User talk:IHelpWhenICan/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

→

Archive 10

"Did It on'em"

No, it's not the font used; the album booklet and back cover both write "Did It on'em" clearly with no space, as does Minaj's official website, the iTunes Store, hmv, Amazon.com Rolling Stone, etc. I don't think you can use allmusic, as it's self-contradictory in the different entries of different editions (compare [1] vs. [2], [3]). Plus, I don't think rap stars are known for their spectacular grammatical skills. :P Yves (talk) 00:23, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

RE:Kylie

Oh wow!!! I had no clue she had a project!

Of course I'm in! I love Kylie so much! Thanks for the info! --ĈÞЯİŒ 1ооо 01:40, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Oh wait. I do have a clue, I'm part of it :P --ĈÞЯİŒ 1ооо 01:41, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Be that way? What way? --ĈÞЯİŒ 1ооо 02:11, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

lol. No! I'm happy that you're bringing the project back, though! --ĈÞЯİŒ 1ооо 02:34, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Re:Headlines

Apologies. You do know that HotCat allows you to remove and add multiple categories all in one go? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 18:09, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

EPs don't tend to have categories btw. Also don't forget that in general EPs can be either singles or albums. Headlines! is an EP album whereas Wordshaker is a studio album (there is a difference). Be careful with that. Thus Headlines! can be classified in album categories so long as none of those categories mention studio album in their name. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 18:13, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Oh no you didnt make a mistake with Wordshaker I was just pointing out that after Talk:The Fame Monster-gate scandal we agreed that EPs could be singles or albums and thus should be categorised as one of the two when a specific EP category doesn't exist. Note the Fascination Records EPs category is likely to be deleted as its very small. No I wasn't having a go... quite the contrary... yeah I've left a small message at Headlines talk page. Essentially the re-release has no new singles and the same cover. A second infobox is not required. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 18:24, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

RE:Chrono

It's just that it's not needed if both chronologies were exactly the same and looks rather weird. --ĈÞЯİŒ 1ооо 00:34, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

If you think it would be best to have two chronos, go ahead and revert my edits to the chrono. --ĈÞЯİŒ 1ооо 01:44, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Re:Welcome

Thank you for welcoming me. I'll try my very best to improve her articles. I already split the discography into two. Novice7 | Talk 03:43, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:KylieUltimateLogo-K.png

Thanks for uploading File:KylieUltimateLogo-K.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:08, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The WikiProject Barnstar
		As I huge Kylie fan, I want to thank you for fixing up Ms. Minogue's WikiProject. ĈÞЯİŒ 1ооо 02:17, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

(WP:Talk page stalker) I cant believe this is you're first barnstar. I'm sure it won't be your last. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 02:24, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

We've been ok wikipedia round the same time which I didn't know. I like your user page btw!! -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 02:32, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

First Barnstar? That's insane! You've done so much to help Wiki! --ĈÞЯİŒ 1ооо 02:38, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

I don't know if its sad or not but I was kinda depressed when I joined wikipedia like 2 years ago and it actually gave me something positive to do. LOl... and then in my last year of college I went through a sporadic editing phase (i registered over 1000 edits in Nov 2009 :O). Aww that's nice of you to say your inspired. Really 10 GAs, 1 FL and 2 DYKs is nothing in comparison to like User:Legolas2186 who has written or significantly contributed to 75 GA articles and probably 6-10 FA/Fls in three years. LOL. i go about my business everyday. But defo keep up the good work :P I might start working on Better Than Today... -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 02:42, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

No problem. Its on my radar so to speak. What's your first GA? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 02:54, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Re: Spinning Around

I usually add the references after all the prose work is completed. Oops!! I forgot to add {{under construction}} tag. Btw, I plan on adding Webcite refs to "Get Outta My Way". Do you want me to replace them for every link or just the "future-dead links"? Novice7 | Talk 03:00, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

I know that. We can use "archiveurl" and "archivedate" fields. What I asked is, should I add "archiveurl" (or backup) for every link or just the important ones. Novice7 | Talk 03:11, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Okay, I'll do it soon. Novice7 | Talk 03:45, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Done :) I didn't archive iTunes, Amazon links, as they don't normally need archiving. Novice7 | Talk 05:59, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

I've added every archive link to Get Outta My Way article. Oh, the Billboard link doesn't need archiving, as I changed the link to vnuemedia. Novice7 | Talk 03:41, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Are the archives okay? I'm not sure if I've done them properly. Btw, I'm working on Spinning Around, as you've seen. Any input from your part is always welcome :) Novice7 | Talk 04:18, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

(→) I know. I tried archiving it, but the archived content didn't come up. So, I used vnuemedia link (which apparently provides Billboard's paid content), so that they never die off. I'll go through it once more soon. Btw, amazing work on Kylie WP ;) Novice7 | Talk 04:26, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

