User talk:Hpfan1

Archives

Please Note: The following are from April 2008 to Today.

Third Reich map

Sure, I'm happy to do that, but I don't really have time right now. Can you remind me in a month's time, with a bit more detail of what you had in mind? :o) — OwenBlacker (Talk) 12:49, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:A&Fgraymoose.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:A&Fgraymoose.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

The following images also have this problem:

Image:Abercrombienavymoose.png

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --19:01, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Hermèslogo.gif)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Hermèslogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Gr1st (talk) 17:47, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Abercrombie & Fitch Kids"

So far as I'm aware you are correct that the store is never called "Abercrombie & Fitch Kids". I'll take a look at the page and see if I can help. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 05:45, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, do not refer to your fellow editors with derogatory language. See WP:CIVIL. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 21:41, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Further, if you edit logged-in then your edits are less likely to be mistaken for vandalism. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 03:32, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Abercrombie classiccool.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:Abercrombie classiccool.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:45, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Public domain"?

You don't really believe that Image:MattRatliff.jpg has been released into the public domain, do you? Do you understand what that term means? I think it's extremely unlikely that the photographer or the company would release the image without any license consideration, and if they did it should be possible to document them doing so. Unless you've got a source for their declaration it must be deleted. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 19:18, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just because someone has copied an image onto their blog doesn't remove the copyright. At most you can make a fair use claim. As the uploader it's your responsibility to get this right. Please correct the license on the image promptly and be more careful in the future. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 19:26, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please read this article: public domain. It explains the concept. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 19:31, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I second Will Beback's comment. Your tagging is an misinterpretation of the definition of "public domain." And other than public domain, there is really no good reason to use an advertisement for the article unless the purpose of the image, of course, is to advertise the subject. This is not the purpose of Wikipedia. мirаgeinred سَراب ٭ (talk) 19:41, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also agreed. Sorry, but there is absolutely no way a commercial A&F ad poster of one of their moneymaker models by one of their professional paid photographers can be claimed as a "Public Domain" image. The only way we can use this sort of image is if the Photographer himself releases the image for unrestricted public use. I have disabled the PD template you used, and substituted {{Non-free promotional}} until the question is resolved properly. Now - please feel free to attempt to defend the image as a non-free promotional image, but forget about trying to claim it as "Public Domain" just because you found someone else violated the owner's copyright and posted it online somewhere before you did. --T-dot ( ^Talk/contribs ) 20:28, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:MattRatliff.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:MattRatliff.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:49, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Harrypotterandthegobletoffireposter.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Harrypotterandthegobletoffireposter.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:56, 7 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 02:56, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Piratedavyjones.JPG

Thank you for uploading Image:Piratedavyjones.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:22, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more careful

I'm going to revert your latest changes to A&F. Aside from the many spelling and grammar mistakes, you make a variety of assertions with no sources to support them. Please find sources and please be more careful with your writing. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 01:24, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:GHwebsiteFALL2008.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GHwebsiteFALL2008.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 22:32, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issues

Another editor just deleted some material from the A&F article.[1] It had been added by you back in November.[2] The text was copied from a press release.[3]

Based on actions like that, and on the numerous alerts on this page, it appears that you are not familiar with the details of Wikipedia's copyright rules. While the fine points are complicated, you appear to be ignorant of even the major points. Please do not copy any more text from any other website or source, and do no upload any images that you have not created personally. If you do so again I will block your accounts to give you time to read the policies. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 00:03, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AFCanoe.jpg

Hi there. I noticed that you uploaded Image:AFCanoe.jpg, and asserted (by your use of the Public Domain licensing tag) that you created it. It really does not appear user-created, and I recall from up above (User_talk:Hpfan1#.22Public_domain.22.3F) that you have had problems in the past uploading as PD images found on the web. Does this image fall in with the others? -Seidenstud (talk) 03:18, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:AFCanoe.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:AFCanoe.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:22, 17 September 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is of course, in response to your message on my talk page. Thanks for your help! - Seidenstud (talk) 18:22, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kraken main depiction.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kraken main depiction.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:RUEHL Jeans.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:RUEHL Jeans.JPG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:31, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:GHlogo.GIF)

