currently a student studying business at the University of San Francisco and thought that the company, Westward Leaning should have a wikipedia page. Please let me know why this page was deleted, or if we could un-delete it.

I would appreciate your constructive feedback.

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dearnash (talk • contribs) 04:34, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

This was deleted per WP:CSD#G11. Articles on companies have to be neutral and factual. You also have to demonstrate WP:N using WP:RS. For guidelines on writing an article about a company, see Wikipedia:Companies, corporations and economic information. INeverCry 17:34, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrolled Rights

Hi there! I have a quick question about getting the rights for autopatrol, what are the requirements and do I qualifiy for it, how many articles do I have to create? Thanks PBASH607 (The One Day Apocalypse) (talk) 19:10, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. INeverCry 19:13, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Adriana Molinari

Were you going to finish the job you started at Adriana Molinari? The article is titled with one name but then the rest of it has Alex Taylor all over it. Some explanation as to why there are two names in the article would probably be good as well. Maybe work in that she had a stage name or something of that ilk. Dismas|^(talk) 03:37, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

I didn't start it. This was a move requested per WP:CSD#G6 by Kevin. I only deleted the Adriana Molinari page so that the other page could be moved there. Kevin will most likely do any required clean-up soon. INeverCry 05:12, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Per an OTRS request, I'm trying to clean the page as much as possible to update it to her current name, since she sent me an e-mail using that name, but I think I am done, as I just finished completing it after seeing this. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 05:36, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

why did You delete my Page (AIDMI)

Hey Dude,

I have not copied the content the reference you have given. I want to contest — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gautambhut (talk • contribs) 12:11, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

The content of this submission was taken directly from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un-dpadm/unpan046564.pdf. You used all the text on page 3 word for word for example. This is unacceptable. Submissions must be written in your own words, and only based on sources, not taken word for word. INeverCry 16:11, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Page Deleted but Article Not Yet Submitted

Hello, INeverCry -- I intend to publish an article about Billy St. John, whom I am sure you will find notable and worthy. I had just created the subject page, probably because of a link that popped up, and intended to finish it later. Maybe I thought it was in my personal space, where I could work on it at my own pace (my mistake!). It looks bad to have an article flagged and deleted, especially when it never existed in the first place. Is there any way we could just cancel or eliminate the scarlet damnation of deletion for this one and let me post it when I have actually written it? I promise I will learn how to draft better, and will probably write it on my computer and copy and paste when the time comes. You will not be disappointed with the subject. Thanks in advance for your understanding. Hairhorse (talk) 17:01, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, that wasn't ready to be in mainspace. I would suggest you start User:Hairhorse/Billy St. John, build it up a bit, and then move it into mainspace. As for the redlink Billy St. John, that would turn blue again once you've moved the userspace draft to it. INeverCry 17:44, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Babushkanism

I created the Babushkanism page. My friends and I believe in this religion and follow it strongly. We wear the Babushki outfits and believe in Mimishka. This is not a hoax page or a joke. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Babushkist (talk • contribs) 01:42, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

In order to have a Wikipedia article, the WP:N of a subject must be demonstrated using WP:RS. INeverCry 01:44, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Beautiful Store

You deleted that page under "(G6: Deleted to fix copy-and-paste page move". First question: where's the fixed page? I am the instructor for the students who are working on that topic. They told me that they improved the page, but it was deleted, and that their sandbox version doesn't have the fixes that were on the deleted page... Could you restore it so I could verify? If you want to preform a hist merge, then the sandbox for most of their edits is at User:GaHee Park/sandbox (just make sure to preserve/move the talk page). Cheers, --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:47, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi Piotr. That page was tagged with G6 by User:Happysailor. The only other edit was a complete paste of the contents (12k) by User:HaeYoon. Do you need this page restored, or just the content put into userspace? Where did HaeYoon get that 12k of text from? INeverCry 02:56, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

If it wasn't from User:GaHee Park/sandbox, than it wasn't a content from anywhere else. The students, including HaeYoon, told me that their newest version of the text at User:GaHee Park/sandbox which they wanted to mainspace at Beautiful Store, after addressing concerns over the previous version, was deleted, and they have no backup. So I think it should either be 1) restored to Beautiful Store or 2) merged back to the User:GaHee Park/sandbox if there other concerns that would justify a speedy. It is certainly not a copy of any other existing article, and I don't think that G6 applies to copies of sandboxes (isn't the appropriate procedure WP:HISTORYMERGE then?). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:03, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

I'm signing off for the night. I restored the article so that you can look at it and figure out what was done, what needs to be done, etc. INeverCry 03:16, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I am not seeing many changes, sigh. I spent ~2h telling them sentence by sentence what to fix... double sigh. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:22, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of Ayesha Thapar Page

Hi INeverCry,

I had recently created an article which was deleted by you. It was a biography of Ayesha Thapar - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ayesha_Thapar&action=edit&redlink=1 .The reason mentioned by the user who put the 'speedy deletion' tag, was that the article appeared to be an advertisement. Since I'm new on Wikipedia, Iam not really sure what amounted to this conclusion. I had no such intent and only wanted to contribute. I did my own research and found out the possible glitches which I have mentioned below. Please let me know if fixing them would serve the purpose -

1- Put a link to the linkedin profile of Ayesha Thapar 2- Opinionated the article in one place

If there are more points to take care of ,then please let me know. It would be great if you could let the article go live and then help me develop it.

Thanks & Regards, Tushar Taliyan (talk) 06:11, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

This was deleted under WP:CSD#G11, but it could just as easily have been deleted under WP:CSD#A7 as it is. It probably struck the speedy tagger as a promo for a non-notable person. I've restored it and placed it in your userspace for you to work on: User:Tushar Taliyan/Ayesha Thapar. I think more has to be done to establish her notability. What, if any, connection does she or her company/ies have with the Thapar Group or the Avantha Group? A mainspace article on her may have to wait until there's an article on atleast one of her companies. If the companies she runs aren't notable enough for their own articles, then she might not be notable at present. The Thapar family connection doesn't necessarily make any member of the family notable. INeverCry 15:16, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Sidewalk Tha Villain

I nominated a page for deletion based on notability yesterday, but the author just removed the template. Take a look at the article and see what you think. Thanks. --Mjrmtg (talk) 10:30, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

I see it's been prodded. We'll see how that goes. If he can provide a reliable source or sources to his membership in the South Park Coalition, and his connection to notable acts, that might be enough to take A7 off the table. Depending on what kind of sourcing is provided, if any, this may have to go to AFD instead. INeverCry 15:24, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Restore request for Talk:@MAX SyncUp

Hi,

You deleted Talk:@MAX SyncUp under WP:CSD#G8 after deleting @MAX SyncUp. However, you then restored the article page ("6 revisions restored: mistakenly deleted" in the log), but didn't restore the talk page. Can you do so please?

Thanks!

