User talk:Herzlicheboy

Welcome!

Hello, Herzlicheboy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sarah Jessie, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! • Gene93k (talk) 16:22, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sarah Jessie

The article Sarah Jessie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Porn star that fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO. Claims of AVN Award nominations and a mainstream film appearance appear to be false. Lacks significant coverage by reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. • Gene93k (talk) 16:22, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sarah Jessie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sarah Jessie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Jessie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Erpert ^{Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it?} 02:22, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Herzlicheboy. You have new messages at Gene93k's talk page.
Message added 18:40, 4 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mike Adriano

The article Mike Adriano has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Fiddle Faddle 20:14, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mike Adriano

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mike Adriano, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. — kikichugirl ^inquire 20:20, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Herzlicheboy. You have new messages at Talk:Mike Adriano.
Message added 21:17, 4 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— kikichugirl ^inquire 21:17, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mike Adriano

The article Mike Adriano has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Fiddle Faddle 21:55, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mike Adriano for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike Adriano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Adriano until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — kikichugirl ^inquire 21:58, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job

Nice job on Mike Adriano. I've withdrawn the AfD. Sorry if I've seemed WP:BITEY - I suppose my time in WP:New pages patrol has eroded away my ability to assume good faith on many things, since there are a lot of vandals and spammers there. Happy editing and I really do hope you like it here! — kikichugirl ^inquire 01:53, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Scarface (1983 film), you may be blocked from editing. JesseRafe (talk) 07:13, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Justin Bieber, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bouncers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:25, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Johnny Hildo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sketch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to World War Z (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

who identifies herself only as "[[Israel Defense Forces ranks|Segen]]" (meaning "Lieutenant")([[Daniella Kertesz]]; Segen being both her rank and her name in the manner of [[Major Major Major

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:06, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

These are not constructive edits. Continued edits like this will result in a block. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:10, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nuremberg Laws

Hello, I'm My-2-bits. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Nuremberg Laws because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!My-2-bits (talk) 00:10, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

If you want to discuss the inclusion or not of the paragraph that you deleted, please go to the talk page of the article, not to mine, so everyone can take part on the discussion. My-2-bits (talk) 00:38, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

reported

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Nuremberg Laws. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. —Darkwind (talk) 11:46, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Herzlicheboy

User:Herzlicheboy, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Herzlicheboy and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Herzlicheboy during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. buff bills 7701 22:41, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Borislav Ivanov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Borislav Ivanov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Borislav Ivanov until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:54, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Wiki brah (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:29, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Herzlicheboy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, there must be some confusion or an error. I have been a editor here for over 3 months without incident. Maybe you got my IP confused with someone else? My landlord that provides internet service just switched service providers in July. I don't know why I am blocked.

Decline reason:

Even if you weren't confirmed to be using multiple accounts (which you are), edits like this would be enough for me to decline your unblock request. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 23:21, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Johnny Hildo

Hello Herzlicheboy,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Johnny Hildo for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 00:41, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mike Adriano for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike Adriano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Adriano (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:15, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny Hildo listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Johnny Hildo. Since you had some involvement with the Johnny Hildo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]