Thanks for uploading Image:GHlogo.GIF. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 13:41, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for repeated copyright problems

I warned you in September that if you continued to upload copyright violations I would block your account until you've communicated to me that you understand this site's copyright policies. You appear to have ignored that warning and have uploaded several more since then. Before I unblock you, you must read Wikipedia:Non-free content, and then post here a note, in your own words, explaining when images qualify for fair use and what steps need to be completed to justify them. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 02:13, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Only free free images are acceptable as in freedom to use whenever on whatever. All other images and uploadable media that those not fall into this is non-free. The most appropriet tags must be used and when in doubt, don't upload. I was not sure about that last image so that was the template that I placed, but since I really do not have the hang off this, I will no longer upload images. I have understood my mistakes as WIkipedia editor. Pardon me for the bother. -- User:Hpfan1 (talk) 19:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for posting that. I've now unblocked your account. Image copyrights are a difficult issue. I recommend that you restrict yourself to uploading images that you've created yourself. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 01:05, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:ModernRUEHLadvertisinglogo.gif)

You've uploaded File:ModernRUEHLadvertisinglogo.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:24, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:RUEHLmarketinglogo.gif)

You've uploaded File:RUEHLmarketinglogo.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:22, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Previous A&F e-commerce Web Design.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Previous A&F e-commerce Web Design.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 12:05, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:First GH advertisement.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:First GH advertisement.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:52, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:LETTERS OF mARQUE.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:LETTERS OF mARQUE.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:50, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Abercrombie & Fitch history

I've removed Template:Abercrombie & Fitch history from articles. It is unnecessary since we already have a navigation template at the bottom of each article, and it messes up the formatting to haev a centered template in the middle of a page. By comparison, would we have a simialr template in the middle of each state in the U.S., to point to the histories of other states? No, I don't think so. Will Beback talk 00:56, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Fierceanf.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Fierceanf.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from abercrombi.com. As a copyright violation, File:Fierceanf.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Fierceanf.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Fierceanf.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Fierceanf.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Fierceanf.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Seidenstud (talk) 19:25, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrights, again

Perhaps you have forgotten being blocked last year. See #Blocked for repeated copyright problems on this page. Since then there have been six more alerts about copyrighted material. Before making any other edits to the encyclopedia, please explain why you have returned to uploading copyrighted images despite your promise that you would no longer upload images. If I don't hear from you I will block the account indefinitely. Will Beback talk 22:30, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you didn't see this post. Please respond here or write me an email to resolve this matter. Will Beback talk 06:38, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is really embarrassing. In my defense, the canoe pictures were not posted by me. This error has happened to me in the past, and those images have been there since before I became active on the article. The "gray moose" image I personally took of the article because someone, I don't know how, updated it with a blue image of a bigger moose. The images from RUEHL have been there since before the previous block. As for the rest, I really did not recall it since it was a long while sicne I recieved notifications and well I have more on my mind that just Wikipedia. I beg your pardon and Wikipedia's I guess because it is a violation in accordance to the guidelines. I will make sure that I never upload any image without FULLY making sure I post the proper tag. Again, I beg your pardon for this terrible inconvinience. - User: Hpfan1 (talk) 13:26, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There have been so many problems in the past that it'd be better if you simply stopped uploading images that you haven't created yourself, as I asked you before. In fact, last year you promised to not upload any more images, a promise which you forgot within five months. If you renew that promise I'll unblock you. If I unblock you and you upload another copyrighted image the next block will be permanent. Will Beback talk 19:18, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I PROMISE to you that I will NEVER upload any image on Wikipedia again. I will NEVER uplaod an image to which I have no COMPLETE authorship to. I PROMISE to uphold my promise. - User: Hpfan1 (talk) 17:06, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your prompt reply. You're making two conflicting promises. I don't see any need to hold to the promise to never upload any images, but I will hold you to the second promise: to only upload images which you have created. And to repeat my warning - the next block of this account for the same cause will be permanent. Will Beback talk 22:30, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I am really sorry and I will keep that in mind. Thank you. - User: Hpfan1 (talk) 17:55, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:A&Fgraymoose.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:A&Fgraymoose.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 00:54, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Hector Barbossa