—me_and 14:23, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

 Done INeverCry 15:18, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for helping clear the image deletion backlogs

		The Deletionist's Barnstar
		Dear user INeverCry: Thank you very much for all your hard work helping to reduce the image deletion backlogs! Your efforts are much appreciated . Dianna (talk) 20:47, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

OMG, you used the dreaded d word! Thanks Dianna! I know this particular barnstar probably isnt pc, but I like it, and of course that's what counts. Good luck finding someone else who wants one though, or who wouldn't hide it deep in an archive. That's where I first came accross one of these the other day. INeverCry 01:19, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Well you aren't really a Deletionist, but you did help a lot with the deletions! And you did suggest handing out these bad boys! Best wishes, -- Dianna (talk) 02:05, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

I'll start working on FFD, etc on a regular basis. I hope you're only temporarily burnt out on those yourself. If you need help with anything else, I'm always here (literally). INeverCry 03:29, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

I've mentioned you on my talk page

if you didn't notice. If you didn't, then you need to enable "mentions" in Notifications. I've referred a lot of people to you when they need a Commons/enwp admin, so I probably owe you a beer or two if we ever meet up. Sometimes, only a dual-admin will do, however, so I'm more glad than ever you got the bit here. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 01:29, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi Dennis. I wasn't sure if I wanted to see these "mentions", but I've turned it on. The folks who complain about me and my deletions on Commons usually don't know how to link my name, so hopefully they're low-tech here too. As for the beers, I'm diabetic, so a couple cups of decaf tea would be more to my liking. ;) INeverCry 02:45, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

I use it when I want to ping you but still give you plausible deniability that a message on your talk page wouldn't give you. It is really handy for stuff like that, where you might be interested in a topic but a talk page entry might be too much. For me, it has mainly been a plus, although for a couple days, several friends thought it would be funny to link 20 times a comment. Since it groups similar mentions, it wasn't a problems. I expect to also like the new "Flow" message grouping, which is also Facebook like [1] and will be a plus for new users since it will be very familiar. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 09:59, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Plz Protection My pages

hi, this IP in back in this history blocked 6 time for Wikipedia:No personal attacks , Wikipedia:Harassment and Wikipedia:Sock puppetry now backed and attack and Harassment in my user page and sub pages , plz help me and protection my user pages from this edit ip , thanks dear فلورانس (talk) 19:05, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

 Done INeverCry 19:15, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks A lot , and ip , he can edit or make other sub page in my user page فلورانس (talk) 19:29, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Deletion question

Hello, you deleted the page Worldwide Initiatives for Grantmaker Support (WINGS) for copyright violation - can you please tell me which sections reflect this violation so I can fix? Thx and best, Urbanmolecule

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Worldwide_Initiatives_for_Grantmaker_Support_(WINGS) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.131.160.158 (talk) 23:28, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

The article was tagged as a copyvio of http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.wingsweb.org/resource/resmgr/files/wings_sp_2011-14_final.pdf. I really don't have the time to go thru such a large article sentence by sentence. Right off the bat though, I would say the fact that the vast majority of the content is referenced to the organization itself is a problem, as is the length itself. This should be a neutral article rather than a detailed company prospectus, with a positive, promotional tone. See WP:RS, and Wikipedia:Third-party sources in regard to referencing, WP:N for notability concerns, and Wikipedia:Companies, corporations and economic information for a guideline on writing company articles. INeverCry 23:48, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Sara Jay

You deleted the Sara Jay article. Can you please tell me why? It's not advertising. It is a noteworthy person in adult. Nothing more. Nothing less. I don't understand. Vickyvette (talk) 01:36, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

This looks like a promo for a non-notable person. The first half is blatant promo, while the bottom half doesn't show me anything that would pass WP:PORNBIO. INeverCry 01:48, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

(stalking) I got a note on my talk page too, but the article has been deleted so I cannot help. My sense is that had I agreed it was a blatant advert (eg: "zomg Sarah Jay is the greatest human being ever to walk this earth!!!11!1one") I would have tagged it as CSD G11 in the first instance. IMHO if you delete stuff you need to give a good explanation why, otherwise people just get pissed. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 06:23, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

I don't see anyone "getting pissed" about my responses. You seem to be the only one complaining about them. INeverCry 16:23, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Ando Drago

Hey I have question why u deleted my page ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ando_Drago If you dont know the artist dosnt mean it isint important... please check how many views he has on myspace...can u pls undo this ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monijwz (talk • contribs) 16:47, 9 May 2013‎

This was deleted because you failed to demonstrate WP:N using WP:RS. INeverCry 16:55, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

(stalking) And you just failed to demonstrate WP:BITE using WP:OMGWTFBBQ. Again, can I politely suggest you spend a bit more time explaining your actions, or referring the newcomer elsewhere such as the help desk. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:09, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

I didn't bite anyone, and I used 2 basic policy links. I told him why the page was deleted in a simple straight-forward way. I don't see anything wrong with it. We have large deletion backlogs here which I'm trying to help take care of, and so I don't have the time to give some long drawn-out explanation of every deletion someone asks me about. This is how I'm going to respond to these questions in future. If you have a problem with it, you're going to be pretty busy here stalking me. INeverCry 16:21, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

JovenLilJoker

I've run out of superlatives. Have some bubble tea Mkdw^talk 19:57, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

We may need to salt that article considering how many times it's been re-created in the last week. Mkdw^talk 19:36, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

 Already done INeverCry 19:37, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Superstar. Mkdw^talk 19:37, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Now you know who to emulate. INeverCry 19:45, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

I can try. BTW he's back JovenLilJoker Rapper. I left him a personalized message, didn't seem to work... Mkdw^talk 19:49, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

I've deleted that too and blocked the acct. INeverCry 19:53, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Rally of Poland

Hey. Did you notice the history of Rally of Poland before deleting the redirect? Prolog (talk) 09:29, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Unfortunately I hadn't. I've restored the page and full-protected it. INeverCry 16:06, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Deleted article

Can you tell me why our /Multiple Sclerosis and Hearing Loss article was deleted? This article was written by a former President of our company.

Jim Kurzec jkurzec@wpintegra.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jkurzec (talk • contribs) 12:19, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

This was deleted as a copyright infringement of http://www.workplaceintegra.com/hearing-articles/MS-hearing-loss.php. In order to have content from that source here on Wikipedia, the copyright holder would have to provide permission to WP:OTRS. INeverCry 16:09, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Indefinitely protecting redirect for edit warring

At Rally of Poland, you indefinitely fully protected that redirect for edit warring and added {{pp-full}} which broke the redirect. However, there have been no edits to the redirect for almost a year, and no edits to the target for over a month, so I think a mistake might have been made. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 01:32, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. I've removed the pp-full. There's a recent deleted edit which caused the protection. INeverCry 01:48, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

If a revision was deleted, the log in the revision history would only be hidden if it was oversighted, which should only be used if personal information was revealed. And you're not an oversighter so you wouldn't have that ability. Also, if it was a single edit, which was so bad that it had to be suppressed, why would the reason for protecting be edit warring/content dispute? Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 02:24, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Take a look at the history now. I've restored the recent edit I referred to. It was the same edit from Alex that led to the last protection in 2011, and which was repeated again in July, 2012, and now in May, 2013. The time that ellapsed between these blankings/CSD taggings led me to indef protect it to prevent further repetition. INeverCry 03:40, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

If it just a single user failing to get the point, wouldn't it be better to warn the user and if they still keep being disruptive, block to prevent further disruption? Those are the measures outlined Wikipedia:Protection_policy#Content_disputes. Also, I am curious as to how you hide those revisions because aren't revisions that are revdeled supposed to show up like this?. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 03:59, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

I've removed the protection and warned the user. INeverCry 04:25, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

G12 Unambiguous copyright infringement

This article was erased due to a false copyright infringement http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogo_Sardesco

sources about the Dogo Sardesco found in many forums and websites were copied by the article of wikepedia started years ago and wrongly erased due to the absence of references and bibliography months ago. I wrote again the same article (cancelled months ago) adding bibliography and external sources, because i'm not able to restore cancelled articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.39.118.133 (talk) 03:33, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

I have no idea what you're saying. INeverCry 03:54, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Header

Just curious: can you please point me to the discussion where consensus was reached to reduce the threshold for Autopatrolled from 50 to 30 articles. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:34, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

