User talk:Horis

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For Careston Castle and your other castle-related articles - keep it up :). Ironholds (talk) 09:09, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Nice work on those castles! RileyBugz ^会話 _投稿記録 11:07, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Horis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! The Neokid talk 10:57, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for experimenting with the page Wikipedia:Help desk on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 22:52, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Scottish Castles

Welcome from the Scottish Castles Wikiproject, thanks for getting stuck in. I just gave your Luffness Castle a quick copyedit - mainly links etc. If you get time, can you clarify the sentence about Patrick Hepburn? Sir Patrick Hepburn, 1st Lord Hales died in 1483, long before the reformation. Patrick Hepburn, 3rd Earl of Bothwell however, was around at this date. Anyway, hope you can sort this out, and I hope you can continue to contribute to the project. Thanks, ::Supergolden:: 12:05, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Scottish Castles

As a participant in Wikipedia:WikiProject Scottish Castles, I'd just like to draw your attention to a proposal, I have put forward on the talk page regarding infoboxes. Your input would be most welcome. Thanks, Edward Waverley 12:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Help

Hello Horis, good to hear from you. Its not too complex: "invalid names, e.g. too many" means that there are too many separate words in the <ref> tag. To illustrate, look at the references which are working on your Couston Castle page:

<ref name=Lindsay>
<ref name=Scotgaz>

And the one that isn't:

<ref name=Historic Scotland>

The difference is, the "name" in the Historic Scotland one is two words, so it breaks. To fix, simply use <ref name=HistoricScotland>etcetc</ref>, without a space. Does that make sense? Then at the end, just type </references> or {{reflist}} to make the references show up.

The error messages link through to Help:Cite errors which explains more. Fascinating to know that William the Lion had a son called "de London" - perhaps his English captivity was not too onerous!

Any further issues I'll be happy to help. Regards, Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 20:50, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox templates

You may be interested in one of the following templates:

Yours aye, Buaidh (talk) 06:20, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnbougle Castle

I was just reading the above article, mostly written by you, and thought it very well written and informative. It was a pleasure to see. Giacomo 23:34, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for all your work on George Mackay Brown. Span (talk) 09:53, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user is interested in Scotland.

This user is a grandparent.

Wikipedian in Residence at the National Library of Scotland

I'm just dropping you a quick note about a new Wikipedian in Residence job that's opened up at the National Library of Scotland. There're more details at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scotland#Wikimedian in Residence at the National Library of Scotland. Richard Symonds (WMUK) (talk) 15:30, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Affleck Castle

When you follow the link to Affleck Castle, you will end up on the Monikie page, but underneath the page title you will see in small text "(Redirected from Affleck Castle)". If you click on the link there, you won't get redirected (or, just click here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Affleck_Castle&redirect=no). Then, just edit the page as normal, replacing the content "#REDIRECT [[Monikie]]" with your article text. Hope that helps. Regards, Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 19:39, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Hi, would you mind if I nominated Kinnairdy Castle for Did You Know, or were you going to do it (or do you not want me to)? Thanks, Mat ty.007 12:06, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated it here. I hope you like the hook and picture, feel free to suggest alternatives. Thanks, Mat ty.007 12:48, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Horis. You have new messages at Matty.007's talk page.
Message added 12:22, 2 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Mat ty.007 12:22, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

DYK for Kinnairdy Castle

On 6 August 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kinnairdy Castle, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Kinnairdy Castle was once owned by a man accused of witchcraft? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kinnairdy Castle. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Alex Shih ^Talk 16:04, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well done for a good article, should get quite a few views. Thanks, Mat ty.007 16:20, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Opting in to VisualEditor

As you may know, VisualEditor ("Edit ^beta") is currently available on the English Wikipedia only for registered editors who choose to enable it. Since you have made 50 or more edits with VisualEditor this year, I want to make sure that you know that you can enable VisualEditor (if you haven't already done so) by going to your preferences and choosing the item, "MediaWiki:Visualeditor-preference-enable". This will give you the option of using VisualEditor on articles and userpages when you want to, and give you the opportunity to spot changes in the interface and suggest improvements. We value your feedback, whether positive or negative, about using VisualEditor, at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 20:11, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work...

...on the various Scottish castle articles! Hchc2009 (talk) 19:45, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Hi Horis, I am going to nominate Barra Castle for WP:DYK, which would hopefully result in its appearing on the main page. If there are any problems with this, please say. Thanks, Mat ty.007 21:28, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A very good quality article. Nominated here. Thanks, Mat ty.007 16:29, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Barra Castle

On 19 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Barra Castle, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Barra Castle was the seat of Kings? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Barra Castle. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Killochan Castle) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Killochan Castle, Horis!

Wikipedia editor FelisLeo just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your work on the Killochan Castle article and keep up the good work!

To reply, leave a comment on FelisLeo's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge

Hi, thanks for your work! I was wondering if you'd be interested in joining the challenge. Scotland is badly underrepresented!♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:22, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Uttershill Castle) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Uttershill Castle, Horis!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I've added a book source, linked to the Wikimedia Commons category and added a picture.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Blythwood (talk) 23:55, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Horis. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Careston Castle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blairgowrie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Horis. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Lochwood Tower) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Lochwood Tower.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Looks OK. I've done some standard formatting cleanup to finish off an article on a listed building: I've cited the HES listing and added a picture from Wikimedia Commons. There's an entry on the building already on Wikidata created as part of a bulk creation of entries for buildings with Historic Scotland IDs, so I've linked both to it and to the Commons category. The Canmore citation went to the wrong URL and I've also corrected a formatting glitch in a few places in the article where the reference came a space after the full stop. I've also tagged the talk page. In case of people searching for Lochwood Castle (which is what HES call it) I've set up a redirect page. Hope that's all OK!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Blythwood}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Blythwood (talk) 08:36, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Blythwood: Many thanks. I'll get this formatting business sorted out one day!Horis (talk) 09:44, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Tronach Castle) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Tronach Castle.

