Jump to content

User talk:Hunterd/archive

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Hunterd/archive, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  CambridgeBayWeather 11:28, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Terry McCrann

[edit]

Hi. I guess almost the last thing I did was put the welcome message on you page before heading off to sleep, whic is why I didn't answer sooner. I assume that this is what you want:

File:McCrann Terry.jpg
Terry McCrann

[[Image:McCrann Terry.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Terry McCrann]] is what I used here.

[[Image:McCrann Terry.jpg|thumb|200px|Terry McCrann]] would also work.

By changing the px number you can make it bigger or smaller but 200 or 250 is probably a good size. I notice that the page you have the picture on has been tagged as not having it's copyright status listed. You need to get that fixed. Where did the picture come from? As to the deleting of the article, well that does happen fast sometimes. What you need to do is to try and set the whole article up beforehand on your own computer. Make sure that you have the categegory(s) and if necessary the stub tags on the article. Also make sure it's Wikified. That is put as much as is possible (and sensible) within the [[, check out Wikipedia:Tutorial and Wikipedia:Tutorial (Formatting). Hope this helps. If you need any more help just leave a message on my talk page. I will be on for the next few days from 0600 - 1300 Coordinated Universal Time. CambridgeBayWeather 18:45, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OK if you click on the picture or go to [[:Image:McCrann Terry.jpg:Terry McCrann] you will see that there is a tag about the copyright status of the picture. You need to get it fixed up. I'm not sure what you need to do so I think you will have to try and find an editor that has some idea of copyright info. CambridgeBayWeather 12:46, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I deleted Terry McCrann for violating the copyright of the article from which it was clipped. I didn't see any indication it was used with permission. Even if it had been, it would still need a major overhaul, as that is not an encyclopedia article but a promotional blurb. If you want to write something in a more serious and encyclopedic form it almost certainly would not be deleted. -R. fiend 14:27, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, you need to avoid copyright violations. This is easily avoided by putting things in your own words, and not doing a cut/paste. It's also important that you keep the article neutral and factual. Avoid superlatives, glowing praise, and anything that really sounds like it was written by the man himself. Also try to keep an encyclopedic tone. ""Will interest rates be cut? Will the dollar fall? Which companies are headed for troubled times?" For more than 20 years Terry has provided critical analysis on these issues and a wide range of events and personalities that have shaped the nation" is not really encyclopedic. Certainly some of that information can be incorporated into the article, but not that way. Finally, it's always best to have more than one source. This is far from always done, but it helps greatly. Good luck. -R. fiend 14:49, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Lol. I see the prob. cool, thanks. I'll hopefully get it right next time, although this won't be for a while (with end-year exams, etc. I'm a tad busy now).ZPMMaker 07:34, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You can just put a speedy tag on it, and someone will be along and delete it. You have to be an admin to delete it yourself. If it keeps getting created enough times that user will probably end up blocked. You could also ask them to stop! Rx StrangeLove 00:41, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup taskforce

[edit]

There are two articles on your taskforce desk (I just added the second).

The new one is Transcience of time. You listed Psychology as an interest and this is an article that the other editors aren't sure is a real psychology term or maybe misnamed. Maybe you can figure it out (the article has been moved to talk:Transcience of time. Otherwise just pass it along.

I put this here because I'm not sure everybody checks there desk as often as I do. Speaking of desks, yours doesn't have the template for the little box that tells the maximum number of open tasks you want. If you want you can tell me the number and I'll set it up for you (I'd just copy it off my desk instead of having to look for the usage details). RJFJR 01:40, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]


I added the template for desk size and interests to your desk. You probably want to edit yoru interestes to be clearer. Tables of content appear when there are enough headings for it to need a table of contents, unless it is suppressed. I edited Wikipedia:Cleanup Taskforce/Loung Ung so the heading would be on that page and added a bullet in front of a comment. And I moved the taskforce notice from article to the talk page for Loung Ung. RJFJR 13:50, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I just added your name to the list at Wikipedia:Cleanup Taskforce/Are you active? RJFJR 16:14, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I read the comment you put at talk:Transcience of time. Looks good to me. Thank you for taking the time to work on this article (especially since it was mainly to prove it wasn't about anything). RJFJR 17:06, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I put it up for AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transcience of time. RJFJR 14:36, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

How to AFD

[edit]

The procedure to nominate an article for deletion is at WP:AFD. Take a look through what has been nominated and how the voting is running before deciding if something should be deleted. (For instance, schools, no matter how trivial, almost never make it through AFD.)

In a few special circumstances an article can be speedied and deleted much quicker than going through AFD. The circumstances and conditions (and the procedure) are at WP:CSD (CSD is an acronym for Candidate for Speedy Deletion).

Hope that helps, RJFJR 14:16, 11 November 2005 (UTC).[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Tcrannold.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 00:19, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Just wondering why you deleted the OneCone International article? ZPMMaker 03:35, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide me with a link or some context, please? Regards,  (aeropagitica)  07:01, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've found a link to the AfD : Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/OneCone_International. The article was deleted because the consensus was delete - the ten delete opinions expressed outweighed keep or comment opinions. If you had a personal stake in this article, it wasn't a personal decision. Regards,  (aeropagitica)  10:42, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:McCrann Terry.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 21:12, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please try and keep a cool head, despite comments people may make against you. Personal attacks and disruptive comments will only escalate a situation; please keep calm and action can be taken against the other parties if necessary. Your involvement in attacking back can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors, and lead to general bad feeling. Please try and be civil. Thanks! (CJ) What you said on his page was unacceptable. If you have any questions, head to my talk page. — Ian Manka Talk to me‼ 18:42, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I should not have removed the entire message, that was my procedural error. Nevertheless, "hey, dickhead!" isn't the nicest way to address someone on their talk page. I was not aware that you had a personal relationship, and that this was playful banter. I will restore the message ASAP, and if you have any further questions, see my talk page. — Ian Manka Talk to me‼ 05:49, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Loung Ung (revisited)

[edit]