I got that update from Wikipedia:Autopatrolled where the number was changed from 50 to 30 by our fellow admin Espresso Addict. INeverCry 04:46, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. FWIW, although there is a current discussion at the VP about unbundling Autopatrolled from the Admin toolset, where there is, AFAIK, no discussion with a community consensus for this change. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:59, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

The unbundling proposal is a bit strange, and a consensus looks unlikely. I won't worry too much about it though; I was autopatrolled long before my RFA. As for the drop to 30 articles, I can agree with that. If you can write 30 decent articles, the next 20 will probably be ok too. INeverCry 15:50, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

I'm not worried about having or losing the 'right' which is only of true interest for the hat collectors because it does not give editors any personal advantages at all. As one of the most active admins at PERM however, who checks all of an applicant's creations, I feel that a lowering of the bar may not be entirely appropriate. My main concern however is that it appears that this the decision to change the threshold - unless I am mistaken - to have been made without any formal discussion and consensus. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:06, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

I think the autopatrolled right has more benefits than giving an editor any kind of vanity hat status or even lightening the patroller load. Other less-experienced users who need help or advice on writing an article might prefer to look to someone who's autopatrolled, or might give more weight to their comments in a discussion about an article. For admins like us, the fact that we qualify to be autopatrolled probably lends a certain ammount of credibility to any content-related log actions we perform, seeing that it signifies a certain level of content creation experience.

In regard to the lower number of articles idea, we have some editors who may not be up to 50 articles, but who'd probably be a safe bet as autopatrolled; folks like User:Harrison49 or User:Richerman and others. I certainly agree that consensus for any kind of change in the article creation # requirement is needed though. INeverCry 01:29, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

I will certainly admit to having accorded Autopatrolled to users who have slightly less than the recommended 50 creations. In such cases, the articles were flawless, but IMHO and based on my experience of having accorded or rejected 100s of applications at PERM, and having patrolled literally tens of thousands of new articles over the years, I consider 50 to be a safe guideline. The new NPP interface accords the opportunity for patrollers to provide the creators with tidbits of useful help and information. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:48, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Why keep one page while you delete the other

I see you deleted SP:BR. If you deleted that, why is SP:AF still redirecting to Special:AbuseFilter? Shouldn't you delete that? Or "un-delete" SP:BR? 15:55, 12 May 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Infinity to the power of infinity (talk • contribs)

That may have been a mistake on my part. The page was created by a sockpuppet though, so I've asked a fellow admin for advice on what needs to be done. INeverCry 16:21, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Update: I've re-created it. INeverCry 20:31, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Confirmation on "Nino Micozzi" Submission

Hi again.. I was just wondering if the following article previously deleted "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alex-bellux/Nino_Micozzi" would be ready to be submitted to be a Wikipedia article. It has been a work in progress for a little over a month and I finished editing it (for now). But I am afraid it still does not fulfill all Wikipedia standards. Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex-bellux (talk • contribs) 18:39, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

One concern I can see at the moment is the need for inline citations. Aside from that, the sources still seem quite local, and may not be enough to establish WP:N. Coverage in national sources would be better, if they exist (Boston Globe, Wallstreet Journal, Forbes, etc). INeverCry 20:12, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

I searched on Boston Globe and for "Micozzi" I had a redirect to Boston.com which is by far one of the few "bostonian" sites to cite his name aside from GlobeSt.com which is a real-estate based site. Micozzi's holdings are mostly private, but they are however mentioned in Newton Public Records which does not disclose its archives online. Since his business is only based in New England, they occasionally talk about him in the local news. Moreover, he's generally not very known unless of course someone types it in Google and finds the Wikipedia article. Thanks.

I searched on Boston Globe and for "Micozzi" I had a redirect to Boston.com which is by far one of the few "bostonian" sites to cite his name aside from GlobeSt.com which is a real-estate based site. Micozzi's holdings are mostly private, but they are however mentioned in Newton Public Records which does not disclose its archives online. Since his business is only based in New England, they occasionally talk about him in the local news. Moreover, he's generally not very known unless of course someone types it in Google and finds the Wikipedia article. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex-bellux (talk • contribs) 10:25, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Rollback

Hi! I just put in a request for rollback. Earlier my request was denied because I was not eligible for it, after lots of hard work reverting vandalism and patrolling new pages, I think I am up for the task, I am almost at the thousand edit mark. Am I eligible or not? If you can you may decline or accept my request on the page with the requests for rollback, but remember to check my progress :) Thanks. PBASH607 (The One Day Apocalypse) (talk) 22:47, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

• (talk page stalker) Looking at stuff like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flatbush zombies, and you asking for rollback in mutliple places [2]. I also saw Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WorthWert where you asked for a Checkuser on an IP, which isn't done, and a less than great record with CSD User:PBASH607/CSD log (trying to CSD List of Oldest Breweries of Canada is almost criminal ;). These are innocent enough mistakes, the kind new users make, but it does make me wonder how familiar you are, and how easy it will be to get in trouble with rollback. But, this isn't my page and you didn't ask me, I'm just butting in... Dennis Brown - 2¢ - © - @ - Join WER 23:37, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Well true, anyways thanks for telling me now, I asked for rollback with a user I knew earlier, he helped me so I asked him and the admin for help, and I put Flatbush zombies for nomination rather than CSD, because some users see it as a potential article, the breweries article, was only one sentence long when I saw it, and out of the 54 articles I nominated, 41 were deleted, thats a decent record, anyways thank you for your opinion on me :) PBASH607 (The One Day Apocalypse) (talk) 23:52, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Your vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Motherfucking Browns was concerning to me, as we have to base our actions here on policy rather than personal feeling. The last week or so of posts on your talk aren't the best recommendation either. That and the opinion of Dennis above would swing me towards declining the request. But I don't quite feel neutral since you asked me specifically, so I'll let another admin make the final decision on this one. INeverCry 01:56, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

• And I don't have a bad opinion of you, you seem like a nice enough fellow. I worry about giving someone rollback if they aren't familiar enough with policy mainly because using it improperly can get you stripped of that right, or even blocked if you abuse it. It is a tool, but like a knife, it can cut the hand of the person holding it just as easily as what you are pointing it at. My concerns shouldn't be seen as a judgement on you as a person, I'm just worried you might not be sufficiently experienced. That is easy to cure, it just takes a little time and practice. Dennis Brown - 2¢ - © - @ - Join WER 02:29, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

SP:BR listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect SP:BR. Since you had some involvement with the SP:BR redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). — This, that and the other (talk) 08:07, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Rey DE LA ATLANTIDAM "Pollitbur" and the Samarkand

Excuse me : Im REY DE la Atlantida.I mnot any Pollidur or anybody more.Im an argentinian user than tries to starta a few articles about certain histotic topic(the timurid empiore) If i violated some rules of wikipedia excuse me , i only try to pracyice creating an article... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.236.211.89 (talk) 23:03, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

I believe that you're User:Polllilur. INeverCry 23:29, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Again i m not , i only use my account sometimes to create articles from the web ( yes it can be vandalism buit i try to modificate the contenide) The suspendt of my account vy the problems of another user is unfair.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.42.8.64 (talk) 00:15, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

deletion of sandbox / information about DeSScipher on wikipedia

Dear INeverCry,

Our page about the project DeSScipher was deleted because of unambiguous copyright infringement.

