User talk:Hidden Hills Editor

Hello, I'm 2601:5CC:8301:FD00:A933:7047:2B4C:5E34. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 50th Air Refueling Squadron, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 2601:5CC:8301:FD00:A933:7047:2B4C:5E34 (talk) 14:31, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Non-free rationale for File:The Edge Fitness Clubs Logo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Edge Fitness Clubs Logo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:58, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Edge Fitness Clubs

Hello Hidden Hills Editor,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Edge Fitness Clubs for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 01:51, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Edge Fitness Clubs Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Edge Fitness Clubs Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:56, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Your help desk question

You have a response.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:58, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Joe Massa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joe Massa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Massa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 22:32, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DjKingston, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

-- RoySmith (talk) 16:18, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Tayshia Adams for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tayshia Adams is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tayshia Adams until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 22:23, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Hannah Godwin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hannah Godwin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hannah Godwin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 22:24, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Dean Unglert moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dean Unglert, does not have enough substantial sources and citations as written to remain published, and contains extensive non-encyclopedic content . It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 05:18, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John Romaniello

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on John Romaniello requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Romaniello. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 17:44, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of My Suicide Story for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article My Suicide Story is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Suicide Story until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 17:50, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Hidden Hills Editor

Thank you for creating Mike Johnson (television personality).

User:Doomsdayer520, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for your new article on Mike Johnson (television personality). Please take a look at WP:REFBOMB, as it is unnecessary, not to mention unreadable, to have 5+ different references after minor factual statements.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:05, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Hidden Hills Editor

Thank you for creating Blake Horstmann.

User:Doomsdayer520, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for your new article on Blake Horstmann. Just like the situation for Mike Johnson, please take a look at WP:REFBOMB, as it is unnecessary to prop up minor statements with so many different footnotes.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:54, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

@Doomsdayer520: Hello, thank you for catching this and bringing it to my attention, I wasn't aware of this and will be sure to be cautious of it in the future! Hidden Hills Editor (talk) 13:07, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Chase Stokes moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chase Stokes, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — YoungForever^(talk) 15:13, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Outer Banks poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Outer Banks poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:42, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chase Stokes (September 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chase Stokes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chase Stokes, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Hidden Hills Editor! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Social Distance Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Social Distance Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:49, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Don't Look Up (2021 film)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Don't Look Up (2021 film). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Draft:Don't Look Up (2021 film). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Draft:Don't Look Up (2021 film). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at [[Talk:Draft:Don't Look Up (2021 film)|the article's talk page]].

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. BOVINEBOY2008 22:07, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Don't Look Up (2021 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Don't Look Up (2021 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don't Look Up (2021 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BOVINEBOY2008 09:18, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Dean Unglert

Hello, Hidden Hills Editor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dean Unglert".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:59, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

A California Christmas: City Lights moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, A California Christmas: City Lights, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BOVINEBOY2008 16:09, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:A California Christmas, City Lights Poster.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:A California Christmas, City Lights Poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Texas Chainsaw Massacre Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Texas Chainsaw Massacre Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of A California Christmas: City Lights for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A California Christmas: City Lights is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A California Christmas: City Lights until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BOVINEBOY2008 01:30, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Kip Andersen (filmmaker) and/or Keegan Kuhn as Did you know...?

Hi Hidden Hills Editor! I wanted to first say that I appreciate you starting these two articles.

Would you be interested in expanding them so they could be nominated for Wikipedia:Did you know? (in case you aren't familiar, this is the section on the front page so the articles would have visibility there for a day). It looks to me like you haven't been involved with this process before, but I would be happy to help.

The biggest thing that we would need to do would be to expand the articles so the "Articles must have a minimum of 1,500 characters of prose..." requirement is met. Also, the article must be nominated when it is "no more than seven days old", so we would need to do this soon.

Are you interested/able to expand either or both of the articles further? Like I said, I'm happy to help, but will defer to you as the person who started both!

Last note: if both are eligible, we could submit them together, which would be neat. For example, the "hook" could be something like "Did you know... that Kip Andersen and Keegan Kuhn have collaborated on two award-winning (or maybe 'controversial'?) documentaries together" (the exact wording can be filled-in later). = paul2520 💬 14:37, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

@Paul2520: Hi there, I would be happy to expand both of these articles and submit these together with you! Since this is my first time doing this, is there anything in particular we would need to add in the article or just general expansion? Thanks! Hidden Hills Editor (talk) 15:44, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
@Paul2520: Also, please feel free to expand as well if you are familiar with the subjects! Hidden Hills Editor (talk) 15:47, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

@Hidden Hills Editor: I think it would be great to add content if there are any other awards either/both have won, or notable projects they have worked on. But yeah, any expansion. I'll see what I can do; I can do the first draft of the nomination in a few days, too, and will of course tag you. = paul2520 💬 20:37, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

One note: make sure to cite everything you add, and to avoid copying and pasting; I fixed a sentence in Kuhn's article that looked to be copied straight from a source. = paul2520 💬 20:45, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Copy that. Will be sure to do both going forward, thanks for the recommendation! Hidden Hills Editor (talk) 20:53, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

I added some content to both articles; I'll keep searching for more. I'm struggling to find any educational background for Kuhn, also a website for the True Nature project mentioned at this source. = paul2520 💬 21:40, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