Hey hunter, nice to meet you. A Featured Article usually becomes such after it has been reviewed by peers (Peer Review), perhaps many times, and criticisms have been addressed. Then that person who wishes to will nominate it (Wikipedia:Featured article candidates). It will then be reviewed by very critical members of the Wikipedia community. None of this occurs until those who collaborate on the article feel that it is ready, sort of a consensus, and request Peer Review. At any rate, this article is far from complete, in my opinion. There is still much to be done to bring it to FA status. If you'd like to remove the tag, go right ahead. After all, you put it there, lol :)) --RogerK 02:36, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personal boxes

[edit]

Hi, I've moved your peronal boxes template to User:Hunterd/boxes, and I've fixed your userpage to transclude it from there. Template space if for general things not stuff specific to one user. --Doc ask? 10:43, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IP note

[edit]

Evidently Comcast only assigns IPs based on my Inet facing MAC addr (In this case my router), so reinstalling Windows (In my case) wouldn't do too much. Thanx for the vote anyway ;D! 68.39.174.238 20:49, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Awesome Barnstar

[edit]

Hey, Dave, thanks for the Barnstar! Now, I just need some help on the article Richard III (1955 film) Watch the damn film! Have a little patience! .... 02:06, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, jesus, you should see my brothers user page: User:Magicpoo

IMPORTANT MESSAGE!

[edit]

Behold the Man! ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 06:07, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can't do it

[edit]

Such a use of images is not fair use. ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 08:07, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Richard III

[edit]

Check it out: Good Article Status!

My Userpage

[edit]

Check out my userpage. It's the fun-kayest thing you've ever seen! And It's completely plagerised! ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 00:58, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yours is nothing compared to the might of mine! ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 23:09, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

cleanup taskforce

[edit]

I've added Pygmalion effect to your desk because you have expressed an interest in psychology. Please take a look at the article or let me know and I will reassign it. Thank you.RJFJR 02:35, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sig

[edit]

Hey Davey, your sig no longer links to you. It's useless! ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 23:45, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Check your mail

[edit]

You should check your mail. ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 03:49, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know. Matter of time, though, you know. I mean, I'm shocked it lasted this long. Well, I've got the source for it stored away somewhere, so when the time comes, it'll be back.

Anyway, I'm working on a spoken version of Richard III (1955 film). It's pretty good, up for FA again. You might wanna take a look, and vote for, or against it, if you wish. Did you get that PDF file I sent you? ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 04:16, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to see that you're not hanging yourself. ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 04:25, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No, not David, battling his way to the phonebook to look up hitmen. ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 04:36, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of stub types

[edit]

In fact, there is a list of stub types. It can be found here. Have a great day and happy editing! Amalas =^_^= 13:25, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you have filed a TfD request for a template you created yourself. If you create an article, redirect, template, or userpage by mistake, and noone else has edited it, you can ask to have it speedily deleted under Wikipedia policy by placing {{db-author}} at the top of the page, bypassing AfD, RfD, TfD, or MfD as appropriate, which saves time. --ais523 07:29, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Your sig

[edit]

Hi, would you think about modifing (reducing) your signature, for example the verson on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deep Space Carrier is disruptive. Please have a look at WP:SIG for reference, Thanks. --blue520 07:49, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa!

[edit]

Are you sure that old sig conformed with the Geneva Convention? ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 09:02, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! (although, I think the naming convention would be a lowercase 's' in ship...) Amalas =^_^= 13:40, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved it for you. For reference in the future, there should be a link up near the "history" tab of the article. I think you have to be a registered member for 4 days or something like that before you get the access to move pages. Amalas =^_^= 17:53, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your VandalProof Application

[edit]

Dear Hunterd/f06-07,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact with the new 1.2 version release it has even more power. As such we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that that you have too few edits in the main article namespace. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again in the not too distant future. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof.Xyrael / 19:06, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Hunterd/archive| Moderators will approve a user based upon sufficient evidence that he or she intends to use the tool in a constructive manner. While in no way a strict rule, new users with fewer than 250 mainspace edits, users who have recently been involved in edit wars, and users with a history of vandalism will generally not be accepted. User talk:Hunterd/archive
Hope that explains things, thanks for querying me :) —Xyrael / 14:29, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OneCone

[edit]

I know. I supported it.

Atlantis and Location hypotheses of Atlantis

[edit]

Hi. I just saw this}. I do not require payment... but I am willing to go halves with you on the work. I am an Atlantis nutcase (overly enthused), and am about to begin my Archaeology degree so that afterward I can start my own quest for it (along with the Holy Grail...). Anyway, I'm in the know when it comes to Atlantis - I have over 30 books (which I have read, lol) on it! Let me know what you think; possibly you can save some money :-) Your one true god is David P. A. Hunter, esq. III Talk to me! 10:45, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My history with Atlantis has been both good and bad. Unfortuately the reason that I offered the bounty is that I don't have enough Wikitime to bring the main article or the locations article to FA status. You are free to contribute to the article and I would definitely consider your contributions to the article if it is brought to FA status. Thanks! --Reflex Reaction (talk)• 14:05, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You is a crazy bitch

[edit]

Stop posting Mottos in bold! ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 07:08, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa, your'e div-ing me out here man! All, like, centred... ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 07:09, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Richard III is a featured article! JUZZAH! ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 06:31, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You should. It's the rockingest Shakespeare film ever. You just need patience. Oh, and those amazon.com bastards are yet to deliver, so it's yet another day of waiting. In fact, it's a whole weekend. ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 07:39, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the userbox issue has been a pretty hot potato, and the acceptability of such userboxes has been very hotly debated. I realize that you of course don't really subscribe to whipping people at work, but I feel the joke is a more than a bit insensitive. We don't need to go all that far back in history to find this kind of physical abuse in several countries during the industrial revolution, and I would certainly not be surprised if this brutal practice takes place today.

I want you to compare your box to the climax of the "userbox wars". Someone created a pedophilia userbox ("This user identifies as a pedophile"), and in the aftermath which was promptly deleted. Another user decided to make a parody userbox ("OMG! This user has been attracted to underage females"), which also upset a lot of people. In the end, the fighting which took place over the userbox resulted in two users being temporarily banned and two admins winding up desysopped (three further admins had their adminship restored). The userboxes were of course meant as a joke, but it was a joke in bad taste, and a joke which offended people.