18:11, 20 April 2013 INeverCry (talk | contribs) deleted page User:Novor/sandbox (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.uni-giessen.de/cms/fbz/fb11/institute/klinik/rheumatologie/desscipher-en/about-desscipher/about-the-desscipher-project/about-desscipher/view?set_language=en)

However, I am also the administrator of desscipher.eu. A link was added in the article. This is a link to the webpage you have identified as copyright infringement of. Can you please help us, how we can report about our project in accordance with the wikipedia rules? Can the sandbox be recovered? Thanks for your help in advance, kind regards Novor (talk) 05:46, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

In order for copyrighted material to be used, the copyright holder should send a permission email to WP:OTRS. INeverCry 23:23, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. Novor (talk) 05:21, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Tagfry

Hi. This is regarding the deletion of page titled Tagfry. It was nominated for deletion by you considering article A7 into account. However, I would like to bring into notice that pages of other similar websites like Pinterest are still existing on wikipedia. In addition to that, my article was to make people aware of an important website which will help them in increasing their knowledge and keeping up to date. Requesting you to please look into this matter and guide me with best possible solution. Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swarnkar.wiki (talk • contribs) 06:34, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

In order to have this article on Wikipedia, you have to show WP:N using WP:RS, of which there were none in this deleted article. INeverCry 23:23, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Parag Parikh

Hello! I see you just recently deleted Parag Parikh. I just posted a note on the talk page of the person who nominated it here: User_talk:MohitSingh#Parag_Parikh and figured it'd be pertinent to give you the same message (though it may be too late for that now). Either way, thanks for all your hard work. :) --Pusillanimous (talk•contribs) 21:46, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

userification please

You speedy deleted Bashir Ahmed.

I didn't see the speedy nomination until after you deleted it.

I request userification.

I had a very persisten wikistalker, probably the wikipedia's most persistent wikistalker ever, who routinely gutted articles I started. In the two years prior to their final indefinite block over 80 percent of this contributor's edit were either to material I contributed or were about material I contributed. So, it is quite possible the article once satisfied A7 -- prior to their extreme and counter-policy disruptive editing.

Thanks Geo Swan (talk) 01:11, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

You started this in 2007 as a simple redirect to Bashir Ahmad. On May 9 2013 User:Bashirbits turned it into an unreferenced stub that basically reads like a hoax. Do you want me to restore the redirect, or would you still like it userfied? I don't think you'll want the stub once you see it. INeverCry 01:22, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

I've emailed you a copy of what was added. Let me know if you want that userfied, or a restore of the redirect. INeverCry 01:26, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, for emailing me the stub.

Yes, I think Bashir Ahmed should redirect to the Bashir Ahmad disambiguation page. For Chinese there is a specific unambiguous transliteration mapping. But for Arabic, Persian, Pashtun, there is no consistent mapping. And all the similar looking names are really analogs of one another.

Did the page ever have any significant content?

Do administrators ever protect redirects from editing? Geo Swan (talk) 03:03, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

The only edits were your initial creation and the May 9 changes, so there was never any significant content. I've restored the redirect. Protection probably isn't an option since there's only 1 user involved, and he may very well have done that stub in good faith. He doesn't look to be an active user. Let's see if we even hear from him again. INeverCry 03:29, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Ayesha Thapar Page Reworked

Copied from Archive -

Hi INeverCry, I have worked on this article, and have made changes as per your suggestions and as per Wiki guidelines - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tushar_Taliyan/Ayesha_Thapar. This is the best I could come up with, with the available information on net. Request you to make it live as a stub. I will update it as and when I come across more information. Thanks, Tushar Taliyan (talk) 10:58, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi INeverCry, I had recently created an article which was deleted by you. It was a biography of Ayesha Thapar - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ayesha_Thapar&action=edit&redlink=1 .The reason mentioned by the user who put the 'speedy deletion' tag, was that the article appeared to be an advertisement. Since I'm new on Wikipedia, Iam not really sure what amounted to this conclusion. I had no such intent and only wanted to contribute. I did my own research and found out the possible glitches which I have mentioned below. Please let me know if fixing them would serve the purpose - 1- Put a link to the linkedin profile of Ayesha Thapar 2- Opinionated the article in one place If there are more points to take care of ,then please let me know. It would be great if you could let the article go live and then help me develop it. Thanks & Regards, Tushar Taliyan (talk) 06:11, 7 May 2013 (UTC) This was deleted under WP:CSD#G11, but it could just as easily have been deleted under WP:CSD#A7 as it is. It probably struck the speedy tagger as a promo for a non-notable person. I've restored it and placed it in your userspace for you to work on: User:Tushar Taliyan/Ayesha Thapar. I think more has to be done to establish her notability. What, if any, connection does she or her company/ies have with the Thapar Group or the Avantha Group? A mainspace article on her may have to wait until there's an article on atleast one of her companies. If the companies she runs aren't notable enough for their own articles, then she might not be notable at present. The Thapar family connection doesn't necessarily make any member of the family notable. INeverCry 15:16, 7 May 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tushar Taliyan (talk • contribs)

I can't put this in mainspace because I still don't think it meets WP:N. INeverCry 16:49, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of File

You recently deleted my photograph of Tellico Dam. Why? The reason stated was "copyright violation." I'm at a loss to understand how I can violate a copyright by posting my own photograph. I took it, I edited it, I uploaded it, and if I had an objection, I would have said so myself.

Scott Johnson (talk) 16:20, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

What's the exact file name? INeverCry 16:48, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

File:TellicoDam.jpg Scott Johnson (talk) 16:49, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Why do you have it listed as "All Rights Reserved" on Flickr? There shouldn't be a conflict between licenses. INeverCry 16:53, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of 3D Flash Lidar Page

Dear Inevercry - you recently deleted our page on 3D Flash Lidar and I would like to be informed of why? We in no way infringed on copyrights so an explanation would be much appreciated as now I have to re-create the whole page from scratch, again... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dind21 (talk • contribs) 19:56, 16 May 2013‎

2 problems:

• 1. I don't know what page you're referring to. What's the exact title?
• 2. Who is we? This edit to my talk is your first, so what other account/s are you using?

INeverCry 20:25, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Elizabeth Kucinich

Good Try but unfortunately some editors seem to think stupidity like a tongue peircing is notbale. I have been trying for many years to get that nonsense removed to no avail. Arzel (talk) 21:16, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Isn't there some policy against reverting admins? INeverCry 21:28, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Apparently not.  :) Arzel (talk) 04:43, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

The detail has been removed again and taken to the article's talk. INeverCry 20:35, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Straw Man

Hi INeverCry, I tried to make a change to the page Straw Man, as I feel some of the information is incorrect. Straw Man is taught in schools as "Straw Man" not "Aunt Sally" and is never referred to as "Aunt Sally" when it is brought up in a discussion as the page suggests. I hope you can accept this correction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Will Webster (talk • contribs) 16:44, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

The inclusion of that detail is backed by two sources. If you want to remove it, you would have to take the issue to the article's talkpage and show reliable sources that back up your assertion that it isn't used. If consensus is reached, the detail could be altered or removed. If, however, you continue to arbitrarily remove it, you'll likely end up having your account blocked. INeverCry 17:13, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Ayesha Thapar Page Reworked

Hi,

Can you please go through this - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tushar_Taliyan/Ayesha_Thapar, and let me know your feedback. I really wish to go live with this.