@Paul2520: Good find! Same here, it seems that the majority of the info for Kuhn is being recycled from one or two sources. I'll keep searching to see if I can find anything different. Hidden Hills Editor (talk) 22:20, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

I created the nomination! See Template:Did you know nominations/Kip Andersen (filmmaker). It includes both Andersen and Kuhn. I'll keep an eye on that page to see if there is any feedback to address, but I will appreciate you doing the same. = paul2520 💬 20:35, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

@Paul2520: Awesome! Most definitely will keep an eye on it as well. Enjoyed working with you on this! Hidden Hills Editor (talk) 20:57, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Not sure if you saw the updates on Template:Did you know nominations/Kip Andersen (filmmaker), but everything looked great to the reviewer! I just had to review a second "Did you know..." nomination since our nomination included two articles. FYI, you only have to do a "quid pro quo (QPQ)" review of someone else's DYK nomination if you've been involved with five or more yourself in the past (which I have).

Once again, great working with you on this & I'd be happy to collaborate again! = paul2520 💬 16:40, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

@Paul2520: Just saw that it was reviewed! Thanks for taking the time to work on this, it was great working with you as well and I would be very pleased to do so again in the future! Hidden Hills Editor (talk) 13:47, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Headspace guide to med poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Headspace guide to med poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Kip Andersen (filmmaker)

On 13 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kip Andersen (filmmaker), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Kip Andersen and Keegan Kuhn were co-nominees for the 2018 Cinema for Peace Award for their documentary What the Health? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kip Andersen (filmmaker). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Kip Andersen (filmmaker)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Keegan Kuhn

On 13 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Keegan Kuhn, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Kip Andersen and Keegan Kuhn were co-nominees for the 2018 Cinema for Peace Award for their documentary What the Health? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kip Andersen (filmmaker). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Keegan Kuhn), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Limited series. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Catching Killers Title Screen Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Catching Killers Title Screen Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Our Father (2022 film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Our Father (2022 film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). Not yet fit for WP:NFF. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 06:13, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Our Father Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Our Father Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Conversations with a Killer: The John Wayne Gacy Tapes

Hello, Hidden Hills Editor,

Thank you for creating Conversations with a Killer: The John Wayne Gacy Tapes.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add a reception section with details of reviews of the series in reliable sources

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Atlantic306}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Atlantic306 (talk) 00:49, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Atlantic306! Because the series is newly released neither Rotten Tomatoes nor Metacritic have scores for the series yet. Should I search for other reviews or wait for Rotten Tomatoes / Metacritic? Thanks! Hidden Hills Editor (talk) 18:00, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi, i'd suggest searching for other reviews in the meantime, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 23:54, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Got it. Thanks for the feedback! Hidden Hills Editor (talk) 19:21, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Our Father (2022 film) has been accepted

Our Father (2022 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 08:57, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

Hello Hidden Hills Editor. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Hidden Hills Editor. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Hidden Hills Editor|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:36, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I am not sure what is giving you this impression but I am most certainly not accepting any direct or indirect financial gain, nor any other form of compensation my edits. My edits are strictly good faith and only made on topics that I am well versed/educated in, which is typically film, tv series, actors, directors, filmmakers etc. Happy to elaborate further if necessary. Hidden Hills Editor (talk) 22:45, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. I was somewhat concerned by the pace at which you were creating articles about relatively obscure actors, as that is a common field for black hat paid editing. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:11, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Sure thing more than happy to chat about it! Definitely not the case and happy to elaborate. What I typically do is create a page for an upcoming film and if there are cast/crew on the film that I feel have a reasonable amount of references, I'll then create the page for them. If there is a way that I can improve my edits to avoid any confusion in the future please do let me know, happy to adjust my methods. Hidden Hills Editor (talk) 00:35, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

I would say that focusing on upcoming films is perhaps not ideal: even for big-name upcoming films, pre-release coverage is usually limited to routine recycled press releases, which makes it hard to demonstrate that notability guidelines are met. The solid standard coverage for demonstrating film and TV notability are critics' reviews. While WP:NFF does provide for future films, in my experience the only times that upcoming films and shows unambiguously meet notability guidelines in advance of their release is when there has been a major controversy in their production. So that's not to say you can't work on upcoming film articles, but you're going to be running in to much more friction during new page review than if you focused on say, just-released films. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:13, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Adrian Greensmith

Hello, Hidden Hills Editor

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username SunDawn, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Adrian Greensmith, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:08, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Untold: The Race of the Century moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Untold: The Race of the Century, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BOVINEBOY2008 12:23, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Untold Race of Century Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Untold Race of Century Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Adrian Greensmith for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adrian Greensmith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Greensmith until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Suonii180 (talk) 02:04, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Untold: The Race of the Century has been accepted

Untold: The Race of the Century, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Legoktm (talk) 02:52, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks as well for your work in creating the other Untold film articles! Legoktm (talk) 02:56, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The 39 Steps (TV series)

Hello, Hidden Hills Editor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The 39 Steps (TV series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The 39 Steps (TV series)

Hello, Hidden Hills Editor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The 39 Steps".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:17, 27 July 2024 (UTC)