User talk:Hercules123!

May 2017

Hello, I'm KGirlTrucker81. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Starving (song), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 13:25, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Lightning (Little Mix song

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Lightning (Little Mix song. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Lightning (Little Mix song). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Lightning (Little Mix song). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Raritydash (talk) 19:10, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, you may be blocked from editing. Raritydash (talk) 19:22, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Raritydash hey um I don't know how to use Wikipedia AT ALL and I'm still new first of all I would like to say I really wanted to edit Lightning (Little Mix song) but it goes straight to the Get Weird album page and also u get the genres wrong on some of the songs so I just change some the genres because I know music so I put the genre in the text to show what one it is so u didn't have to threaten me and be rude so um it would be good if u could help me out and show me how to add a image to the page thanks...

For genres, you would have to provide a reliable source for all edits made even if you did know music. And also for that article that you wanted to edit on has failed per WP:NSONGS, because that is not a single and does not warrant their own article, that's why it has been redirected to the album page, and also for genres, you had removed the sources for the genres, while changing the genres which is important that sources must be provided for genres and please sign your post at the end of your comment with four tildes like this; ( ~~~~ ). Raritydash (talk) 22:53, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Raritydash Thank you thats way more helpful thanks for telling me i still dont know how to use this thing so i needed to know how to do all those things you just told me but most places i edit doesn't need a source so what does that mean? (Hercules123!)

My advise to you is to read Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources, this will explain everything about the genres and the source you need to provide for those changes. Raritydash (talk) 00:34, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Raritydash why do you have to keep targeting me! (Hercules123!)

User:livelikemusic OMG f of im still new to this thing maybe if u help i would be way better at this so if u dont want me to change anything without a f'ing source get of my page (Hercules123!)

As of right now, you are now making personal attacks at me and the other fellow editors who warned you by editing on people's comments on your talk page which is against Wikipedia policy. I would suggest you stop doing this or else this may lead to your block. And again, why do continue to put down genres without sources or discussion? And this is also know as WP:GWAR. Raritydash (talk) 05:00, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Raritydash Why are you bringing other people into this? You just need to be patient with new editors. Also i share this account with four others and they make changes to heaps of other songs as well so if you are talking about other editors as well. It would nice if you tell them to patient with us Thank You (Hercules123!)

User:Raritydash Also why do you think that where changes thing in the music era. That were changing without the account. We only edit with our account so you cant blame us for other peoples mistakes. (Hercules123!) 2nd owner btw

Your contributed article, Power (Little Mix Song)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Power (Little Mix Song). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Power (Little Mix song). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Power (Little Mix song). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 09:00, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wait until the song is important enough for an article to be created (e.g. if it has received coverage in multiple sources, has been released as a single). In addition, you should have edited the currently-existing redirect instead of creating a new page with incorrect capitalization. There are several policies and guidelines you should read and understand first, such as Wikipedia:Notability (music) and Wikipedia:Verifiability. Anything that reads remotely like "is features growls and hot motorbike sounds" (especially without a source) is likely to be nominated for deletion for having a completely inappropriate tone. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 09:13, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Little Me (song), you may be blocked from editing. SummerPhD^v2.0 02:22, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please upload non-free files on Wikipedia and not on Wikimedia Commons. Commons only allows files which are freely licensed or in the public domain. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 05:40, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 05:43, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Vanamonde (talk) 10:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hercules, can you please clarify whether you are a single person, or whether there are multiple people behind this account? Vanamonde (talk) 10:59, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Vanamonde93 Hello yes there are four of us behind this account (Hercules123!)

Okay. In that case, according to this policy, three of you (or all of you) will have to give up this account. Only one person is allowed to operate an account. You could also abandon this altogether, and create four new accounts. Vanamonde (talk) 06:05, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Vanamonde93 Yes thank you for that. Yes we are probably gonna have our own accounts anyway because of all the bad edits that are going on Hercules123! (talk) 08:32, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Album style guide

Hi. Please see the album style guide at WP:MOSALBUM for better music article formatting. I made several fixes on your "You Gotta Not" article. Thanks --Jennica✿ / ^talk 20:12, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jennica hello thank you for that but im pretty sure the "You Gotta Not" page is deleted (Hercules123!)