In general, there has been a consensus that userboxes which jokingly promote violence (e.g. "This user thinks pacifists make good target practice") are candidates for speedy deletion, in particular, they meet criterion T1 which Jimbo Wales himself introduced, calling for the deletion of "divisive and inflammatory templates". Several admins and users interpret this criterion very broadly, making it include userboxes which represent a religious or political belief. I personally do not subscribe to such a wide interpretation (indeed I have frequently voted to undelete userboxes which I feel were wrongly deleted), but I do feel that violence boxes (as well as some anti boxes e.g. "This user hates America") are such candidates.

In the case of the Scourge box, I originally did not delete it myself, because T1 is itself rather controversial and quite a lot of grief has arisen from admins deleting userboxes unilaterally. I therefore tagged the userbox for speedy deletion so that another admin could review it, and the speedy delete was confirmed. When you recreated the userbox, I deleted it again, having it confirmed that the box was indeed a T1 candidate. However, since most people don't bother to read userpages, I (reluctantly) decided to allow you to keep the raw code on your userpage. Also, the edit summary you used when recreating the box was... not particularily helpful, calling people "dickheads" does have a tendency to lead to a lot of hard feelings and distress. There are people behind each username, volunteers who donate time and effort to write an encyclopedia, so it's a good thing to be nice to them.

To summarize, I feel that the box you created was made as a good faith joke, but that it was insensitive, and you cannot always expect everyone to get the joke. Userboxes can sometimes be fun, but sometimes it's best to have the fun within your own userspace, and not let it spill over to the "official" namespaces such as Template.

Sorry for a long-winded response, if you have further questions feel free to ask.

Best wishes, Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:32, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Image:Icebird.jpg and Image:221 ul-Icebird pack ice.jpg, uploaded by you, are both labelled GFDL. The copyright of the first one is owned by Rigby Heinemann, according to the image page, and the second one by the Australian government. I wonder, where did you find these images? Have Heinemann and the Australian government released these images under GFDL? If so, where did you find this information? We'll need this info, or the images will have to be deleted. // Habj 12:46, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I should have helped you checking stuff here... and I planned to, but never got around to it. Sorry! It seems they were found to be copyvio and deleted. // Habj 09:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus!

[edit]

When posting a message on my talk page, kindly create a new heading for it. And that's not my motto. And I know, because I put it there. Toodle-oo. ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 06:50, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: fair use images

[edit]

I have removed fair use images from your userpage and your freinds, please do not readd them as fair use can not be used outside the main namespace.

Also, your userpage may require a cleanup as it is extremley messy (or badly formed in FF) Matthew Fenton (contribs) 16:07, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image:OneCone logo.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:OneCone logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Matthew Fenton (contribs) 17:36, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:OPM sml.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:OPM sml.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Matthew Fenton (contribs) 17:36, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:OPM lge.JPG listed for deletion

[edit]
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:OPM lge.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Matthew Fenton (contribs) 17:36, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:OPM.JPG listed for deletion

[edit]
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:OPM.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Matthew Fenton (contribs) 17:36, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: OR

[edit]

OR = Orphan, they are fair use images and thus cant be used outside main space i removed them from your user space, thus making them orphans and orphaned fair use images are not allowed here. Matthew Fenton (contribs) 08:56, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you created all the images you want to release as free then yes you can use them outside main space ;-) Matthew Fenton (contribs) 09:01, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nope

[edit]

No package yet.


....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 22:35, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup Recruitment

[edit]

Hey! I found you through the Cleanup Taskforce, and I was wondering if you'd like to pitch in on an article Mayerling. I was going to add it to your desk, but I see you've got your hands full at the moment, so I came over here instead. Thanks! Kerowyn 09:40, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your help, and also the FYI re: my signature. I can't get it to do anything fancy for some reason. C'est la vie. --Kerowyn 08:44, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
*The split is done, as we discussed. Let us expand both articles and clean them up. Oh, and I hope you don't mind. but I stole a few of your userbox templates. :-) Your one true god is David P. A. Hunter, esq. III Talk to me! 12:08, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You

[edit]

Are an idiot. And no package. ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 07:22, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They're refunding our postage money, and saying that it will probably come in the next few days. I'm giving them till next Wednesday. If not then, they must give us an express delivery! ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 04:33, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Stop masturbating on my talk page. ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 23:06, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I HAVE A PACKAGE!

[edit]

As it says. On Monday, your order of

  1. Henry V - Laurence Olivier
  2. Hamlet - Laurence Olivier
  3. Richard III - Laurence Olivier
  4. Zulu - Cy Endfield

will be delivered to you for a total of $24.99 AUD. We apologise for the delay. Please bring your money to the campus on Monday, and the aformentioned DVDs will be yours.

Thank you for shopping with OneCone.


....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 23:45, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi, and welcome to the Biography WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of biographies.

A few features that you might find helpful:

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

  • Starting some new articles? Our article structure tips outlines some things to include.
  • Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every Firefly article in Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Your one true god is David P. A. Hunter, esq. III Talk to me! 05:12, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: MOTD

[edit]

Thanks for the request. I am fine with it. Check with Childzy though. Also there are quite a few mottos on nominations that need transcribing. If you could help with that please do. Geo. 19:28, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

As Childzy will be out of town, I will deputize you as a Temp. Overseer until he gets back. At that time I will write a review and we will determine permanent status. Geo. 21:16, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

I meant to make sure that the mottos from the old page were rearranged in the new style. Feel free to approve or reject any mottos in the Recently closed section or older than seven days without labels. To put a motto on the lists, copy it from the nomination, to allow the whole nomination to be archived. Please leave a Moved note so I dont redo it. Thanks for the help Geo. 20:20, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

August 2006 Biography Newsletter

[edit]

Huzzah!

[edit]
WOW! That crazy Box set actually had some good stuff in it, didn't it?!

For your edification, the one's I've seen:

  • The Ten Commandments, fantastic, and I own it.
  • To Catch a Thief, an OK Hitchcock thriller
  • Marathon Man, a Laurence Olivier Oscar Nomination! Yay!
  • Roman Holiday, fantastic Romantic comedy from my favourite director, and actress! And I own it
  • Ben-Hur, own it. Good stuff.