Thanks, Tushar Taliyan (talk)

Copied from Archive

Copied from Archive - Hi INeverCry, I have worked on this article, and have made changes as per your suggestions and as per Wiki guidelines - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tushar_Taliyan/Ayesha_Thapar. This is the best I could come up with, with the available information on net. Request you to make it live as a stub. I will update it as and when I come across more information. Thanks, Tushar Taliyan (talk) 10:58, 16 May 2013 (UTC) Hi INeverCry, I had recently created an article which was deleted by you. It was a biography of Ayesha Thapar - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ayesha_Thapar&action=edit&redlink=1 .The reason mentioned by the user who put the 'speedy deletion' tag, was that the article appeared to be an advertisement. Since I'm new on Wikipedia, Iam not really sure what amounted to this conclusion. I had no such intent and only wanted to contribute. I did my own research and found out the possible glitches which I have mentioned below. Please let me know if fixing them would serve the purpose - 1- Put a link to the linkedin profile of Ayesha Thapar 2- Opinionated the article in one place If there are more points to take care of ,then please let me know. It would be great if you could let the article go live and then help me develop it. Thanks & Regards, Tushar Taliyan (talk) 06:11, 7 May 2013 (UTC) This was deleted under WP:CSD#G11, but it could just as easily have been deleted under WP:CSD#A7 as it is. It probably struck the speedy tagger as a promo for a non-notable person. I've restored it and placed it in your userspace for you to work on: User:Tushar Taliyan/Ayesha Thapar. I think more has to be done to establish her notability. What, if any, connection does she or her company/ies have with the Thapar Group or the Avantha Group? A mainspace article on her may have to wait until there's an article on atleast one of her companies. If the companies she runs aren't notable enough for their own articles, then she might not be notable at present. The Thapar family connection doesn't necessarily make any member of the family notable. INeverCry 15:16, 7 May 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tushar Taliyan (talk • contribs) I can't put this in mainspace because I still don't think it meets WP:N. INeverCry 16:49, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

I would suggest clicking the "submit the page!" link in the box at the top of the page, and getting a second opinion on notability. INeverCry 17:06, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

European Community Shipowners' Associations

Hello ,

I (German, no native speaker) have published the abive named article. It exists in [3] . When I got notice about the speedy deletion Notification, I wrote to

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Blanchardb#European_Community_Shipowners.27_Associations the man who had proposed that. In de.wikipedia.org it is common that "Schnelllöschanträge" are discussed 8 days. Maritime policy / coordination / EU lobbyiong and much more are specific themes . Of course, they are not "mainstream" but I think they should have their niches in the wikipedia (no one is obliged to read them if he/she does not want to ...)

Please revert your deletion. Thanks & regards, --Neun-x (talk) 19:06, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

 Done INeverCry 19:14, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much! this (219.999 hits) may confirm you that the ECSA is one of the bigger players and not some 'lobbyists in a nutshell' ... Europe is fighting against other big blocks like China and the USA , and every try / effort for mutual consent (especially if it is more than lip service) has my great respect. --Neun-x (talk) 19:27, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Jaylen Bledsoe

Looks like they're back at it again, no new sources have been added and the user is now claiming direct approval from WikiMedia "because hes a huge donor". --BigPimpinBrah (talk) 22:55, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Guess you mean to say, that you're at it again. You know you are all a bunch of narcissistic editors who want to be administrators. Don't even know why, I even tried to work with you guys for this school project. And yes, the Wikimedia contact is Josh VanDavier who expressed that he felt nothing was wrong with the current article in it's state. And I see that you all are now attacking the subject for "creating/writing" an autobiography. For god's sake, he's 15 years old. When he see's a Wikipedia page about himself, with no prior knowledge on edit/creating an autobiography who wouldn't edit their owns. As a human, you are instantly compelled to think you know more about yourself than anyone else. If you're gonna move this page again, just go ahead and delete the content at "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaylen_Bledsoe". I don't want people to see this, when they attempt to create a page about him in the future or when someone looks him up on Wikipedia, because of me. Have a nice night... Scottgramble (talk) 01:28, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Let me just say that my only interest is in clearing up what's happening here. At the moment, it doesn't look like you're trying to work with anyone, but rather are trying to force your way. The opinion of a WMF member has no bearing on the approval or decline of an AFC, nor does the claim that you are a "huge donor". The issue here is and has been whether the subject meets Wikipedia notability guidelines. INeverCry 01:45, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Deletion

Good day, I saw that you deleted Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Andrea Cunningham for G11 and G12. However, you haven't leave a message explaining why to its authors which would have been useful and the courteous thing to do, especially considering they are new contributors. Please keep that in mind, thanks, Amqui (talk) 01:57, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Actually, that's the job of the user who tagged the article for speedy deletion. INeverCry 02:23, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

International Code Council

Hi, thanks for your deletion work here. Just wondering about this article - it has existed since 2006. Did you check if any earlier versions were free of copyright infringement? If so, it might be better to revert to an earlier version than delete completely. (The tagging editor may wish to comment on this as well.) Cheers — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:23, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

In the case of CSD taggings by experienced fellow admins like DGG, I usually do the deletion quickly, and without checking closely. I basically tend to trust their judgement. I'll take a look at this soon, and see how much can be salvaged, if anything. INeverCry 16:30, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Yes, DGG is an experienced editor and administrator. But in my experience, the reason that administrators tag the article rather than just delete it themselves, is to get confirmation from a second pair of eyes. Anyway, no big deal, and don't worry if you don't have time to look into this. Regards — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:50, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I really am quite busy, so I appreciate your help with this one. INeverCry 17:43, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Raquel Amparo

I declined to delete Raquel Amparo and instead put a hangon tag there, to give the author a chance to answer the request I posed on the talk page. I felt that the number of albums released, in the 1990s when self-releases weren't common, may be associated with a religious music record label and therefore mean the subject is notable per WP:MUSICBIO. I'd still like to give the author a chance to respond or modify the article to address the notability concerns. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:09, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Prior BLPPROD and A7 deletion, but if you feel like there's potential, go for it. INeverCry 23:15, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

After more thought, I will take it up on the author's talk page and offer to restore the article if he can convince me that this musician meets any of the WP:MUSICBIO criteria. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:23, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Ukecast

19:05, 22 May 2013 INeverCry (talk | contribs) deleted page Ukecast (A7: Article about a website, blog, web forum, webcomic, podcast, browser game, or similar web content, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject)

I'm sorry, but I do not understand why the article on the UkeCast fails to meet the requirements for WikiPedia. It appears to totally ignore the fact that it was created to show a nexus between a large number of important individuals in the ukulele community. Half the people listed have their own WikiPedia articles seems harsh. At least give me a chance to get all that work back! If this site doesn't want my hard work there are others that do.

Aggie80 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aggie80 (talk • contribs) 23:32, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

There's no doubt that some notable people were involved, and the subject may in fact be notable. The issue here is that you didn't give any sources showing the notability of the subject. See WP:GNG for a general guideline on notability. If you'd like to continue working on this, I can place a copy of it in your userspace, or I could email you a copy. Let me know. INeverCry 23:47, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Of course I want to work on it! (And I'm not sure why it went 'public', the other article I was working on was in a suspended status while I was editing it, this went live without review). I figured the number of existing articles on WikiPedia that were related to the topic would be enough to show the nexus. Please place a copy in my workspace. Aggie80 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aggie80 (talk • contribs) 23:56, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Here you go: User:Aggie80/Ukecast. INeverCry 00:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! Aggie80 00:33, 23 May 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aggie80 (talk • contribs)

Deletion of ArrayBot

Dear INeverCry,

Please forward the information written yesterday for "ArrayBot," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArrayBot for rewrites and resubmission. If this was a subtopic under the corporation name and its importance was explained better, could we resubmit?