Nomination of You Gotta Not (Little Mix song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article You Gotta Not (Little Mix song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/You Gotta Not (Little Mix song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 15:04, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Grown (Little Mix Song)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Grown (Little Mix Song). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Grown (Little Mix song). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Grown (Little Mix song). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Bennv3771 (talk) 10:41, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please note that not every thing meets the criteria for having a standalone article on Wikipedia. What determines whether a topic gets an article or not is the Wikipedia:Notability guideline. For songs, they should meet WP:NSONGS or they will likely get deleted. Please read through the WP:NSONGS guideline to see if the song you want to create an article about meets it before creating an article. Thanks. Bennv3771 (talk) 10:50, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Grown (Little Mix Song), a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Bennv3771 (talk) 11:00, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

talk sorry for that i accidentally deleted the source sorry don't worry i will keep an eye out on the talk page (Hercules123!)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Vanamonde (talk) 11:13, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are coming off a very recent block for unsourced content; this should have warned you to not add such content again. You pretty much went on as before, so I have blocked you for a week. Also, the issue of shared use remains. Before your block has expired, you need to state unequivocally here that only one person has control over this account, else I will block you indefinitely. Vanamonde (talk) 11:19, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Vanamonde93 Why did u block me! i dont even know how to use Wikipedia they only reason why i signed up was because to change some others mistakes thats all and know im caught up in this mess just because i didnt source some links the only reason why i dont source things is because i dont get how to maybe tell me in person to make it easier im still new you cant expect me to know things (Hercules123!) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hercules123! (talk • contribs)

Please sign your posts with four tildes at the end (~~~~).

You've been blocked because it seems that you don't seem to be listening to the advice of other editors and you keep making the same mistakes such as adding unsourced information. If you don't understand the language used in the notices, please say so. (You may want to add content to existing articles instead of writing new ones.)

To source a statement, find a webpage that supports it. Make sure the website is a reliable source that doesn't make dubious claims too often. There's a button at the top of the normal code editor which says "Cite". Pick one of the templates and fill in the blanks as necessary, and a <ref>...</ref> tag should appear where your cursor is. It should display like ^[42] when the page is saved.

Also, images on Wikimedia Commons need to be freely licensed; some copyrighted images can be uploaded locally on the English Wikipedia under fair use. Please don't upload fake song covers, because… well, they're fake.

I hope this is helpful to you. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 10:27, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hercules, Jc86035 has kindly answered your questions about sources; but please remember that you will not be able to edit until you explicitly state here that only one person controls this account. I would prefer that you explain how you have brought this about. Vanamonde (talk) 15:58, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Vanamonde93 I've already cleared that that there is only one person owning this account! That has been clear for weeks now so. (Hercules123!) User talk:Jc86035 Thank you that is so helpful! Finally someone who makes there message in detailed oh my gosh thanks. (Herrcules123!)

No, it has not been clear for weeks: you told me just 8 days ago that four of you were operating this account. What have you done to ensure that the other three people are no longer accessing this? Vanamonde (talk) 06:58, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanamonde93: If the other three people now have their own accounts, should Hercules123! identify them, or is this not necessary? Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 16:08, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Vanamonde93 The other four are of doing there own edits so im the only one running this account we all normally edit from the same place thats why sometimes you will see the same ip address but clearly its just me because theres not a million edits going at the same time User talk:Hercules123! (talk) 09:17, 6 June 2017 (UTC) User talk:Vanamonde93 And also i told u that 10 days ago actually so yeah a little over a week now (Hercules123!)[reply]

Comment That, to me, sounds like the user is attempting to re-direct blame for their edits on someone else, etc. That does not seem acceptable, per Wikipedia's standards. Claiming ignorance is not acceptable, and seems to me, to be the behaviour of not "getting it", and that "my brother did it". User has been pointed out about reliable sources, and has yet to show decent understanding of this and understanding that what they've been doing is wrong and against Wikipedia's intent and policies. Also, might I remind them, again, to sign their posts with four tildes at the end (~~~~). livelikemusic talk! 04:31, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jc86035: No, I don't think I can require them to disclose what those accounts are. I am going to assume good faith for the moment, and accept that only one person controls this account. However, should there be any evidence of account sharing, that would be grounds for an immediate indefinite block. Likewise, this statement by Hercules essentially takes responsibility for all their editing from now on: "somebody else did it" is no longer an excuse. This also does not resolve the issue of unsourced editing. Hercules, please read the instructions about sourcing very carefully, and follow them very carefully; if you resume the same behavior, I will have to block you for increasingly long periods of time. Vanamonde (talk) 06:52, 6 June 2017