You've got some films there that I've been dying to see!

  • A Place in the Sun
  • Sabrina (Audrey Hepburn goodness)
  • Chinatown (though I despise the director)
  • Love Story
  • Die Hard with a Vengance

Ooh, the tables have turned! ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 22:30, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're not allowed to have that. Also, check out YMDB it's awesome! I'm Raoul Hernandez on there, search for me!
Ooh! Goody. I just looooooooooooooooooooooooooooove Audrey Hepburn. Seriously. I think I have serious problems in that department. I'm scaring myself. ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 09:27, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

[edit]

Hi, Just wanted to request that you shorten and change your signature line. It's currently taking up 4.5 lines in the edit window, which is quite bulky. It also contains external links, which are very strongly discouraged. Please see relevant guidelines at WP:SIG#Length and WP:SIG#External links. Thanks, and happy editing :) --Quiddity·(talk) 18:14, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

motto.once.more

[edit]

Everything looks fine. Thanks Geo. 23:33, 8 August 2006 (UTC) Feel free to add t the schedule. Geo. 00:35, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

huh?

[edit]

I owe you a comment since long... but this page makes me confused. Is this an archive, or am I supposed to write messages to you here? // Habj 00:10, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. It also prevents the "User contributions" and "E-mail this user" links from showing up. Could I suggest that you put the normal talk page in its regular spot and use the 'move' function to archive your talk pages (which I presumme is the purpose behind the redirect to here)? Thanks. --Quiddity·(talk)
Happy now?!?!?!?! Your one true god is David P. A. Hunter, esq. III Talk to me! I forbade it! Join Stargate Wars! Chaos Hail OneCone International! 06:32, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
So I am supposed to write here. OK. If what you want to achieve is to avoid the "new have new messages"-sign, you can do so by inserting
.usermessage { display: none }
in your monobook.css. // Habj 09:40, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi! I stumbled across the article by accident, while doing some stub sorting, so I took the opportunity to fix other things that could be fixed... {{bio-stub}} is reserved for people only; films should be tagged with {{film-stub}} or any of the derived stub templates. In fact, I now see that such a template really exists: {{bio-film-stub}} - and I just edited the article accordingly... GregorB 12:24, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your message

[edit]

Feel free to update the schedule. Geo. 19:11, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Equal Measures

[edit]

Bugger. I'm sorry that it has been viewed that way, but I was just trying to add relevant details there. Equal Measures is a first season episode of Transformers: Beast Wars. I created it as part of an agrrementbetween myself and another user. Articles like Cheetor and Rattrap have large portions of material in them that are little more than episode summaries that arent really relevant to the character, so we thought it was best if we moved them to a list of Beast Wars episode synopses instead of having the useless info in the articles. Probably shouldn't do it that way in future. I'm sorry for the inconvenience.SMegatron 10:24, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it. I've just been trying to semi-wikify it and add details as to what it is, infobox, etc. And I get what you say about most people wanting to delete it(can't say I blame them), but its better than having random episode synopses cluttering up the page. Take a look at the differences between Optimus Primal and Cheetor for a good example. The idea was that as soon as we'd gotten that stuff into separate articles we'd clean up the articles to a higher quality. But thanks for your input and your patience. SMegatron 10:41, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heh. No argument from me.SMegatron 10:46, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


No worries. I had an abundance of time during that week, which I wasn't expecting, which was why I listed it with the taskforce. Like I said on the Taskforce page, now it just needs some better verification. --Kerowyn Leave a note 09:54, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chekov

[edit]

Do you have a source for Chekov's first name? This info would be greatly apreciated. American Patriot 1776 21:08, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TEST Top 20

[edit]

Well, my current place is #11, with a score that brings you off limits! It's comment is that I am in serious trouble. Well, get along! I tried to plan to go for a wikibreak but, not enough time...

PS My score on the Wikipediholic Test was 3420 over...•Sean•gorter• 09:34, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Follow this link and find the template which fits - User:Sean gorter/USBX. Happy? •Sean•gorter• 09:40, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Any way, it's {{user Wikipediholic| your score}}. •Sean•gorter• 09:43, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, it's {{User:Sean gorter/user Wikipediholic-proud}}, which means I created it. •Sean•gorter• 09:50, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hunterd, I changed the userbox style. Anyway, I don't think Wikipedia would accept my userbox. I tried fitting in one of them, but it got deleted. •Sean•gorter•(Talk) 01:16, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speaking of Wikipediholic test score, how come you posted your score twice on the top 20 table? AstroHurricane001 19:25, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ktip images

[edit]

Hey, just wanted to let you know that Image:Crystal Clear Ktip.png has been replaced by Image:Crystal Clear app ktip.png and you will probably want to update your pages/templates. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 23:39, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just wanted to let you know that Image:Crystal Clear Ktip.png has been replaced by Image:Crystal Clear app ktip.png and you will probably want to update your pages/templates. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 23:41, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Episode IV

[edit]

Hey, yeah I actually had submitted it for FA status. But their demands are too large at the moment for me to handle while dealing with my real life at the moment. So I withdrew the nomination. Their two large demands were that the article needs a through copyedit, more references, and perhaps more information. I'd greatly appreciate it if you could copyedit the article, as I usually have three great guys to do so. One is on a wikibreak, and one just won't message me back. Would you mind if I messaged you again towards the time that I'm going to nominate the article again for FA status, just to see if you can do another run-through (if I've added more info)? The Filmaker 13:56, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Actually, before you do that. As a side favor, could you run over to this article Pilot (House episode) and copyedit it for me real quick. As you'll see it's very short and I'm working on it to be an FA as well (as we don't have any episode featured articles). Let me know if you have any ideas for more info I can give. The Filmaker 18:49, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hey, not to be a pest, but I'd really appreciate it if you'd run over that article on the House Pilot and spend the five-ten minutes to copyedit before you work on the Episode IV article as I'm done with the Pilot article right. Plus, the Pilot article won't take too long. :) The Filmaker 03:01, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • No offense taken. But which article are you talking about, the Pilot, or the Episode IV article? If you're talking about the Pilot, than I can see this because I'm trying to find as much information as possible. I've spent hours trying to find the original ratings for the episode when it premiered but I keep finding the ratings for the Season Three premiere. Go figure. The Filmaker 14:01, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        • Actually IMDb is not paticularly reliable. I only use it occasionally for references. Still, no it does not carry ratings for the paticular episodes of television shows. The Filmaker 22:44, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
          • So what were you talking about with Pilot when you said you found quite a bit of information to be "omitted". I can't allow alot of the show's general information into the article as the article is specifically about the episode and not the show. This what I've been able to scrap up. Or was there something else you were thinking of when you mentioned this? The Filmaker 02:00, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Biography Newsletter September 2006