Amy Snook Executive Assistant for Ken Oosting Inspired Solar Technologies, Inc. amy.snook@inspired-solar.com

There are several problems with this submission. First, it doesn't use any WP:RS to show WP:N. Second, it's written in a positive, promotional tone. Third, having a representative of a company submit an article about that company or a product can be a WP:COI. Fourth, there doesn't seem to even be an article on Inspired Solar Technologies. Also, the Arraybot is being referred to as something not yet out of testing/production. Solar trackers are notable, but I don't know that individual, as yet unrealized examples, merit coverage on Wikipedia. I've sent a copy of the deleted content to the address above. INeverCry 18:52, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Ralph Carr

• Thanks for fixing the Ralph Carr mess. --Cuppysfriend (talk) 23:25, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Glad I could help, but the credit should go to Boleyn. I just clicked a button to put her move request through. INeverCry 00:29, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Portal Moziila

Hi! Could you delete these subpages, too (deletion disscusion). --Edgars2007 ^{(talk/contribs)}

 Done INeverCry 16:05, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Aishwarya Rai Bachchan

Please take care to make necessary changes after moving an article. In case you are unsure, you can post a message at nominator's talk page and ask him to make changes. I do lots of move requests, and it is a problem I regularly face! The worst point is there is no list of the RMs I have started,so, I sometimes miss RM closures. --Tito Dutta (contact) 20:41, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

I thought the person doing the CSD tag for the move would take care of that. I'll probably just leave these alone in future if I'm going to get complaints. INeverCry 20:58, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

CSD tag?? Though in this article only 1—2 lines need to be rewritten. And following BoD the edit was okay! But, the editor who'll close Talk:List_of_Bengali_films_of_2013#Requested_move may need to change lead and wording of 90+ articles. --Tito Dutta (contact) 21:07, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Oh, I see, you did not close the move. Apologies. The person who is closing a move discussion should make changes too! --Tito Dutta (contact) 21:09, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, Tito. I basically just delete the CSD-tagged page to make way for a move. I'm not actually involved in any of these moves beyond that speedy deletion. INeverCry 23:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Ivan laverde

Hey there, just curious why this article got deleted. I only got but a short look at it, but appeared to be packed full of reliable sources, and well written at that. Also it doesn't appear that the author was notified. Is this user a sockpuppet at a repeat attempt to create the same article or something? — MusikAnimal ^talk 21:25, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

The first version that I deleted was a plain infobox with no other content or refs. The second version, that was deleted by another admin as vandalism, looks like a copy and paste of the content at Daddy Yankee. I see another vandalism warning on the creator's talk, so maybe a disruptive acct. INeverCry 23:46, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Ah yes it was a copy of Daddy Yankee. Exactly what I saw. Guessing this user was out to make whoever "Ivan Iaverde" is as a superstar. That'd be vandalism alright. Thanks — MusikAnimal ^talk 23:52, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Submissions/Upcoming Horror Movies.com

I had just restored that from a G13 deletion, as a result of this request at REFUND. Although it is pretty terrible, and has been lurking there for four years, I feel that in order to demonstrate that the G13 promise of restoration on demand works, we should restore it and tell him that he has only, say, a month to sort it out or it will be deleted again. JohnCD (talk) 20:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

 Done INeverCry 20:18, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. It's astonishing how close an eye people keep on their pet creations - he hadn't touched it, or edited at all, for four and a half years, but within an hour of being notified that it had been tagged G13 he was requesting undeletion. JohnCD (talk) 20:28, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

He probably just got an email alert from the talkpage notice, though the fact that he still gives a shit after almost 5 years is pretty surprising in itself. Maybe he thinks having a declined AFC here is better than nothing. Reminds me of spammers and their love of sandboxes. INeverCry 20:42, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Ah yes, that would explain it; and the site still exists. JohnCD (talk) 21:04, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Not a bad looking site, but when I want horror, I just turn on CNN and see what the latest tragedy is. INeverCry 21:08, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

He's back

This is the usual case of Déjà vu. IP user 46.223.35.119 (talk · contribs) went back to his disruptive editing as soon as his last block expired.[4] And thanks for the vote of confidence at Commons. Much appreciated, Poeticbent talk 21:48, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

If he continues, we can give him a 6 month block. INeverCry 22:25, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Regarding your deletion of my pages

Could you please explain to me why my page "3D Flash Lidar" was deleted? It was cited that we infringed on Advanced Scientific Concept's copyrights but my clients own the copyrights and are upset that the page is gone... please explain and possibly reinstate so I can re-write any part of the article needed? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3D_flash_LIDAR. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.112.102.164 (talk) 14:30, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Could you please explain to me how exactly were the contents in Oceansat-1 and Mansur Ali Khan Pataudi Memorial Lecture were copyright infringements? I took special care not to copy down the entire text from those sites. I took time to translate and rewrite them to avoid copyright infringements. They have now been deleted by you. - Jayadevp13 02:35, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Both articles contain text taken word-for-word from http://space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/irs-p4.htm, and http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-sports/an-annual-lecture-in-memory-of-pataudi/article4387664.ece respectively. INeverCry 02:57, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Can they be restored if I promise to completely rewrite those articles? At first you restore one on a trial basis. I will edit it. If you are dissatisfied with my work, then you can straight away delete it. If you are satisfied, then you can restore the second one for the same. You can also tell me which points/parts are copyright infringements. Also take a look at the file Sunil Gavaskar delivering the inaugural Mansur Ali Khan Pataudi Memorial Lecture.jpg for any problem, so that they could be solved on time. Regards. - Jayadevp13 03:08, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) You can create articles in your sandbox, or recreate the articles unless the titles are salted! --Tito Dutta (contact) 03:22, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

But I need access to the earlier contents of those articles first. But it would be better if they are restored for editing. - Jayadevp13 03:47, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

• Here is the lecture article and here is the Oceansat! The second link may expire soon! --Tito Dutta (contact) 03:54, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

• I've deleted File:Sunil Gavaskar delivering the inaugural Mansur Ali Khan Pataudi Memorial Lecture.jpg. We have a free image of him that can be used. The article itself can explain that he's delivering the lecture, so a non-free image of him speaking really isn't needed to clarify such a simple premise. Also, multiple people likely photographed him delivering the lecture, so a free alternative could probably be found. INeverCry 04:00, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

• Fails NFCC! --Tito Dutta (contact) 04:02, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank You for sharing those links. But can't they be restored to avoid the burden of recreating it completely again? - Jayadevp13 04:05, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

• Generally a copyvio deleted article is not restored! But, depends on INeverCry. Click on the edit link of the first link, you'll get the content of the article including wikicodes, from the second link, copy paste the content1 Be careful about copyvio! --Tito Dutta (contact) 04:09, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
• I'm not going to restore them. You should work on these off-wiki and get rid of the copyvio material before placing them anywhere on Wikipedia, even a sandbox. INeverCry 04:20, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

I have recreated Oceansat-1 article here. Please take a look. Do not straight away delete it if it has problems. Tell it to me and give me time to solve it. - Jayadevp13 08:05, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

• No copyvio detected --Tito Dutta (contact) 08:26, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

A starbarn for you!

		The Commons Barnstar
		For your work in Wikipedia and Commons! Tito Dutta (contact) 03:21, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

• When I first looked at this, I wondered where I was for a second. Thank you Tito. INeverCry 04:13, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Deletion

Could you please explain me why my side was "(G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion)"? If you check these company pages:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motorex http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D._Medical_Industries http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthes

I don't think that my page was very much differnet from these. It is thought to be an information about the company. So please explain me what you did not like or I did wrong. Since it was my first page it took quiet a while to set it up. Constructive feedback would be much more helpful than just delet the page. So please could you give me some inputs what I can do now?Could you place the article in my user space where I can work on it until it is ready to go to main space?

