User talk:Holcman1

May 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Draft:Redundancy Principle (in Biology), may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternately, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 15:21, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Holcman1. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Active flow network, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 18:32, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Active flow network moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Active flow network, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 18:33, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Triangulation sensing moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Triangulation sensing, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 18:33, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Redundancy principle (Biology) has been accepted

Redundancy principle (Biology), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gpkp [u • t • c] 17:08, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Single particle trajectories

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Single particle trajectories requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4643198. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:35, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Active flow network has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Active flow network. Thanks! Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:42, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Single particle trajectories, from its old location at User:Holcman1/Single particle trajectories. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 10:51, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Active flow network (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Davidwr was:

This draft is very confusing. If in fact the term "active flow networks" can mean several different things, then you need to pick a better title, OR at least describe WHAT you mean in the first sentence. I did a "Google Scholar" search and it looks like ONE meaning of the term is described in the research of Aden Forrow, Francis G. Woodhouse, and Jörn Dunkel (Woodhouse, F. G. & Dunkel, J. Active matter logic forautonomous microfluidics.Nat. Commun.8,15169 doi: 10.1038/ncomms15169 (2017) and other works by these three authors). But that doesn't seem to be what you mean. Please decide what you want to write about, have the opening section clearly state what it is in terms a layman can understand, and include a handful of citations that demonstrate that the topic is notable and not something "too new to assess the notability of." Consider consulting with other editors at one or more of the science WikiProjects listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/Science before re-submitting. A pro-tip: Check a WikiProject's talk page for recent activity. If there hasn't been much activity lately, that WikiProject may be semi-inactive. Pick a more active project to consult with. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 22:01, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Active flow network and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Active flow network, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 22:01, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Holcman1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 22:01, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Single particle trajectories (October 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/227090v1.full-text. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Single particle trajectories may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

(t · c) buidhe 05:41, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... Dear wiki controller,

Could you give me access to my page.

Single_particle_trajectories

The statement of copyright mentioned in your email is non-sense,

1-as I am the corresponding author and own the rights of my papers that you are quoting. I am OK to give right to wikipedia

2-I wrote the article by making substancial changes compared to the exiting review. I am not sure how this decision was made.

Thus I reject the statement of the email below. Best, David. Holcman1 (talk) 15:56, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:DONATETEXT for how to release already-published works via a compatible license. At the moment your paper is not released under such a license. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 16:08, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... I have now given full right for wikipedia as request. See the note I added and accepted in BioRxiv-->

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/227090v1.abstract

Could you please unlock the version I wrote, Best wishes, David. Holcman1 (talk) 21:24, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – You appear to be engaged in publishing your own original research as Wikipedia articles, with no regard for whether or not the topics meet Wikipedia's notability standards. Referring to your own publications in Wikipedia articles is strongly discouraged and, at a minimum, would require that you disclose your conflict of interest on your user page. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:38, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a publisher of original research nor a vehicle for promotion. If another editor working on a related article topic sees your article and decides to include it, that's fine. Trying to promote your journal article for consideration, however, is not generally accepted. Congratulations on your research and on the accomplishment it represents but please allow others to discover your work through regular channels. I'm sorry that is not what you want to hear but I hope it helps explain matters. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:28, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... This is not article but a review, which is a summary of the exisiting litterature. I have followed the instruction to give rights as that we can use the explanantion of several mathematical formula, that cannot be changed. Holcman1 (talk) 22:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see above. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:34, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... Dear commenters,

I am still waiting for the release of what I wrote, as it was new text. I have provided the rights that were asked previously so I can use the routine explanation for the equation that I published in a review of the existing litterature.

Could you please give me access to my text, because I did not make copy and this text was original. I need to have acess, I am not going to publish it online, as I need to rework some parts and add new references.

