User talk:HueSatLum/Archive 10

This is an archive of past discussions with HueSatLum. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

< Archive 9

Archive 10

All Pages:

1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - ... (up to 100)

Four Award

		Four Award
		Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on James P. Hagerstrom. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:52, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Hesburgh (film)

On 4 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hesburgh (film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that director Patrick Creadon said he made the documentary Hesburgh in part because he was skeptical whether the work of Father Theodore Hesburgh "really lived up to his reputation"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hesburgh (film). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Hesburgh (film)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TFA

I started a TFA request at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/James P. Hagerstrom. (t · c) buidhe 02:45, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

James Hagerstrom scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the James Hagerstrom article has been scheduled as today's featured article for January 14, 2021. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 14, 2021, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.

We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:23, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for the article, "about a U.S. Air Force fighter pilot who was a flying ace in both World War II and the Korean War. It passed a thorough MILHIST A-Class Review in 2018, and I believe it has only improved since then and meets the FA criteria. As this is my first FAC nom, Nick-D was gracious enough to mentor me through the process, and I hope to get the article to FA in time for it to run on TFA next January for the 100th anniversary of his birth."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:49, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

James Hagerstrom

Thank you for quality article James Hagerstrom, from the beginning to the featured end, for Maria Pinto (fashion designer), Charles Seaforth Stewart and Columbus murals, for a great organization of useful links, for impressive reviewing and patrolling, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2512 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:46, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Gerda! ~hue sat lum 18:40, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| June 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Robert Parker Coffin Bridge

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Robert Parker Coffin Bridge you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 20:02, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Robert Parker Coffin Bridge

The article Robert Parker Coffin Bridge you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Robert Parker Coffin Bridge and Talk:Robert Parker Coffin Bridge/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 00:22, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Robert Parker Coffin Bridge

The article Robert Parker Coffin Bridge you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Robert Parker Coffin Bridge for comments about the article, and Talk:Robert Parker Coffin Bridge/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 22:03, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]