User talk:HueSatLum/Archive 3

This is an archive of past discussions with HueSatLum. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

< Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4 >

All Pages:

1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - ... (up to 100)

Closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barry Charles Honig

Hello. Could you provide for me a more detailed explanation of your closure and how you weighed the arguments? →Σ σ ς. 02:11, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This was a difficult one to close; I should have provided a rationale to my closure.

Dewritech's argument was true; with sources from "Reuters, Bloomberg, and Forbes he meets WP:BASIC." Although there are a lot of primary sources, there are many independent, reliable sources.

I know per WP:POLL that "most decisions on Wikipedia are made on the basis on consensus", but with one "vote" for delete and 4 "votes" for keep, I thought the community mostly wanted keep. —Hue Sat Lum 17:38, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2012 July newsletter

We're approaching the beginning of 2012's final round. Pool A sees Cwmhiraeth (submissions) as the leader, with 300 points being awarded for the featured article Bivalvia, and Pool B sees Grapple X (submissions) in the lead, with 10 good articles, and over 35 articles eligible for good topic points. Pool A sees Muboshgu (submissions) in second place with a number of articles relating to baseball, while Pool B's Ruby2010 (submissions) follows Grapple X, with a variety of contributions including the high-scoring, high-importance featured article on the 2010 film Pride & Prejudice. Ruby2010, like Grapple X, also claimed a number of good topic points; despite this, not a single point has been claimed for featured topics in the contest so far. The same is true for featured portals.

Currently, the eighth-place competitor (and so the lowest scorer who would reach the final round right now) has scored 332, more than double the 150 needed to reach the final round last year. In 2010, however, 430 was the lowest qualifying score. In this competition, we have generally seen scores closer to those in 2010 than those in 2011. Let's see what kind of benchmark we can set for future competitions! As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 22:25, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox Doubles

I was browsing your userboxes when I noticed you have the "This user performs non-admin closures at articles for deletion." twice. I just figured I'd let you know. --~Scholarly Breeze~ 22:45, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks for noticing! —Hue Sat Lum 22:49, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! --~Scholarly Breeze~ 23:28, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

your reply of 30/7 to my help feedback

many thanks for taking some time out and explaining to me the correct syntax of the ref name command, and finding the further resource for more info. Yaara dildaara (talk) 01:24, 6 August 2012 (UTC)Yaara dildaara Yaara dildaara (talk) 01:24, 6 August 2012 (UTC)6th August, 2012.[reply]

You're welcome! —Hue Sat Lum 14:42, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer permission granted

Hi, HueSatLum. I have reviewed your recent contributions and articles you have created, and have granted you the Reviewer permission as requested. Keep up the good work. -- Dianna (talk) 23:38, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you —Hue Sat Lum 23:59, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phrateres

I undid you non-admin closure at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phrateres. I don't think that it was an appropriate AFD for non-admin closure.--GrapedApe (talk) 00:43, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Wikify and the future of wikification

Hi! There is an ongoing proposal at the project talkpage concerning the future of wikification, including possible deprecation of the {{wikify}} template which is being discussed at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 August 10. Your input would be greatly appreciated!

You are receiving this message because you are listed as an active member of the wikify project. To update your status, go here.

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:45, 12 August 2012 (UTC) on behalf of Project Wikify[reply]

DYK for Pemberton Point

On 21 August 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pemberton Point, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Pemberton Point is home to the first commercial urban wind turbine in North America? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pemberton Point. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]