User talk:IMFWHO

Stop being casteist

Please stop being a casteist and stop distorting the Ravidassia page. You not only deleted the Guru Ravidass picture from the page but also continuously deleted a list of notable Ravidass people. The proper references have been provided for most of the eminent people. There are many other caste pages where you will find such a list, but casteist people like you only target pages where information about Dalits is provided. So I request that you please stop discrimination by showing your casteist behavior. Regards Dev Mahey (talk) 04:50, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Daniel Case (talk) 06:46, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is the page name bro??? IMFWHO (talk) 08:26, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alisha Parveen (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qcne were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No evidence of passing WP:NACTOR.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alisha Parveen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 10:19, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IMFWHO! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 10:19, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Changes inHolkar and Adivasi Page

hi IMFWHO you changed in holkar clan from maratha to dhangar without any reference as well you tried to edit in adivasi page as well. it looks like you are changing and undid a lot of in specifically caste related pages, please first go through the rules and regulations of wikipedia again. if you not stopped casteism and kept vandalise these pages you will be banned by the community, so i request to please avoid these edits. Khopashya Bhil (talk) 17:37, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you did 125 edits in just 3 days Khopashya Bhil (talk) 17:38, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Previous accounts?

Hello, IMFWHO,

You are not acting like an editor with a 4 day old account. You are issuing warnings and doing page moves and editing in a way that is typical for an experienced editor. A four day old account doesn't review draft articles and move them to main space of the project, stating that they are "accepted". What were your previous account(s)? You should disclose them on your User page. It's better if you volunteer to do this on your own or you could be seen as a returning blocked account.

If you have questions, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:34, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see the draft history which was moved by a user, where i learned something. IMFWHO (talk) 05:47, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Impersonating AFC reviewers

Hey there. Please stop using edit summaries such as this. Unless you are an official AFC reviewer, you should not be "accepting" or "declining" drafts, or mentioning WP:AFCH in your edit summaries. You may WP:MOVE any page, but you should not pretend to be an AFC reviewer, because it is deceptive and disruptive. Do you agree to stop? –Novem Linguae (talk) 05:09, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okk IMFWHO (talk) 05:48, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concerns regarding your editing behavior

I've noticed a pattern of disruptive behavior on your part, specifically with regards to issuing warnings and making page moves without performing the necessary post-move cleanup. Additionally, your editing approach, which appears uncharacteristic of an experienced editor, involves changing and removing information from numerous Dalit caste-related and sensitive pages. I would strongly advise conducting thorough research before making any edits. RevenueDPT ✉ 07:09, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pennar Industries (October 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pennar Industries and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:17, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Thakor Sumant Sinhji Jhala per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thakor Sumant Sinhji Jhala. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 09:41, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: United States v. Balsara has been accepted

United States v. Balsara, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

(t · c) buidhe 00:34, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Parvathy (TV series) (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Parvathy (TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 15:46, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gouri Shankaram (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DreamRimmer was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All of the provided sources are routine updates and database entries.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gouri Shankaram and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– DreamRimmer (talk) 15:23, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]