[edit]

Have fun

[edit]

with that. Oh, and my Brother actually pissed off on Founder's Day. So...yeah. ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 23:34, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup taskforce

[edit]

I added Bud Bagsak Massacre to your desk. Please look at it and eitehr accept, decline or let me know and I'll reassign it. Thank you. RJFJR 15:36, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

I have cleared up the autoblock incident I just havent archived it Geo. 19:40, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Dates on my userpage

[edit]

Please help me get the dates working correctly in the date/time area on my userpage, directly beneath my photograph at the top of the page. I have altered the date templates with the corrections for each type of calendar. Thanks. Goiter McWilliostein, P. I. You can't control me! I'm a P. I.! Save Stargate SG-1! 10:55, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed! Daniel.Bryant (talk · contribs · count)
I'm sorry, that one with the DAY+21 and MONTH+4 isn't going to work. At least, I don't know how to fix it. Template:Tomorrow may give you some clues, however I'm stumped on February (leap days - eek!), and the MONTH+4 is impossible, because you can't add "4" to "September". Daniel.Bryant 11:34, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please go ahead and schedule October mottos? It's close to the end of the month.
P.S. I think you do a great job as a MOTD overseer. --Gray Porpoise 01:27, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's getting near that time again... Thanks! I love MOTD! --Gray PorpoisePhocoenidae, not Delphinidae 19:48, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

[edit]

I have so too made it to first base, and indeed third base with this delightful woman. Hot damn! ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 06:28, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Users_who_have_actually_gotten_to_first_base%2C_but_some_jerk_created_an_userbox_and_placed_it_on_his_talk_page%2C_and_now_the_category_is_stuck%2C_despite_the_removal_of_the_userbox

Apparently, Angie didn't take the hint the first time.... -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 03:10, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

[edit]

Hi, Hunterd. I notice you have an external link in your signature. The issue has come up before (with other users), and "it was decided" that external links in signatures are a bad idea, as WP:SIGN now says. Can you please remove the link from your signature? (You can, of course, display it on your user pages). Zocky | picture popups 09:39, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Umm, sorry, that's WP:SIGNATURE, not WP:SIGN. Well, just goes to prove there's a good reason we hawe WP:OMG. Zocky | picture popups 16:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please remove the link from your signature. Naconkantari 22:59, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedit Episode IV

[edit]

So dude, I just got done with Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope again. So would you mind copyediting for me before I submit it for FAC? Also, if you have any suggestions for the FAC before I submit, just post them in my talk page or the article's. Thanks. :) The Filmaker 04:38, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only thing I think I overlooked. If you could insert this into the reaction section, between Ebert's quote and Pauline Kael's quote.
  • Vincent Canby called the film "the movie that's going to entertain a lot of contemporary folk who have a soft spot for the virtually ritualized manners of comic-book adventure."[1]
  • Hey dude, are you working on the article? I only ask because you said you only had yesterday and the day before to work on it and since you simply uploaded my quote, it implied that you didn't have anything to change in the article (which, yes, I find to be highly unlikely). I'm just a little worried as I'm having a bit of trouble getting people to copyedit for me. So if you could just drop me a message and sooth my worries, I'd appreciate it. :) The Filmaker 02:36, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hello once again, dude. Could you let me know how far you are from completion. I ask because another editor is willing to work on it now, but he's aware that you are working on it. If you're not too far, I can go ahead and let him start. If you're going to be done within the next day or two, I'll have him back off till then. Let me know, and thanks. :) The Filmaker 03:33, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • If that's the case, I'll let you know that I've got a few ancy people who want me to submit the article for FAC. So here's what I'm thinking, Deckiller is really interested in copyediting it. So I'm going to have him copyedit and then I'll submit it for FAC. While it's up for FAC, and when you are able to copyedit at the end of the week. You can copyedit it as well, based off the version that Deckiller has come up with. For your sake, I'll give you a day to send a message and disagree. But I hope you understand, I've been trying to get a copyedit done for close to a month now. And I've been waiting on yours for two weeks. I fully understand that you have your exams to worry about, which you should over this. But because of your exams, I'm going to have Deckiller copyedit and than you can copyedit over his while it's up for FAC. How does that sound? :) The Filmaker 13:45, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

warn test4 User talk:129.96.234.230 re Craig Charles

[edit]

When using certain template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. -- Paleorthid 04:26, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

De La Salle connection

[edit]

My response to you query.
--ric_man 08:46, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed!
--ric_man 14:28, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Templates

[edit]

What is the ussefulness of

Good articles Hunterd/archive has been listed as a Kick-Arse article. If you can improve it further, please do.

and the other templates? They serve no purpose and do no give any significant insight into your "assessment/review". Please do not add them to talk pages. It would be more constructive if you left a review on the article's talk page. Joelito (talk) 14:50, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

adopt me?

[edit]

That would be great. PStrait 02:51, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

a few questions

[edit]

Hey man, thanks for adopting me. How old are you btw? No offense, but your picture makes you look like you are in highschool. Nevertheless, you seem to know how to use the wikipedia format especially well, and I am struggling. A few questions came to mind:

First, how do I archive my talk page when it becomes time to do so?

Second, what software should i get to make editing easier?

Third, how do I upload pictures?

Fourth, how can I make a counter work to see how many edits I have? I have tried a few, but they failed (and now I dont even remember what they were called).