Best wishes, David. Holcman1 (talk) 11:49, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the third time you've posted the same question, are you not understanding something? There are no rights for us to release. Your bioRxiv paper has apparently been accepted for publication Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application so nothing you have written here could be affecting it. You always retain the copyright to anything you have written on this website anyway. Please read this page which states: The text of Wikipedia is copyrighted (automatically, under the Berne Convention) by Wikipedia editors and contributors and is formally licensed to the public under one or several liberal licenses. If, on the other hand, you are trying to get something you said in that paper (or some other paper) included in this website, asking for permission to publish it, no matter how many times you repeat the request, is not going to work. As you have been told in the review of your draft article, Wikipedia does not publish work. It summarizes secondary sources, which is a very important distinction. If there is another existing Wikipedia article you think your work is relevant to, please use an Edit Request on the relevant article's talk page to bring it to the attention of other editors. Your request will need to include exactly what text you are proposing for inclusion, where you think it belongs in the article, and why you think the article does not cover the point you are proposing adequately in its present state. Please read, understand, and follow the Core Content Policies and What Wikipedia is not for more information. I hope this helps. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:22, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Please help me with... Could this message be given to some responsible authorities at wiki.

I have now written several wiki pages with the same style as that one and had in mind to finish also that one. I do not understand why this SPT page cannot be released to me in my PRIVATE SPACE so I can modify it and change what needs to be changed in the text but not the equations.

So far, none of the answers made to me are making much sense. I was first asked to release copyright, which I did and then got responses that I do not understand, although I have been University Professor for the past 25 years in 5 countries: U. Cambridge, Oxford, ENS, UCSF, Weizmann,etc...

I repeat, I do not ask to post my page, I would like to have it back to my private work space as the amount of formula I wrote is quite extensive and I have no time to rewrite them. This page present, introduce and review the works of the past 20 about SPts.

I see several major disfunctions at wiki in translational knowledge, with many confusion about what is a research article, a review and explanation for large public, students or experts.

Best wishes, David. Holcman1 (talk) 23:11, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is my understanding that the problem, as identified by those who posted here before me, is that copyrighted text cannot be stored anywhere on Wikipedia, your "private space" (which is actually public) included.

However, I think it might be possible to have the text of the deleted page e-mailed to you by one of the admins, such as @Cabayi: the admin who deleted Draft:Single particle trajectories as long as you promise not to publish any of it here until it's ready. 78.28.55.91 (talk) 03:03, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

David, you state "I was first asked to release copyright, which I did" which is correct up to a point. The release on bioRxiv states:

Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

That's a licence to bioRxiv exclusively to host a copy, not to Wikipedia. A licence to Wikipedia would need to be handled through one of the ways outlined at WP:DONATETEXT (a link you've already been given), permitting the modification & reuse of the text.

Because Wikipedia allows its material to be copied, modified, and reused any material uplaoaded needs to be released to Wikipedia on those same terms.

The material you've uploaded is your own publication which, in Wikipedia terms, is Original Research WP:OR which you're not just self-citing WP:SELFCITE but republishing. I understand that you want to make a distinction between publications which are "a research article, a review and explanation for large public, students or experts" but Wikipedia policy does not.

I'll happily email a copy of the deleted wiki article to you if you wish, but please note, it shouldn't be uploaded to Wikipedia again while the copyright issues remain. Cabayi (talk) 09:26, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... Please send me my wiki page Single particle trajectory, so I can edit and make the suggested corrections and changes. I will then resubmit the page to the WIKI editors before publishing it online following your recommendations:

You can release or sending it to my professional email adress:

david.holcman@ens.fr

Best wishes, David. Holcman1 (talk) 12:35, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Last version of Draft:Single particle trajectories emailed to the email address associated with this account. Cabayi (talk) 13:15, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Active flow network (January 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chicdat was:

Resubmitted with no improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Active flow network and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Active flow network, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🐔 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 11:18, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Single particle trajectories (February 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Single particle trajectories may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 19:29, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Single particle trajectories has been accepted

Single particle trajectories, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 03:10, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Triangulation sensing (July 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

It is nearly impossible to evaluate this draft because it is difficult to determine what field of scientific knowledge it belongs to, and therefore what the necessary background is, and what WikiProject could be asked to assist in the review. The lede section should be revised to indicate what scientific field this belongs to. Additional links are also needed to provide context.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Triangulation sensing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Triangulation sensing, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:07, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Active flow network (July 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