I learned that you're a web designer. I must say, the Project page looks great :O Novice7 | Talk 04:31, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Ooh, maybe All the Lovers can go for a GA soon. It seems to be in a good shape. Novice7 | Talk 04:49, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

I'll try to complete Spinning Around by then, and start Light Years by then. Also, I Believe in You, and some of her older GAs need serious attention. No one can tell when they're gonna face a GAR. I'll look into it too. Novice7 | Talk 04:54, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Re: Kylie

Haha thanks. Very interesting I must say. ;) Hey, I'd like to ask something of you. Can you contact the members of the project and tell them to support or not support this move. I'd really appreciate it. Some people were involved, but I don't think that it looks as if it's being voted for or against, so could you tell them to boldly specify please. Thank you so much! ℥^nding·start 12:33, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

I think you are all misinterpreting what it means by "Aphrodite Tour." Many people may not understand what "Les Folies" means and so they have both "Aphrodite" and "Les Folies" on the same page. Besides, why should it be named to the other leg. Only one leg is "called" the Aphrodite Tour. --ĈÞЯİŒ 1ооо 12:42, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Yes I did. I discussed it with Novice, and we decided on removing the US, US Dance, Canada, and Austria from the charts, as only 10 are allowed, and we found it suitable because those charts have the less uncharting ones. ℥^nding·start 16:57, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

I don't think it needs to be said whether I support it or not. I started the move, so obviously I'm for it. xD ℥^nding·start 16:59, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Then you can add the US to it if you want. 11 is fine, but 14 was unacceptable. And also notice on all those FLs you mentioned, most are using the old discog format, so they can fit more with the text being smaller. I wasn't exactly in support of removing the US, but Novice noted that it isn't really necessary, with not many of them charting. Add it, but please don't add any more than that. I think we can get away with 11, but if questions are raised once it's nominated for FL, it will be the one having to be removed. ℥^nding·start 17:13, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Color thing? Change blocker? ℥^nding·start 17:30, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

The color thing... is just gross. WTH. And you have to have a reason for pending changes (vandalism). ℥^nding·start 17:38, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

And we're talking about the singles one. I think Novice is going to be doing the albums one. And LOL that's true. xD ℥^nding·start 17:49, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

You should probably bring up a discussion before adding colors to the article. Personally, I see no point in it at all, and it looks very messy. ℥^nding·start 20:41, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

What Goes Around... Reassessment

Hey. I'd just like to know what your thoughts are about What Goes Around.../...Comes Around being a GA. I was going to attempt to fix it up to keep it at GA level, but it just lacks a lot of things, and I don't feel like it was correctly reviewed in the first place. Please, if you can, leave your comments here. Thanks so much! ℥^nding·start 23:07, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Ok. I Help, When I Can.^[12] 23:32, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Kylie Minogue

I would like to be a participant. I am a big fan of Kylie, I follow all the news about her etc, (also I wrote Pink Sparkle (EP) and I wrote all the articles on Croatian wikipedia about Kylie), so... Is that enough to become a participant? Take care --AmyMirka (talk) 04:17, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Of course you can join. Novice7 | Talk 04:26, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much. I was just adding some userboxes to my user page. I will help in Wikiproject how much I can. Greetings. :) --AmyMirka (talk) 04:33, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Actually

WP:DISCOGSTYLE says ten columns in a discography is the maximum. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 20:01, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

I am aware, that notice should have been removed by now. But nevertheless it is still the guideline that we work towards and that discographies are judged against when they go through WP:FL process. In fact if you look at most discographies by the likes of popular artists, e.g. Kelly Rowland, Beyoncé, Usher, Jennifer Lopez, Rihanna etc. you'll find it hard to find one that uses more than ten charts. Is there a justified reason as to why you want more than ten? Think about it logically, for Kylie Minogue AUS, FR, GE, IR, NLD, NZ, NOR, SWI, UK, US DAN would suffice enough. Plus if you or the Kylie Minogue project ever decide to nominate the discographies for featured list status you need to remove the ugly color formatting which is unfair as it makes it difficult for some readers with visual impairment per MOS:ACCESS. Even as an able reader I've find it an eyesore. You should also consider rewriting the lead section to focus explicitly on her singles achievements instead of mixing it with album achievements. See Madonna singles discography. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 20:22, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

IMO if someone wanted to add US charts only the dance one is appropriate. Her achievements on other US charts are very limited. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 20:29, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Yup that's fine though I'll say don't feel obliged to include the US... there is no specific requirement. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 20:35, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Re:

It's alright. I know you were probably just trying to see what I'd be like. No biggie. ℥^nding·start 20:43, 29 January 2011 (UTC)