I have more questions but I don't want to burden you right now and perhaps I can figure some of it out on my own. Thanks for your help. PStrait 04:20, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If I put a "nonsense articles" tag on their talk page, then the user must have created an article that appeared to be nonsensical. It's not showing up in that user's contribution history because it's been deleted. There's no easy way (that I know of) to determine what that deleted article was. I wasn't the only one who left a warning for Magicpoo on that date; note [1] this warning message (erroneously left on the user page instead of the user talk page). OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:52, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Holic test

[edit]
Hello Hunherd, I'm just here to tell you that you have two scores posted on the wp:holic test. I don't think it's fair for users outside of the top 20 that someone has two scores there. Please do #21 a favor and remove one the older of your 2 scores. Thank you. | AndonicO Talk 17:36, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup Taskforce

[edit]

You have a number of open projects on your desk. How are they progressing? Do you need assistance with any of them? RJFJR 20:27, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars thingummy

[edit]

That's the Sith credo...they're one mean biker gang. ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 23:31, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Message reversion

[edit]

The message has been restored! Apologies for any inconviniences. It seemed like vandalism at the time, but upon looking at your userpage, I noticed that it just couldn't be the case. =) That's a pretty high score.... –- kungming·2 (Talk) | Review 07:32, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages are for discussing the articles. Your changes showed teh beginnings of a pattern that would compromise the discussion pages. If you want to change your sig dynamically great, (go into preferences select raw and paste this in "''[[User:Hunterd|Duke of]] [[User talk:Hunterd|{{subst:BASEPAGENAME}}]]''," ).
(E.G. "Duke of Hunterd,"

But it is Baron Farnborough not Duke. Rich Farmbrough, 16:08 28 November 2006 (GMT).

MedCabal

[edit]

Hi, we have a heavy backload of cases at WP:MEDCAB and since you are on the mediator list I thought I would request your help. Thanks! --Ideogram 10:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The best way to learn is to jump right in, but if you want to co-mediate with someone else I'm sure anyone currently mediating a case would be willing. In particular Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-11-18 Singapore Changi Airport has already asked for a second mediator. --Ideogram 19:38, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for offering to help! Firstly, I don't know, maybe it's just me, but that sig using {{subst:BASEPAGENAME}} gets awfully long when dealing with subpages (as you can see at the mediation page), I don't suppose you could change it (perhaps if you want to keep it, just for the duration of the case? It'll be weird to see "The Duke of Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-11-18 Singapore Changi Airport" all the time heh). First thing is we'll have to notify the participants involved. Personally I like to ask them to give their views on the discussion section at the same time. – Chacor 02:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Right now I'm waiting for responses from all the parties. This way we can get a better idea of what the dispute exactly is. – Chacor 05:37, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up. I've been fairly busy in real life recently, so haven't had much time to work on the case. I'll have a look, cheers. – Chacor 12:41, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Singapore Changi Airport

[edit]

Re: Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2006-11-18 Singapore Changi Airport, the one person it was designed to convince is now disputing the MedCab decision and reverting the 'compromise' change at Singapore Changi Airport. You might want to head over to the talk page for a looksee. Jpatokal 06:21, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration

[edit]

Greetings! You are being contacted to be notified that a Request for Arbitration has opened and you were listed as an involved party. You can find the discussion and make a statement at Wikipedia:Requests for Arbitration#Huaiwei and Singapore Changi Airport. Thank you for your cooperation. thadius856talk|airports|neutrality 20:12, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note to self...

[edit]

...User:Hunterd/archive/CE. 210.50.112.55 02:24, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note to all...

[edit]
Today is the birthday of Hunterd. Feel free to wish this user a happy birthday.

I've given the project a second refreshing, cleaned out all the pages and organised new mottos well into February 2007 - are you participating in this as an overseer any more, or would you like to be removed from the list? Oh, and happy birthday! —Vanderdeckenξφ 18:33, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

:)

[edit]

Thanks for the note. - Mgm|(talk) 20:17, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

[edit]
Happy Birthday, Hunterd! Wishing you a very happy birthday and an awesome upcoming year! Don't forget to save us all a piece of cake!

Best regards from the Birthday Committee and myself! --lovelaughterlife♥talk? 00:50, 21 December 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Happy Birthday Hunterd! · AndonicO Talk

I wish you a Happy Birthday! I hope you have a magnificent day! You are a year older now, enjoy it! · AndonicO Talk
.

Thingy

[edit]

Maybe later. I need your phone number again....so I can put it in my new Video iPod! ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 00:32, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My Game

[edit]

I cordially invite you and every person on Wikipedia to participate in my user game. To read more about this click on the question mark in my name.


--¿Why1991 ESP. | Sign Here 00:15, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

[edit]

Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays Hunterd! | AndonicO Talk | Sign Here 01:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
May you and your family have a Merry Christmas, as well as any other Holiday you may celebrate. I hope that warmth, good cheer, and love surround you during these special days. May God bless you during the Holidays. | AndonicO Talk | Sign Here 01:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply] File:Julekort.jpg
.

MOTTO

[edit]

No problem. Nice signature you've got there... would that be a {{subst:PAGENAME}}? ;) —Vanderdeckenξφ 10:39, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


My competition

[edit]

I am pleased to invite you and every person on Wikipedia to participate in my story writing competition. To read more about this click on the question mark in my name.


Littleghostboo[ talk ] 07:36, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ADOPT

[edit]

Hi there,

As a current Adopter with the Adopt-a-User program there has been some ongoing developments that we would like to bring to your attention.

A new Adopter's Area has been created where you can find useful resources and other Adopter's experiences. Please feel free to add any resources you may have found useful as an Adopter, as well as recount any experiences that you think may help others. If you know of any useful resources for new users / Adoptees then you can add them here.

Also the way the adoption process works has changed slightly. To decrease workload at Category:Wikipedians seeking to be adopted in Adopt-a-user, on offering adoption please change the {{Adoptme}} template to {{Adoptoffer}} on the user's user page, and this will add the user to Category:Wikipedians having been offered adoption. Users that have already been offered adoption can always have a second or third offer, but by separating out those users that have not had an adoption offer yet, it is hoped that no one will go lacking.

