User talk:Amalas
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. Amalas has not edited Wikipedia since July 2017. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
| Leave me a new message. |
| I will always reply on your talk page unless otherwise requested. |
| Archives |
| 3 April 2006 – 18 May 2006 | 19 May 2006 – 12 June 2006 | 13 June 2006 – 12 July 2006 | 13 July 2006 – 29 Aug 2006 | 30 Aug 2006 – 20 Nov 2006 |
| 21 Nov 2006 – 28 Dec 2006 | 29 Dec 2006 – 6 March 2007 | 7 March 2007 – 16 April 2007 | 17 April 2007 – 19 June 2007 | 20 June 2007 – 10 Sept 2007 |
| 11 Sept 2007 – 18 Jan 2008 | 21 Jan 2008 – 4 July 2008 |
Thanks Amalas
[edit]Hello Amalas,
I am very new in Wikipedia and this is my first page in English Wikipedia. (Though I have started 2 entries in the Turkish Wikipedia, Epigenetics and DNA Methylation, I'm also very new there).
Therefore, I'm not sure whether this article; Sarkar's Linguistic Concepts and Criteria, is good according to Wikipedia's standart. If it's not, could you suggest me any idea?
Thanks in advance,
Cordially,
--Universal Life (talk) 15:14, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Re: SfD log
[edit]Hi Amalas - I've put all those redlinks back in the August log. I always leave them until the start of the next month - that way we can guarantee that no subpages are missed from the log, and it makes it easier to simply copy and paste the lot as a "start template" into the next month's log. Grutness...wha? 00:08, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, you're right about it looking messy, but it's only temporary. I can understand you tidying it the way you did, but I think its better messy for a while if it saves work later :) Grutness...wha? 02:26, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
Motto of the day
[edit]Hello, I notice you're using one of the {{motd}} templates, run by Wikipedia:Motto of the day. You may have noticed that some of the mottos recently have been followed by a date from 2006, or on occasion simply "Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia". The reason for this is that Motto of the day is in some very serious need of help. Participation in the project, which has never been especially high, has dropped considerably over this past summer, to the point we have had several days where no motto was scheduled to appear at all. Over the past several weeks, I've been the only editor scheduling mottos at all, but there aren't enough comments on some of these mottos to justify their use. If we do not get some help - and soon - your daily mottos will stop. In order for us to continue updating these templates for you, we need your help.
When you get a chance between your normal editing, could you stop by our nominations page and leave a few comments on some of the mottos there, especially those that do not have any comments yet? This works very simply; you read a motto, decide whether or not you like it, and post your opinion just below the motto. That's it - no experience required, just an idea of what you personally like and what you feel reflects Wikipedia and its community. If you do have past experience with the project, then please close some of the older nominations once they've got a decent consensus going. There are directions on the nominations page on how to do this.
If you have any questions, please let me know, or post on the project's talk page. I'm looking forward to reading your comments on the suggested mottos, and any additional suggestions you'd like to make. Until then, happy editing! Hersfold (t/a/c) 01:42, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Tommy Lowne
[edit]Hello Amalas. I noticed you edited the Tommy Lowne page which I have been trying to update recently. Now this might seem a strange question but, sadly, Tommy Lowne is very ill and not expected to survive the week. I am his daughter - how do I update his page please, when the time comes? I have no idea where to look for WIKI templates - can you advise? Thanks. AndreaUKA (talk) 22:03, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Proofreading complete for Dario Bellezza (it --> en)
[edit]Hello!
I have completed the proofreading and revised the page above by adding a significant number of sources after some reading; since you contributed to it in the past, I invite you to take a look at it, and leave any comments, feedback or suggestions on the page's talk by starting a new section. I'll watch it for a few days.
Thanks! -- Campelli (talk) 00:56, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
==Dhamma Jagoda
could you Please add more details about this dramatist.
Jets (talk) 15:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
There hasn't been much activity at WikiProject Missouri or any of its child projects lately, and I saw your name on the list of active participants. If you are willing to jump in again, please consider helping to revive the project:
- Put {{WikiProject Missouri}} on the talk pages of articles involving Missouri. This helps to categorize articles
- Write, cleanup, or expand an article about Missouri
- Source a Biography of a living person living in, born in, or otherwise affiliated with Missouri
- Help spread the word about the project
- Update the project page or the portal
- Watchlist or check the project talk page for updates
- Join one of the child projects:
If you know anyone who might be interested in Missouri (its history, culture, sports, people, places, architecture, etc.), please pass this message along to them! If you are still interested in the project but aren't currently active, please add yourself to the list of inactive participants at the bottom of this list. Thanks!
On behalf of the project, fetchcomms☛ 21:42, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
The article D-Link G604T Network Adaptor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- There is no verifiability, its all original research and its not a notable product. Find at least one neutral review, or really this article should go.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jez t e C 19:06, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Nitto Records
[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing, Nitto Records, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nitto Records. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 05:47, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]
Hello Amalas! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 306 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Phil Hall (UK writer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:43, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Why did you delete an article?
[edit]Provide me with an explanation as to why the article below was deleted.
Albert Street (Regina)
Happy Birthday
[edit]
Upcoming Wikimedia events in Missouri and Kansas!
[edit]You're invited to 3 exciting events Wikipedians are planning in your region this June—a tour and meetup at the National Archives in Kansas City, and Wiknics in Wichita and St. Louis:
|
 |
|
And two local editions of the Great American Wiknic, the "picnic anyone can edit." Come meet (and geek out with, if you want) your local Wikipedians in a laid-back atmosphere:
|
 |
Message delivered by Dominic·t 19:31, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
[edit]
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 06:45, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Template:PRChina-company-stub has been nominated for merging with Template:China-company-stub. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. LukeSurl t c 10:44, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
[edit]
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
[edit]
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
[edit]
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WJBscribe (talk) 22:42, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Someone else nominated this, but didn't alert you.
[edit][1]. 41.132.48.255 (talk) 05:58, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Motto of the Day Help Request April 2014
[edit]Motto of the Day (WP:MOTD) is in a state of emergency and really needs your help! There are not enough editors who are reviewing or nominating mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review, and this probably means that you will notice a red link or “This space for rent” as our mottos for the next weeks and months.
Please take a moment to review the nominations and nominate your own new mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review and Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/'Specials. Any help would be appreciated! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- This message has been sent by pjoef on behalf of Motto of the Day to all editors of the English Wikipedia who are showing MOTD's templates on their pages, and to all the participants to MOTD: (page, template, and category).
Request for comment
[edit]Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Category:Nelson and Tasman District geography stubs has been nominated for discussion
[edit]
Category:Nelson and Tasman District geography stubs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:06, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Documentary films by Eric Rohmer listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Documentary films by Eric Rohmer. Since you had some involvement with the Documentary films by Eric Rohmer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:55, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Other fictions by Eric Rohmer listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Other fictions by Eric Rohmer. Since you had some involvement with the Other fictions by Eric Rohmer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:02, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Amalas. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Sfdisc top
[edit]
Template:Sfdisc top has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:05, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Nomination for merging of Template:Sfp create
[edit]
Template:Sfp create has been nominated for merging with Template:Sfp top. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:17, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
The article The Unitarian Universalist Church of Charlotte has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unreferenced for years
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jax 0677 (talk) 15:50, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Sfdisc list
[edit]Template:Sfdisc list has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 18:13, 7 April 2023 (UTC)