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Hector Barbossa. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hector Barbossa. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Abercrombienavymoose.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Abercrombienavymoose.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:18, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dumbledore and Elder Wand.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dumbledore and Elder Wand.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 01:24, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Abercrombie & Fitch people

Template:Abercrombie & Fitch people has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Connormah^talk 22:58, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Abercrombie & Fitch publication

Template:Abercrombie & Fitch publication has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:53, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HarrypotterGoFsountrack.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HarrypotterGoFsountrack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:27, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Louis Vuitton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madonna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pirates of the Caribbean association

I have nominated Template:Pirates of the Caribbean association, which you created in 2007, for deletion. If you would like to share your thoughts on the nomination, you're welcome to comment at the template's discussion section. Cheers, -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 19:11, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Dior (designer)

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Christian Dior (designer), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Christian Dior. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. VWBot (talk) 01:40, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Prometheus in Zeta Reticulae

Hpfan1,

Thanks for your contribution to Stars and planetary systems in fiction. You should know that this film and its connection to Zeta Reticuli has been the subject of some controversy in this article. The Prometheus item has been added to Zeta Reticuli at least twice, and has been as often removed by other contributors (not me) who denied that the star has any connection to the film. It would be great if you could provide documentation (interviews, screenplay, whatever) to verify the assertion in this item.

Thanks OperaJoeGreen (talk) 08:33, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Pirates of the Caribbean character

Template:Infobox Pirates of the Caribbean character has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:55, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Gilly Hicks storefront.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Gilly Hicks storefront.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 12:25, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Initialwebsetup.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Initialwebsetup.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RNYfirstonlinestore.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RNYfirstonlinestore.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Entrance close-up.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Entrance close-up.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:26, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Georgiana Cavendish, Duchess of Devonshire may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

The House of Spencer, from which she derived, was an ardent supporter of the [[Whig (British political party|Whig party]] as was she and the House of Cavendish. However, because the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:07, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Georgiana Cavendish, Duchess of Devonshire

added links pointing to Enlightenment, St. James, Chatsworth and William Mason

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Hpfan1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of C-IN2

The article C-IN2 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ori Livneh (talk) 23:36, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Hpfan1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Hpfan1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox Pirates of the Caribbean character

Template:Infobox Pirates of the Caribbean character has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox character. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:46, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox fictional ship

Template:Infobox fictional ship has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox fictional vehicle. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:56, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:A&Ffierce.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:A&Ffierce.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:20, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HarrypotterSSsoundtrack.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HarrypotterSSsoundtrack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:PoloembroiledwithTrubble.jpg

The file File:PoloembroiledwithTrubble.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kraken (Pirates of the Caribbean)

The article Kraken (Pirates of the Caribbean) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:22, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kraken (Pirates of the Caribbean) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kraken (Pirates of the Caribbean) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kraken (Pirates of the Caribbean) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:59, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Flying Dutchman (Pirates of the Caribbean) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flying Dutchman (Pirates of the Caribbean), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flying Dutchman (Pirates of the Caribbean) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Wandlore (Harry Potter)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wandlore (Harry Potter) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 1#Wandlore (Harry Potter) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:42, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use of File:Dumbledore and Elder Wand.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Dumbledore and Elder Wand.JPG. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 11:56, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dumbledore and Elder Wand.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dumbledore and Elder Wand.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:18, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Australian-themed retailers has been nominated for deletion

Category:Australian-themed retailers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 13:46, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]