Furthermore numerous Adopters have been adding their details to a list of users available for adopting, to offer a more personalised service and allow new users to browse through and pick their own Adopter. The quickest way to adopt though, is still to contact users at the Category:Wikipedians seeking to be adopted in Adopt-a-user.

Finally - thanks for all your hard work, keep it up - and if you have any general questions or suggestions about the further development of Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User please bring them to our talk page. Cheers Lethaniol 13:52, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Littleghostboo's Userpage

[edit]

Care to come to see my newly created Userpage? It's pretty nice (I really don't wanna boast, but please give me comments on my talk page and sign my signiture book please!)... And the competition has changed a bit already...Littleghostboo[ talk ] 09:14, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duke of me?

[edit]

Why did you say you are the Duke of Littleghostboo? Littleghostboo[ talk ] 07:42, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Kenny.gif)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Kenny.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 00:00, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Participation Drive

[edit]

League of Copyeditors participation drive!

[edit]

Dear League member,

We've started a participation drive for the remainder of February. If you can, please help clear the backlog by adopting the following goals each week:

Thanks for your help! Rintrah 09:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Helping out with the Unassessed Wikipedia Biographies

[edit]

Seeing that you are an active member of the WikiBiography Project, I was wondering if you would help lend a hand in helping us clear out the amount of unassessed articles tagged with {{WPBiography}}. Many of them are of stub and start class, but a few are of B or A caliber. Getting a simple assessment rating can help us start moving many of these biographies to a higher quality article. Thank you! --Ozgod 20:52, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you lot get the hint?

[edit]

I AM ON WIKIBREAK!

Don't expect me to reply to any messages left here.

The Duke of Hunterd 23:58, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Biography WikiProject Newsletter Delivery

[edit]

Mocko13 21:39, 28 February 2007 (UTC) [reply]

SO SORRY!!!

[edit]

ok Hunterd, I am SORRY for that vandalism. I did that before I had learned about discussion pages. SO VERY SORRY!!!!! Please forgive me and if you can get back to me about doing certain wiki things!! THANX!!!!FonzieRules! 20:40, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Actors and Filmakers

[edit]

Hey see my proposals at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Actor and Filmmakers and the main WP Film and Biography talk page. Know anybody who is interested? Actors and all film people articles need a body on wikipedia to upkeep them asthey need more focus -it would be a part of Biogrpahy and Film. If you are interested or know somebody who would be, please let them know and whether you think it is a good progession for the project or not. Please leave your views at the council or biogrpahy main talk page. THanks ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "I've been expecting you" 14:48, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Shahbag

[edit]

The article is inching towards an FA status and is being reviewed for a second time by peers. But, it still needs much copyedit (especially with citation template and dating web citations). A wholesomely coherent style of English and a completely cohesive flow of the article is mightily required at this point. I have also tagged the article for sopyedit, and have posted a request with Wikipedia:WikiProject League of Copyeditors. Please, help. Aditya Kabir 16:08, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Biography Newsletter Volume II, no. 2 - April 2007

[edit]

--kingboyk 12:28, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive

[edit]
WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive!

WikiProject Biography is holding a three month long assessment drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unassessed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2007 – September 1, 2007.

Awards to be won range from delicacies such as the WikiCookie to the great Golden Wiki Award.
There are over 110,000 articles to assess so please visit the drive's page and help out!

This drive was conceived of and organized by Psychless with the help of Ozgod. Regards, Psychless Type words!.

hey adoptee

[edit]

I need some help -- can you show me how to create a disambiguation page?

thanks p

Hi. I'm sorry to bother you, but as a LoCE member, I just wondered if you would be willing to have a look through the Sheerness‎ article. It is currently a Featured Article Candidate and needs a copy-edit for grammar by someone who hasn't yet seen it. Any other ways to improve the article would also be welcome. Thank you very much, if you can. Epbr123 17:43, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully you hang around here!

[edit]

you disappeared dude! miss our conversations about sam :P it's ixusi5 at hotmail.

WP:CVU status

[edit]

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 15:49, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Biography Newsletter 5

[edit]

To receive this newsletter in the future, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 15:37, 7 October 2007 (UTC) .[reply]

Newsletter for WikiProject Biography

[edit]


Note: You have been delivered this newsletter because you are listed on the WikiProject Biography Spamlist. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter, remove your name. From the automated, Anibot 16:02, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
[reply]

OK people, I'm back! (and all the past crap will be archived).

[edit]

What the heading said.

The Duke of Hunterd 12:15, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hi

[edit]
Just a happy Birthday message to you, Hunterd/archive, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!
League of Copyeditors roll call
Greetings from the League of Copyeditors. Your name is listed on our members page, but we are unsure how many of the people listed there are still active contributors to the League's activities. If you are still interested in participating in the work of the League, please follow the instructions at the members page to add your name to the active members list. Once you have done that, you might want to familiarise yourself with the new requests system, which has replaced the old /proofreading subpage. As the old system is now deprecated, the main efforts of the League should be to clear the substantial backlog which still exists there.
The League's services are in as high demand as ever, as evinced by the increasing backlog on our requests pages, both old and new. While FA and GA reviewers regularly praise the League's contributions to reviewed articles, we remain perennially understaffed. Fulfilling requests to polish the prose of Wikipedia's highest-profile articles is a way that editors can make a very noticeable difference to the appearance of the encyclopedia. On behalf of the League, if you do consider yourself to have left, I hope you will consider rejoining; if you consider yourself inactive, I hope you will consider returning to respond to just one request per week, or as many as you can manage. Merry Christmas and happy editing, The League of Copyeditors.

Template:The Barnstar Of UserPage Editors has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. RichardΩ612 Ɣ ɸ 15:41, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Stargate

[edit]
Project Logo Hello, Hunterd/archive! Your username, as well as the usernames of other members of Wikipedia: WikiProject Stargate, has been moved to the inactive members list, as part of a process for update the activity of the wikiproject. If you would like to continue to be an active member, please follow the instructions on the top of the participants page to add your name to the active participants list.

Thanks! – sgeureka tc 16:35, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MOTD needs your help!

