User talk:Huzaifaswati50

April 2023

Hello, I'm DreamRimmer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sultan Pakhal Swati, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DreamRimmer (talk) 10:51, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Everybody knows that Raja Geera was king of swat before Sultan Pakhal, it is written in every historical book Huzaifaswati50 (talk) 11:00, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to cite reliable books here to support the information you have entered. DreamRimmer (talk) 11:11, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Punjabi Muslim tribes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. (Roundish ⋆t) 14:59, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That page is created by an Indian user He is spoiling our history Huzaifaswati50 (talk) 15:01, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

if he is spoiling our history I will spoil his pages .Why he is doing to our pages As a user is providing him references still . Huzaifaswati50 (talk) 15:02, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

You can consider it your last chance and warning, if you added offensive language like this again on my talk page[1], you will get blocked indefinitely. Read WP:PERSONAL Sutyarashi (talk) 13:06, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

o chl nikal be nasaly Teri auqat kia ha Huzaifaswati50 (talk) 14:47, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism, as you did at User_talk:Sutyarashi.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:08, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Gibari Sultan per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gibari Sultan. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 08:51, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Huzaifaswati50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked on socket puppetry, however at that time I was totally unaware of Wikipedia rules, but this time I came fully prepared having read all rules and now I will not repeat violations again. Secondly,I am a Swati historian and the user sutyarashi is constantly making vandalising content to articles related to Swati Tribe. He deleted all the articles and left only main article of Swati's history. Whenever I added information,I did citations but this user sutyarashi has make a new edit to Swati page and totally made Swati a Suspicious tribe adding Dardic origin. Read any book any article on Google,you will never find any article or book which will say Swatis are Dardic. He made very big change and this thing is showing his hatred towards Swatis and making their history more suspicious. We are here to contribute by proper sources not to add any origin claim by ourselves. For me I am basically a Pashtun Swati. I am in Pashtun culture but check the edit history of Swati page once In start when I had no citations,I used to add Pashtun word to Swatis just following the stores which I listen in my home. But When I started studying books, I found that We Swatis were actually Persian speaking Tajiks. However someone changed it to Indo-Aryan origin which was acceptable to both Pahstun claiming Swatis and Tajik claiming Swatis because both are Indo-Aryan races but the Claim of Dardic is totally Illogical and false. So I request Wikipedia Admins to Unblock me so I contribute to Swati history by citations, If I am not allowed to unblock then kindly Lock the Swati page and revert the baseless edits of sutyarashi and I request Admins to block this user for vandalising pages again and again

Decline reason:

Please make your request using your original account. Yamla (talk) 21:21, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.