User talk:Honeybear1995

Honeybear1995, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Honeybear1995! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like TheAafi (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Puerto Rican hip hop

Hello, Honeybear1995, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Puerto Rican hip hop, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puerto Rican hip hop.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 07:56, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have now redirected this entry. Please do not mass create meaningless stubs. If you create an article you need to include sources and enure the topic is notable. See WP:GNG. Regards. Hughesdarren (talk) 08:23, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Romani people in Barbados

A tag has been placed on Romani people in Barbados requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.travellerstimes.org.uk/features/feature-roma-and-gypsy-slavery. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 12:39, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please write texts

I have added some informations to your Bulgarian villages, but I find your method extremely minimalistic. Please care aboutthe subject, eg. the sterilisation. Xx236 (talk) 13:30, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

One of your creations, Vietnamese hip hop, just stated

That was it. Please stop creating these microstubs. Sdrqaz (talk) 13:58, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Romani Kafenava moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Romani Kafenava, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 14:28, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

White Uruguayans moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, White Uruguayans, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:35, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Romani people in Norway moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Romani people in Norway, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:37, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Christian Roma

Hello, Honeybear1995,

Thank you for creating Christian Roma.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 23:21, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Roma moved to draftspace - need more reliable sources for statements of fact (see Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_16#Christianity_Today)

An article you recently created, Christian Roma, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ASUKITE 16:50, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gypsy eggs for deletion

A discussion is taking place to determine if the article Gypsy eggs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gypsy eggs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bulgarians in Chicago

A tag has been placed on Bulgarians in Chicago requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 09:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Albanians in Chicago

A tag has been placed on Albanians in Chicago requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.encyclopedia.chicagohistory.org/pages/35.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 09:56, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cüneyt Sepetçi

The article Cüneyt Sepetçi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eldra Jarman

The article Eldra Jarman has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:39, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cüneyt Sepetçi

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Cüneyt Sepetçi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:39, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Eldra Jarman

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Eldra Jarman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:39, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Honeybear1995! Your additions to Albanians in Chicago have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:44, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Topcheta soup moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Topcheta soup, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fërgesë moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Fërgesë, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Burgenland-Roma moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Burgenland-Roma, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:39, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Haitians in Miami

The article Haitians in Miami has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ––FormalDude ^talk 12:04, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

You've made 232 edits, and your talk page is littered with deleted articles and warnings. You need to seriously consider your ability to improve Wikipedia.

Please stop adding the category "OnlyFans creators" to biographies with no mention of the person being an OnlyFan creator. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:33, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mexicans in New Zealand moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mexicans in New Zealand, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:24, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bonairean cuisine

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Bonairean cuisine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DMySon (talk) 08:37, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines cuisine

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Saint Vincent and the Grenadines cuisine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fram (talk) 09:03, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Albanians in New York City" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Albanians in New York City and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 11#Albanians in New York City until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Fram (talk) 09:05, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Kazakhstan

Portal:Kazakhstan, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Kazakhstan (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Kazakhstan during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Fram (talk) 09:11, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Portal:Albania

A tag has been placed on Portal:Albania requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section P2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a portal based on a topic for which there is no non-stub header article, and there are not at least three non-stub articles detailing subject matter that would be appropriate to discuss under the title of that portal.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:23, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Portal:Kazakhstan

A tag has been placed on Portal:Kazakhstan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section P2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a portal based on a topic for which there is no non-stub header article, and there are not at least three non-stub articles detailing subject matter that would be appropriate to discuss under the title of that portal.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:24, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Portal:Miami

A tag has been placed on Portal:Miami requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section P2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a portal based on a topic for which there is no non-stub header article, and there are not at least three non-stub articles detailing subject matter that would be appropriate to discuss under the title of that portal.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:25, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Portal:Las Vegas

A tag has been placed on Portal:Las Vegas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section P2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a portal based on a topic for which there is no non-stub header article, and there are not at least three non-stub articles detailing subject matter that would be appropriate to discuss under the title of that portal.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:26, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Portal:Romani people

A tag has been placed on Portal:Romani people requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section P2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a portal based on a topic for which there is no non-stub header article, and there are not at least three non-stub articles detailing subject matter that would be appropriate to discuss under the title of that portal.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:26, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Romanians in Chicago" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Romanians in Chicago and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 18#Romanians in Chicago until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:23, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Romani people in Afghanistan" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Romani people in Afghanistan and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 18#Romani people in Afghanistan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:27, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Day Sulan" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Day Sulan and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 19#Day Sulan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:36, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of trap musicians moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of trap musicians, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Information that can not be referenced should be removed. I've moved your draft to Draftspace where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's General Notability Guideline and ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 09:26, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Haitians in Venezuela" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Haitians in Venezuela and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 27#Haitians in Venezuela until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Caribbean immigration to Florida" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Caribbean immigration to Florida and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 27#Caribbean immigration to Florida until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:29, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Haitians in Florida" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Haitians in Florida and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 27#Haitians in Florida until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:31, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"International Roma Conference" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect International Roma Conference and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 27#International Roma Conference until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:38, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:43, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you from editing mainspace, as you have continued to make disruptive edits across various topics, and have not once responded despite several editors having asked you to change your approach. I'm willing to lift this block as soon as you promise to engage with others' concerns and work towards editing in a more constructive manner. Even while blocked from editing articles, you should still be able to participate in talk page discussions, such as the RfDs you have been notified of above. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:48, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Kelmysh" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Kelmysh and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 27#Kelmysh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:48, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Romani people in Iceland" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Romani people in Iceland and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 27#Romani people in Iceland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay (talk) 19:59, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Irish Americans in Atlanta" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Irish Americans in Atlanta and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 30#Irish Americans in Atlanta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:33, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Spanish immigration to Paraguay" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Spanish immigration to Paraguay and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 6#Spanish immigration to Paraguay until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Spanish immigration to Panama" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Spanish immigration to Panama and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 6#Spanish immigration to Panama until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:35, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Spanish immigration to Nicaragua" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Spanish immigration to Nicaragua and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 6#Spanish immigration to Nicaragua until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:35, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Mexican Australians" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Mexican Australians and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 6#Mexican Australians until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:48, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Mexicans in Bolivia" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Mexicans in Bolivia and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 6#Mexicans in Bolivia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Mexican Argentines" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Mexican Argentines and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 6#Mexican Argentines until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:51, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Mexicans in Italy" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Mexicans in Italy and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 6#Mexicans in Italy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:51, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Mexicans in El Salvador" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Mexicans in El Salvador and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 6#Mexicans in El Salvador until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:51, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Mexicans in Peru" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Mexicans in Peru and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 6#Mexicans in Peru until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:53, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Mexicans in Paraguay" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Mexicans in Paraguay and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 6#Mexicans in Paraguay until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:54, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Romani New Zealanders moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Romani New Zealanders, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:29, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Ugandan Canadians" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ugandan Canadians and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 9#Ugandan Canadians until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:19, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Rwandan Canadians" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Rwandan Canadians and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 9#Rwandan Canadians until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:24, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Kenyan Canadians" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Kenyan Canadians and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 9#Kenyan Canadians until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:24, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Tanzanian Canadians" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Tanzanian Canadians and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 9#Tanzanian Canadians until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:25, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Burundian Canadians" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Burundian Canadians and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 9#Burundian Canadians until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:25, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Marquesote" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Marquesote and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 9#Marquesote until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:33, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

yes

per this ANI thread. Pinging Rosguill as an FYI.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:06, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Fërgesë

Hello, Honeybear1995. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fërgesë, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]