--MichelleLily14 (talk) 06:23, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Articles on companies have to be neutral and factual, and based more on the company and it's people than individual products. The minutely-detailed description of pumps, and the "sample products" are issues in this particular submission, and make it look promotional. You also have to be sure to demonstrate WP:N using WP:RS. For guidelines on writing an article about a company, see Wikipedia:Companies, corporations and economic information. I've emailed you a copy of the article. You can work on it off-line or copy&paste it into a sandbox. Whichever you prefer. INeverCry 18:27, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Many thanks, I will try to improve my article. --MichelleLily14 (talk) 06:14, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Article Deletion

Hello, I am new to Wikipedia and noticed one of my articles was deleted a few days ago. If I add content to the article that is considered significant, would I be able to re-publish it? Thank you. Molar28 (talk) 21:22, 27 May 2013 (UTC)Molar28

Oh and here is the link to the deleted page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Molar28/sandbox Molar28 (talk) 21:24, 27 May 2013 (UTC)Molar28

As it was when deleted, the subject definitely doesn't meet WP:GNG. You would have to come up with content based on WP:RS showing how he's notable. INeverCry 22:00, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Oh okay. Thank you for the info. I'll work on this. Molar28 (talk) 14:19, 28 May 2013 (UTC)Molar28

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Clement Appiah-ghana

The user has recreated a similar user page to the one discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Clement Appiah-ghana. Can you please review and determine if it is similar enough that the MfD can just be reopened? Many thanks! VQuakr (talk) 22:29, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

• (talk page stalker) This is an MFD candidate! In my opinion,you can create a second MFD nomination rather than opening the first one whic ended with a U1 (user's request to delete)! --Tito Dutta (contact) 22:50, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

• See my comment at the re-opened MFD. INeverCry 22:56, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Copyright help

Hi, INeverCry, could you perhaps help out here? I'm not an expert, but my understanding is that once permission has been confirmed, it should be noted in the image on Commons (WP:PERMISSION). Yet, I don't see that. Perhaps the editor is confused about requesting permission vs. having permission confirmed, or perhaps they haven't completed the final steps, or perhaps I've got it wrong. I don't believe I have the power to check the permission number in the edit summary and see what the status is. Thanks for any help you can provide.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:43, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

I've asked an OTRS member on Commons to check this out. INeverCry 01:12, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Great, thanks, I'll keep watching here.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:23, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

I wasn't quite sure what OTRS queue she's referring to, so I asked Kevin as well. INeverCry 01:45, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

The image has now been nominated for deletion with an explanation as to the problem. My inclination is to remove the image from the article pending what is most likely going to be a deletion. Any thoughts on that? Thanks.-Bbb23 (talk) 01:21, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

I'd suggest letting the DR take it's course and leaving the image in place for now. This would avoid any confusion for the person who added it, or attempts to re-add it, and there's always the off-chance that she'll come up with proper permission. INeverCry 01:46, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Sounds reasonable. An added bonus is there won't be an edit war over it. :-) Thanks.-Bbb23 (talk) 01:51, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Maintenance categories

When I created Category:Category:Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from The American Cyclopaedia with no wstitle or title parameter it was clearly a cut and past error. But before deleting it why did you not inform me that there was a request for its deletion and/or recreate it with the correct name?

If you had looked at its parent: Category:Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from The American Cyclopaedia you would have seen that it is one of a number of hidden categories which are used to monitor the parameters of {{Cite AmCyc}} and {{AmCyc}}. Removing such templates without editing the template so that it can not populate the category in the future will if populated in the future case this maintaince template to appear in article space, which would be an undesired outcome. -- PBS (talk) 09:20, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

This was tagged for CSD by User:Train2104, so I would've expected him to have informed you. He usually tags dozens of pages and categories at a time, and so I go thru and delete them. I've never had a problem from any of his taggings before, which I took to mean that he's careful about his tagging, and I can trust his judgement. I'm sorry if that wasn't the case here. If at any time you see a deletion of mine you disagree with, please don't hesitate to restore the page or file. INeverCry 16:30, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback. I have left a similar message at User talk:Train2104 which when I get a response may give you an indication if User:Train2104 usually performs due diligence when tagging categories. -- PBS (talk) 17:04, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Wow, you're fast!

I keep seeing my CSD13's deleted before the Twinkle script finishes logging them. (Not a problem, just impressive!) Thanks for your assist! --j⚛e decker^talk 17:30, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Joe. I'm working on getting one of these. INeverCry 17:44, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Regarding SD A7

Dear INeverCry, could you explain me where i'm failing with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ApocalypticWorld ? I understood one month ago, i wasn't providing references of it, now i did, and explained the general concepts. What should i need to don't get it deleted? Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sirzaito (talk • contribs) 17:54, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

The article contained only 1 reference, which means that almost all the content was unreferenced. You need to provide sufficient WP:RS to demonstrate WP:N. INeverCry 18:44, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick answer. The reference cover almost all I wrote on the article. How many references would be minimum to verify it or be notorius enough? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sirzaito (talk • contribs) 20:47, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

It's more about quality than quantity, though I usually try to get atleast 2 reliable sources. See Wikipedia:Verifiability#Reliable sources. You also need to show with inline citations what content is from what source, and where all the content is sourced from. In this article you only provided one citation for a small part of the content at the top. INeverCry 21:34, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Understood. I need to improve how I put the sources and have more of them. Thanks for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sirzaito (talk • contribs) 11:29, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Salt (Wuthering Heights album)

This had a review, indicating possible notability, and the parent band, prod-deleted, are at WP:UND. consider restoring and letting the in-progress AFD run its course. 86.42.94.218 (talk) 22:01, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

 Done INeverCry 22:52, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

! Thanks for your work. 86.42.94.218 (talk) 05:02, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Wow!

In regards to the recent speedy deletions for promotions, you deleted one within the same minute I requested and the other one a minute after I requested it. I think that's the fastest speedy deletion I've ever seen! Keep up the good work! =) - Amaury (talk) 05:09, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. INeverCry 06:07, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

The frogs will never cry (any more) ...

... because they are probably dead now. Someone was trying to do a "Waterbody restoration" with a digger. I was trying to convince him to use more soft method as described in the German wikipedia. But because he didn't understand German, I tried to translate the German text to English "wiki style" to be able show him. But before I was finished you removed "Waterbody restoration". And Restoration ecology don't contain clear suggestions how to do "Waterbody restoration". There is only a link to Groundwater remediation, but this does not really work for lakes. Do you agree? --Zukunft (talk) 22:38, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

This page contained a couple of badly written, unsourced sentences that didn't expand on Restoration ecology. If you want to translate an article from another wiki, you should work on it in a sandbox until you've translated the whole article, including references, then put it in mainspace. INeverCry 23:25, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Deleted page

Hi INeverCry, could you please help me out for my Tuango page. My page has been deleted and I'm not sure I understand the reason. I've tried to publish my page a couple of times without success. I would like to have more info about how to keep my page live.

Here's the link to my page : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuango

Thank you for your help

SwannF (talk) 15:50, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

The problem with this one is that it's written in a very positive, promotional tone, and reads like an advertisement. Articles on companies have to be written in a neutral, factual tone. You also have to make sure you demonstrate notability using reliable sources. See Wikipedia:Companies, corporations and economic information for a basic guideline on writing an article about a company. INeverCry 16:23, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the quick answer. I'll fix that and make sure to be more neutral. SwannF (talk) 19:08, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Schwarzrheindorf/Vilich-Rheindorf

Yesterday, you speedily deleted Schwarzrheindorf/Vilich-Rheindorf under criterion WP:CSD#A3 "no content". However this was incorrect for 2 reasons. Firstly because it was a redirect the A (article) criteria do not apply, and secondly it was being discussed at RfD (Wikipedia:Redirect for discussion/Log/2013 May 12#Schwarzrheindorf/Vilich-Rheindorf) and so not eligible for speedy deletion under any criterion.