User:Girth Summit while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Hi Horis, nice work on this new article. My only slight concern is that some of your text is fairly similar to the content of your sources - some close paraphrasing, some phrases actually more or less identical. I'll try to fix that later this evening, unless you want to do some work on it first. I'll also see whether I can add a couple of sources and a bit more content - if it's a scheduled monument, the Historic Environment Scotland Portal ought to have an entry for it, and I'll take a look in the Pevsner for Moray to see if it's mentioned.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Girth Summit}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

GirthSummit _(blether) 18:46, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of poets, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Collier (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Castle of Park (Aberdeenshire)

Hello, Horis,

Thank you for creating Castle of Park (Aberdeenshire).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your new article on Castle of Park in Aberdeenshire. Note that it is currently an "Orphan" meaning that no other Wikipedia articles link TO it, and this makes the article tough to find for interested readers. See WP:DE-ORPHAN for pointers.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 23:36, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{Re|Doomsdayer520}}Thanks. There is a link from List of castles in Aberdeenshire which would be a first stop for Aberdeenshire Castles. There is also a redirection from Castle of Park.Horis (talk) 11:27, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cottown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Inverey Castle

Hallo, Thanks for starting this article.

Please remember that the infobox (if any) goes before the lead sentence, and the coordinates If any) go nearer the end, after references but before categories. See WP:ORDER. It helps all editors if they know where to find anything they want to edit in an article, so it's useful to keep to the specified order. I've tidied this article up. Thanks. PamD 18:25, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Kinmuck Castle

Hello, Horis,

Thank you for creating Kinmuck Castle.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for creating these articles on Scottish castles. In the "Structure" section you say an area of 40 miles, but the reference says 40 meters, can you correct please.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961^Talk 20:17, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Senior Wikipedians

WikiProject Wikipedians aged 70 and older has been inactive for some time. The following three proposals may help invigorate this project.

Change the name of this project to WikiProject Senior Wikipedians.^[a]
Open membership in this project to users who are at least 60 years of age and have made at least 50 edits in the past year.^[b]
Open supporting membership in this project to users who are less than 60 years old but have made at least 50 edits in the past year and support the goals of this project.^[c]

Suggested goals for this project:

To support collaboration and communication among members for the advancement and improvement of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement.
To encourage older people, retired people, and soon-to-be-retired people to participate in Wikipedia both for the advancement of the encyclopedia and for their own personal enjoyment.
To encourage older people to share their experience and expertise for the improvement of Wikipedia.
To encourage older users to use their experience and expertise to help younger and less experienced users.
To encourage participation in local and regional Wikimedia events.
To sponsor Wikipedia meetings and classes at places where older people gather.
To advocate for the elimination of ageism and sexism in Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement.

Notes

^ The current name of this project, WikiProject Wikipedians aged 70 and older, is somewhat cumbersome and excludes participation by any users under the age of 70 years.
^ This current minimum age limit of this project is 70 years. A minimum age limit of 60 years should permit the participation of most retired users. The minimum activity level of 50 edits per year is arbitrary. A minimum activity level indicates continued interest. Members who do not meet the minimum activity level shall be moved to inactive status. Members who have died shall be moved to memorial status.
^ A new class of Supporting Members allows those users under 60 years to support the goals of the project. Users approaching the age of 60 years may wish to become supporting members in anticipation of reaching the minimum age limit for members.

Please add your suggestions for this project at Senior Wikipedians. Thank you, Buaidh talk e-mail 01:15, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't wish to receive any further information about Senior Wikipedians, please remove your username from our notice list. Thanks.

Wikiproject

Hi, I see you've contributed a lot to Njals saga, would you be interested in a taskforce on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 09:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Elder Wikipedians

My proposal to make extensive changes to WikiProject Wikipedians aged 70 and older was a bust, primarily because many users felt that the term "Senior Wikipedian" implied a higher ranking Wikipedia membership. Therefore, I am making two less ambitious proposals:

Proposal #1. Change the name of "WikiProject Wikipedians aged 70 and older" to "WikiProject Elder Wikipedians".

Proposal #2. Drop the minimum age requirement to 60 years.

Please respond to Elder Wikipedians and let us know what you think of each of these proposals.
Thank you, Buaidh talk e-mail

If you don't wish to receive any further information about Elder Wikipedians, please remove your username from our notice list. Thanks.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] The current name of this project, WikiProject Wikipedians aged 70 and older, is somewhat cumbersome and excludes participation by any users under the age of 70 years.

[2] This current minimum age limit of this project is 70 years. A minimum age limit of 60 years should permit the participation of most retired users. The minimum activity level of 50 edits per year is arbitrary. A minimum activity level indicates continued interest. Members who do not meet the minimum activity level shall be moved to inactive status. Members who have died shall be moved to memorial status.

[3] A new class of Supporting Members allows those users under 60 years to support the goals of the project. Users approaching the age of 60 years may wish to become supporting members in anticipation of reaching the minimum age limit for members.

[a]

[b]

[c]