User talk:Humanitarian2

Welcome!

Hello, Humanitarian2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia or the Tutorial
Create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
How to add those all-important references
Simplified style guide

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, If you need help visit the Teahouse or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Sm8900 (talk) 13:35, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will not change the draft again, but...

...being part of a panel with famous people does not make him notable. Notability is not contagious. David notMD (talk) 02:30, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was not a panel was a plenary session in a summit for leaders. You think that I am stating that information because I want to make him notable, but you are wrong ... In my opinion, you cannot talk about the spice girls without mentioning the entire group, or talk about the judges of X factor without mentioning all of them. I'm just writing things down as they happened !! just being in such an event and at such a young age is sufficient proof to show that he is a NOTABLE person

I an not a reviewer. I will not be commenting or editing the draft. David notMD (talk) 09:55, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Benjamin Bocio moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Benjamin Bocio, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sulfurboy (talk) 22:29, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benjamin Bocio (April 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

social media and video hosting sites aren't typically considered reliable sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Benjamin Bocio and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Benjamin Bocio, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 22:30, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Humanitarian2! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 22:30, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Draft:Benjamin Bocio, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Do not remove AfC decline messages, no matter whether or not you agree with them. Sulfurboy (talk) 22:52, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benjamin Bocio (April 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Notability not established, still using unreliable sources to attempt to establish notability. Zero changes made since last review. Continually resubmitting without improvement will lead to rejection and/or deletion as it is viewed as WP:GAMING the system.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Benjamin Bocio and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Benjamin Bocio, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 23:02, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewers decide

Your draft has been declined twice. Your last action was to make it a mainspace article regardless of the reviewer decision. I will not be surprised if the article is deleted and you are blocked. I can understand that you believe the references are sufficient to establish notability. The (very experienced) reviewer does not agree. David notMD (talk) 23:09, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I bet the experienced reviewer didn't listen or watch to the sources. I want the opinion of another reviwer, why the reviewer has 2 completely different claims in less than 10 minutes ....

You can appeal the decision at the Articles for Creation Help Desk. David notMD (talk) 23:16, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like rather than the article being draftified again, it will be an article. As noted below, it has been nominated for deletion. That is usually a 7-10 day process during which people express their opinion to Keep or Delete. At the end, an Administrator makes a decision. If you intend to comment, please do not type all capital letters. That is considered shouting, and hence bad manners. David notMD (talk) 23:28, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Benjamin Bocio for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Benjamin Bocio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Bocio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:17, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Bocio, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:01, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Humanitarian2 (talk) 01:13, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Correction

Hope you are well !! I clarified some points in your comment in the discussion about Benjamin's biography. I am planning to intervene, but I will wait for more opinions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Madeindominicanrepublic (talk • contribs) 05:20, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Dominicans in the house........Thank you hermano, I am looking for better references, we need to improve the quality of our dominican biographies. Humanitarian2 (talk) 06:43, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is your connection to Bocio?

This is a valid question, and one that should have been asked earlier. What, if any, is your connection to Bocio. Is he a person you know, personally? A family member? Are in contact with about this effort to create this article? These types of connections mean that you have a conflict of interest (WP:COI), and that should be declared on your User page. If you are being in any way paid or compensated or this effort is a job assignment, then WP:PAID applies, and that must be declared on your User page. If none of this applies (not COI, not PAID), then a simple statement to that effect here on your Talk page is sufficient. I am asking because the sole purpose of your account to date has been to create this article. David notMD (talk) 12:37, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We do not have any kind of relationship, I work in the UNDP so I know about his humanitarian work, I came here to write biographies about Dominicans activists, entrepreneurs, etc. I am preparing my second biography about Rainier Mallol. We are in times of COVID-19, I don't have many things to do Humanitarian2 (talk) 15:39, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Humanitarian2, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Chris Troutman (talk) 14:18, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of sockpuppetry block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Humanitarian2. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 20:27, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

just so we're clear

Please understand that you, personally, are blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you create other accounts, we'll figure out that it's you and block those immediately, regardless of their editing. There is no expiration on this block so you are off Wikipedia for the indeterminate future. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:38, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Benjamin Bocio

Hello, Humanitarian2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Benjamin Bocio, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Benjamin Bocio

Hello, Humanitarian2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Benjamin Bocio".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Benjamin Bocio Richardson

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Benjamin Bocio Richardson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Bocio. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:30, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Benjamin Bocio Richardson

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Benjamin Bocio Richardson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:32, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]