User talk:Hypnosef
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Hypnosef, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Hypnosef, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.
Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.
New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
- Article development
- Standard layout
- Lead section
- The perfect article
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Nobody (talk) 07:07, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Hypnosef
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Hypnosef requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Nobody (talk) 07:07, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
August 2024
[edit]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to User:Jimfbleak, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 02:47, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note - If you have an issue with the deletion of your user page, you can post a note on the deleting admin's talk page. Tagging the deleting admin's user page for U5 is not acceptable. Don't ever do this again. -- Whpq (talk) 02:49, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- It seemed his page was guilty of the same supposed shortcomings that mine was and since that standard had been set, I only followed it. Hypnosef (talk) 04:20, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Again, if you think it was a mistake you can take it up with the admin. If you are not satisfied with the admin's answer and think the deletion is out of process, you can request a deletion review. But if you insist on nonsensical tit-for-tat tagging, then you will find yourself in some trouble. -- Whpq (talk) 04:26, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- It seemed his page was guilty of the same supposed shortcomings that mine was and since that standard had been set, I only followed it. Hypnosef (talk) 04:20, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
Alan shefsky moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Alan shefsky. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ... discospinster talk 00:36, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Alan Shefsky for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Shefsky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.