User talk:HungryThai
Recent edit to Jorge Horacio Brito
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Jorge Horacio Brito without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Mike1901 (talk) 06:09, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Materialscientist (talk) 09:55, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
HungryThai (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I explained the reasons of my edits and ask to another user if I should make further details of them. Please, tell me what gave I've done wrong and what can I do to explain my edits and avoid to get.blocked again. Thank you--HungryThai (talk) 13:07, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
It's fairly obvious from a look through the article's history and the associated talk page that there has been a history of paid PR firms editing the article. You state "I have made a more neutral version of the article" but you just reverted to the previous paid editor's version; none of it was the work of your account. The obvious conclusion would be that you're either the same paid editors, or a new paid organization that's a little lazy. I would suggest an unblock request with significant transparency. Please note that paid editors are required to disclose this in our terms of usage. Kuru (talk) 13:32, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
HungryThai (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
We didn't know that we have to disclose that we are a PR firm. Now that we are blocked we can't do it in the user page but as soon as we get unblocked we are going to explain that. In fact, if there is something else that we can do yo improve our user page we will do it. In the other hand, we read more about Wikipedia's requirements and are ready to improve articles in the correct way!
Decline reason:
What is your relationship with the blocked users User:ClufoWatson and User:Tuquoquefili, also editing about the same subject from the same IP address? --jpgordon::==( o ) 14:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Do you understand that Wikipedia accounts are for individuals only, and that 'we' do not share an account? Account names must fit with WP:USERNAME and must not appear to be the name of an organisation. Peridon (talk) 14:09, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
HungryThai (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Thank you Peridon for telling me about the 'we' issue. This is an individual user but since I've been told to disclose that I work for a PR Firm I wrote in representation of the whole team. In the other hand, you found that I share an IP adress with two other users. This is because I work in a building where many PR Firms work with press, advertising and marketing agencies. It's like a building where many companies of communication work and we share the same Internet provider. As far as I could find out, those users belong to two former employees of a neighboring company who had worked with Banco Macro before us. Tell me if you need further information about my profile and my company and if I can improve my user page in any way. Thank you so much!!
Decline reason:
The standard offer is one way to go, which requires that you avoid disrupting the site and therefore avoid the article entirely for 6 months. This includes anyone in your building or from your company, broadly construed. --slakr\ talk / 03:32, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
HungryThai (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I accept the standard offer and promise not to edit the article. Of course I will disclose that I work for a PR Company in my user page. Is there anything I can do yo improve my perfomance in Wikipedia? Many thanks!!--HungryThai (talk) 14:23, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Excellent! See you in six months! Vanjagenije (talk) 20:07, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Formal mediation has been requested
[edit]The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Jorge Horacio Brito". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 6 January 2016.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 17:58, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Request for mediation rejected
[edit]The request for formal mediation concerning Jorge Horacio Brito, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 19:45, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)