User talk:Hpfan1/Archive 3

Please Note: The following are dated from November 2007 to March 2008.

Hollister Co.‎ needs sources

Let's try to find some. William Ortiz 08:32, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Abercrombie & Fitcth

I would rather not get into an edit war with you. The current A&F article read like it was written by a 12-year-old, so I have been making efforts to improve the writing style of the article. You chose to revert all of my clean-up efforts with your latest changes. Please make your changes from the latest version of the article! Mwdelta 20:10, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please add edit summaries to your edit

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

mirageinred 20:39, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Abercrombie & Fitch publication

Why do we need a template for this? So far as I'm aware, there's only been on publicaiton, and it's now defunct. I'm going to nominate it for deletion. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 21:53, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Abercrombie Logo.GIF

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Abercrombie Logo.GIF. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Previous A&F e-commerce Web Design.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Previous A&F e-commerce Web Design.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 00:46, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Official Hollister Logo.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Official Hollister Logo.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cutler Beckett/Davy Jones

Hi! I just wanted to take a moment to thank you for helping out with the Cutler Beckett and Davy Jones articles. That was really nice of you! By the way, I'm also a Harry Potter fan :)

I also wanted to ask you to source the info you put when you "Greatly edited" them. Even though we know the info, just to keep it up to other Wikipedia page standards, a sourcing would be great. Again, thanks so much! BlackPearl14 ^{Pirate Lord-ess} 01:21, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Abercrombie & Fitch brand

Template:Abercrombie & Fitch brand has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Rhobite (talk) 17:26, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Darkmarkovercmpsite.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Darkmarkovercmpsite.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:55, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pirates of the Caribbean

Why have you named characters such as Bootstrap Bill Turner and Tia Dalma as Protagonists? That's not correct, mate. And you've also added a whole bunch of information that's not necessary. BlackPearl14 ^{Pirate Lord-ess} 22:26, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re

I did. Just thought I ought to let you know, mate. Now, I've got to go off to Hermione's page. BlackPearl14 ^{Pirate Lord-ess} 19:41, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kraken main depiction.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kraken main depiction.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Voldemortandharry.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Voldemortandharry.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 03:20, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DetailtofaceofDavyJones.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DetailtofaceofDavyJones.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:33, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lord Cutler Beckett.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lord Cutler Beckett.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:02, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kraken main depiction.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kraken main depiction.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:12, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Pirates of the Caribbean character

Template:Pirates of the Caribbean character has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 08:08, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:GHlogo.GIF

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:GHlogo.GIF. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:24, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gilly Hick

Are you able to get a better picture of the Gilly Hicks storefront. Also a picture of the store interior and merchandise would be a good addition to the article because this in a different product than the other A&F Brands. 66.94.95.194 (talk) 19:32, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From Hpfan1: This image was found in the website stated on the image's page. I did not take this picture and it is the only one I have. However, it is a good image (apart from the mild burriness), but I would like if someone placed a beter one. I agree, too, that an interior picture should be added, but I live nowhere near Natick, Massachusetts and interior picture shoots are not allowed. Only if an associate in the store takes one, then it take be posted.

Brethren Court

The page has been nominated for deletion, please join the discussion here. Therequiembellishere (talk) 09:55, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:HollisterCo.flyingseagull.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:HollisterCo.flyingseagull.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:19, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Interior of RUEHL store.jpg

I have deleted Image:Interior of RUEHL store.jpg because it is copyrighted by the New York Times.[1] I have a hard time believing you didn't copy it from the Times article given your history of uploading images with dubious copyright status. Please do not upload copyrighted images to Wikipedia in the future. Please do not claim an image has been released into public domain without evidence. Thanks. Rhobite (talk) 16:11, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your recent edits to Greenwich Village and West Village, Manhattan

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field - please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you.

For those edits that you just made, it would especially help if you could leave a message on the Greenwich Village talk page and West Village talk page explaining what you have done, since it is unclear what the purpose of your edits were. --M @r ē ino 22:30, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:NYTimageofRUEHLatGardenStatePlaza.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:NYTimageofRUEHLatGardenStatePlaza.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rhobite (talk) 17:19, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Scary Movie film series

I have nominated Scary Movie film series, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scary Movie film series. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TrU Co ⁹31¹ 17:40, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:RUEHLstorefront.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:RUEHLstorefront.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rhobite (talk) 01:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop linking the years when they are by themselves

What should be linked -> February 20 2009 What should not be linked -> 2009, or any other years that stand alone

Only relevant articles should be linked. I think WP:MOSNUM can help you. Also please try to refrain from using "Spring" or "Fall" to indicate time since it is different part of the year in some parts of the world. мirаgeinred سَراب ٭ (talk) 22:29, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I think Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context can help you more. Happy editing. мirаgeinred سَراب ٭ (talk) 22:32, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About the Cruft

Just got back to this; I noticed the fancruft on the locations you specified; please don't bite me, even though I'm not as new as you might expect. I understand what you've said, I was just saying that a few sections you had deleted were not cruft. I understand your perspective on the Lord Voldemort article - I had been watching the edit wars at the time. Thanks for your concern, and thank you for taking the time to talk to me and let me know. Just remember, next time, please don't bite. I would appreciate a little bit of respect. And as far as my "screen name" is concerned, yes, I am a big pirates fan, but I am very well aware and experienced in how not to write with cruft. As I am much more experienced, I would have noticed, I just hadn't read through everything you deleted, seeing as some of what I saw was not cruft. Earlier on, I had the assumption that you, too, were an experienced, kindly editor, but I see my assumptions were wrong. I would like an apology, or an explanation as to how I might have mistaken what you said. Remember, this response is written in the same tone as what I felt yours was. Keep your hat on, mate! BlackPearl14 ^{Pirate Lord-ess} 00:51, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Louis Vuitton

I appreciate your additions to the article, but it took me around 20 edits to fix spelling errors, red wikilinks, and several factual errors. I think you should always test wikilinks first before adding them. In addition, you really need to review WP:MOS and WP:MOSNUM. Thanks. OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 23:56, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Piratedavyjones.JPG

Thank you for uploading Image:Piratedavyjones.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr ^{If you've written a quality article...} 16:42, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:RNYfirstonlinestore.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:RNYfirstonlinestore.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:26, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:RUEHLmarketinglogo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:RUEHLmarketinglogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:26, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]