I was about to close the discussion as no consensus (and therefore keep) as it has 1 keep recommendation and one delete recommendation. Thryduulf (talk) 19:31, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Sorry about that. My mistake. I've restored it. INeverCry 19:38, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

undeletion request

Hi INeverCry, could you see if you can undelete What The Hell Is Going On? (album), based on the source there from the Sydney Morning Herald that provides significant coverage in the form of a review? It would be nice if you could keep User:York Earwaker in the loop on this one, he requested it on irc help. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:47, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

 Done INeverCry 18:42, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Dokidoki! PreCure

Why'd you delete this under G8? It doesn't meet any of those criteria.—Ryulong (琉竜) 01:13, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

I made a mistake on a batch delete. I've now batch undeleted all the effected pages. Sorry about that. INeverCry 01:37, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of Talk:Battle of Aleppo (1918) talk page

Hi, can you explain why you did this, please. --Rskp (talk) 01:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

I made a mistake on a batch delete. I've now batch undeleted all the effected pages. Sorry about that. INeverCry 01:36, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

No probs. Have a nice day :) --Rskp (talk) 03:28, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Page move

Can you move this page User:Titodutta/Swami Vivekananda 2013 birthday celebration initiatives to User:Titodutta/Swami Vivekananda's 150th birthday celebration initiatives. I was unable to perform the action! --Tito Dutta  (talk • contributions • email) 09:09, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

• Without keeping a redirect.. --Tito Dutta  (talk • contributions • email) 09:13, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

I don't know how I missed this message... Let me know if you need those redirects deleted. INeverCry 21:52, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Darian Kovacs

Hi, you deleted an article Darian Kovacs. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darian_Kovacs I have edited it and was wondering if you could give any advice on additional problems.

Sublimeharmony (talk) 21:04, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

You'll want to make the article as neutral and factual as possible. Basically, anything that might sound good to a prospective client, employer, or business partner is to be avoided. INeverCry 21:57, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Freedom of Panorama

If I upload an image of RCSI-MUB campus, will it be deleted due to FoP? This happened in the past when I uploaded images for buildings in Bahrain due to FoP in Bahrain being non-commercial only (see this). So, does this apply to Wikipedia as well? and if so, is there anyway to post such images? Mohamed CJ (talk) 15:37, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

FoP in Bahrain has to be honored here as well. You might be able to take photos of the campus itself if the buildings are unseen or de minimis. They should be uploaded to Commons. INeverCry 16:52, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

I don't think de minimis is going to be helpful, as campus building is big and will dominate any image. Thanks for your answer. Mohamed CJ (talk) 17:39, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

OMG!

How the hell did that make it through every one of my edits AND the DYK without anyone noticing?!? 108.168.95.104 (talk) 20:37, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Delected Hydus, Inc

Hi INevercry,

I created an article about company called Hydus, Inc. Unfortunately due to lack of notable and representing that article like promoting it got speedy deletion. However, i would like to create a new article maintaining the same subject or heading of the article same. Kindly let me know how to start?

I am hereby providing you link of the deleted article for your kind reference. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydus,_Inc.

Looking forward to hear from you asap. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sairavi.k (talk • contribs) 21:01, 3 June 2013‎

See WP:GNG, WP:N and WP:RS. You might also try using Wikipedia:Article wizard. INeverCry 22:11, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Undeletion request

Per this could you restore Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Recent changes? Thanks. Biosthmors (talk) 04:52, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

 Done INeverCry 04:59, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you

For deleting those work pages for me. You are FAST. JSFarman (talk) 05:15, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome. INeverCry 05:43, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Airgates deleted per notability

As it seems my talk page messages on the page were ignored, I would like a copy of the Airgates page sent to me so I can complete it. RDN1F TALK 14:02, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

 Done by email. INeverCry 15:05, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Deletion Inquiry/Undeletion Request

Hello INeverCry, I would like to inquire why exactly the page Wisconsin Arts Board was deleted. I would like to do what I can to have it undeleted. Concerning G11 Promotional: What part of the text do you consider promotional? I would locate the problem in the narrative portions of the History section. Is this correct? Concerning G12: I do not know where copyright has been infringed, but if you could let me know, I will fix it. Any information and help you can provide will be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anied13 (talk • contribs) 15:48, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

It was deleted as a copyvio, so undeletion isn't an option. If you hook up an email address for your account, I can email you a copy for you to work on. It looks like the copyvio is from the official website, so the article text can be checked against the site content to see exactly what's copyvio'd from there. As for the promo angle, most of this looks like brochure content or something you'd expect to see on the organizations website, rather than in an encyclopedia article. You should go for something more general, neutral, and encyclopedic, rather than what looks to be a detailed prospectus. INeverCry 16:17, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the quick response. I've added an e-mail address to my account and would appreciate a copy of the article. Once I have a new version, how should I proceed in order to get the page reinstated? Must I create a new page?Anied13 (talk) 16:39, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

 Done. I've emailed a copy to you. Once you feel you've addressed all of the above concerns, and that the article is ready to go, you can re-create the page or post it in your userspace (copy and paste it into User:Anied13/Wisconsin Arts Board) as a {{userspacedraft}} and submit it. INeverCry 16:46, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Andrew McIndoe

The deletion log says you've deleted this page, but from all indications you didn't? What's going on? I just want to know if this is a problem on my end or Wikipedia's end.--TKK ^{bark !} 02:01, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Looks like another admin has since deleted it again. INeverCry 23:55, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Deletion Inquiry/Undeletion Request

Thank you for assistance. I am requesting undeletion of Prelert We have updated the entry for compliance. The revisions are located in my sandbox so you can see. Will move it pending your review. Appreciate your feedback. Let me know if you have questions. Thank you. —Preceding undated comment added 15:42, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

The first paragraph is unreferenced, as is the second sentence of the second paragraph, and the last sentence. I would suggest providing references for that material before moving. Otherwise, it looks ok. INeverCry 23:51, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Vancouver iTech Prepratory

Hi INC, I have restored Vancouver iTech Prepratory as it was about a school, which is out of scope for A7 speedy delete. Hope you don't mind! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:53, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

And I moved it to Vancouver iTech Preparatory because I'm a pedant. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 22:24, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

@Graeme - Thanks for fixing that. INeverCry 23:46, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

University of BC Talk page deletion

It appears that you mistakenly deleted the entirety of Talk:University of British Columbia, a Talk page for an article over a decade old. Can you please restore it? Thanks! ElKevbo (talk) 00:22, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

 Done. Sorry about that. Not sure how that made it into a batch deletion from a G6 category. INeverCry 00:25, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedied AfDs

Hi. Just a note to let you know that, when you speedy-deleted a couple of the pages up at AfD today, forgot to close the corresponding discussions; I've closed them. Dricherby (talk) 23:20, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for helping with that. INeverCry 01:00, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thanks for deleting my introduction page. I am creating a mentoring program for newcomers to the Articles for Creation process and got mixed up on the directory. You're awesome. TheOneSean ^{[ U | T | C ]} 23:22, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm glad I could help. INeverCry 01:01, 7 June 2013 (UTC)