User talk:Helperedits

Reversion of Global City Edits

Hi Helperedits, I just wanted to let you know that your removal of information from the "Global City" page has been undone. The removal of the listing of cities does not add anything to the article, and because the example cities provided are such a small sample, it creates bias towards the few listed cities. The information is at it appears on the GaWC website (check the sources) and is listed for informational purposes. The gallery has also been removed, due to numerous problems with cities being misrepresented with pictures from other cities. Simply clicking on the name of the linked city will bring you to the proper city page. I ask that you please refrain from mass deletion of information in the future.

If you'd like to talk about this, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!

SortaScience (talk) 20:13, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Helperedits, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Cineworld (Bradford), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! DanielRigal (talk) 12:42, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cineworld (Bradford)

The article Cineworld (Bradford) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of individual notability, distinct from the chain as a whole, which already has an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DanielRigal (talk) 12:42, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 62nd Filmfare Awards

Hello Helperedits,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 62nd Filmfare Awards for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 15:35, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Star Wars: The Force Awakens with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:40, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Star Wars: The Force Awakens with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mike1901 (talk) 19:43, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Star Wars: The Force Awakens with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Mike1901 (talk) 19:44, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Star Wars: The Force Awakens does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Mike1901 (talk) 19:45, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Star Wars: The Force Awakens. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - ^theWOLFchild 00:18, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Deadpool (film) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Deadpool (film) was changed by Helperedits (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.878411 on 2016-03-26T09:36:25+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:36, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Joe and Caspar Hit The Road

Hi, I'm JamesG5. Helperedits, thanks for creating Joe and Caspar Hit The Road!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Directed by "Brian" who? Released in what countries? Where are the sources? I had to do some research to determine if this was even a real thing or if it met WP:NOTABILITY. Please expand and add sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. JamesG5 (talk) 16:52, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Fan (film)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Fan (film) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Dcirovic (talk) 16:40, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMPLOT

Hi there, though I'm sure you meant well with your recent edits at Fan (film), the plot content you submitted in this edit is far too long. Plot summaries should be 400-700 words. Your version exceeded 1400 words which is clearly too long. Overly-long plot summaries might be considered a derivative work, which raises copyright problems. I have reverted your edit. You are free to improve the existing prose, but you should not exceed the 700 word cap, please. Thanks. Additionally, please keep an eye out for embedded notes like the one currently in the plot section which reads:

Note: Per WP:FILMPLOT, this section should be 400-700 words long. Lengthy summaries may present serious copyright concerns as "derivative works". Please keep the length under 700 words. See Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright#Derivative_works

Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:56, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMPLOT again

Please keep plot descriptions under 700 words. Your resubmission of overly detailed plot here despite my previous notification informing you about established community consensus, is disruptive. If you resubmit plot that materially exceeds 700 words, I will have no choice but to assume you're doing it to be disruptive. See WP:FILMPLOT and Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright#Derivative works. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:09, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cineworld Sheffield

Hello Helperedits,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Cineworld Sheffield for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 21:41, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Hello, I'm Sjö. I noticed that you recently removed content from 89th Academy Awards ‎ without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sjö (talk) 17:34, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 89th Academy Awards, you may be blocked from editing. Sjö (talk) 19:06, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 18th IIFA Awards

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 18th IIFA Awards requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Alexf505 (talk) 17:02, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 18th IIFA Awards for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 18th IIFA Awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/18th IIFA Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alexf505 (talk) 17:07, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with 18th IIFA Awards. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:06, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at The Disaster Artist (film).

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. As others have warned you in the past, please read WP:FILMPLOT before making complete overhauls to an article's plot. Mistakenformatt (talk) 07:49, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Controversy of Padmavati

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Controversy of Padmavati requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Padmavati_(film). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 15:19, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Smashby

Hello Helperedits,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Smashby for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 23:28, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Smashby. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 23:38, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Smashby

Hello Helperedits,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Smashby for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 00:01, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:44, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You've been briefly blocked for apparently using multiple accounts to edit war over speedy deletion tags added to Smashby, an article you created. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:44, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:46, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For this. I question your competence if you think "they fucked" is an appropriate substitution for "they got intimate". You're free to request an unblock, but be prepared to explain to a reviewing administrator why you think that was appropriate tone for an encyclopedia in the context of a plot description. Since you haven't responded to any previous notices on your talk page, I think it's important that you communicate about this situation. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:54, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]