It is difficult for a scientifically educated reviewer to know, on reading this draft, what scientific fields of knowledge are required to understand it, so this draft is nearly impossible to assess as to notability and validity. The lede section may need to be reworked. Please associate this draft with one to three WikiProjects that can facilitate its review.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Active flow network and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Active flow network, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:14, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Active flow network (July 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Active flow network and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Active flow network, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:49, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Active flow network (July 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Active flow network may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 09:49, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Active flow network (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Active flow network may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 12:07, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Active flow network (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sahaib3005 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Active flow network and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Active flow network, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sahaib3005 (talk) 19:07, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Active flow network (August 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tamingimpala was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Active flow network and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Active flow network, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tame (talk) 13:03, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Active flow network (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Active flow network may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep^Talk 06:32, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zeev schuss

Hello Holcman1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Zeev schuss for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Yeeno (talk) 🍁 07:20, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello Holcman1! Your additions to Zeev schuss have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yeeno (talk) 🍁 07:57, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 10:52, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Holcman1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here 1-I was still working on the page when it was removed. 2-All material are mine: located on my website with no copyright: https://www.ibens.ens.fr/?rubrique40&lang=fr 3-The figures is a-the one I made for a conference,b- the figure given to me by Bob Eisenberg 3- the fig given by Zeev Schuss at his arrival in 1943. for all of these reasons, I do not undersand the reasons to block my draft. Best wishes, -- *********************************************** David Holcman, PhD Director of Research, CNRS Computational biology, Data modeling and Predictive medicine Ecole Normale Superieure, PSL 46 rue d Ulm, 75005 Paris France Phone : (00 33) 1 44 32 36 61 web: http://www.biologie.ens.fr/bcsmcbs/ https://www.ibens.ens.fr/spip.php?rubrique40&lang=fr Fellow of the Churchill College Visiting Professor at DAMPT University of Cambridge, UK ************************************************ Holcman1 (talk) 13:14, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I've moved your below text out of an unblock message. There's no need to have more than one open request at a time, if you want to reply, just post below the bottom message. Of course, I've now closed this unblock request, so you could open a new one, if suitable.

The copyright is yours, but that does not mean there are no copyright issues. To use content on Wikipedia requires not merely owning the copyright, but releasing a license for it in an extremely specific way. A way that your website does not meet. free to use with appropriate reference is more like a custom release set-up, whereas we use a specific license that will irrevocably change and establish a range of license conditions.

That you say have put to wiki personal content from my professional personal webpage many time before and never got any problems, because there are no copyright ISSUES is immensely concerning - no-one will unblock you without all these aspects being identified, as currently every one of them will be out of compliance.

While drafts under construction are immune from certain deletion reasons, especially notability, they are still subject to avoiding promotional phrasing and content - we aren't obliged to wait until article submission to decide such. Nosebagbear (talk) 11:36, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Holcman1 (talk) 13:14, 21 September 2021 (UTC)}}[reply]

Note that your site explicitly claims copyright, right at the bottom. It says, "© ENS - 2014-2021". It also links to this notice about copyright, explicitly claiming the copyright belongs to the Biology department (and not, say, you personally). --Yamla (talk) 13:24, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And please in addition note that this is not the first time you have been counseled about copying material under copyright and with an incompatible license to Wikipedia, which is why I blocked you—simply asking you to stop seems to be ineffective. If I am convinced that you will stop introducing copyright violations to Wikipedia, I would be willing to unblock you, but you would need to at this point agree to stop copying material from elsewhere altogether. I know that copyright and license compatibility can be difficult to understand, but without a thorough understanding of them and a certainty that the license truly is compatible, you shouldn't be copying things from elsewhere into Wikipedia (and often, even if the license is compatible the material wouldn't be appropriate here anyway). Instead, it is best to use the remote material as a reference, and write about the facts it verifies in your own words. Would you be willing to agree to this? Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 18:20, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

-- Could you release the text I was writting and put it in my directory, so I can continue editing

You probably did not understand that the content of the page https://www.biologie.ens.fr/depbio/spip.php?article33&lang=fr

is MINE

ENS-which is my institution-is not responsible for the contain of INDIVIDUAL page, which belongs to them. Thus there is no copyright issue contrary to what you said. I have put to wiki personal content from my professional personal webpage many time before and never got any problems, because there are no copyright ISSUES.

