User talk:Hvnlytearss

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Hvnlytearss! Thank you for your contributions. I am CrispyCream27 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! CrispyCream27 ^(Talk) 03:12, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Unfuckupable

The article Unfuckupable has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTDICT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 09:17, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Self-guilt moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Self-guilt, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GirthSummit _(blether) 22:03, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I wanted to give you some more extensive feedback on this article, and why I think you need to work on it a bit more before publishing.

My main concern is that there is not very much in the way of reliable sourcing there. If you take a look at WP:RS, you'll see that blogs are not acceptable - that rules out radmavarix, theferrarinn, iqmatrix, tinybuddha and the like. Quora.com is user-generated, so also not reliable. If you take all that stuff out, a lot of the sources supporting the major content is gone. Psychology Today is more like the kind of thing you should be looking for - however, the mentions of this subject in reliable sources all seem to be passing mentions - they use the phrase once or twice, but don't talk about it in depth.

That brings me on to my next concern - I'm not certain whether or not the subject is notable. If it's just a phrase that sources use in pieces of writing, but don't discuss in and of itself, then it's not notable per WP:GNG - you need some reliable sources actually discussing self-guilt as a concept to demonstrate that it passes that threshold. Without that, any article will likely end up getting deleted.

Finally, I think the writing style could be tightened up. Phrases like 'Self-guilt is said to the devil inside your own mind' would be find in a piece of journalism, but they're not encyclopedic. Try to be strictly factual and dispassionate - boring, if you like - don't try and make the writing more interesting with creative comparisons. (If there was a reliable source that said it was like the devil inside your own mind, you could probably get away with making it a directly attributed quote - e.g. Dr Tim Smith has described self-guilt as being 'like the devil inside your own mind'.)

I hope this is helpful. If you can find and add some better sourcing, let me know if you'd like me to take a look. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 22:21, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Unfuckupable for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Unfuckupable is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unfuckupable until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 22:03, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Self-guilt (August 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MJL was:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not meet WP:GNG as it only receives a passing mention.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Self-guilt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Self-guilt, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 02:20, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hvnlytearss! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 02:20, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Self-guilt

Hello, Hvnlytearss. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Self-guilt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 15:20, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]