@Vanamonde93: Thank you for that but i would just like everyone to remember that i'm still new and that im trying to comprehend everything that everyone is helping me with and i'm just clearing out that i'm probably the youngest editor so try to just keep up with me Thank You ~ (talk) 10:31 6 June 2017

You may want to read WP:Guidance for younger editors. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 08:32, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Jc86035 Okay thank you for that that is much more helpful. Im just now figuring out on how to source words and how to make a wikipedia page much better as again also with sources i have been reading a few pages that give help on first editors so i should be getting better soon thank you. (Hercues123!)

Proposed deletion of Grown (Little Mix Song)

The article Grown (Little Mix Song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Song is not notable, does not have significant coverage in reliable sources. Title has inappropriate capitalisation that does not follow WP:MOS, and there is already a Grown (Little Mix song) redirect page, hence this page is not useful as a redirect.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bennv3771 (talk) 11:13, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating Grown (Little Mix Song) for deletion

Hi. As my proposed deletion of the article you created, Grown (Little Mix Song), was deprodded, I want to inform you that I have nominated the article for deletion under WP:AFD. The deletion discussion can be found here if you wish to participate: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grown (Little Mix Song). Bennv3771 (talk) 14:37, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Little Me (song). SummerPhD^v2.0 13:13, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:SummerPhDv2.0 Excuse me i added a source code, if u haven't seen any other messages it said that i'm trying to test out different sources i was going to remove my edit from the page Little Me (song) but then i came back on to realise that it was already deleted. If you don't want any one to edit the genre line then why can't you do it yourself if your not happy with anyone else editing it, and i would like to add that i have seen countless pages that have genres on flatlist and they don't even use a source for example Soap (Melanie Martinez song) so please don't block me without some help or an explanation remember i'm still a beginner and a young editor (Hercules123!)

The source you cited does not say that the song is either of the genres listed.[1]

Do not add, remove or change genres without either citing a reliable source or first establishing a consensus for the change on the article's talk page.

If you are unsure if a source is reliable, please discuss the issue on the article's talk page or raise the question at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard.

If you are having difficulties formatting references, please ask for assistance on the article's talk page or by placing a {{helpme}} note on your talk page. You may also experiment at Wikipedia:Sandbox. Do not make changes to articles with the intention of correcting them later. - SummerPhD^v2.0 17:08, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hercules123! (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So i have been gone for almost 6 months and i have practiced and learnt my lesson. Yes i joined this account with three other friends, one of them was the owner of Musicalnote1 but then i took over that account and same with (b_ball123) I was the owner of all three of those account, Then i got blocked three times until i was blocked indefinitely. I have read most of the notifications that i have missed and apparently i'm the owner of 7 or more other account! which as i explained i am the only owner of three or four, Just to make that clear. So i have come back to ask for permission to be unblocked i have waited and i love contributing to wikipedia i promise that o will do reliable edits, And i have found out what citing a source mean, I hope that my message will be seen soon.

Decline reason:

The latest block evasion and sockpuppetry seems to have been much more recent than six months ago. You should: 1. Wait six months without editing Wikipedia at all, 2. Provide a list of all accounts you have used, 3. Comment on the problems with your edits, beyond the sockpuppetry. Huon (talk) 22:08, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Checkuser note: There has been blocking as recently as a few days ago. I have reblocked this account as a CU block.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:17, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hercules123! (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been gone for ages! I want to edit so badly and i think i deserve to because i have been gone for 8 months! and i have missed wikipedia. So please unblock me since i have been reading different things to help me edit properly and source my edits properly. Hercules123! (talk) 03:05, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Gee. Do you think we wouldn't notice you were editing with, and blocked for editing with, another account, like, yesterday? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 03:26, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Jpgordon: So your saying that i am lying to you? I just said that i have been gone away for 8 Months! And i have been blamed for most of the accounts which half of it was not true. As i said i am only the owner of B_ball123 and Musicalnote1 and i am requesting on this account because this is my first official account. So i gave you my reason. Hercules123! (talk) 07:57, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]