In addition, you blocked my account when I was in the middle of writting a bibliography for a mathematician, it was NOT READY to be evaluated, so it is too early to send me a feedback about promotion, as I was cleaning and editing the draft.

As you can see I do contribute to Wiki, so please be respectful for the work I am doing for free.

Please unlock my account, I do not see any reason to create a new one.

Best wishes, [[User:Holcman|Holcman}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Holcman1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here: The text was removed from my website, so I guessed all the issues discussed above are now resolved. Could you release now my acount.Best wishes David.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. There's already an open unblock request above. SQL ^{Query Me!} 18:56, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Insert your reason to be unblocked here

The text was removed from my website, so I guessed all the issues discussed above are now resolved. Could you release now my acount.Best wishes, David.[[User:Holcman|Holcman}}}

@Yamla: & @Nosebagbear: It looks like this editor has been operating at David1212121 since December 13, 2021 (so literally the day after the last unblock request) and has gone as far as to write their own autobiography at David Holcman. Best, GPL93 (talk) 23:16, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeap. I'll go do the cleanup. --Yamla (talk) 10:29, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Active flow network (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Active flow network may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MoonlightVector^{Talk page} 16:34, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Holcman1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here: Dear wiki adminisrtator, I cannot correct the page about Active flow network, as I am still block for unknown reasons[as I remove my own text, from which your system through I was copying: it looks like Kafka in much worse]. Something is not working correlctly at wiki and I am not sure I will be interested in contributing anymore, not supporting directly or financially. i will share my experience in youtube and engage my community in a new media, *********************************************** David Holcman, PhD Director of Research, CNRS Computational Biology, Data Modeling and Predictive Medicine Ecole Normale Superieure, PSL 46 rue d Ulm, 75005 Paris France Phone : (00 33) 1 44 32 36 61 web: http://www.biologie.ens.fr/bcsmcbs/ https://www.ibens.ens.fr/spip.php?rubrique40&lang=fr Fellow of the Churchill College Visiting Professor at DAMPT University of Cambridge, UK ************************************************ The text was removed from my website, so I guessed all the issues discussed above are now resolved. Could you release now my acount.Best wishes David.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:45, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have removed the two duplicate unblock requests from this page. SQL ^{Query Me!} 19:55, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Holcman1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here:

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Holcman1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

To wikipedia editor-in-chief, Although, 1- I have understood the reason why I have been blocked for, --> misinterpretation of copyright by search engine so that the administration from our university has now corrected our website, where I provided for free to reuse my own text without requesting permission as shown at the bottom of the page https://www.ibens.ens.fr/spip.php?rubrique40&lang=fr "copyrights@David Holcman, free to use with appropriate reference." --> will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and I never intended to damage and disrupt, as shown from my record. --> will make useful contributions instead. I have made for more than 8 years usefull and substantial contribution to wikipedia as can be seen from my record. To that day, my account is still blocked with no sustantial justifications. Finally, due to this block, I still cannot submit a corrected version for my article "Active network flow". Best wishes, David.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:15, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Holcman1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here:

@Holcman1:

To wikipedia Yamla editor-in-chief, I confirm as I did already 4 times, that the block is no longer necessary because

I understand what you have been blocked for,

I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and

I will make useful contributions instead, as I did in the past, Best wishes, D. Holcman. (Holcman1 (talk) 15:09, 12 December 2021 (UTC)).[reply]

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:Triangulation sensing

Hello, Holcman1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Triangulation sensing, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Active flow network

Hello, Holcman1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Active flow network, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Active flow network

Hello, Holcman1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Active flow network".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:59, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Active flow network

Hello, Holcman1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Active flow network".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! •Cyberwolf•talk? 15:57, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]