[edit]

You're listed as one of our contributors, but recent inactivity in the project has led us to be rather short on mottos. Currently, the schedule only has mottos up to August 12th, and that's only because I just spent half an hour or so filling them in! In order to make sure the project doesn't fold in, we need your help coming up with ideas for new mottos, commenting on active proposals, closing finished submissions, and your input on a new proposal to re-use some of our older mottos when we run out of new ones. Hundreds of editors see our mottos every day; if you can, please take some time out of your normal editing and drop by to help the project out. Thanks for your time. Hersfold (t/a/c) 04:59, 31 July 2008 (UTC) P.S. - You're getting this because you're using {{User MOTD}}. If you don't want to participate any more, please remove the userbox. Thanks.[reply]

WP:MOTD

[edit]

Please see Wikipedia_talk:Motto_of_the_day/Nominations#Running_dry Simply south not SS, sorry 18:31, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Frequently used idea and approved areas

[edit]

The Frequently used idea are needs updating seriously and now the future of the approved area is questioned. Please see the discussions at Wikipedia talk:Motto of the day/Nominations/Archive 2#Help with FUI and Approved area discussion. Simply south (talk) 22:45, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your request

[edit]

I've referred it to oversighters, who can do as you ask. I'm going to go ahead and remove your request from the various talk pages to which it was posted, to as not to draw more attention than necessary to this. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 05:28, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, seek oversight, and in the future ask one person instead of many if you can't find the answer. Andre (talk) 05:45, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
One easy way to do that is to email User:Oversight. Angela. 07:30, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

[edit]

It's a cute trick, but it is rather confusing, and could be seen as impersonating. Do you think you could switch it off, please? --Dweller (talk) 09:56, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Doubt it. If consensus agrees, I will, but until then, there is no policy preventing me from doing this (as far as I am aware...) and so I shall not. If you want to organize a vote, feel free to have anyone in support of my changing my signature immediately below this message. Ta. The Duke of Hunterd 11:35, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Don't take it personally, but I completely agree with Dweller's criticism. Consider that your message on my (Tapatio's) talk page was signed "Duke of Tapatio." What am I supposed to think of that? Tapatio (talk) 15:14, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Consider it done. :) Hunterd is back! 20:00, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, no! I'm going to miss the cleverest signature around. It's nice of you to be so accommodating, though. Best wishes! GreenGourd (talk) 00:25, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Geophys

[edit]

Regarding the difficulties applying geophysics to Australian archaeology you mentioned in Talk:Geophysical survey (archaeology):

I realize that in most places GPR, Mag and Res. are the most common techniques. However, down here in Australia, geology significantly limits the use of these techniques. This is particularly true for where most of my work is done... in the state of Victoria. There's a lot of clay (GPR is out in most places), it's all volcanic rock (Mag is out), and with the current drought, there's very little water in the ground (Res is out)! I realize that this is an extreme irregularity, but the more experimental techniques (as you would call them) are basically what my career will rely on.

Your situation is not irregular at all. In North America, we face a very great diversity of physical environments, and the conditions you mention would be typical of much of the western US. The same could be said for the Middle East. What we have found is that these dificult conditions can often be overcome with an adaptive approach based on a thorough understanding of the archaeological record and the physical environment, and of the way both are expressed in geophysical data. Often the results may not make a pretty picture, but can yield information relevant to archaeological questions. In other cases, it is probably best to accept that your archaeological questions might best be answered with non-geophysical approaches.

I would not categorically say that mag is out in areas of volcanic/igneous geology; in some cases I have had outstanding results. I have used resistance with at least intermittent success in very arid conditions. If you really can't use res, conductivity may work. How about susceptibility?

In any case, It is always a challenge to adapt to site-specific conditions, and it has taken decades here to adapt geophysical methods to environments and an archaeological record very different from those found in Britain and Europe. Tapatio (talk) 17:27, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MOTD

[edit]

Would be gatreful if you have any ideas for mottos. Please help at WP:MOTD/N. Also see Wikipedia talk:Motto of the day/Archive 5#Archival Simply south (talk) 21:39, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Atlantis

[edit]

The article Atlantis is undergoing a review as part of the good article sweeps project. You are listed as "actively involved with this article". The article does not seem to meet current requirements for a good article. It has been put on hold for a week; if these issues are addressed satisfactorily within that period the article will be kept as a GA, otherwise it will be delisted. Lampman (talk) 17:13, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Ubangi River
Moros
Steltor
Royal Thai Army
Midge
Straight Plan for the Gay Man
Suliban
Faces (film)
Lemminkäinen
Miranda
Cranial capacity
Ateliosis
Blue ice runway
Troilus
Thaumas
Canadian Forces Disaster Assistance Response Team
Dizin
Breechblock
Curtain
Cleanup
2003 invasion of Iraq
Pug (fictional character)
Piri Reis map
Merge
Spartel
Bandwagon effect
Neutronium
Add Sources
Replicator (Stargate)
John Sheppard (Stargate)
Jumpgate
Wikify
Ufology
Fall of the Ottoman Empire
Ertuğrul
Expand
Teal'c
Reckoning (Stargate SG-1)
Stargate (film)

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:39, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure the Kinnoull Campus is named after the hill and not Kinnoull? I'm assuming the hill was named after the area of the city. - Dudesleeper / Talk 23:26, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Motto of the Day contributions

[edit]

This is a general message to get people to contribute as we are running out again so if you could please do. Please also see Wikipedia talk:Motto of the day#The Future. Note to anyone who reads this, WP:MOTD/N. Simply south (talk) 19:12, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest and promotional edits

[edit]

Please do not take this personally, but you should not be adding your name or the name of your company (or links to it) to any of our articles, please see WP:COI. The list of archaeologists is meant to be a list of notable archaeologists, not simply a list of all the people in the world who might call themselves an archaeologist. On a minor point, you might want to read WP:CREDENTIAL, I've also reverted the edit where you added 'Dr.' to Tony Robinson's article. Dougweller (talk) 16:33, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ Vincent Canby (May 26, 1977). "'Star Wars'--A Trip to a Far Galaxy That's Fun and Funny..." The New York Times. Retrieved 2006-10-04.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: year (link)