User talk:Hendricolucky

A page you started (Willem Jan Pieter van der Does) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Willem Jan Pieter van der Does, Hendricolucky!

Wikipedia editor TeriEmbrey just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please come back and add citations where marked. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.

To reply, leave a comment on TeriEmbrey's talk page.

TeriEmbrey (talk) 18:39, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Storm, Ijs, en Walvisschen moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Storm, Ijs, en Walvisschen, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:02, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Storm, Ijs, en Walvisschen (April 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:

The previous comments have not been addressed. Wikipedia only accepts articles on "notable" topics, and as such references to reliable secondary sources are needed. See Wikipedia:Notability (books).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Storm, Ijs, en Walvisschen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Storm, Ijs, en Walvisschen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv (he/him) _(talk) 00:19, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hendricolucky! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Bilorv (he/him) _(talk) 00:19, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hendricolucky! I'd just like to say that templates at the top of draft pages shouldn't be removed, and you shouldn't resubmit a draft until you've fixed the problems that have been pointed out, or it will simply be rejected again for the same reason. Please do ask me on my talk page or ask another volunteer at the Teahouse if you have any questions. Thanks! — Bilorv (he/him) _(talk) 00:21, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Storm, Ijs, en Walvisschen (April 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

Almost ready.

What it still needs: 1. Full publication information for the references. 2. And,, the statement about the importance of the book needs an exact reference and if possible a short quotation.

3. If at all possible, and you can probably do this better than anyone else here, are there any references to the book in later works? Were there any published reviews of either the original or the translation?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Storm, Ijs, en Walvisschen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Storm, Ijs, en Walvisschen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 13:19, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Storm, Ijs, en Walvisschen (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:

It doesn't look like any of DGG's suggestions were effectively implemented.

1. Use Cite book when you reference book sources. What is the ISBN number for the books you reference? If someone wanted to find the information you cited in this article, where would they look for it?

2. Thank you for adding the Importance section, but it means nothing if it isn't referenced as well. Remember to reference and cite any information you use in the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Storm, Ijs, en Walvisschen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Storm, Ijs, en Walvisschen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 15:03, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Hello Hendrico. Is the source "Bartholomeus Hendrico, Willem van der Does 'Monet of the Dutch East Indies'" a published source? I can't seem to verify that this source exists, there's also no year on there. Is this a self-published source by yourself? If so, we can't cite self-published sources, we have to reflect what reliable secondary sources have said about a topic. "Private collection's archive" is also not a source we can cite, it needs to be a published source. If you ever have any questions, come ask at the Teahouse :) – Thjarkur (talk) 18:53, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see you added a copyright symbol a paragraph in Willem Jan Pieter van der Does. If the text is copyrighted and you are not its author, we can't include it here. If you are its author, you have agreed to publish your text under the Creative Commons license Wikipedia uses. You might want to see our conflict of interest guidelines, it appears you added a quote to yourself to that article, which we recommend against doing. – Thjarkur (talk) 19:01, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Storm, Ijs, en Walvisschen concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Storm, Ijs, en Walvisschen, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Willem Jan Pieter van der Does. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:56, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Rotsachtige kust van Zuid-Java met de grotten van Karang Bolong moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Draft:Rotsachtige kust van Zuid-Java met de grotten van Karang Bolong, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. b uidhe 13:23, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Storm, Ijs, en Walvisschen has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Storm, Ijs, en Walvisschen. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 04:25, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Storm, Ijs, en Walvisschen (June 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Lots of unverified parts of this draft, such as "Importance", "Editions" and "Translations" sections.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Storm, Ijs, en Walvisschen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Storm, Ijs, en Walvisschen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 06:49, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rotsachtige kust van Zuid-Java met de grotten van Karang Bolong for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rotsachtige kust van Zuid-Java met de grotten van Karang Bolong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rotsachtige kust van Zuid-Java met de grotten van Karang Bolong until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vexations (talk) 11:18, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ivan Sermoskin moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ivan Sermoskin, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 14:50, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maanlicht over de Javaanse rijstvelden for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maanlicht over de Javaanse rijstvelden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maanlicht over de Javaanse rijstvelden until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 16:03, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zeilen door de grote storm for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zeilen door de grote storm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeilen door de grote storm until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 04:44, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Storms, Ice, and Whales (September 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

"it provides details of the flora and fauna, including penguins and albatross, and describes such natural phenomena as the colors of the ice, the sea, and the sky. It also chronicles in detail the workings of the ship and describes the crew and their tasks. [...] This book had a significance in the whaling world [...]." The draft asserts value and significance, but fails to back it up. There's very little comment on the book other than from blurbs, and blurbs are cheap. Where within his book of almost four hundred pages does Verlinden discuss this book, and what does he say about it? What reviews have there been, either of the Dutch-language original or of the English translation, and what is said in these reviews?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Storms, Ice, and Whales and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Storms, Ice, and Whales, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 13:31, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ivan Sermoskin

Hello, Hendricolucky. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ivan Sermoskin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Storms, Ice, and Whales

Hello, Hendricolucky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Storms, Ice, and Whales, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rotsachtige kust van Zuid-Java met de grotten van Karang Bolong

Hello, Hendricolucky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rotsachtige kust van Zuid-Java met de grotten van Karang Bolong, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Storms, Ice, and Whales

Hello, Hendricolucky. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Storms".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:05, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]