User talk:Housewatcher
Barnstar
[edit]Thanks much. I think I know what fixes you noticed. For background, see the request on Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/Tasks to fix links to "Wings of a Dove". Cheers! Chris the speller yack 05:02, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Ditto
[edit]Thank you for mine as well - not sure I deserve it though! Ghmyrtle (talk) 20:55, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
Barnstar
[edit]Thank you very much for the barnstar you bestowed on me. I really do appreciate it. Kohoutek1138 (talk) 09:26, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Barnstar
[edit]A belated thanks for the barnstar. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 10:27, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Survey
[edit]Hi Housewatcher!
I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!
It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!
Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!
Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 03:35, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Run for your life
[edit]Please let us know what you didn't understand about the edit summaries. I notice other editor has already partially reverted your change. Uniplex (talk) 15:29, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Stub category
[edit]In [1] you added a stub category with category code. It doesn't look like a stub to me and stub categories are supposed to be added via stub templates like {{Ohio-politician-stub}}. Did you mean to add a normal (not a stub) category? The article creator posted to Wikipedia:New contributors' help page/questions#Marian Spencer. PrimeHunter (talk) 23:58, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
- It's been awhile since I added that, but I think I added it at the time because the article was new and a work in progress. It looks the article has been updated a lot since then. Thanks for removing the category. Housewatcher (talk) 02:17, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
- OK. See the guideline at Wikipedia:Stub. PrimeHunter (talk) 10:56, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
WikiWomen's Collaborative
[edit]| WikiWomen Unite! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi Housewatcher! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:
We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved! |
WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)!
[edit]| WikiWomen - We need you! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi Housewatcher! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more! Get involved by:
Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 00:56, 10 January 2013 (UTC) |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ed Cray is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed Cray until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeorgeLouis (talk) 05:08, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity
[edit]Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Dean until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.